WiFi Radiation in Classrooms May Be as Dangerous as Microwave Weapons

http://www.emfnews.org/store/

Envi Headsets

Home Radiation Protection

British Physicist and Microwave Weapons Expert Barrie Trower Warns Our Children are at Great Risk from WiFi Radiation

There continues to be controversy about the use of WiFi in the classroom. To add to the confusion, over the past year or so, we are learning that WiFi transmitters emit Electromagnetic Radiation (EMR) similar to the microwave radiations used in the design of microwave weaponry. Barrie Trower, a British physicist and microwave weapons expert has been sharing his experiences on the subject to audiences considering WiFi in the classroom.

When connected to these potential dangers, keep your distance from the source, such as your WiFi router. When using your laptop computer, iPad, tablet or other handheld device in your lap, be sure to use a laptop radiation shield. Protecting yourself using an Electromagnetic Radiation (EMR) shield from devices at zero distance from the body will eliminate the worst dangers the WiFi transmitter can deliver.

Background on Barrie Trower and WiFi

With most of the career with the Royal British Navy and military intelligence, Barrie Trower dedicated much of his career in the study of the effect of microwave energy on the human body. He recently came out of retirement to share his experiences about WiFi in part, because he strongly understands that microwave radiation and WiFi radiation are very similar. Both are health risks to humans and not harmless as others may claim.

In various interviews and presentations to, for example, to Health Canada, Mr. Trower delivers a common theme – WiFi is dangerous. He says that WiFi signals are equal to those used in microwave weapons and that they are threats to humans, particularly the elderly and children. When it comes to children and WiFi, Mr. Trower says, “children are physiologically and neurologically immature. It takes years for the blood-brain barrier to form, leaving children more prone to cell-leakage from microwave radiation.” When visiting children in schools, he notes that WiFi exposure is causing health problems that include, nausea, headaches and vision problems. He further says, “Children have less dense bones, immature immune systems and, by virtue of their size, they can act as aerials. Females have more complex hormone based systems to be disrupted than males.”

In another example, Trower says, “I was previously aware of reports concerning dead birds in and around communication bases. On examination these birds were found to be cooked.” He was referring to powerful microwave communications having the capacity to oscillate cells sufficiently as to cook the birds alive. Additionally, he points out that Electromagnetic Radiation (EMR) can give us headaches, disrupt our sleep, open us up to infection and create fatigue. He goes on to say that, in high concentrations and over large durations of time, it has been documented that these radiations can cause cancers, like leukemia.

What Does All This Mean?

Laptops, tablets, and other handheld devices connected to the internet via WiFi, can either rest on a desktop or a child’s lap emitting Electromagnetic Radiation (EMR). Elsewhere within a building, there are access points and routers, also transmitting Electromagnetic Radiation (EMR). When directly near the router transmitters, children are exposed to the strongest signal the equipment can emit. Even moving only a few feet away, exposure dangers quickly diminish. As a good rule of thumb, at four foot away, exposure levels and associated health dangers are greatly reduced.

Mr. Trower believes all exposure is dangerous, but sometimes you may find it important to be connected to the internet via a WiFi connection. Maybe you are traveling, or maybe your university offers WiFi, or maybe you just have a WiFi router you use at home. In many ways, WiFi is impossible to avoid. The most intense exposure is when you electronic device is on your lap at zero distance away from the body. For these conditions, find laptop radiation protection. Putting an Electromagnetic Radiation (EMR) shield between you and the device removes the worst of the exposure danger.

Conclusion

WiFi in our classrooms, by some, is considered as dangerous as military microwave weaponry. At the very least, we should be aware of the potential dangers and find ways to avoid them. Keep your distance from radiating sources or use laptop radiation protection when using laptop computers, tablets and other handheld devices that contain WiFi transmitters that emit Electromagnetic Radiation (EMR).

Qlink Pendant

Electromagnetic Field Meter

Cell Phone Radiation, Cell Phone Radiation Protection

Click on any of the pictures below

to learn more

 

Anti-Radiation Air-tube Headset

EMF Harmonization Products

 

Cell Phone Safety: Radiation from Cell phones and Telephone Towers can Cause Health Problems

http://www.emfnews.org/store/

Envi Headsets

Home Radiation Protection

Radiation from cell phones and telephone towers can cause health problems such as brain tumors, cancer, infertility, memory loss, depression, sleep and behavior problems.

A recent AOL-Pew Research Center Mobile Lifestyle Survey revealed that 52 percent of American adults surveyed keep their cell phone turned on all the time while 40 percent of those between the ages of 18 and 29 are saying that they are increasingly likely to drop their land line once and for all.

With an estimated three billion cell phone users worldwide and most adults and teenagers owning a cell phone or smart phone, it seems a bit late to be asking the question: are cell phones safe?

Nevertheless, the Environmental Working Group (EWG) has reported that many research groups around the world are working hard to find out if cell phones are actually safe to use. Some (not all) studies of frequent cell-phone users suggest cell phone radiation may increase risks for cancer and children’s behavior problems.

Why Cell Phones Can Be Dangerous

All cell phones and mobile devices emit radiation in order to send all those voice calls and text messages which so many people depend on each day.

Cell phone radiation exposure is long-term, and its effects on the body, particularly the electrical organ, the brain, are compounded by numerous other simultaneous long-term exposures including continuous waves from radio and TV transmitter towers, cordless phone base stations, power lines, and wireless computing devices.

Can Cell Phones Cause Brain Cancer?

World renowned neurosurgeon, Dr. Vini Khurana has deemed cell phone use “”worse than smoking”” for cancer risk. Dr. Khurana has published a study in which he links cell phone usage to an increased risk of brain cancer. He also suggests that mobile phones could one day be responsible for more cancer deaths than either cigarette smoking or asbestos exposure.

A malignant brain tumor represents a life-ending diagnosis in the vast majority of those diagnosed. Since many cancers take more than a decade to develop and be detected, often well after it is too late, Dr. Khurana fears the potential lethal prognosis which may be waiting for those who constantly have a mobile phone held (or strapped) to their heads.

The “”incubation time”” or “”latency”” (the time from commencement of regular mobile phone usage to the diagnosis of a malignant solid brain tumor in a susceptible individual) may be in the order of 10 to 20 years, he writes.

Despite the dismissal of the physicians concerns by industry groups and millions of cell phone users, Dr. Khurana insists it’s only logical to conclude that radiation emanating from the phones isn’t good for the brain; he’s worried that we may soon start seeing a virtual cancer epidemic as the exposure takes its toll.

Can Cell Phones Cause Infertility?

If brain cancer wasn’t bad enough, it seems that cell phone use may also contribute to an increase in male infertility, which could be a huge problem if you’re trying to conceive. According to a 2008 observational study by the Reproductive Research Center, use of cell phones has been shown to decrease the semen quality in men by decreasing the sperm count, motility, viability, and normal morphology. The decrease in sperm parameters was dependent on the duration of daily exposure to cell phones and independent of the initial semen quality.

Cell Phone Exposure Poses Great Risk to Children

Already pregnant? You should seriously consider tossing your cell phone’s handset. A massive study by the universities of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) and Aarhus, Denmark of over 13,000 children from birth up to age seven has shown that pregnant women using cell phone handsets just two or three times a day was enough to raise the risk of their babies developing hyperactivity and difficulties with behavior, emotions and relationships by the time they reached school age. The research also indicates that the risk is even greater if the children themselves used the cell phones before age seven.

According to the Russian National Committee on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection, child cell phone users are likely to face health hazards such as disruption of memory, decline of attention, diminishing learning and cognitive abilities, increased irritability, sleep problems, increased sensitivity to stress, and increased epileptic readiness in the near future.

Expected (possible) long term health risks of cell phone use by children include brain tumors, tumors of acoustical and vestibular nerves by the age of 25 to 30 years, Alzheimer’s disease, dementia, depressive syndrome, and other types of degeneration of the nervous structures of the brain by the age of 50 to 60.

The Committee emphasizes the ultimate urgency to defend children’s health from the influence of the electromagnetic fields (EMF) of mobile communication devices in order to prevent negative consequences to the future generation’s health.

Qlink Pendant

Electromagnetic Field Meter

Cell Phone Radiation, Cell Phone Radiation Protection

Click on any of the pictures below

to learn more

 

Anti-Radiation Air-tube Headset

EMF Harmonization Products

 

Explosive Use of WiFi Creates Massive Increase in RF Radiation Exposure

http://www.emfnews.org/headset.html

Radiation Detection Meters

Cell Phone Radiation Protection

How to Protect Yourself from Wireless Radiation

Enter a home with WiFi, and you are immediately exposed to an invisible, odorless and untouchable Radio Frequency (RF) Electromagnetic Field (EMF). Go into a school, office building or a coffee shop and you are exposed to even more radiation from multiple WiFi routers and repeater antenna sources. Some say the ambient exposure in these rooms can be as high as 800 millivolts/meter (mV/m), 6000 mV/m at the router antenna and close to 3000 mV/m at the laptop computer. To put this in perspective, if you were to go into the country where no radiating sources exist, the ambient reading would be approximately 11 mV/m. That’s right, it is that low because in nature, there is no natural source of Radio Frequency (RF) radiation.

Recently, the American Academy of Environmental Medicine (AAEM) released an article entitled Electromagnetic and Radio Frequency Field Effect on Human Health which says, “In the last five years with the advent of wireless devices, there has been a massive increase in Radio Frequency (RF) exposure from wireless devices as well as reports of hypersensitivity and diseases related to electromagnetic field and RF exposure.” In short, radiation from modern wireless devices is increasing at an exponential rate, and lets face it, not going away anytime soon. With that said, we need to consider actions to reduce radiation exposure, including the use of a laptop radiation shield.

What is WiFi?
WiFi is an electronic communication which enables wireless connection between a computer to the internet. Many WiFi connections are at RF fields the 2.4 GHz and 5.0 GHz bandwidths which can travel up to several 100 feet or more. Microwave ovens use the identical 2.4 GHz frequency to cook food by penetrating the food and oscillating (heating up) the cells until the food is fully prepared. The WiFi 2.4 GHz may be less intense, but can be considered a thermal and non-thermal exposure which can heat up cells and generate reasonably high current flow in the body and create potential health dangers. Ironically, the FCC only considers thermal effects of exposure, not the non-thermal impacts which have proven to have many health impacts.

WiFi Radiation Effect on Human Health
The American Academy of Environmental Medicine (AAEM) reports there needs to be more scientific studies that better document evidence of thermal bioeffects and non-thermal negative health effects of RF exposure. It continues, “However, many in vitro, in vivo and epidemiological studies demonstrate that significant harmful biological effects occur from non-thermal RF exposure and satisfy Hill’s criteria of causality. Genetic damage, reproductive defects, cancer, neurological degeneration and nervous system dysfunction, immune system dysfunction, cognitive effects, protein and peptide damage, kidney damage, and developmental effects have all been reported in the peer-reviewed scientific literature.” They also say, “Genotoxic effects from RF exposure, including studies of non-thermal levels of exposure, consistently and specifically show chromosomal instability, altered gene expression, gene mutations, DNA fragmentation and DNA structural breaks.” Genotoxic is defined as the damaging of DNA causing mutation or cancer. These damages have been reported to neurons, red blood cells, cells and tissue.

This report goes on to say that WiFi will degenerate the kidney, can cause neurological damage and has proven to be the source of Electromagnetic Field Hypersensitivity (EFH). It concludes, “Because of the well documented studies showing adverse effects on health and the not fully understood quantum field effect, AAEM calls for exercising precaution with regard to EMF, RF and general frequency exposure. It is clear that the human body uses electricity from the chemical bond to the nerve impulse and obviously this orderly sequence can be disturbed by an individual-specific electromagnetic frequency environment.”

What Can We Do to Protect Ourselves from Wireless Radiation?
Martin Blank, PhD, Associate Professor, Department of Physiology and Cellular Biophysics, Columbia University, College of Physicians and Surgeons; Researcher in Bioelectromagnetics; Author of the BioInitiative Report’s section on Stress Proteins, sums it up well, “The scientific evidence tells us that our safety standards are inadequate, and that we must protect ourselves from exposure to EMF due to power lines, cell phones and the like, or risk the known consequences. The science is very strong and we should sit up and pay attention.”

Because of its convenience, it’s a good bet that WiFi technology will all around us for the foreseeable future. We need to minimize health dangers from constant exposure until technology inherently becomes safer. We should actively consider actions for dealing with WiFi in our environment.

Steps to shield from WiFi Radiation:

In general, try to avoid EMF-transmitting sources like a WiFi routers. The farther away you get, the less intense the signal and potential health dangers. A few feet distance away can reduce transmitting intensity levels by as much as 80%.
Use Ethernet wiring to connect to the internet to avoid WiFi signals in your surroundings.
Place your laptop, tablet or other electronic device on a desk instead of your lap.
When using your WiFi-enabled electronic device in your lap, at zero distance from the body, try to keep the use time to a minimum.
If possible, after using the WiFi network, turn off the router. This will eliminate a constant radiation field from permeating your environment.
If you chose to use your WiFi device in your lap for a long period of time, place a laptop shield between your body and your device to prevent EMR from penetrating your body. This action removes one of the most intense sources of exposure to your body that is found in your environment.

Blue Tube Headset

TriField EMF Meter

RF Radiation Exposure, Cell Phone Radiation Protection

Click on any of the pictures below

to learn more

 

Anti-Radiation Air-tube Headset

EMF Harmonization Products

 

Do Cell Phone EMF Protectors Work?

http://www.emfnews.org/store/

Envi Headsets

Home Radiation Protection

http://suite101.com/article/do-cell-phone-emf-protectors-work-a97175

Cell phone risks are known and noted in the scientific community, but whether or not devices designed to limit their hazards really work is still up for debate.

Mobile phones have been associated with brain and jaw cancer for many years. But despite the known health risks of microwaves, electromagnetic frequencies and other radiation put out by cell phones, very few people make use of the devices that are designed to protect from radiation dangers. There’s little scientific evidence that they work, yet many people report improvements in their health and productivity when using a cell phone protector.

Cell Phone Hazards

The dangers of cell phones are two-fold, since cell phones emit electromagnetic frequencies (“”EMF””) as well as microwaves.

The effects of cell phone exposure can be easily observed on EEG scans.
Many people report disorientation, dizziness, fatigue, irritation, loss of focus, headaches, migraines, and insomnia when exposed to EMF without protection.
Microwaves are known for their cancer risk; the brain, ears and eyes are especially vulnerable to microwave frequencies.
Mobile phones have been linked with fertility problems for those who wear cell phones in their pants pockets.
Cell Phone Radiation Protection

Several products exist that can protect people from the hazards of cell phone use.

Cell phone protectors usually come in the form of a chip or small decal that can be installed in a phone or attached to the back of your cell. They are usually programmed with frequencies that counter the effects of EMF pollution emitted by phones.

Although there is some variation in such products, EEG reports show that some are genuinely effective in blocking or limiting the effect that cell phone use has on the brain and body.

People who are sensitive to electromagnetic frequencies generally report less headaches, more mental clarity, and better ability to focus productively when they use a cell phone protector on their phone, Blackberry, portable home phone or other mobile device.

Do Cell Phone Protectors Really Work?

There is significant debate over whether cell phone protectors work or are just an elaborate hoax. Although little third-party, peer-reviewed research exists that could verify that they have passed scientific muster, they do help some people with intense EMF reactions, and that alone is evidence that there is truth to the claims about cell phone protectors.

The research just doesn’t exist that could establish how much cell phone radiation is necessary for serious health problems to occur. But with the known risks, it makes sense to do everything possible to protect yourself – especially for those who use mobile phones or PDAs frequently.

Qlink Pendant Reviews

Electromagnetic Field Meter

Cell Phone Radiation, Cell Phone Radiation Protection

Click on any of the pictures below

to learn more

 

Anti-Radiation Air-tube Headset

EMF Harmonization Products

 

Study Exposes Increased Health Risks from Laptop EMFs, Particularly During Pregnancy

http://www.emfnews.org/store/

Radiation Detection Meters

Cell Phone Radiation Protection

The Negative Effects of Laptop EMFs on a Woman and Their Fetus

The laptop computer Electromagnetic Field (EMF), also known as Electromagnetic Radiation (EMR), is harmful to users and a particular health risk to pregnant women and their unborn fetuses. In 2012, a European journal released a study that links radiation emissions from laptop computers to low currents in the human body thus, increasing the potential for health problems. The study suggests that there should be actions taken by standards bodies and users to reduce these exposures. In the meantime, consider radiation protection from laptops as well as tablets and other handheld electronic devices.

Study Abstract
Early in 2012, the Environmental & Occupational Health Publication published the article Exposure to Electromagnetic Fields From Laptop Use of “Laptop” Computers. The abstract says that laptop computers are often used in tight contact with the body. They conclude that laptops generate Electromagnetic Fields (EMFs), also known as a magnetic flux, that induce currents in the body. This study investigates if there are health concerns when exposed to these fields, with particular emphasis on women and their fetus. The study concluded that Swedish EMF standards were exceeded by 71–483% which, by the standard’s definition, increases risk for tumor development. They also say that laptops are contacting the body in a very delicate area close to skin, bones, blood, genitals, and, in pregnant women, close to the fetus. These laptops have electrical circuits and power supplies that produce Electromagnetic Fields (EMFs) causing detectable impairment to the health of the exposed individual or his or her offspring.

Study Details
Five laptop computers from different manufacturers were studied in a laboratory to determine radiation emissions. Measurements were taken using highly specialized and sensitive testing equipment to find the field density, a measurement of power and strength. The higher the density, the more likely currents are created in the body. The researchers correlated their findings into a large database of average pregnant woman developed by National Institute of Information and Communications Technology and Ciba University. This merge of data enabled the study to acutely determine, with statistical significance, how patterns of exposure impact the health of pregnant women and their fetus.

Study Conclusions
The study concludes that a mother and fetus are exposed to higher amounts of EMFs by laptops than those found in close proximity of high-voltage power lines or video screens. EMF values were higher than the values recommended by 2 recent guidelines for computer monitor magnetic field emissions and considered a risk for the development of blood tumors.

Observations
The authors reviewed study data from many sources and concluded that the effects of Electromagnetic Fields (EMFs) in some studies failed to link low-intensity Electromagnetic Radiation (EMR) and tumors while others reports found clear adverse effects impacting heart rate, sleep, and other health concerns. In part, they observe, that the studies that found no links, were nevere intended to find links.

Conclusion
The authors recommend reducing exposure to Electromagnetic Fields (EMFs) and agree with World Health Organization (WHO) recommendations that devices, like laptops should be reengineered to lower emissions. They go on to say that laptops are a source of increased EMF exposure and that users should be aware of increased health risks, particularly during pregnancy.

Blue Tube Headset

TriField EMF Meter

Cell Phone Radiation, Cell Phone Radiation Protection

Click on any of the pictures below

to learn more

 

Anti-Radiation Air-tube Headset

EMF Harmonization Products

 

Maine Lawmakers Mull Cancer Warning for Cell Phones

http://www.emfnews.org/store/

Blue Tube Headset Reviews

Home Radiation Protection

While the scientific community continues to study the possible relationship between cell phone radiation and brain tumors there is no consensus on the subject as of yet state legislators in Maine are considering a proposal that would require cell phones to carry warnings that they may cause brain cancer. Democrat Andrea Boland is leading the charge, citing studies that have shown a link between cancer and cell phone use, according to the Associated Press.

If passed, Boland’s bill would mandate that cell phone manufacturers put warning labels on mobile phones and packaging, indicating the risk of cancer from exposure to low-grade electromagnetic radiation. The permanent labels on phones would be written in black ink, except for the word “warning,” which would appear in red. Warnings would also include recommendations that people not hold the devices too closely to their bodies or heads.

A recent study from the Danish Cancer Society found that cell phone use did not increase brain tumor rates. But study authors suggested that it may be too early to determine the true impact of regular exposure to low-grade radiation, as brain tumors are slow to develop and cell phones only came into wide use in the 1990s. While research into the cancer risk posed by cell phone use is ongoing, the mobile devices continue to grow in popularity some 270 million Americans currently own a cell phone, up from 110 million nearly a decade ago.

Qlink Pendant

Electromagnetic Field Meter Ghost

Cell Phone Radiation, Cell Phone Radiation Protection

Click on any of the pictures below

to learn more

 

Anti-Radiation Air-tube Headset

EMF Harmonization Products

 

Mobile Radiation Norms to Take Effect Only From Sept 2013

http://www.emfnews.org/headset.html

Radiation Detection Meters

Cell Phone Radiation Protection

NEW DELHI, AUG. 23:

The Government has decided to postpone the radiation norms for mobile phones by a year till September 2013. This is because the handset makers are seeking more time.

The radiation norms were supposed to come into effect from this September.

From September 2013, only the mobile handsets with revised specific absorption rate (SAR) value of 1.6W/kg would be permitted to be manufactured or imported in India for the domestic market, according to a Department of Telecom proposal.

The Government has carefully considered the demand and supply position of mobile phones with revised SAR value, time required to launch new models and phasing out of existing models, the DoT proposal says.

“All new design of mobile handsets shall comply with the specific absorption rate (SAR) values of 1.6 W/kg averaged over one gram tissue from September 1, 2012. However, the mobile handsets with existing designs which are compliant with 2 W/kg averaged over 10 gram tissue, may continue to co-exist up to August 31, 2013,” it said.

The DoT had received requests from the manufacturers to permit existing designs of handsets complying with International Commission on Non-ionising Radiation Protection norms to co-exist with the newly designed and introduced handsets as per the new norms.

However, other instructions that were directed in January will remain the same, including the manufacturer’s booklet containing safety precautions.

SELF-DECLARATION

Also, self-declaration of manufacturers for conformity to SAR level of mobile handsets and testing in International Laboratory Accreditation Co-operation (ILAC) accredited labs will continue to be enforced, it said.

They should also provide a self-declaration certificate accredited by ILAC or Telecom Engineering Centre (TEC) India, in respect of SAR value based to the DoT for necessary action.

“Such self-declared SAR limits shall be subjected to TEC as and when required,” it added.

Blue Tube Headset Reviews

TriField EMF Meter

Cell Phone Radiation, Cell Phone Radiation Protection

Click on any of the pictures below

to learn more

 

Anti-Radiation Air-tube Headset

EMF Harmonization Products

 

Excessive Exposure to Computer Radiation and Heat Leads to Many Health Concerns

http://www.emfnews.org/store/

Blue Tube Headset Reviews

Home Radiation Protection EMF

The amount of time the average person spends in contact with an electrical device is understandably large. The majority of middle-class Americans own a cellphone and/or a computer, not to mention a myriad of other devices such as microwaves, DVD players, televisions, etc. In fact, according to the New York Times, 54% of Americans aged 18 to 30 own a minimum of one laptop. Needless to say, these devices are so integral to modern life that interaction with them on a daily basis is seemingly inevitable. This reality makes the idea of radiation that much more alarming; particularly radiation from one’s laptop computer, which is used for both work and leisure and often comes into close contact with one’s body.

In significant enough doses computer radiation can have a myriad of negative effects on the body such as; psychological conditions like depression and anxiety, mild to severe headaches, insomnia, respiratory difficulty, nausea, and dizziness, to name a few. The danger from computer radiation is derived both from thermal and low-energy, non-iodizing radiation, which stems from the computer’s internal mechanisms and wireless connection.

Exposure to heat radiation from computers poses a significant danger if exposure is excessive. As previously stated, excessive use of laptop computers is common, and therefore dangers to one’s health from computer radiation are quite real. Among; the biggest risks is the possible damage to fertility if laptops are placed on a male’s lap for hours per day. Prolonged exposure to laptop thermal energy may not only decrease sperm count, but it can also cause severe irritation of the skin. As far as other laptop radiant energy is concerned, electromagnetic radiation is the other primary focus in the media and among concerned individuals. Exposure to large amounts of electromagnetic radiation can cause meaningful damage to healthy cells and signal and internal body temperature.

Dangers posed by computer radiation come from excess exposure to electromagnetic radiation and thermal energy from internal computer components. Although there are competing studies as to how serious the dangers may be, tech users can never be too careful. In order to protect oneself from possible negative side effects of computer radiation, there are effective solutions such as The DefenderPad EMF shield that mitigate possible health damage.

Qlink Pendant

Electromagnetic Field Meter

Cell Phone Radiation, Cell Phone Radiation Protection

Click on any of the pictures below

to learn more

 

Anti-Radiation Air-tube Headset

EMF Harmonization Products

 

Expert Panel Suggests Stricter Radiation Norms for Mobiles

http://www.emfnews.org/headset.html

Radiation Detection Meters

Cell Phone Radiation Protection

NEW DELHI, JUNE 5:

An expert group set up by the Department of Telecom has suggested stricter radiation norms for mobile handsets and towers in order to mitigate any possible health related effects due to emissions from these devices.

The proposed radiation norms are 10 times stricter than the existing ones.

The current rules governing mobile radiation are based on the guidelines set by the International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection (ICNIRP).

THE CEILING

This body has stipulated that manufacturers must ensure that the Specific Absorption Rates (SAR) level of a cell phone does not exceed 2 watts per kg averaged over 10 grams tissue.

SAR is the amount of radio waves absorbed by the body while using a mobile phone.

The expert group has suggested that this limit should be brought to 1.6 watts per kg averaged over 1 gram tissue. For mobile towers the committee has suggested revising from 200 watts per square meter to 2,000 watts per square meter.

Mr Sachin Pilot, Minister of State for Communications and IT, said, “While telecom is a huge success story in India, any possible health related effects of radiation emitted by mobile phones and towers are to be reflected and ensured in the guidelines. The final guidelines would take into account the best global benchmarks and scientific evidence on the subject.”

The Department of Telecom had set up the group in August 2010 to evaluate the evidence, revisit radiation guidelines for mobile towers and adopt guidelines for radiation emission by cell phones.

This group had experts from Ministry of Health, Department of Biotechnology, Ministry of Environment and Forests and Indian Council of Medical Research.

The WHO had recently said that use of mobile phones could cause cancer. The health body advised consumers to switch to text messaging and use of the hands-free option to reduce exposure.

Blue Tube Headset Reviews

Electromagnetic Field Radiation Meters

Cell Phone Radiation, Cell Phone Radiation Protection

Click on any of the pictures below

to learn more

 

Anti-Radiation Air-tube Headset

EMF Harmonization Products

 

Court Rules Cell Phones Are Causing Brain Tumours

http://www.emfnews.org/store/

Envi Headsets

Home Radiation Protection

In response to the increasing amount of information shedding light on how cell phones can alter the brain in many known and unknown ways, Italy’s Supreme Court cantered in Rome has decided to take action. Seeking to protect unknowing consumers with a particular eye on children, whose brain is still developing and more susceptible to damage, the court has ruled that a link exists between brain tumour development and cell phone use.

The ruling follows a monumental study that found a massive 290% spike in brain tumour risk after using a cell phone for 10 years. A study that has real relevance for Innocente Marcolini, an Italian businessman who was a key part of the court’s ruling. Marcolini was an active cell phone user, reportedly talking on the phone for around 6 hours every single day at work. Over 12 years of use, Marcolini developed a tumour which many scientists are saying is the result of cell damage via the electromagnetic radiation emitted from cell phones.

This electromagnetic radiation, which is also emitted from cordless phones, damages cells to the point where tumours can become much more likely. DNA damage can also occur, similar to how laptop Wi-Fi has been found to damage both DNA and fertility in as little as 4 hours of direct use.

Marcolini, like many professors and doctors around the globe, is pleased that the Italian government has finally recognized the link between cell phones and tumours like his own. According to The Telegraph, Marcolini hailed the announcement as essential to protecting susceptible children from the dangers:
“I wanted it recognised that there was a link between my illness and the use of mobile and cordless phones… Parents need to know their children are at risk of this illness.”

Marcolini’s statement was also backed by professor Angelo Gino Levis, a highly recognized oncologist and educator of environmental mutagenesis. Coupled with neurosurgeon Dr Giuseppe Grasso, Levis explained to The Sun that the ruling will allow for many consumers hurt by cell phones to take action. Discussing a potential future lawsuit against cell phone companies, Levis seemed very optimistic over the future of the ruling. He said:
”The court decision is extremely important. It finally officially recognises the link. It’ll open not a road but a motorway to legal actions by victims. We’re considering a class action.”

A class action could very well not only gain media attention on the subject, but actually go places legally. In the event that enough consumers jumped on board, class actions could spring up outside of Italy and take on big cell phone corporations for the damages incurred by the use of their phones. Then again, Apple and other companies actually warn you right inside their manuals that the phones can cause serious problems and recommend holding it a couple inches or so away from your head. In other words, these companies were certainly aware of the real dangers to public health.

Nevertheless, the ruling means great things for the future of forcing companies to answer for their actions and create safer technology.

Joliet, Illinois
Norfolk, Virginia
Davenport, Iowa
Armenia, Yerevan
Fort Wayne, Indiana
Wangaratta, Victoria
Czech Republic, Prague,
Townsville, Queensland
Hobart Burnie, Tasmania
Congo, Republic of the Cook Islands

Qlink Pendant

Electromagnetic Field Meter

Cell Phone Radiation, Cell Phone Radiation Protection

Click on any of the pictures below

to learn more

 

Anti-Radiation Air-tube Headset

EMF Harmonization Products