World Health Organization Classifies Cell Phone Radiation as “Possibly Carcinogenic”

Cell Phone Radiation, Cell Phone Radiation Protection

http://www.emfnews.org/headset.html

Lifebluetube Headset

Cell Phone Radiation Protection

Mobile Phone Radiation Protection

Trifield Electromagnetic Field Meter

by Matthew L. Schafer
(Note: This article originally appeared on the media website LWR.
On Tuesday, with almost 91% of Americans now using cell phones, the World Health Organization (WHO) and the The International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) classified radio-frequency electromagnetic fields as “possibly carcinogenic” to humans. About 5 million people worldwide have cell phone subscriptions.

“[T]he evidence, while still accumulating, is strong enough to support a [the conclusion that cell phone use may cause cancer],” Dr. Jonathan Samet, Chairman of the International Agency for Research on Cancer, said in the report. “The conclusion means that there could be some risk, and therefore we need to keep a close watch for a link between cell phones and cancer risk.”

According to the report, mobile phone use may increase the risk of developing glioma and acoustic neuroma. Glioma is a type of cancer that attack the brain’s glial cells, which normally act to protect the brains neurons. Acoustic neuroma affects cells that are responsible for the protective the myelin sheath around nerves outside the brain.
Just last May, the WHO stated that “no adverse health effects have been established for mobile phone use.” It also noted that the results of the studies as of 2010 “have too many limitations to completely rule out an association.”

“IARC conducts numerous reviews and in the past has given the same score to, for example, pickled vegetables and coffee,” John Walls, Vice President of Public Affairs for the industry group The Wireless Association, said. “This IARC classification does not mean cellphones cause cancer.”

The IARC classified the electromagnetic frequency given off by cell phones as a “Group 2b” carcinogen. Some other Group 2b carcinogens include: DDT (the controversal pesticide), lead, and gasoline. Group 2b is the lowest level of confidence that the IARC uses when classifying something as carcinogenic, followed by Group 2a (“probably carcinogenic to humans”), and Group 1 (“carcinogenic to humans”).
The IARC, which met from May 24-May 31, reviewed hundreds of previous studies to come to its conclusion of the possible link between cell phones and cancer. It did not conduct any new research. IARC has also been criticized in the past for its lack of transparency in classifying chemicals and other compounds as carcinogenic.
This recent classification adds to a growing swell of controversy surrounding cell phone use and cancer. Just last June, the City of San Francisco passed its widely publicized “Cell Phone Right to Know” ordinance.

The ordinance required cell phone retailers to disclose the phone’s “SAR” rating, which is short for specific absorbtion rate and measures how much radiation is absorbed by the body. Just days after San Francisco passed the law, The Wireless Association filed a lawsuit claiming that the law would cause “consumer confusion.” Ironically, after the long controversy over the law, San Francisco finally gave up fighting the suit just three weeks ago, and discontinued the legislation.
While it’s still unclear whether cell phones do, in fact, cause cancer, it is clear that people likely won’t stop using cell phones no matter the science. As Maureen Dowd said of society’s love affair with technology, “We don’t yet really know the physical and psychological impact of being slaves to technology… We’re living in the cloud, in a force field, so afraid of being disconnected and plunged into a world of silence and stillness that even if scientists told us our computers would make our arms fall off, we’d probably keep typing.”

Paterson New Jersey USA
Lichtenstein Vaduz
Guatemala Guatemala City
Malta Valetta
Dominica Roseau
Kiribati South Tarawa
Zambia Lusaka
Iceland Rekyavik
Italy Rome
Dominican Republic Santo Domingo

Click on any of the pictures below

to learn more

Anti-Radiation Air-tube Headset

EMF Harmonization Products

Fresh Fears Over Mobile Phones

Mobile Phone Radiation, Mobile Phones Protection

http://www.emfnews.org/qlinks.html

Qlink Pendant

Home Radiation Protection

Envi Headsets

Gauss Meter

A major study into the safety of mobile phones has concluded that they may affect the health of people who use them.
Research carried out by scientists in Finland suggests radiation from mobile phones causes changes in the brain.
It is the first time that scientists have looked at the effects of mobile phone radiation on human cells rather than those of rats.
The two-year study concluded that even low-level emissions from handsets are damaging.

Scientists from the Radiation and Nuclear Safety Authority found that exposing human cells to mobile phone radiation damaged the blood-brain barrier – a safety barrier in the body that stops harmful substances in blood from entering the brain.
They discovered that the exposure caused the cells in blood vessel walls to shrink which enabled molecules to pass into brain tissue.
Lab tests
Professor Darius Leszcynski, who carried out the study, said the results came from laboratory tests on human cells and that further research was needed to see if the same effect actually happened in humans.

But speaking to BBC News Online, he said: “The blood-brain barrier has been shown to be affected by radiation in animal studies.
“There is a lot of uncertainty about whether this happens in humans. We have shown some biological effects.”
Prof Leszcynski said these changes could have a serious impact on a person’s health if they were found to happen in humans.
“If it did happen it could lead to disturbances, such as headaches, feeling tired or problems with sleeping. A study by a Swedish research group even suggested it could lead to Alzheimer’s disease.”
However, he added: “It is important to remember that our study has been done in the laboratory where we can detect even the smallest changes.

“We cannot say whether it happens in humans. We need further study looking at real people to see if the blood-brain barrier is affected.
“What is happening in the human brain is an absolute enigma. We don’t know at all.”
‘Still safe’
Prof Leszcynski said mobile phones were still safe to use.
“At the moment, there is no scientific support for introducing any sort of limitation either on use of mobile phones or setting new safety limits.

“There is no need because we don’t have any science to support it. All the guidelines in place at the moment are fine.”
Prof Leszcynski will present his findings at a conference in Quebec, Canada, next week.
He said a study by French scientists, which will also be presented at the conference, found similar results in rats.
Dr Michael Clark, science spokesman at the National Radiological Protection Board, said the research did not show any impact on people’s health.

“This is demonstrating a biological effect in cells in the lab.”
Speaking to the BBC, he said: “It doesn’t relate to a health effect. You can’t go from a biological effect in a Petri dish to say that’s a health effect.”
He added: “The authors themselves are saying that this doesn’t mean that mobile phones are unsafe or the guidelines are wrong.”
The Consumers’ Association said there was still insufficient evidence to say whether or not mobile phones were safe.
A spokesman said: “At the moment, it’s too soon to reach a definitive verdict on health risks from mobile phones, but neither has research given it the all clear.”

The National Consumers’ Council said mobile phone users were reaching their own conclusions about the risks.
“The people who feel that mobile phones are very important and essential in their lives would attach less weight to this new information than those who are already concerned about the risk,” said a spokeswoman.
More than 40 million people in Britain have mobile phones, many of them children.

Government studies
Two years ago a government inquiry led by Sir William Stewart concluded that mobile phones posed no provable health risk.
But its report urged caution over the use of mobile phones by children until more was known about their impact on health.
In January, a new £7.4 million research programme was announced, backed by the government and the mobile phone industry, to be managed by an international committee of experts led by Sir William.
The programme includes 15 studies which will seek clear conclusions about the health hazards of mobile phones, in particular fears of an association between mobile phone radiation and brain cancer.
The main purpose of the research will be to see whether “subtle biological changes” already known to be caused by mobile phones pose a risk.

Croatia Zagreb
Cape Verde Praia
Lithuania Villinus
Latvia Riga
Alexandria Virginia USA
Belgium Brussels
Oman Muscat
Central African Republic Bangui
Romania Bucharest
Malaysia Kuala Lumpur

Click on any of the pictures below

to learn more

Anti-Radiation Air-tube Headset

EMF Harmonization Products