The Danger EMF Cell Phone Radiation

Envi Headsets

Home Radiation Protection

Damage from cell phones comes from two sources. The first damaging source occurs from the Near-Field Plume of radiation generated by the cell phone’s antenna. This plume of radiation extends out a distance of six or seven inches from the antenna in all directions. The near-field plume has been studied most extensively and contains the most intense energy. It is able to penetrate deep into biological tissue. This radiation is absorbed when the cell phone is held in close proximity to the body.

The second form of damage comes from a radio wave called the information-Carrying Radio Wave, or ICRW. The cell phone signal is made up of two parts. The first part of the signal vibrates at 600 to 2500 megahertz. This wave is moving much too fast for the body to recognize and, as far as we can tell, is not causing any harm. However, when a person speaks or sends a text message the information is “piggy-backed” or packeted onto the first radio wave. This creates a second wave or signal which is called the information-carrying radio wave, or ICRW. It vibrates at a frequency down in the hertz range. In this range the ICRW is recognized by the body and it is this wave that is causing damage. Data Sourced From Report “The Cell Phone Poisoning Of America” Written by Lynn Quiring, Rph CCN, NMD – Logical Health LLC

WHAT HAPPENS TO YOUR BODY WHEN IT IS EXPOSED TO EMF RADIATION?

Your cellular energy is now used for protection rather than metabolism. Cell membranes weaken keeping nutrients out and waste products in.

This causes waste to accumulate inside the cells creating a higher concentration of free radicals, leading to both disruption of DNA repair (micronuclei) and cellular dysfunction.

THE DANGER: Unwanted cell death occurs releasing the micronuclei from the disrupted DNA repair into the fluid between cells (interstitial fluid) where they are free to replicate and proliferate. This, says Dr. Carlo, is the most likely mechanism that contributes to cancer.

Damage occurs to proteins on the cell membrane resulting in disruption of intercellular communication. When cells can not communicate with each other, the result is impaired tissue, organ, and organism function. In the blood-brain barrier, for example, cells can not keep dangerous chemicals from reaching the brain tissue, which results in damage.

WHAT DO THE EXPERTS SAY?
Dr. George Carlo: The cellphone industry’s own research program concluded cellphone radiation was damaging to consumer’s health. Dr. George Carlo, was the cellphone industry’s Director of Research who was hired to run their $28 million dollar, 7 year research program to find out if cellphones were dangerous. Dr. George Carlo presents and reveals how the information-carrying radio waves from cell phones and other wireless technology are causing biological harm. Dr. Carlo says that when our cells are hit by EMF radiation, the cells regard the information-carrying radio waves as unrecognizable foreign toxins. This causes the cell membranes to weaken and shut down the transport channels between cells. As a result, nutrients donít get in and waste products donít get out. Among these waste products are free radicals that cause disruption of the cellular respiratory function. The cells become further energy-deficient, eventually triggering programmed cell death. The free radicals also interfere with DNA repair, a factor in the development of micronuclei and tumor formation.

France Paris
Gosnells, Victoria,
Paraguay, Asuncion,
Vanuatu, Port Vila,
Costa Rica, San Jose,
Lesotho, Maseru,
Mongolia, Ulan Bator,
City of Fairfield, Australia,
Mount Isa, Queensland,
Grand Rapids Michigan USA

Qlink Pendant

Electromagnetic Field Meter

Cell Phone Radiation, Cell Phone Radiation Protection

Click on any of the pictures below

to learn more

 

Anti-Radiation Air-tube Headset

EMF Harmonization Products

 

How To Detect WiFi Radiation Without An RF Meter

http://www.emfnews.org/headset.html

Lifebluetube Headset

Cell Phone Radiation Protection

I know a lot of people are still sitting on the fence about WiFi. They’ve read my articles, they know what the studies say about RF radiation. They know WiFi is no good for them.

But they carry on using it.

Why?

For a whole load of reasons. The main one is probably convenience. Personally WiFi offers me nothing. The connection is not as good and I am not interested in surfing the Internet whilst I am wandering round the house or whilst I’m lying in bed……

Call me old fashioned but my PC stays firmly on the office desk. Apart from the occasions when I am away for a few days. And even then, I’d rather live without Internet if I can.

But if you are one of those people who prefer to keep using WiFi then this one’s for you.

It’s some software which you can install on your laptop which gives you a detailed map of your Wi-Fi coverage. It will actually show you the information on a floor plan (that you have to supply first). You just download the software, upload your floor plan and then walk round your home or office to survey signal strength.

Of course the people who designed this software designed it with the idea that people would be able to determine where the strongest signal was. It’s good for that too.

But for us EMF conscious types it can be better used to reduce your WiFi radiation exposure.

For instance, if you live in an apartment you may not even have WiFi. But you know that your neighbor does because when you switch your laptop on it tells you there is another signal. This software can tell you where the WiFi hotspots are. If your bed is situated on one of them then you know you need to either talk your neighbors into moving their router or move your bed.

If you are in a shared office and you don’t need the Wifi then this software can tell you where to situate your desk so you are the least exposed to it.

Similarly if you regularly go to an Internet café but you don’t use the WiFi then this software can tell you where it’s best to sit to minimize your exposure.

You may think, why bother with the software? Why not just look at the signal bar information in the WiFi function of your laptop.

You can do this too. But this software condenses all this information by telling you what the combined coverage is for a given location. If the map shows the location in green it means the signal is strong and if it shows it in red it means the signal is weak.

The other great thing about this software is that it’s FREE.

In giving you information as to the WiFi signal strength it is actually giving you information on RF radiation levels. It gives you the choice.

Of course it’s not as good as an RF meter, because it does not measure the RF levels in RF units, it just gives you an indication of signal level. But from an EMF mitigation viewpoint this is still very valuable information.

I don’t have WiFi so I have not been able to test this software, but the reviews I have read on it are very good.

Latvia, Riga,
Plano, Texas
Carrollton, Texas
Seychelles, Victoria
Thailand, Bangkok
Dallas, Texas, USA
Santa Ana, California
Baltimore, Maryland
Berkeley, California,
Al Hayrah, United Arab Emirates, Al Hayrah, UAE

Trifield Electromagnetic Field Meter

Cell Phone Radiation, Cell Phone Radiation Protection

Click on any of the pictures below

to learn more

 

Anti-Radiation Air-tube Headset

EMF Harmonization Products

 

Mobile Phones Health Risks and Dangers

Envi Headsets

Home Radiation Protection

In this modern society we can’t live without a mobile phone. We spend a lot of time on a cellphone. Is this cause health problem? Yes! The usage of mobile phone makes the health problem because of the radio waves that coming at the time of switched on the mobile. The very basis of cell phones carries voice through radio waves. The contact with the radio waves increases many when you are talking on the mobile phone.

There are many disadvantages of using mobile phone especially it related to the health. There are many diseases such as cancer, the danger of using mobile phone still existing and it will exist forever. In this article we can see the different diseases and dangers of using mobile phones. First of all we can examine the hazards of living in areas having cell phone towers.

Cell phones are not really a danger one but some researchers have found that living in an area with high frequency telephone towers can cause cancer. According to a study conducted by ITAS (Indian Thermal Analysis Society) says that three cancer patients were found in the Usha Kiran Apartments that stands near the cell phone tower named Vijay Apartments (Carmicheal road, Mumbai, India). A well-known Indian midday newspaper carried this article on the issue of Usha Kiran Apartment patients suffering from cancer due to the mobile towers.

The ITAS concludes that people living within 50-300 meter radius of cell phone towers are causing many diseases because of electromagnetic radiation. This conclusion tells that the acceptable radiation is 9.2Watt per square meter in India. The “danger zone” is different for other countries based on their acceptable standers of radiation. It is 580-1000 Micro- Watts per square centimeter for the US. The people living within 2 to 2.5 miles in the radius of towers are in the danger zone.

Italy, Rome
Spain, Madrid
Bathurst, Australia
Poland, Warsaw
Bosnia, Sarajevo
Czech Rep, Prague
Grenada, St. George’s
Malawi, Lilongwe
Arlington Texas USA
Cambodia, Phnom Penh

Electromagnetic Field Meter

Qlink Pendant

Cell Phone Radiation, Cell Phone Radiation Protection

Click on any of the pictures below

to learn more

 

Anti-Radiation Air-tube Headset

EMF Harmonization Products

 

How To Detect RF Radiation Using Your AM Radio

http://www.emfnews.org/headset.html

Lifebluetube Headset

Cell Phone Radiation Protection

What if you think you have got radio frequency RF radiation in your home but you do not want to, or cannot, go to the expense of buying a dedicated RF meter?

Worry not, you can use your portable AM radio to detect certain radio frequency (RF) sources, otherwise known as electromagnetic fields or EMFs.

How To Detect RF Radiation With Your AM Radio Step By Step
Here is how you can detect RF radiation with your portable radio:

1. Turn your radio dial to the white noise between stations, where there is no radio signal.

2. Move around turning your radio antenna in all directions.

When you hear it start to hiss this means you are picking up static and that there is a source of radiofrequency radiation present.

DETECT RF RADIATION USING YOUR AM RADIO – DIFFERENT SOURCES

– put your AM radio next to your cell phone when it is switched on. Next get someone to send you a text message, or to call your phone, see what happens

– place your AM radio near a Compact Fluorescent Bulb (CFL), switch it on and listen to what happens.

– hold your AM radio next to your electrical appliances and listed. Many of them are now being equipped with RF transmitters to link up with the smart meters which are being deployed

– move round your house holding your portable AM radio near your electrical sockets, if your radio starts to hiss as you are doing this this is a good indication that there is dirty electricity.

Limitations Of Using Your AM Radio To Detect RF Radiation

You cannot use your AM radio to detect all sources of RF radiation. It won’t pick up certain sources, such as certain Wi-Fi and Wimax sources, which are too high a frequency and don’t generate a strong enough electric field to create static.

In the absence of a dedicated RF meter your AM radio can be a reliable indicator of where radiofrequency fields are present, given the limitations listed above. If you are on a low budget what better way to detect RF radiation than with your AM Radio.

Irving, Texas
McAllen, Texas
Wichita Falls, Texas
Cape Coral, Florida
El Salvador, San Salvador
Slovakia, Bratislava,
Mauritania, Nouakchott,
Colorado Springs, Colorado
Maryborough, Queensland,
City of Canada Bay, Australia

Trifield Electromagnetic Field Meter

Cell Phone Radiation, Cell Phone Radiation Protection

Click on any of the pictures below

to learn more

 

Anti-Radiation Air-tube Headset

EMF Harmonization Products

 

Cell Phone Radiation – A Possible Solution

Envi Headsets

Home Radiation Protection

August 20th 2012 – Everyone has been hearing the question Are cellphones dangerous, and everyone who has children prays that they are not. Unfortunately, radiation emanating from mobile phones (or cell phones) is a very real thing and something that little ones cannot escape from. One tends to think that the worst thing one can conceive simply cannot be true, but this escapism does not save one from adversity, when the effects of cellphone radiation begin to show up in the form of headaches, hyperactivity or inability to concentrate in children.

Cell phones and health risk are not linked together idly; but that does not mean that cell phones and health risk have to coexist. There is some truth in the matter, for which reason stories of health toll, radiation sickness and the harm caused by EMF have been doing the rounds. However, it is important for careful parents to look into and get a real answer on the truth of the matter. And the book How To Protect Your Child From Cellphone Radiation gives exactly those answers that every parent has been looking for. Cell phones are a necessary evil. The only thing to do, then, is to protect children from the harmful effects of cellphone radiation. This book tells parents how they can protect their children without giving up on the convenience and utility of having a cell phone. Learn how one can possibly still acquiesce and buy the child the up-market, hip cell phone that he or she asks for, while being careful of their health and future risks.

Understanding the nature of electromotive force and how it may harm humans who are exposed to it is now made easy. One can easily check out the book and even get the Kindle version of it for less than a dollar. This book lays down simple rules, dos and don’ts that tell it like it is to every parent, and suggests measures that all members of the household can inculcate with ease. This is one book which is quite small, interesting to read and simple to understand.

Croatia, Zagreb,
Nigeria, Abuja
Tonga, Nuku’alofa
Oxnard, California
Chad, N’Djamena
Cape Coral, Florida
San Diego California USA
Western Sahara, El Aaiun,
Cote d’Ivoire, Yamoussoukro
The Netherlands, Amsterdam

Qlink Pendant

Electromagnetic Field Meter

Cell Phone Radiation, Cell Phone Radiation Protection

Click on any of the pictures below

to learn more

 

Anti-Radiation Air-tube Headset

EMF Harmonization Products

 

Cellphones Also Pose a Danger

http://www.emfnews.org/headset.html

Lifebluetube Headset

Cell Phone Radiation Protection

Mobile phone masts or towers are not the only dangers to health because of the radiation they emit but cellular phones may also pose danger to one’s health.

The effect of mobile phone radiation on human health is the subject of recent interest and study, and as a result of the enormous increase in mobile phone usage throughout the world (as of June 2009), there were more than 4.3 billion subscriptions worldwide.

Mobile phones use electromagnetic radiation in the microwave range.

Other digital wireless systems, such as data communication networks, produce similar radiation.

The World Health Organi-sation (WHO) has classified mobile phone radiation on the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) scale into Group 2B – possibly carcinogenic.

A carcinogen denotes any substance, or radiation that is an agent directly involved in causing cancer.

This means there ‘could be some risk’ of carcinogenicity, so additional research into the long-term, heavy use of mobile phones needs to be conducted.

Some national radiation advisory authorities have recommended measures to minimise exposure to their citizens as a precautionary approach.

The issues of radiation and their dangers are well known to the kingdom’s Consumer Association, and the chairman Bongani Mdluli, on Tuesday this week made it known that the Ministry of Information, Communications and Technology needed a commission of inquiry to look into this.

There is growing concern internationally that the radiation from gadgets like the cellphone and cell-phone masts or towers needed to be minimised.

Many scientific studies have investigated possible health symptoms of mobile phone radiation. These studies are occasionally reviewed by some scientific committees to assess overall risks.

A recent assessment was published in 2007 by the European Commission Scientific Committee on Emerging and Newly Identified Health Risks (SCENIHR).

Part of the radio waves emitted by a mobile telephone handset are absorbed by the human head.

The radio waves emitted by a GSM handset can have a peak power of two watts, and a US analogue phone had a maximum transmit power of 3.6 watts.

The maximum power output from a mobile phone is regulated by the mobile phone standard and by the regulatory agencies in each country.
In most systems the cellphone and the base station check reception quality and signal strength and the power level is increased or decreased automatically, within a certain span, to accommodate different situations, such as inside or outside buildings and vehicles.

The rate at which radiation is absorbed by the human body is measured by the Specific Absorption Rate (SAR), and its maximum levels of modern handsets have been set by governmental regulating agencies in many countries.

In 2006, a large Danish study about the connection between mobile phone use and cancer incidence was published.

It followed over 420 000 Danish citizens for 20 years and showed no increased risk of cancer.

The German Federal Office for Radiation Protection (Bundesamt für Strahlenschutz) considers this report inconclusive.

A 2009 study examined the effects of exposure to Radio Frequency Radiation (RFR) emitted by standard GSM cell phones on the cognitive functions of humans.

The study confirmed longer (slower) response times to a spatial working memory task when exposed to RFR from a standard GSM cellular phone placed next to the head of male subjects, and showed that longer duration of exposure to RFR may increase the effects on performance.

Peru, Lima
Bahamas, Nassau
Liechtenstein, Vaduz
Holland, Amsterdam,
Montenegro, Podgorcia,
Andorra, Andorra la Vella
Cote d’Ivoire, Yamoussoukro
Green Bay Wisconsin USA
Republic of Sri Lanka, Colombo
Antigua and Barbuda, Saint John’s

Click on any of the pictures below

to learn more

 

Anti-Radiation Air-tube Headset

EMF Harmonization Products

 

High-Frequency Fears About Wi-Fi

High-Frequency Wi-Fi, Wi-Fi Protection

http://www.emfnews.org/qlinks.html

Qlink Pendant

Home Radiation Protection

Envi Headsets

Gauss Meter

When Sacha Ghadiri first learned about potential adverse health effects from prolonged exposure to Wi-Fi, he immediately thought about moving to the countryside.
That’s because two Montreal companies are planning to blanket his Plateau Mont Royal neighbourhood with wireless Internet access this fall.
But Ghadiri is not moving anywhere yet. Instead, he is trying to stir support for a moratorium on the Wi-Fi project until the technology’s safety is studied and residents are comfortable with the idea. The companies have said they intend to expand the project to cover 87 per cent of the population of Montreal Island by 2009.
Ghadiri is especially concerned because one of the companies involved in the project, Internet service provider Radioactif, is a stone’s throw from the playground at Louis H. Lafontaine elementary school on Berri St.

The father of two has raised the issue with other parents at the school. Some worry that exposure to the wireless signals could have long-term effects on children.
“It’s the kind of technology that’s quite similar to that of cellphones, and a large number of studies show that there are ill effects and we know that there are other studies, perhaps as numerous, that say to the contrary,” Ghadiri said. “But it does not mean that we should stop doing research and embrace the technology.” While little or no research has been done specifically on Wi-Fi, studies on other emitters of radio waves such as cell phones have stirred debate.
Federal health authorities say they consider the technologies safe. But some experts say the abundance of radio waves is starting to show its effects on humans.

Cases of electrohypersensitivity – somewhat like an allergy to magnetic fields or to radio waves such as those emitted by radio and television broadcasts, cellphones and Wi-Fi networks – are on the rise, according to Dr. Magda Havas, an environmental studies professor at Trent University in Ontario.
“We’re blanketing cities with this form of radiation,” Havas said. “It’s really very irresponsible of our governments to allow this to happen.” The spectrum on which the technology to be used by Radioactif, called Wi-Max, operates is licensed by Industry Canada, a spokesperson for the federal agency said. The licences are sold through auctions.

Health Canada, which regulates human exposure to radio frequency electromagnetic fields, says Wi-Fi and other wireless technologies such as cellphones are safe.

“The World Health Organization has recently confirmed that as well,” spokesperson Renée Bergeron said.
An article on the topic posted on the WHO website concludes: “Considering the very low exposure levels and research results collected to date, there is no convincing scientific evidence that the weak RF (radio frequency) signals from base stations and wireless networks cause adverse health effects.” But according to Havas – who teaches a course on the biological effects of electromagnetic fields – continuous exposure to Wi-Fi could, at the very least, interfere with children’s ability to learn. “There’s growing evidence that some of the symptoms we attribute to attention deficit disorder may be linked to exposure to high radio frequency radiation,” she said.

In May, Sir William Stewart, chairman of Britain’s Health Protection Agency, called for a review of the health effects of Wi-Fi in a BBC investigative television program that looked at wireless Internet in schools.
In 2000, Stewart recommended that cellphone towers “should not necessarily impact directly on areas where children were exposed, like playgrounds and that,” he recalled to the BBC.

But the BBC investigation found that radio frequency radiation levels in some schools were up to three times the level found in the main beam of intensity from cellphone towers.
Ghadiri, a Ph.D. student, wants a public debate on the issue of installing Wi-Fi masts around schools and in densely populated areas such as the Plateau.

Radioactif didn’t return calls for comment on this story.
Ghadiri was quick to say that he’s not against the technology.
“Wi-Fi is superb technology,” he said. “I’m just concerned about the health effects.

Newcastle, Australia
Aurora, Illinois
Oakland, California, USA
Korea (North), Pyongyang
Morocco, Rabat
Estonia, Tallin
Ontario, California
Maryborough, Queensland
The Netherlands Amsterdam
Ash Sha’m, United Arab Emirates,Ash Sha’m, UAE

Click on any of the pictures below

to learn more

Anti-Radiation Air-tube Headset

EMF Harmonization Products

The Health Protection Agency Has Commissioned A Study Into Wi-Fi Radiation

Wi-Fi Radiation, Wi-Fi Radiation Protection

http://www.emfnews.org/headset.html

Life Bluetube Headsets

Cell Phone Towers Health Effects

Cell Phone Sensitivity

EM Field Meter

No parent or teacher wants to be responsible for harming a child in their care, so the succession of media scare stories about the supposed dangers of Wi-Fi are bound to give people pause. Is the educational benefit of a wireless classroom really worth frying your children’s brains for?

Faced with that dilemma, it is no surprise that a handful of schools have decided to turn their Wi-Fi networks off until they are satisfied the technology is safe – despite reassurances from scientists and public health bodies.

The Health Protection Agency has always said that although Wi-Fi is relatively new, there are good scientific reasons for thinking that the levels of radio frequency waves given off by routers and computers are so low that they are not a cause for concern. It has now commissioned research to show definitively that this is the case.

The plan is for a two-year study to measure real exposure to Wi-Fi radiation in homes, schools and offices. If exposures are indeed low, this may go some way to calming public fears, but it is unlikely to satisfy those who are convinced that Wi-Fi is a menace.

The level of exposure is important because of the mechanism by which Wi-Fi radio frequency (RF) waves emitted are thought to damage cells. They are “non-ionising” – meaning that they are not powerful enough to cause havoc by knocking electrons off molecules in cells. However, if they are high enough power they could harm cells by heating them up.

The power levels of Wi-Fi routers are much lower than mobile phones or base stations and the HPA estimates that someone using a mobile phone (which uses similar frequencies) for 20 minutes receives a radiation dose equivalent to sitting in a Wi-Fi hotspot for a year (let’s not get into the argument over whether mobile phones are damaging except to say there is much more evidence and it is pretty conclusive that they are not harmful in the short to medium term at least). If mobile phones are safe, then Wi-Fi is safer still.
The World Health Organisation’s advice on this is very clear. “Considering the very low exposure levels and research results collected to date, there is no convincing scientific evidence that the weak RF signals from base stations and wireless networks cause adverse health effects.

So exposure levels appear to be low and we have no reason to think that there is anything to worry about at those levels. So why the research? The HPA wants to be sure that its assumptions about low exposure are correct. Some work has been done in this area, but not enough. When launching the study, Professor Pat Troop, chief executive of the HPA said, “There has not been extensive research into what people’s exposures actually are to this new technology and that is why we are initiating this new programme of research and analyses. We have good scientific reasons to expect the results to be reassuring and we will publish our findings.” If she is right, they will have removed one niggling doubt about Wi-Fi and off the back of the research the report will presumably come up with recommendations for how users who are concerned can reduce their exposure.

Scientists know a lot about the potential dangers of electromagnetic fields, but there is still the remote possibility that there is something strange about the particular frequency that Wi-Fi uses which can cause people harm. No scientist, hand on heart, can say that is not true, but that fear alone is not enough to base policy decisions on.

Kazakhstan, Astana
Italy, Rome
Cape Coral, Florida
Memphis, Tennessee
Logan City, Queensland
Carrollton, Texas
Pasadena, California
Lincoln, Nebraska, USA
Macedonia Skjope
Al Hayrah, United Arab Emirates, Al Hayrah, UAE

Click on any of the pictures below

to learn more

Anti-Radiation Air-tube Headset

EMF Harmonization Products

Cell Phones, WiFi and Health Effects Part 2

Cell Phones, WiFi

http://www.emfnews.org/qlinks.html

Qlink Pendant

Home Radiation Protection

Envi Headsets

Gauss Meter

EMF sensitivity advocates believe studies reveal that even these low-frequency, low-power fields can cause subtle damage to human tissue, citing evidence of cell death, faster-growing tumors and DNA damage.

What side are you? The one who ignores the ill effects? Or the one who already started getting those symptoms?

Whatever the case is, Prevention is much slicker than Cure. These technologies are sweet poisons we can’t live without.

Here are few things you can do to Avoid any possible harms of WiFi :

1. Keep WiFi AP (Access Point) away from the bedroom or the place where you sit frequently.
2. At all times, there should be a distance of 5 feet, at least.
3. Turn WiFi off when not in use.
4. Use Ethernet (wired) when possible.

Here are few tips for Cell Phones:

1. Use Handsfree kit or Bluetooth headset for making long calls. (BT headsets use much lower power than cell phone’s RF)
2. Locate the phone internal antenna, and hold the phone from a different location. (e.g. for iPhone 2g, the antenna lies in the bottom black section. Holding the phone from top will help as body will not absorb these RF waves while they try to reach the tower (BTS).)
3. Keep it away from head and chest, even when not in use.
4. Never keep it beside your pillow while sleeping.

Sydney, Australia
Chile, Santiago
Yonkers, New York
Ukraine, Kiev
Belmont, Victoria
Trinidad and Tobago, Port-of-Spain
San Buenaventura (Ventura), California
South Bend, Indiana
Sydney, Australia
Al Jaddah, United Arab Emirates, Al Jaddah, UAE

Click on any of the pictures below

to learn more

Anti-Radiation Air-tube Headset

EMF Harmonization Products

Cell Phones, WiFi and Health Effects Part 1

Cell Phones, WiFi

http://www.emfnews.org/headset.html

Life Bluetube Headsets

Cell Phone Towers Health Effects

Cell Phone Sensitivity

EM Field Meter

Five years back when I first bought my WiFi router, I was so excited with the possibilities – Freedom from 10m long Ethernet cat6 cables at home. Networking became much easier.

I knew what did I do wrong, right at that moment itself – An unhealthy decision.

During my grad, I was always interested in RF and Networking. And now even as part of my daily job, I understand how things in software and networks can bring different kinds of illness to humans.

Not many people know that continued exposure to powerful 802.11 WiFi or any other RF signals might cause damage that could result in memory loss or other serious neurological harm. What’s worst is, this is more amplified in case of children.

Scientifically, this has never been proved but few researches has yielded results that people having similar kind of Radiation exposure – by their daily habits – WiFi, excessive cellular phone usage, etc. yielded similar symptoms. Ont he contrary, some scientists condemn the blame.

“A professor called it Compulsive Risk Assessment Psychosis, otherwise known as CRAP,’” said Rod Read of ElectroSensitivity-UK. “He says everyone is deluded. It insults and abuses people who are sick. I thought that went out with the Victorian era.”

But it`s more than CRAP. It can actually result in short term memory, dizziness, eye burns, headaches, over prolonged exposures.

Sufferers have reported headaches, nausea, stomach upsets, tinnitus, brain fog and short-term memory, to name a few. Skeptics, however, suspect that blaming EMF sensitivity for their ills amounts to an easy answer to almost any medical problem.

“There is no known mechanism by which EMF from any source — power lines, cell phones or Wi-Fi networks — can cause health problems of any kind,” said Michael Shermer, publisher of Skeptic magazine. “In fact, there is nothing that even needs explaining.”

While some groups focus on non-specific symptoms, others claim links to more severe conditions such as cancer.

Scientists recognize the dangers of high-frequency ionizing radiation, such as gamma rays unleashed by nuclear fallout. Non-ionizing radiation, however, such as Wi-Fi signals, cellular networks (mobiles), television broadcasts (satellites), GPS and visible light, cannot break down atomic bonds and has long been considered safe.

“The fields that are induced by Wi-Fi transmissions are well below those that could cause problems to humans,” said Chris Guy, head of The University of Reading’s School of Systems Engineering. “The maximum power that is allowed to be transmitted by any Wi-Fi unit is one-tenth of a watt.”

But what about cellphones? GSM cellphone’s peek power, when the signal is low, can be as high as 2 watts as per the specification. Such a High power of radiation can cause tissue breakage.

Germany, Berlin
Benalla, Victoria
Fremont, California
Darwin, Northern Territory
Spokane, Washington
Chad, N’Djamena
Sweden, Stockholm
Libya, Tripoli
City of Lismore, Australia
Al Hamriyah, United Arab Emirates, Al Hamriyah, UAE

Click on any of the pictures below

to learn more

Anti-Radiation Air-tube Headset

EMF Harmonization Products