Cell Phone Radiation

Air Tube Head sets

Cell Phone Video Reports

Cell Tower Articles

Cell Phone Protection Products

http://www.emfnews.org/qlinks.html

The Bioinitiative Group has produced a report called: A Rationale for a Biologically-based Public Exposure Standard for Electromagnetic Fields (ELF and RF ((Radio Frequency))). In that report, evidence for childhood leukemia caused by exposure to power lines is addressed as well as the issue of gliomas and acoustic neuromas caused by cell phone and cordless phone use. They state, In summary we conclude that our review yielded a consistent pattern of an increased risk for acoustic neuroma and glioma after 10 (or more) years mobile phone use. We conclude that (the) current
standard for exposure to microwaves during mobile phone use is not safe for long-term brain tumor risk and needs to be revised.

The report further states, The existing FCC and international limits for public and occupational exposure to electromagnetic fields and radiofrequency radiation are not protective of public health. New biologically based public and occupational exposures are recommended to address bioeffects and potential adverse health effects of chronic exposure. These effects are now widely reported to occur at exposure levels
significantly below most current national and international limits.

It therefore behests our scientific societies to address this issue. There is one caveat; that is, only one group, Hardell et al, have carried out actual studies pertaining to the issue and found a clear relationship between brain tumors and ELF. No other long-term studies have been carried out; Dr Khurana’s warning is based on a review of literature only. It seems that a cooperative effort by both the scientific community and state governing bodies will be needed. Some spearhead is now necessary in view of the magnitude and seriousness of the situation.

Click on any of the pictures below to learn more

Anti-Radiation Air-tube Headset Q-Link Products EMF Harmonization Products

http://www.emfnews.org/qlinks.html

In March of this year, Dr Vini G. Khurana, an Australian Neurosurgeon, made news headlines declaring that, based on his research of the literature, the long-term use of cell phones was leading to brain tumors and was more dangerous to health than smoking cigarettes.

The relationship between exposure to electromagnetic fields (ELFs) and brain tumor incidence has long been a subject of concern and research in the neurosciences and oncology. However, until this last year, most studies have failed to show a clear relationship between cell phone use and brain tumors.

Then in April of 2007, Lennart Hardell, a professor of oncology and cancer epidemiology at the University Hospital in Orebro, Sweden, along with 4 other authors published an article using case-controlled and cohort studies that clearly demonstrates that the use of cell phones for 10 years or more is associated with an increased risk for the development of glioma and acoustic neuroma ipsilateral to the side where the phone was used.

Subsequently, in April of this year, the same authors published a
meta-analysis of several studies on the topic and also concluded that there is a positive relationship between long-term cell phone use and ipsilateralglioma and acoustic neuroma.

Needless to say, such findings are alarming. Cell phones are ubiquitous in our society, and the numbers and use of such devices have increased exponentially since being introduced in the mid-1980s. Furthermore, cell phone use by teenagers and even preteens has also grown to become common place.

http://www.emfnews.org

Click on any of the pictures below to learn more

Anti-Radiation Air-tube Headset Q-Link Products EMF Harmonization Products

http://www.emfnews.org/qlinks.html

Members: Canada, Australia, Italy, Israel, Japan, Denmark, Sweden, France, Germany, Finland, New Zealand, Norway, United Kingdom.

Cancers studied: gliomas, meningiomas, acoustic neurinomas and parotid gland tumours.
Participating Canadian cities: Ottawa, Vancouver, Montreal.

Study period: 2000 to 2004.

Complete published analysis: Expected in 2006. Still waiting.

Age group studied: 39 to 50 year olds.

Countries that have published own results: Japan, Denmark, Sweden, France, Germany, Norway, United Kingdom, Finland.

Countries that haven’t published: Canada, Israel, Australia, Italy, New Zealand.

Click on any of the pictures below to learn more

Anti-Radiation Air-tube Headset Q-Link Products EMF Harmonization Products

http://www.emfnews.org

http://www.emfnews.org/qlinks.html

The reasons are “not sinister,” he assured. “They have to do with facts and data that can legitimately be interpreted in different ways.”

Asked why Canada hasn’t released an analysis of its own data as eight other countries have, Siemiatycki said it was agreed at the outset that Canada would release its study after Interphone is published. For this reason the Canadian data, while collected, has not yet been analyzed.

“And doing so won’t be a trivial task,” he added.
Australia and Israel have also not published their national Interphone results, but the scientists heading up each country’s research have said publicly, including in interviews with the Star, that there are concerning patterns emerging for long-term use.

It’s part of the reason why Toronto Public Health and the University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, in what some considered a controversial move, both recommended this summer that children minimize their use of cellphones and use headsets as a precaution.

Blank isn’t surprised there’s a concern.
“I think there’s going to be a building up of momentum,” he said.

http://www.emfnews.org

http://www.emfnews.org/qlinks.html

It’s supposed to be the mother of all studies into cellphones and their potential link to head cancers, a definitive report that the multibillion-dollar wireless industry has partially funded.

But the published analysis of the 13-country Interphone study is two years late and likely to be delayed further as the more than 50 scientists involved bicker over how to interpret the results, knowing full well that any hint at health risks would have a profound impact on the industry.

The stakes are high, and the steps toward the final outcome are being closely watched. More than three billion people around the world use a cellphone, and while sales next year are expected to fall slightly amid tough economic times, wireless gadgets like the BlackBerry and iPhone are woven into the fabric of our daily lives.

Participating countries are free to publish their individual national results, and eight countries have.

Among Nordic countries, there are already hints that cellphone use for 10 years or longer increases the risk of developing glioma and acoustic neurinoma tumours on the side of the head where a handset is held.

It’s far from definitive, but suggestive enough to spark closer scrutiny from some scientific corners. Growing impatient and citing the public’s right to get “the whole pattern,” a group of scientists calling themselves The BioInitiative Working Group are urging the remaining five countries including Canada to hand over their results “without further delay.”

“There is a lot of data that’s been obtained, but not all of it, and the people sitting on it are being obstructionists for a particular reason,” said Dr. Martin Blank, a professor of cellular biophysics at Columbia University in New York City and one of 11 scientists who signed a letter earlier this month asking for speedy release of the data.

http://www.emfnews.org

Click on any of the pictures below to learn more

Anti-Radiation Air-tube Headset Q-Link Products EMF Harmonization Products

The Environmental Protection Agency has determined that cell phone towers are safe!!?? Wow! It just goes to show that the cell phone industry has a powerful lobby and lots of money. School Board President Larry Mason is in favor of these leases, calling them a, “big moneymaker.” They can bring in profits around $90,000 a year. But does any amount of money justify putting school children at risk? The philosophy seems to be: take a pill, do some Chemotherapy, you’re only 15 years old, we can fix you. I feel that children should not be getting leukemia and brain cancer at such young ages. The INDEPENDENT STUDIES HAVE NOT BEEN DONE on the effects of these towers on humans. Schoolchildren should NOT be put at risk when there is a question about their safety. Folks, this is reminiscent of high voltage power lines in many school districts. They actually proved that these power lines increased the risk of cancer and leukemia and the courts stepped in to protect the children. Should we allow the telecommunications industry to put these towers in schools when they have not yet been proven safe, when there are studies that bring into question the safety of these towers’ effect on living organisms? Does this make any sense to you? These towers are being put up now, as I write, in a neighborhood, church or school district near you and the test results are not good. Read my previous posting to learn more. Clark County schools expected to OK cell phone towers
httpv://ca.youtube.com/watch?v=BzlCw4MDIHk

Are cell phone sites and towers days numbered? SRI International, a research firm best known for demonstrating the first computer mouse, says the solution to eliminate some dropped calls is simple: Make cell phones less dependent on cell towers. SRI, which has been developing technology in its labs for almost 60 years, has software that when implemented in a wireless handheld device allows the handset to continue working even when the network is down. The software is embedded in the phone. The signal of the device then jumps from handset to handset -– which must also have the software -– until it reaches its final destination. Sounds interesting folks, what about the health effects of that? Will that make our cell phones more dangerous or less? My guess is more! When a device becomes a transmitter and a receiver it emits and uses more power to function especially when it is having touble getting a signal. These new devices will be exactly that transmitters and receivers. All in all this is still fascinating technology. Wired News: A Call to Drop Cell Phone Towers
httpv://ca.youtube.com/watch?v=3Vb7F_afHAw

Once the cell towers go up they don’t come down. This is a classic story of what you can be sure will be happenning frequently in the future to our landscapes. Property values diminishing as a result of these huge metal environmental atrocities. Read below and do your best not to let this happen in your area. In upcoming articles we will be talking about what you can do to stop this.

Cell Tower Alternatives Limited – from TBO.com

First Cell Phone 
On a little lighter note, this article is on the first cell phone weighing in at 2 pounds. WOW. 10 years later and a total of $100 million in development costs before the phone was officially unveiled in 1983. They needed to build the cell tower infrastructure that is now taking over 20 years later. Technology is amazing and makes life convenient for our current generations. The question is at what cost to our health and well being will the cell phones, wireless computers and labtops have? CNN.com – First cell phone was a true ‘brick’ – Apr 11, 2005