The Danger EMF Cell Phone Radiation

Envi Headsets

Home Radiation Protection

Damage from cell phones comes from two sources. The first damaging source occurs from the Near-Field Plume of radiation generated by the cell phone’s antenna. This plume of radiation extends out a distance of six or seven inches from the antenna in all directions. The near-field plume has been studied most extensively and contains the most intense energy. It is able to penetrate deep into biological tissue. This radiation is absorbed when the cell phone is held in close proximity to the body.

The second form of damage comes from a radio wave called the information-Carrying Radio Wave, or ICRW. The cell phone signal is made up of two parts. The first part of the signal vibrates at 600 to 2500 megahertz. This wave is moving much too fast for the body to recognize and, as far as we can tell, is not causing any harm. However, when a person speaks or sends a text message the information is “piggy-backed” or packeted onto the first radio wave. This creates a second wave or signal which is called the information-carrying radio wave, or ICRW. It vibrates at a frequency down in the hertz range. In this range the ICRW is recognized by the body and it is this wave that is causing damage. Data Sourced From Report “The Cell Phone Poisoning Of America” Written by Lynn Quiring, Rph CCN, NMD – Logical Health LLC

WHAT HAPPENS TO YOUR BODY WHEN IT IS EXPOSED TO EMF RADIATION?

Your cellular energy is now used for protection rather than metabolism. Cell membranes weaken keeping nutrients out and waste products in.

This causes waste to accumulate inside the cells creating a higher concentration of free radicals, leading to both disruption of DNA repair (micronuclei) and cellular dysfunction.

THE DANGER: Unwanted cell death occurs releasing the micronuclei from the disrupted DNA repair into the fluid between cells (interstitial fluid) where they are free to replicate and proliferate. This, says Dr. Carlo, is the most likely mechanism that contributes to cancer.

Damage occurs to proteins on the cell membrane resulting in disruption of intercellular communication. When cells can not communicate with each other, the result is impaired tissue, organ, and organism function. In the blood-brain barrier, for example, cells can not keep dangerous chemicals from reaching the brain tissue, which results in damage.

WHAT DO THE EXPERTS SAY?
Dr. George Carlo: The cellphone industry’s own research program concluded cellphone radiation was damaging to consumer’s health. Dr. George Carlo, was the cellphone industry’s Director of Research who was hired to run their $28 million dollar, 7 year research program to find out if cellphones were dangerous. Dr. George Carlo presents and reveals how the information-carrying radio waves from cell phones and other wireless technology are causing biological harm. Dr. Carlo says that when our cells are hit by EMF radiation, the cells regard the information-carrying radio waves as unrecognizable foreign toxins. This causes the cell membranes to weaken and shut down the transport channels between cells. As a result, nutrients donít get in and waste products donít get out. Among these waste products are free radicals that cause disruption of the cellular respiratory function. The cells become further energy-deficient, eventually triggering programmed cell death. The free radicals also interfere with DNA repair, a factor in the development of micronuclei and tumor formation.

France Paris
Gosnells, Victoria,
Paraguay, Asuncion,
Vanuatu, Port Vila,
Costa Rica, San Jose,
Lesotho, Maseru,
Mongolia, Ulan Bator,
City of Fairfield, Australia,
Mount Isa, Queensland,
Grand Rapids Michigan USA

Qlink Pendant

Electromagnetic Field Meter

Cell Phone Radiation, Cell Phone Radiation Protection

Click on any of the pictures below

to learn more

 

Anti-Radiation Air-tube Headset

EMF Harmonization Products

 

How To Detect WiFi Radiation Without An RF Meter

http://www.emfnews.org/headset.html

Lifebluetube Headset

Cell Phone Radiation Protection

I know a lot of people are still sitting on the fence about WiFi. They’ve read my articles, they know what the studies say about RF radiation. They know WiFi is no good for them.

But they carry on using it.

Why?

For a whole load of reasons. The main one is probably convenience. Personally WiFi offers me nothing. The connection is not as good and I am not interested in surfing the Internet whilst I am wandering round the house or whilst I’m lying in bed……

Call me old fashioned but my PC stays firmly on the office desk. Apart from the occasions when I am away for a few days. And even then, I’d rather live without Internet if I can.

But if you are one of those people who prefer to keep using WiFi then this one’s for you.

It’s some software which you can install on your laptop which gives you a detailed map of your Wi-Fi coverage. It will actually show you the information on a floor plan (that you have to supply first). You just download the software, upload your floor plan and then walk round your home or office to survey signal strength.

Of course the people who designed this software designed it with the idea that people would be able to determine where the strongest signal was. It’s good for that too.

But for us EMF conscious types it can be better used to reduce your WiFi radiation exposure.

For instance, if you live in an apartment you may not even have WiFi. But you know that your neighbor does because when you switch your laptop on it tells you there is another signal. This software can tell you where the WiFi hotspots are. If your bed is situated on one of them then you know you need to either talk your neighbors into moving their router or move your bed.

If you are in a shared office and you don’t need the Wifi then this software can tell you where to situate your desk so you are the least exposed to it.

Similarly if you regularly go to an Internet café but you don’t use the WiFi then this software can tell you where it’s best to sit to minimize your exposure.

You may think, why bother with the software? Why not just look at the signal bar information in the WiFi function of your laptop.

You can do this too. But this software condenses all this information by telling you what the combined coverage is for a given location. If the map shows the location in green it means the signal is strong and if it shows it in red it means the signal is weak.

The other great thing about this software is that it’s FREE.

In giving you information as to the WiFi signal strength it is actually giving you information on RF radiation levels. It gives you the choice.

Of course it’s not as good as an RF meter, because it does not measure the RF levels in RF units, it just gives you an indication of signal level. But from an EMF mitigation viewpoint this is still very valuable information.

I don’t have WiFi so I have not been able to test this software, but the reviews I have read on it are very good.

Latvia, Riga,
Plano, Texas
Carrollton, Texas
Seychelles, Victoria
Thailand, Bangkok
Dallas, Texas, USA
Santa Ana, California
Baltimore, Maryland
Berkeley, California,
Al Hayrah, United Arab Emirates, Al Hayrah, UAE

Trifield Electromagnetic Field Meter

Cell Phone Radiation, Cell Phone Radiation Protection

Click on any of the pictures below

to learn more

 

Anti-Radiation Air-tube Headset

EMF Harmonization Products

 

Mobile Phones Health Risks and Dangers

Envi Headsets

Home Radiation Protection

In this modern society we can’t live without a mobile phone. We spend a lot of time on a cellphone. Is this cause health problem? Yes! The usage of mobile phone makes the health problem because of the radio waves that coming at the time of switched on the mobile. The very basis of cell phones carries voice through radio waves. The contact with the radio waves increases many when you are talking on the mobile phone.

There are many disadvantages of using mobile phone especially it related to the health. There are many diseases such as cancer, the danger of using mobile phone still existing and it will exist forever. In this article we can see the different diseases and dangers of using mobile phones. First of all we can examine the hazards of living in areas having cell phone towers.

Cell phones are not really a danger one but some researchers have found that living in an area with high frequency telephone towers can cause cancer. According to a study conducted by ITAS (Indian Thermal Analysis Society) says that three cancer patients were found in the Usha Kiran Apartments that stands near the cell phone tower named Vijay Apartments (Carmicheal road, Mumbai, India). A well-known Indian midday newspaper carried this article on the issue of Usha Kiran Apartment patients suffering from cancer due to the mobile towers.

The ITAS concludes that people living within 50-300 meter radius of cell phone towers are causing many diseases because of electromagnetic radiation. This conclusion tells that the acceptable radiation is 9.2Watt per square meter in India. The “danger zone” is different for other countries based on their acceptable standers of radiation. It is 580-1000 Micro- Watts per square centimeter for the US. The people living within 2 to 2.5 miles in the radius of towers are in the danger zone.

Italy, Rome
Spain, Madrid
Bathurst, Australia
Poland, Warsaw
Bosnia, Sarajevo
Czech Rep, Prague
Grenada, St. George’s
Malawi, Lilongwe
Arlington Texas USA
Cambodia, Phnom Penh

Electromagnetic Field Meter

Qlink Pendant

Cell Phone Radiation, Cell Phone Radiation Protection

Click on any of the pictures below

to learn more

 

Anti-Radiation Air-tube Headset

EMF Harmonization Products

 

How To Detect RF Radiation Using Your AM Radio

http://www.emfnews.org/headset.html

Lifebluetube Headset

Cell Phone Radiation Protection

What if you think you have got radio frequency RF radiation in your home but you do not want to, or cannot, go to the expense of buying a dedicated RF meter?

Worry not, you can use your portable AM radio to detect certain radio frequency (RF) sources, otherwise known as electromagnetic fields or EMFs.

How To Detect RF Radiation With Your AM Radio Step By Step
Here is how you can detect RF radiation with your portable radio:

1. Turn your radio dial to the white noise between stations, where there is no radio signal.

2. Move around turning your radio antenna in all directions.

When you hear it start to hiss this means you are picking up static and that there is a source of radiofrequency radiation present.

DETECT RF RADIATION USING YOUR AM RADIO – DIFFERENT SOURCES

– put your AM radio next to your cell phone when it is switched on. Next get someone to send you a text message, or to call your phone, see what happens

– place your AM radio near a Compact Fluorescent Bulb (CFL), switch it on and listen to what happens.

– hold your AM radio next to your electrical appliances and listed. Many of them are now being equipped with RF transmitters to link up with the smart meters which are being deployed

– move round your house holding your portable AM radio near your electrical sockets, if your radio starts to hiss as you are doing this this is a good indication that there is dirty electricity.

Limitations Of Using Your AM Radio To Detect RF Radiation

You cannot use your AM radio to detect all sources of RF radiation. It won’t pick up certain sources, such as certain Wi-Fi and Wimax sources, which are too high a frequency and don’t generate a strong enough electric field to create static.

In the absence of a dedicated RF meter your AM radio can be a reliable indicator of where radiofrequency fields are present, given the limitations listed above. If you are on a low budget what better way to detect RF radiation than with your AM Radio.

Irving, Texas
McAllen, Texas
Wichita Falls, Texas
Cape Coral, Florida
El Salvador, San Salvador
Slovakia, Bratislava,
Mauritania, Nouakchott,
Colorado Springs, Colorado
Maryborough, Queensland,
City of Canada Bay, Australia

Trifield Electromagnetic Field Meter

Cell Phone Radiation, Cell Phone Radiation Protection

Click on any of the pictures below

to learn more

 

Anti-Radiation Air-tube Headset

EMF Harmonization Products

 

Cell Phone Radiation – A Possible Solution

Envi Headsets

Home Radiation Protection

August 20th 2012 – Everyone has been hearing the question Are cellphones dangerous, and everyone who has children prays that they are not. Unfortunately, radiation emanating from mobile phones (or cell phones) is a very real thing and something that little ones cannot escape from. One tends to think that the worst thing one can conceive simply cannot be true, but this escapism does not save one from adversity, when the effects of cellphone radiation begin to show up in the form of headaches, hyperactivity or inability to concentrate in children.

Cell phones and health risk are not linked together idly; but that does not mean that cell phones and health risk have to coexist. There is some truth in the matter, for which reason stories of health toll, radiation sickness and the harm caused by EMF have been doing the rounds. However, it is important for careful parents to look into and get a real answer on the truth of the matter. And the book How To Protect Your Child From Cellphone Radiation gives exactly those answers that every parent has been looking for. Cell phones are a necessary evil. The only thing to do, then, is to protect children from the harmful effects of cellphone radiation. This book tells parents how they can protect their children without giving up on the convenience and utility of having a cell phone. Learn how one can possibly still acquiesce and buy the child the up-market, hip cell phone that he or she asks for, while being careful of their health and future risks.

Understanding the nature of electromotive force and how it may harm humans who are exposed to it is now made easy. One can easily check out the book and even get the Kindle version of it for less than a dollar. This book lays down simple rules, dos and don’ts that tell it like it is to every parent, and suggests measures that all members of the household can inculcate with ease. This is one book which is quite small, interesting to read and simple to understand.

Croatia, Zagreb,
Nigeria, Abuja
Tonga, Nuku’alofa
Oxnard, California
Chad, N’Djamena
Cape Coral, Florida
San Diego California USA
Western Sahara, El Aaiun,
Cote d’Ivoire, Yamoussoukro
The Netherlands, Amsterdam

Qlink Pendant

Electromagnetic Field Meter

Cell Phone Radiation, Cell Phone Radiation Protection

Click on any of the pictures below

to learn more

 

Anti-Radiation Air-tube Headset

EMF Harmonization Products

 

Cellphones Also Pose a Danger

http://www.emfnews.org/headset.html

Lifebluetube Headset

Cell Phone Radiation Protection

Mobile phone masts or towers are not the only dangers to health because of the radiation they emit but cellular phones may also pose danger to one’s health.

The effect of mobile phone radiation on human health is the subject of recent interest and study, and as a result of the enormous increase in mobile phone usage throughout the world (as of June 2009), there were more than 4.3 billion subscriptions worldwide.

Mobile phones use electromagnetic radiation in the microwave range.

Other digital wireless systems, such as data communication networks, produce similar radiation.

The World Health Organi-sation (WHO) has classified mobile phone radiation on the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) scale into Group 2B – possibly carcinogenic.

A carcinogen denotes any substance, or radiation that is an agent directly involved in causing cancer.

This means there ‘could be some risk’ of carcinogenicity, so additional research into the long-term, heavy use of mobile phones needs to be conducted.

Some national radiation advisory authorities have recommended measures to minimise exposure to their citizens as a precautionary approach.

The issues of radiation and their dangers are well known to the kingdom’s Consumer Association, and the chairman Bongani Mdluli, on Tuesday this week made it known that the Ministry of Information, Communications and Technology needed a commission of inquiry to look into this.

There is growing concern internationally that the radiation from gadgets like the cellphone and cell-phone masts or towers needed to be minimised.

Many scientific studies have investigated possible health symptoms of mobile phone radiation. These studies are occasionally reviewed by some scientific committees to assess overall risks.

A recent assessment was published in 2007 by the European Commission Scientific Committee on Emerging and Newly Identified Health Risks (SCENIHR).

Part of the radio waves emitted by a mobile telephone handset are absorbed by the human head.

The radio waves emitted by a GSM handset can have a peak power of two watts, and a US analogue phone had a maximum transmit power of 3.6 watts.

The maximum power output from a mobile phone is regulated by the mobile phone standard and by the regulatory agencies in each country.
In most systems the cellphone and the base station check reception quality and signal strength and the power level is increased or decreased automatically, within a certain span, to accommodate different situations, such as inside or outside buildings and vehicles.

The rate at which radiation is absorbed by the human body is measured by the Specific Absorption Rate (SAR), and its maximum levels of modern handsets have been set by governmental regulating agencies in many countries.

In 2006, a large Danish study about the connection between mobile phone use and cancer incidence was published.

It followed over 420 000 Danish citizens for 20 years and showed no increased risk of cancer.

The German Federal Office for Radiation Protection (Bundesamt für Strahlenschutz) considers this report inconclusive.

A 2009 study examined the effects of exposure to Radio Frequency Radiation (RFR) emitted by standard GSM cell phones on the cognitive functions of humans.

The study confirmed longer (slower) response times to a spatial working memory task when exposed to RFR from a standard GSM cellular phone placed next to the head of male subjects, and showed that longer duration of exposure to RFR may increase the effects on performance.

Peru, Lima
Bahamas, Nassau
Liechtenstein, Vaduz
Holland, Amsterdam,
Montenegro, Podgorcia,
Andorra, Andorra la Vella
Cote d’Ivoire, Yamoussoukro
Green Bay Wisconsin USA
Republic of Sri Lanka, Colombo
Antigua and Barbuda, Saint John’s

Click on any of the pictures below

to learn more

 

Anti-Radiation Air-tube Headset

EMF Harmonization Products

 

Radiation Exposure and Cancer Part 3

Radiation Exposure, Radiation Exposure Protection

http://www.emfnews.org/headset.html

Lifebluetube Headset

Cell Phone Towers Health Effects

Cell Phone Sensitivity

EM Field Meter

Natural background radiation

We are all exposed to some amount of radiation just from being on this planet. This is known as background radiation. For most people, background radiation accounts for most of their exposure to ionizing radiation during the year. It comes from several different sources.

Cosmic rays: Cosmic rays are radioactive particles that hit the earth from outer space. They come from the sun and from other stars. The earth’s atmosphere blocks a portion of these rays, but some of them reach the ground. Because the atmosphere blocks some cosmic rays, exposure is greater at higher altitudes. For example, people who live in Denver, Colorado, which is at a high elevation, are exposed to slightly more cosmic rays than people living at sea level. People are also exposed to higher levels of cosmic rays during airplane flights. Airline pilots and flight attendants, who spend many hours at high elevations, are exposed to more of these rays, but it is not clear if they have an increased risk of cancer because of it.

Radiation in the earth: People are also exposed to small amounts of radiation from radioactive elements that occur naturally in rocks and soil. Some of these may end up in building materials used in houses and other structures. Tiny amounts of radiation may even be found in drinking water and in some plant-based foods as a result of being in contact with the soil. For people who smoke, tobacco can account for a significant portion of the yearly radiation they receive.
Radon: The largest source of natural background radiation for most people is radon. This is an odorless, colorless gas that is formed from the breakdown of radioactive elements in the ground. Radon levels are usually higher inside buildings and homes, especially in levels closer to the ground such as basements. Radon levels can vary a great deal, depending on where you live. For more detailed information on radon and its possible health effects, see our document, Radon.

Medical radiation

Ionizing radiation is used in the diagnosis and treatment of some medical conditions. This can be in the form of radiation that penetrates from outside the body, or radioactive particles that are swallowed or inserted into the body.
Imaging tests: Certain types of imaging tests, such as x-rays, CT scans, and nuclear medicine tests (such as PET scans and bone scans) expose people to low levels of radiation in order to create internal pictures of the body. (MRI and ultrasound exams do not use ionizing radiation.)

The increased risk of cancer from exposure to any single test is likely to be very small. Still, concerns have been raised in recent years as the average amount of radiation a person is exposed to from medical tests has risen. Children’s growing bodies are especially sensitive to radiation.

Because of the very small but real risk, and the fact that radiation exposure from all sources can add up over one’s lifetime, imaging tests that use radiation should only be done if there is a good medical reason to do so. The usefulness of the test must always be balanced against the possible risks from exposure to the radiation. In some cases, other imaging tests such as ultrasound or MRI may be an option. But if there is a reason to believe that an x-ray or CT scan is the best way to look for cancer or other diseases, the patient will most likely be helped more than the small dose of radiation can hurt.

City of Canada Bay, Australia,
Thousand Oaks California USA
Caloundra Queensland Australia
Nashville Tennessee USA
Orange California USA
France Paris
Logan City, Queensland,
Modesto California USA
Gambia, Banjul,
City of Lake Macquarie Australia

Click on any of the pictures below

to learn more

Anti-Radiation Air-tube Headset

EMF Harmonization Products

Radiation Exposure and Cancer Part 1

Radiation Exposure, Radiation Exposure Protection

http://www.emfnews.org/headset.html

Lifebluetube Headset

Cell Phone Radiation Protection

Mobile Phone Radiation Protection

Trifield Electromagnetic Field Meter

Next to the thermal effect is non-thermal effect, in which keeping the temperature generated by radio waves constant we discuss only the electric current that passes through the cell membrane, while transceiving messages, and finally the genotoxical effect, which has been included in the discussion in 2006. Researches by Greek scientists, Panagopoulos DJ, Chavdoula ED, Nezis IP, and Margaritis LH (2007 Jan) claimed that there’s a casual relationship between cell phone radiation and DNA damage. Later a European study REFLEX had come up with some evidences proving the claim, but all the cases were found to have an exposure to mobile phone quite more than normal.

Besides thermal, non-thermal, and genotoxial effects, there had been a long debate on ‘mobile phone radiations and cancer’. A list of studies supporting the claim and rest opposing has also been observed in this context.
The other face of picture shows the effect of radio waves emitted by base stations. This is another sensitive issue as these waves are emitted continuously, and the increasing number of towers to expand the coverage with a relatively larger bandwidth. The recent reports claim harmful effects of radio waves on peoples’ health living near by the base stations (WHO database). Besides such kind of effect there may be some occasional hazards that may be caused by the ignorance or due to the demand of extreme perfection. For instance during maintenance, the base stations are not turned of, as it may present the network as an inefficient one. This sort of mismanagements would certainly have hazardous effects on the health of people come under the range of waves.

Categorizing hazards may sort out the level of harmful effects generally but being specific to the use of mobile phones it may explore more avenues. The increased use of mobile phones due to technological progress and decreased prices as a result of low cost of production, contribute to the GDPs, but an alarming situation, ignored most of the time is children’s vulnerability to mobile phone radiations. Being an age group, which is in the process of physical and mental growth, they need extra care, but stringent work schedules of parent and the availability of mobile phones for their use may affect their mental and physical growth in any of the above-mentioned way.

Over and above the facts unveiled earlier, there’s no regulation of services in the cellular networks. The problem may persist in a very low proportion in developed countries but the developing countries though being the biggest markets for cellular networks, are not provided the health safety measures, i.e. the use of cell phone in best possible way. Another alarm may persist in the form availability of low quality handsets in these countries, which are either not passed by any regulatory authority or if so, the authenticity of authority might have been questionable.

The debate is all about the hazardous effects of cell phones on human health, but saying that cell phones are hazardous in totality won’t be fair enough. There’s nothing 100% in the world, and there’s always a room for improvement, and betterment, so is the case for cellular phone technology. We can’t leave it as well, but a fair better option is to keep a regulation and check on usage. Cell phone communication does include the emission of radio waves, which are absorbed by the bodies in one way or other, but it’s a hazard only for people with high exposure to the radio waves, i.e. extensive use.

In order to have healthy masses it’s crucial to have regulation of all cellular activities, along with insistence on sustainable growth in the sector. The precautionary principle as recommended by WHO can also be a good measure, but as the sped up life can’t exclude cellular technology from its sphere, further research on hand-off and blue tooth can be innovative and more sustainable measures.

Sri Jayawardenepura Kotte
Italy Rome
Raleigh North Carolina USA
Little Rock Arkansas USA
Gosnells, Victoria,
Germany, Berlin,
Montenegro Podgorcia
Toowoomba Queensland Australia
Plano Texas USA
Dominican Republic, Santo Domingo

Click on any of the pictures below

to learn more

Anti-Radiation Air-tube Headset

EMF Harmonization Products

Mobile Phone Radiation & Health Part 2

Mobile Phone Radiation, Mobile Phone Radiation Protection

http://www.emfnews.org/headset.html

Lifebluetube Headset

Cell Phone Towers Health Effects

Cell Phone Sensitivity

EM Field Meter

Next to the thermal effect is non-thermal effect, in which keeping the temperature generated by radio waves constant we discuss only the electric current that passes through the cell membrane, while transceiving messages, and finally the genotoxical effect, which has been included in the discussion in 2006. Researches by Greek scientists, Panagopoulos DJ, Chavdoula ED, Nezis IP, and Margaritis LH (2007 Jan) claimed that there’s a casual relationship between cell phone radiation and DNA damage. Later a European study REFLEX had come up with some evidences proving the claim, but all the cases were found to have an exposure to mobile phone quite more than normal.

Besides thermal, non-thermal, and genotoxial effects, there had been a long debate on ‘mobile phone radiations and cancer’. A list of studies supporting the claim and rest opposing has also been observed in this context.

The other face of picture shows the effect of radio waves emitted by base stations. This is another sensitive issue as these waves are emitted continuously, and the increasing number of towers to expand the coverage with a relatively larger bandwidth. The recent reports claim harmful effects of radio waves on peoples’ health living near by the base stations (WHO database). Besides such kind of effect there may be some occasional hazards that may be caused by the ignorance or due to the demand of extreme perfection. For instance during maintenance, the base stations are not turned of, as it may present the network as an inefficient one. This sort of mismanagements would certainly have hazardous effects on the health of people come under the range of waves.

Categorizing hazards may sort out the level of harmful effects generally but being specific to the use of mobile phones it may explore more avenues. The increased use of mobile phones due to technological progress and decreased prices as a result of low cost of production, contribute to the GDPs, but an alarming situation, ignored most of the time is children’s vulnerability to mobile phone radiations. Being an age group, which is in the process of physical and mental growth, they need extra care, but stringent work schedules of parent and the availability of mobile phones for their use may affect their mental and physical growth in any of the above-mentioned way.

Over and above the facts unveiled earlier, there’s no regulation of services in the cellular networks. The problem may persist in a very low proportion in developed countries but the developing countries though being the biggest markets for cellular networks, are not provided the health safety measures, i.e. the use of cell phone in best possible way. Another alarm may persist in the form availability of low quality handsets in these countries, which are either not passed by any regulatory authority or if so, the authenticity of authority might have been questionable.

The debate is all about the hazardous effects of cell phones on human health, but saying that cell phones are hazardous in totality won’t be fair enough. There’s nothing 100% in the world, and there’s always a room for improvement, and betterment, so is the case for cellular phone technology. We can’t leave it as well, but a fair better option is to keep a regulation and check on usage. Cell phone communication does include the emission of radio waves, which are absorbed by the bodies in one way or other, but it’s a hazard only for people with high exposure to the radio waves, i.e. extensive use.

In order to have healthy masses it’s crucial to have regulation of all cellular activities, along with insistence on sustainable growth in the sector. The precautionary principle as recommended by WHO can also be a good measure, but as the sped up life can’t exclude cellular technology from its sphere, further research on hand-off and blue tooth can be innovative and more sustainable measures. ‘

Sri Jayawardenepura Kotte
Italy Rome
Raleigh North Carolina USA
Little Rock Arkansas USA
Gosnells, Victoria,
Germany, Berlin,
Montenegro Podgorcia
Toowoomba Queensland Australia
Plano Texas USA
Dominican Republic, Santo Domingo

Click on any of the pictures below

to learn more

Anti-Radiation Air-tube Headset

EMF Harmonization Products

Mobile Phone Radiation & Health Part 1

Mobile Phone Radiation, Mobile Phone Health Risks

http://www.emfnews.org/qlinks.html

Qlink Pendant

Envi Headsets

Gauss Meter

Home Radiation Protection

The sped up feature of day-to-day life and increasing demand for perfection in maximum possible spheres of life along with the ultimate desire of comfort and ease has lead us to the heights of development in contemporary times. All these factors are not only the driving forces of economic development round the globe but also the speedometers of standard of living in a particular region, country or area. The only thing that deploys the essence of this development is the unavailability of sustainable growth. On one hand where we’re touching the skies of mega and cellular technology, we’re losing list of essentials, i.e. health.

Setting cellular technology the theme of discussion let’s have an overview of it. One of the major examples of cellular technology, i.e. the mobile phone system is in question for a long time. Both the technology concerns and the social scientists had agreed to differ. And it’s still a vexed question. Cellular phone services being the easiest and fastest modes of communication have billions have billions of subscribers round the world. Even in developing countries where a major part of population is striving hard to satisfy basic needs, i.e. food and clothing, use of mobile phone have become a necessity for them.

Mobile phones use cellular technology whereby the regions are covered by radio waves using a base station antenna as a transmitter and the handset as receiver. Cellular technology is the better option in a sense that it provides better coverage, increased capacity and reduced power usage. Both the digital GSM and the CDMA systems share this base. The point that’s been raised more by the social scientists and health concerns is the effect of radio waves on health. These radio waves are emitted by both handsets and base stations.

With reference to the handsets, the effect of radio waves emitted by the cell phone communication, especially with specific reference to human health, can be categorized as, thermal, non thermal and genotoxical. Thermal effect is one whereby the electromagnetic field of radio waves induces polar molecules that generates dielectric heat letting the live tissues die. For instance some part of head, while receiving the message through radio waves if happens to experience increased temperature can have damaged nerve fibers.

Guinea, Conakry
Yugoslavia, Belgrade
Nauru, Yaren
Israel, Jerusalem,
Guatemala, Guatemala
Columbia, Missouri, USA
Toledo, Ohio, USA
Dominican Republic, Santo Domingo
Mandurah, Victoria, Australia
Croatia, Zagreb

Click on any of the pictures below

to learn more

Anti-Radiation Air-tube Headset

EMF Harmonization Products