Electromagnetic Field (EMF) Health Dangers

http://www.emfnews.org/headset.html

Lifebluetube Headset

Cell phone Radiation Shield

Electromagnetic Fields (EMFs), also referred to as Electromagnetic Radiation (EMR), are all around us. Electromagnetic Fields can come from household wiring, power lines, computers and electronic appliances.

Many health concerns have been identified as a result of exposure to Electromagnetic Radiation, particularly when the radiation is very intense and close to the body. Electromagnetic Radiation can cause health dangers can include infertility, heart conditions, leukemia, miscarriages, nausea, muscle pain, skin burns as well as many other health issues.

Sources of the Electromagnetic Field (EMF)
Computers – When near the body, computer generate Rlectromagnetic Radiation can significantly exceed recommended standards and saturate the body.
Power Lines radiate Electromagnetic Fields (EMFs). Highly elevated power lines carry very high voltages, yet can be relativity safe because typically the human body is a safe distance from the source.
Home Wiring running in the walls and ceilings of the home emit low frequency EMFs and should be considered a potential health concern to electrically sensitive people.

Electric Blankets can create an Electromagnetic Field (EMF) that penetrates about 6-7 inches into the body and has been linked to miscarriages and childhood leukemia by experts such as Dr. Nancy Wertheimer and Ed Leeper.
Microwave Ovens emit high frequency microwave radiation. They emit high frequency emissions measured in milliwatt per centimeter squared (mW/cm2). The U.S. safety limits on microwave emission exposure is 1 mW/cm2. Thus limit is often are exceeded when the body is close to older or faulty microwave ovens.
Electric Clocks produce very high Electromagnetic Fields (EMFs) as much as 5 to 10 mG up to three feet. Studies have linked exposure at this distance over large periods of time to brain tumors.

Telephones, especially mobile phones, can emit surprisingly strong EMFs. Depending on the type of phone and distance, there may be no measurable EMFs or very powerful EMFs that can travel several inches into the brain.
Electric Razors and Hair Dryers can emit high levels of EMFs. Because their use is intermittent, exposure tends to be less dangerous than that over constant long periods of time. Some EMF experts suggest that children should not use hair dryers because of the vulnerable development stage of their brains and nervous systems.

Studies on the Electromagnetic Field (EMF)
In 1990, after reviewing extensive group of studies, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) released a controversial report that initially characterized Electromagnetic Fields (EMFs) as a probable human carcinogen, but later modified this view in their final report by removing the cancer reference. Ironically, they wrote, “In conclusion, several studies showing leukemia, lymphoma and cancer of the nervous system in children exposed to supported by similar findings in adults in several/ occupational studies also involving electrical power frequency exposures, show a consistent pattern of response that suggest a causal link. ” Martin Halper, the EPA’s Director of Analysis and Support says “I have never seen a set of epidemiological studies that remotely approached the weight of evidence that we’re seeing with EMFs. Clearly there is something here.”

The Department of Energy (EPA), in November 1989, reported “It has now become generally accepted that there are, indeed, biological effects due to field (Electromagnetic Field) exposure.”

Throughout the 1990s, alarming reports were documented by the Wall Street Journal and several popular computer publications. Back then, even ABC’s Ted Koppel and CBS’s Dan Rather aired special segments on EMFs. In recent years, the EMF issue has returned to the spotlight with many published studies and broadcast news reports. For example, testing has shown that EMFs emitted by laptops has a direct causal effect on the sperm of the men.

What EMF Levels are Safe?
Although still controversial, there is a growing consensus on the acceptable levels of Electromagnetic Field exposure. Expert documentation and government agencies suggest that the air around us contains an ambient level of a 60 Hz Electromagnetic Field of 0.5 mG (milligauss). That means Electromagnetic Field exposure over this level is introduced by electronic devices within the area. To assure health safety in Sweden, electronic devices should not exceed 1mG. In the US, several sources suggest 2.5 mG as the cutoff point.

Spain, Madrid,
Subiaco, Victoria
Miami, Florida
Bhutan, Thimphu
Afghanistan, Kabul
Salt Lake City Utah USA
Mackay, Queensland
Whyalla, South Australia
Birmingham, Alabama
Zimbabwe, Hararesssss

Gauss Meter and EMF Detectors

Cell Phone Radiation, Cell Phone Radiation Protection

Click on any of the pictures below

to learn more

 

Anti-Radiation Air-tube Headset

EMF Harmonization Products

 

Electromagnetic Radiation (EMR), Radio Frequency (RF) Radiation and Heat Radiation Health Effects

Envi Headsets

Radiation Protection Products

Lower frequency, Electromagnetic Radiation (EMR), higher frequency, Radio Frequency (RF) radiation and heat radiation emitted from laptop computers can pose real dangers to our health. This exposure danger is not new. Appliances and devices all around us emit similar radiation including, desktop computers, mobile phones, television sets and microwave ovens.

What’s different with laptops though?

Laptops used directly in our laps directly touching the body expose us to more intense radiation that otherwise would be harmless if we were only a few feet away.

Laptops have parts that heat up and radiate, with older laptops emitting the highest levels of heat radiation. Laptops generate electromagnetic, low-frequency radiations referred to as Electromagnetic Radiation (EMR) from storage and computing processing. When laptops use Bluetooth, WiFi and wireless cellular connections, they emit higher frequency, Radio Frequency (RF) radiation. All three of these sources are very close to your genitals, skin and muscles. Your exposure to these dangerous radiations may create bodily reactions such as a skin rash and muscle soreness. In some cases, infertility can occur.

There are government standards for electronic devices on Electromagnetic Field (EMF) radiation that laptop computers typically meet. However, these standards were written for general use assuming a safe distance from the devices. It is not clear if the standards were written to protect us from electronics used in our laps. Health officials and industry leaders have differences of opinion on this subject, making it a difficult technology area to understand. However, in spite of negative publicity and health scares, we continue to use electronic devices in our daily lives so guarding against possible health dangers will be left up to us.

Laptop Radiation Exposure Symptoms

Leading experts have known for many, many years that heat and electronic radiation exposure, particularly when prolonged at high levels, coincide with fatigue, dizziness, headaches, breathlessness, insomnia and various cancers. When emissions are exposed directly to the lap, more serious health conditions, including infertility and skin damage, have occurred. See a doctor if you experience any of these health issues.

In recent years, studies on the effects of laptop radiation were conducted with some demonstrating cell and DNA damage, while others claimed no impacts. With emitting devices so close to our bodies as a normal part of our daily lives, further studies may create more consensus of understanding.

Laptop Radiation Sources

Laptops have fans that exhaust hot air and can greatly exceed 110 degree temperatures. These fans keep the operating temperature stable inside the computer, insuring proper performance, but this exhausted hot air exposes users to potentially harmful health effects.

When converting energy to perform the various functions of the laptop, Electromagnetic Fields (EMFs) are created. These fields are in the low frequency range and radiate out of the outer shell of your computer from such sources as processor activity, hard drive operations, memory storage and other computing functions.

To connect to the internet laptops, iPods and other computer devices use technologies such as Bluetooth, WiFi and 4G. To make these connections, your laptop is equipped with a receiver and a transmitter. The transmitter produces higher frequency Radio Frequency (RF) radiation and when placed in your lap, your laptop radiates the dangerous emissions directly into your body.

Conclusion
Some studies show that laptops are a health hazard while other studies, cannot not find a strong link between health problems and laptop radiation. While experts are evaluating the impacts of laptop radiation on children, adults and seniors, we may want to take precautionary measures to protect ourselves. Why risk it? When used off the lap, your laptop presents little danger. When using your laptop near your body, invest in a protective device like The DefenderPad which virtually eliminates laptop radiation dangers.

Dominica Roseau
Bulgaria, Sofia,
Ukraine, Kiev
Beaumont Texas USA
Sweden, Stockholm
Czech Rep, Prague,
Romania, Bucharest,
Burundi, Bujumbura
Denmark, Copenhagen,
Swaziland, Mbabane (administrative)

Qlink Pendant Review

Electromagnetic Radiation Meter

Cell Phone Radiation, Cell Phone Radiation Protection

Click on any of the pictures below

to learn more

 

Anti-Radiation Air-tube Headset

EMF Harmonization Products

 

The Invisible Threat That Pulls Apart DNA, Causing Genetic Disorders and Cancer

http://www.emfnews.org/headset.html

Lifebluetube Headset

Cell phone Radiation Shield

(NaturalNews) We are all exposed to electromagnetic radiation constantly on a daily basis from mobile phones, Wifi hot spots, power lines and electrical appliances. The sources of this pollution are many and varied, each having its own range of wavelength, frequency and intensity. How does the artificial electromagnetic soup that we bathe in every day affect our most precious gift, our DNA?

Our DNA is a polar molecule which is affected by charged particles and electromagnetic fields, much in the same way as other polar molecules. Put simply, a polar molecule such as water has predominantly negative and positive regions. The charge on the molecule will align itself with the direction of an electromagnetic field. When the field oscillates then the molecule will switch from one direction to the other resulting in increased temperature, this is essentially the workings of the microwave oven.

The issue with DNA, however, is not merely one of increasing temperature. Many studies into mobile phone frequency EM radiation have only studied the heating effects. Whilst heating of the brain does occur, this is not the only cause of concern. The internal components of the DNA structure are rotated at different frequencies and different rates and the external ribbons of deoxyribose and phosphate are rotated and pulled.

Unzipping DNA

With so many differing EM fields being transmitted by so many different sources, the DNA components attempt to turn to align with their respecting fields. This causes rotational and tensile stresses on the molecule. The base pairs of the molecule are held together down the middle by weak hydrogen bonds, much the same as a zipper. These weak hydrogen bonds are used in replication, but are weak enough to be broken by the physical stresses put on the structure of the molecule. The result is damaged DNA structures that are unable to function in the way they are designed to do so. Damaged DNA results in many diseases such as genetic disorders, infertility and cancer.

The many studies into mobile phone use and overhead power lines have come to different conclusions depending on who has carried out the studies; however some results are universally proven. DNA is damaged by EM radiation. Heating of the brain occurs when a mobile phone is used and cases of cancer have been observed in areas of the body consistently exposed to mobile phone frequency radiation.

Despite evidence of the dangers, the use of EM devices is still rapidly on the increase, with smart meters, Wifi, and more powerful next generation mobile communications. This is in addition to the already numerous sources from electrical appliances, TV and radio signals, body scanners, overhead power lines and even the wiring in the walls of your home. There is no doubt that more research needs to be done. But whilst the dangers are ignored in the search for profit, no amount of research will change the daily onslaught of this silent and invisible danger.

Ghana, Accra,
South Africa,
Israel, Jerusalem,
Gladstone, Queensland,
Hungary, Budapest,
Uruguay, Montevideo,
Pueblo Colorado USA
Cameroon, Yaounde,
Denmark, Copenhagen,
Turkmenistan, Ashgabat,

TriField EMF Meter

Cell Phone Radiation, Cell Phone Radiation Protection

Click on any of the pictures below

to learn more

 

Anti-Radiation Air-tube Headset

EMF Harmonization Products

 

Protect Yourself from the Effects of Radiation Safely and Naturally

Envi Headsets

Radiation Protection Products

The natural approach

A strong, healthy thyroid is the best protection from radioactive iodine-131 (nuclear power plant steam), and EMF exposure. Steven Schacter, author of Fighting Radiation with Food, Herbs and Vitamins, explains, “”If sufficient amounts of natural iodine are available, radioactive iodine will not be absorbed.”” Schacter advises eating seaweed (kelp) to obtain natural iodine.

Eating foods naturally high in iodine will supply the thyroid with adequate amounts of iodine, discouraging the absorption of radioactive iodine, and protecting it from EMF damage.

These foods are high in iodine and part of a natural, safe approach.

• Other seaweeds and sea vegetables
• Cranberries or cranberry juice
• Potatoes with the skin
• Beans – especially navy beans
• Himalayan crystal salt

For protection from cancers induced from radiation eat a variety of:

Dark leafy greens and orange starchy foods – (sweet potatoes, winter squash, carrots).

Additional protection:

• Milk thistle – a proven detoxifier
• Siberian ginseng – facilitates overall cellular health, strengthens body against all types of stress, including cancer treatments
• Curcumin – antioxidant and scientifically proven anti-inflammatory, protects and helps tissue healing
• Ecklonia cava – antioxidant seaweed extract
• Drink plenty of pure water every day to eliminate toxins
• Visual imagery – the power of positive thinking through the visualization of wellness throughout the body

Algeria, Algiers
Liverpool Australia
Lichtenstein Vaduz
Djibouti Djibouti
Hungary, Budapest
Uganda, Kampala
Arlington Texas USA
Singapore, Singapore
Trinidad and Tobago, Port-of-Spain
Luxembourg, Luxembourg City,

Qlink Pendant

Electromagnetic Field

Cell Phone Radiation, Cell Phone Radiation Protection

Click on any of the pictures below

to learn more

 

Anti-Radiation Air-tube Headset

EMF Harmonization Products

 

Laptop EMF Radiation Effects on Children

http://www.emfnews.org/headset.html

Lifebluetube Headset

Cell Phone Radiation Protection

Lower frequency Electromagnetic Radiation (EMR) and higher frequency Radio Frequency (RF) radiation are all around us. These radiations are referred to Electromagnetic Fields (EMFs), also known as electromagnetic pollution. This pollution has been on the rise over the last 50 years from sources such as house wiring, power lines, TVs and desktop computers just to name a few.

Laptop Radiation

Laptop use in business, homes and in schools continues to increase. They are a convenience and a necessity in most cases. This poses the problem. When we use laptops directly in our laps we are exposed to radiation fields at a zero distance to our bodies. In the scientific and medical communities there is a growing concern of the effect of laptop radiation to the adult body. But what about our kids? Laptop radiation can be a technology toxin.

What are Electromagnetic Fields (EMFs)?

Electromagnetic Fields (EMFs) are energy emissions generated from within our laptop and other electronics devices we use in our laps. Lower frequency Electromagnetic Radiations (EMRs) are radiations emitted from the various electronic components within our devices such as computer processors, hard drives and other electronic parts. The higher frequency Radio Frequency (RF) emissions are the transmitting signals being generated by our devices to communicate to the internet using WiFi and cellular connections. Both can be dangerous.

The idea that children use laptops, iPads and other devices in the lap is worrisome. Radiating fields are at the highest of intensity and likely, remain in the lap for long durations of time. Intensity, time and the combination of Electromagnetic Fields (EMFs) increase the potential health risks, particularly because children are more susceptible to their dangers than adults.

Children are at Increased Risk

A child’s body absorbs more Electromagnetic Fields (EMFs) than adults, according to many reports including The Stewart Report (2000) and other studies. In fact, in reviewing these reports, we find that children absorb up to 60% more energy per Kg of body weight than adults do. These radiating fields can penetrate bone marrow up to ten times greater in children than adults. The effects of these exposures can be accumulative and will span their lifetime at rates never seen by today’s adults or previous generations. The child can experience darkening of the skin, DNA damage, fertility issues, electromagnetic hypersensitivity and many other health concerns.

Protect Your Children Laptop EMF Radiation

With Electromagnetic Fields (EMFs) from electronic devices potentially more dangerous to children than adults, steps should be taken to reduce the health risks. When possible, children using laptop computers, iPads and other electronic devices should place them on a desk or table, as a way of avoiding direct contact with the body. If a child should use these devices in their laps, a laptop radiation shield should be used to prevent Electromagnetic Fields (EMFs) from penetrating their young body in the very formidable years of their life.

Norway, Oslo,
Ireland, Dublin,
Peru, Lima, City,
Croatia, Zagreb,
Portugal, Lisbon,
Malta, Valetta,
Congo, Brazzaville,
Logan City, Queensland,
Andorra, Andorra la Vella,
Paterson New Jersey USA”

Electro Magnetic Field

EMF Radiation Radiation, EMF Radiation Radiation Protection

Click on any of the pictures below

to learn more

 

Anti-Radiation Air-tube Headset

EMF Harmonization Products

 

New Evidence On The Dangers Of Mobile Phones

Mobile Phone Radiation, Mobile Phone Radiation Protection

http://www.emfnews.org/headset.html

Lifebluetube Headset

Cell Phone Radiation Protection

Mobile Phone Radiation Protection

Trifield Electromagnetic Field Meter

By Tom Leonard

Could mobile phones be giving us brain cancer? And has the ¬mobile phone industry spent years trying to bury the ¬scientific evidence that it does in order to protect its ¬$3 trillion, 4.6billion-¬customer, global business?
According to Devra Davis, an eminent ¬American scientist and one of the country’s leading epidemiologists, the answer to both these questions is a resounding ‘yes’.
With mobile phone use soaring, especially among the young, Dr Davis says we could face a ‘global public health catastrophe’ in as little as three years if the problem is ignored.
Mobile phones are low-powered radio ¬frequency transmitters which produce ¬microwave radiation.
The debate over the cancer risks from this radiation has been going on for years. Yet the lack of any conclusive evidence has allowed the industry to claim phones are safe and led to sceptics being dismissed as scaremongers.

But now the alarm has been raised by an award-winning academic and toxicologist who was in the group that won the 2007 Nobel Peace Prize.
So should we think twice before clamping a mobile phone to our ears?
In a new book provocatively titled ¬Disconnect: The Truth About Cell Phone Radiation, What The Industry Has Done To Hide It And How To Protect Your Family, Dr Davis says we have underplayed the threat from mobile phone radiation for too long.
She says: ‘Is it possible that the pervasive use of mobile phones is causing a host of ¬subtle, chronic health problems, damaging our ability to have healthy children and creating long-term risks to our brains and bodies?
‘The fact we do not have clear answers to this question at this point in the history of electronic technology is not an accident.’
Dr Davis says crucial scientific evidence, some of which has existed for decades, has been ignored – particularly that involving experimental research on animals and human cells.

Her work includes supporting research from studies in the U.S., Sweden, Greece, France and Russia. For example, a team at the ¬University Of Washington found that just two hours of mobile phone-level radiation splintered the DNA of brain cells in rats, making them ¬similar to cells found in malignant tumours.
In humans, the evidence is less dramatic, but equally worrying.
In Moscow, a study has found that while the brains of children who regularly use mobile phones look the same as the brains of those who do not, users have poorer memories and other learning problems.
Dr Davis, who is a grandmother, is worried about the effect on ¬children, arguing that their thin, pliant skulls make them more vulnerable.

Last year, the Finnish ¬Radiation and Nuclear Safety Authority warned that regular use of mobiles could damage children’s brains, ¬confirming previous warnings in the UK, France and Israel.
Dr Davis believes children are ‘growing up in an unprecedented flood of radio frequency signals’. She says they should only use mobile phones in emergencies. ‘The dangers for children are not definitively proven but do we really want to risk it?’
The most troubling research, she says, threatens male fertility. Research in seven ¬countries, including the U.S., China and Australia, suggests that keeping a switched-on mobile in a trouser pocket can have a ¬drastic effect on sperm count.
‘All the research shows the same thing – if you take young men who are trying to become fathers, those who use mobile phones at least four hours a day have about half the sperm count of others,’ says Dr Davis. ‘Sperm exposed to mobile phone radiation in the lab is sicker, thinner and less capable of swimming.’

Using a mobile for four hours a day sounds a lot, but Dr Davis says 20 per cent of the young males in a 2008 study, by America’s Cleveland Clinic, used their mobiles for this long. However, her most compelling evidence about the health ¬dangers, and that mobile phone manufacturers are probably aware of the risks, is buried in the small print of the ¬instructions that ¬accompany every new phone.
Those for the latest BlackBerry (the Torch), warn users to ‘use hands-free ¬operation if available and keep the device at least 0.98 inches from your body (including the abdomen of ¬pregnant women and the lower abdomen of ¬teenagers)’ when it is switched on.
Apple tells iPhone users to keep them 0.625 inches away from their body and to point the dock connection towards their ¬shoulders ‘to increase ¬separation from the antenna’.

Dr Davis says at least two ¬senior scientists who work for mobile phone companies told her they were ‘deeply ¬concerned’ about the health risks. Insiders say phone manufacturers are now developing safer models.
Many studies looking into the cancer risks of mobiles have been inconclusive.

In May, the hotly-anticipated Interphone report for the World Health Organisation drew no conclusions, but suggested that heavy phone users could be at risk.

The research team was divided about their findings, but that didn’t stop the UK-based GSM Association, which represents the global mobile industry, from deciding the report supported a consensus that there was ‘no established health risk’.

Dr Davis specialises in how the environment affects our health and wrote a book about how the tobacco ¬industry was not ¬initially ¬honest about the links between cigarettes and ¬cancer. Similarly, she says, the debate in Britain over the ¬dangers of asbestos lasted a century.
She insists the mobile phone industry has behaved the same way, working, often with ¬government help, to ¬discredit independent scientists while ensuring that others toe the line for fear of losing their funding.

‘Those studies that have been paid for by the industry tend to find that there’s not a problem,’ said Dr Davis. ‘Studies that are ¬independent – while there are fewer – tend to show there is a problem. I don’t think that’s an ¬accident. This has had a chilling effect on the ability of policy-makers to form policy.’
She said the debate has been distorted by a ‘show me the bodies’ approach to evidence.
But it is too early to expect ¬mobile phone users to develop brain tumours, she said.

The same slow development of problems occurred when the Hiroshima bomb survivors were tested: after ten years ¬researchers found no evidence of brain cancer, but 30 years later many cases were found.
While defenders of the safety of mobile phones point out that official statistics show the ¬incidence of brain cancer is ¬falling in countries like the U.S., Dr Davis says people ¬typically don’t develop it until they are over 65 and, at present, people in that age group have not been big mobile phone users.
‘The absence of an epidemic right now is hardly cause for great relief,’ she says.
In most countries, heavy mobile phone use is recent. Even in Scandinavia, home of many of the world’s biggest mobile phone makers, only half the population owned one in 2000.

Dr Davis finds it ¬frustrating that there are ¬simple ¬precautions that users could be ¬taking. She says ¬fashion will have to adapt, with people keeping phones in bags and the ¬knee-level pockets of cargo trousers, well away from their ovaries or testicles.
Her book, ¬published in Britain next month, has already been ¬challenged in America over its science. But Dr Davis doesn’t ¬dispute that mobile phone radiation is weak – she stresses the cumulative effect on people using phones for several hours.

Her solution is for a ‘major, independent research ¬programme, not a fake one like those we’ve had for decades’.
As for her own habits, she has cut down her dependence on her mobile but still uses one.
‘We’re as dependent on mobile phones as we are on our cars,’ she says. ‘They do a lot of good – they save lives in emergencies – but we have to be smarter about how we use them.’

Micronesia Palikir
Turkmenistan Ashgabat
Armenia, Yerevan,
Colombia, Bogota,
Bangladesh, Dhaka City,
Croatia, Zagreb,
New Orleans Louisiana USA
Andorra Andorra la Vella
Congo, Brazzaville,
Congo, Democratic Republic of the Kinshasa,

Click on any of the pictures below

to learn more

Anti-Radiation Air-tube Headset

EMF Harmonization Products

Cautions About Cell Phone Use, Especially For Children

Cell Phone Radiation, Cell Phone Radiation Protection

http://www.emfnews.org/qlinks.html

Qlink Pendant

Home Radiation Protection

Envi Headsets

Gauss Meter

Dr. Devra Davis spoke at Georgetown University Thursday about the disconnect between the data about the harmfulness of cell phone radiation and public opinion about its safety. Hence the name of her new book, Disconnect. Dr. Davis was the Founding Director of Center for Environmental Oncology at the University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, and has been an advocate of public health for several decades.

In her talk and her book Dr. Davis asserts that:
• Cell phone radiation damages DNA
• Long term use increases brain tumor risk, and the appearance of tumors is slow, so is as yet underestimated
• Users who start as teens have a 4 to 5 fold increase in malignant brain tumor development than those who don’t start so early
• Men who use cell phones 4 or more hours per day have half the sperm counts of men who do not
• And that health policy and regulatory standards are written by the trillion-dollar cell phone industry

While some studies identifying cell phone radiation as entirely safe have been talked about in the media recently, Dr. Davis asserts that these studies have mobile industry funding and study nonsensically limited usage. The famous Interphone Study, which she cites as an example, had an average cell phone use rate 2 hours per month — compared to an average of over 2 hours per week for U.S. users. More questionable still is their “exclusion of data from children and young adults, the exclusion of people who died from brain tumors as well as a limit to the type of tumors studied” said Lloyd Morgan a Senior Research Fellow at the Environment Health Trust at the Bioelectromagnetics Society’s 2010 annual meeting.

But Dr. Davis’ biggest concern is about children. With half of the world’s 4 billion cell phones used by people under 20, and the increased penetration of microwaves into children’s smaller, still-developing brains, she’s concerned we’re headed for an epidemic.
Microwaves? you say. Yes, cell phones operate in the microwave range of the electromagnetic spectrum, close to the range used by microwave ovens. (Cell phones currently operate between 300 MHz and 2 GHz at a power of about 1-3 W, and microwaves typically operate at about 2.45 GHz at about 1kW power.) So a cell phone is a small, low-powered microwave transmitter that most users hold against their heads or at their hips (near the genitals). Considering that alone could give one pause.
So, considering that it’s likely cell phone radiation is harmful, what can you do to protect yourself and your children. You can check our The Environmental Health Trust, and you can also follow these safety suggestions:
• Don’t use a phone or text while driving or doing something that requires your attention!
• Use a landline when possible
• Text for short messages instead of calling — less exposure and less signal use
• Use a headset (but not a wireless one, because those use similar radiation)
• Don’t carry your phone on your body — leave it in your bag or at the far end of your desk when working
• Only use where the signal is strong — the cell phone will up its power to compensate for weak signal
• Leave it far from you when you’re sleeping, or better still, turn it off at night
• Don’t let your children use the cell phone, and keep it away from them — they are by far the most vulnerable

Sierra Leone Freetown
Micronesia Palikir
Bulgaria Sofia
Switzerland Bern
Coral Springs Florida USA
Perth Albany Victoria Australia
Japan Tokyo City
Guyana, Georgetown,
Haiti, Port-au-Prince,
Burkina Faso, Ouagadougou,

Click on any of the pictures below

to learn more

Anti-Radiation Air-tube Headset

EMF Harmonization Products

Cell Phone Radiation Linked To Cancer, Memory Loss, Sterility

Cell Phone Radiation, Cell Phone Radiation Protection

http://www.emfnews.org/qlinks.html

Qlink Pendant

Home Radiation Protection

Envi Headsets

Gauss Meter

Cellphones-a basic necessity to us like water, food-emit radiation that is harmful for us, a new book has suggested.
In her new book, ”Disconnect: The Truth About Cell Phone Radiation, What the Industry Has Done to Hide It, and How to Protect Your Family,” Devra Davis, an environmental health has probed why cell phone radiation is now a “national emergency.”
“Among the most stunning new findings is evidence that you can cause birth defects in mice embryos from cell phone radiation. Researchers at the University of Athens looked at fatal development and studied pregnant mice exposed to smart phones. And they looked at the offspring of the mice and they found basic defects in their brain structure and skeleton,” ABC News quoted Davis as saying.

“In one study, they showed significant damage in the exposed mice embryos. And they showed, for example, mice normally have 13 pairs of ribs and the exposed mice sometimes had less or their cartilage was ossified, meaning it was kind of fused. And they showed other defects in the skeleton and head bone that were associated with the radiation from the smartphone – to 3G smartphones.

“Other work that’s been done has to do with damage to the ovaries and testes of the fruit fly. The fruit fly, as you may know, has been very well studied by science and they have shown that the ovaries and testes of a fruitful can be shrivelled up by radiation,” she said.

Meanwhile, the wireless industry says that the amount of radiation emitted by cell phones is very low.
“It’s not the amount of radiation, it’s the nature of the signal, because, in fact, these phones are very, very weak. They’re very low-power but it’s the pulsed, digital nature of the signal that I’m more concerned about,” she said.

In her book, Davis said the nature of the signal is especially harmful because it is constantly searching for a connection with a cell tower. Exposure is increased in areas of weak reception because the radio signal has to increase as the phone seeks a connection.

“I think the impact on fertility and sterility should be way up. Sperm naturally will die but the sperm exposed to cell phone radiation dies faster and don”t swim as well,” added Davis.
Davis also said that in addition to brain illness, memory loss is a serious issue.

Sierra Leone Freetown
Israel, Jerusalem,
Italy, Rome,
Micronesia Palikir
Orange Australia
Peoria Illinois USA
Lithuania, Vilnius,
Luxembourg, Luxembourg,
Brunei Darussalam Bandar Seri Begawan
Elk Grove California USA

Click on any of the pictures below

to learn more

Anti-Radiation Air-tube Headset

EMF Harmonization Products

Warning: Cell Phones Reduce Fertility!

Cell Phone Radiation, Cell Phone Radiation Protection

http://www.emfnews.org/headset.html

Lifebluetube Headset

Cell Phone Radiation Protection

Mobile Phone Radiation Protection

Trifield Electromagnetic Field Meter

There are plenty of us right here in Atlanta metro who rely heavily on cell phones even to the point of forfeiting land lines.

Researchers are now warning against the electromagnetic radiation from cell phones and in particular cell phone wires worn on the body!
There is apparently enough data now that talking on cell phones hampers fertility. A phone on standby harms your reproductive organs as you are exposing yourself to radiation.

And for men the electromagnetic radiation means one third less sperm count! For those who are trying hard to conceive, especially later in life, these figures could be devastating!
There are also severe warnings for pregnant women who must speak on cell phones and drape wires near the womb – researchers warn that you stop that immediately!
So not only are cell phones now directly related to brain cancer but their electromagnetic frequencies are related to infertility!

Look into all the intricacies of this cell phone warning – if they are known to cause cancer and harm reproductive organs, what else can they do?
Cell phones have also been blamed for bee population reductions – the cell technology pervading the atmosphere with intense electromagnetic radiation – what is that doing to human behavior and health?

There’s also a special reason why people are asked to shut off their cell phones on airplane because it interferes with the electrical equipment. Cell phone technology is that powerful.
For those of you who cannot be separated by your cell phones and think they’re sexy and powerful — you’re right they’re very powerful! Sexy, I don’t know…
Take special care with cell phone usage.

Belgium, Brussels,
Switzerland Bern
Bulgaria, Sofia,
Canada, Ottawa, Ontario,
Sierra Leone Freetown
Senegal Dakar
Spain Madrid
Australia Canberra
Charlotte North Carolina USA
Townsville Queensland Australia

Click on any of the pictures below

to learn more

Anti-Radiation Air-tube Headset

EMF Harmonization Products

Europe Issues Alert Over “More Or Less Potentially Harmful” Cell Phone Radiation

Cell Phone Radiation, Cell Phone Radiation Protection

http://www.emfnews.org/qlinks.html

Qlink Pendant

Home Radiation Protection

Envi Headsets

Gauss Meter

By Matthew Lasar

The global movement for governments to err on the side of electro-magnetic caution got a huge boost this month. The Council of Europe has issued a new draft resolution and report on device radiation safety that urges its 47 member nations to adopt a “precautionary principle” when it comes to cell phone safety. Such a principle would apparently include banning all mobile phones, DECT phones, WiFi and WLAN systems from classrooms as a measure to protect children.
Yes, you read that right. Here’s resolution 8.3.2 of the draft: “ban all mobile phones, DECT phones or WiFi or WLAN systems from classrooms and schools, as advocated by some regional authorities, medical associations and civil society organisations.”

The document will be discussed by the Council’s Parliamentary Assembly at their meeting in Kyev, Ukraine on Friday. Authored by Luxembourg MP and Green Party activist Jean Huss, it contends that even if science isn’t certain about low frequency radiation emanating from mobile phones and power lines, its member states should recognize that these devices “appear” to have “more or less potentially harmful, non-thermal, biological effects on plants, insects and animals, as well as the human body when exposed to levels that are below the official threshold values.”

Despite the tentative conclusions of extant research on this problem, the report urges governments to “respect the precautionary principle” and revise their estimates of the levels at which non-ionising radiation can be regarded as unsafe.
“Waiting for high levels of scientific and clinical proof can lead to very high health and economic costs, as was the case in the past with asbestos, leaded petrol and tobacco.”

Anxieties and fears
It’s not every day that one reads an international report that more or less implies that using your iPhone might be as dangerous as smoking a pack of cigarettes a day. But the Council’s stated mission is to “develop throughout Europe common and democratic principles,” and it’s clear that public worries over this issue will not wait for conclusive scientific research on the question of the impact of non-ionising frequencies on the human body.

This draft is obviously responsive to that global mood:
The potentially harmful effects of electromagnetic fields on the environment and human health have not yet been fully elucidated and a number of scientific uncertainties continue to exist in that regard. Nevertheless, anxieties and fears remain in wide sectors of the population over the health hazards posed by the waves, and also of the demands voiced by high-level scientists, by groupings of doctors and by the associations of concerned citizens which abound in many Council of Europe member states.
The resolution urges governments “to take all reasonable measures to reduce exposure to electromagnetic fields, especially to radio frequencies from mobile phones, and particularly the exposure to children and young people who seem to be most at risk from head tumours.” These would include launching “information and awareness-raising campaigns” on their supposed risks.

And the document wants Europe to “pay particular attention” to “electrosensitive” people, defined as those “suffering from a syndrome of intolerance to electromagnetic fields and introduce special measures to protect them, including the creation of wave-free areas not covered by the wireless network.”

This category of sensitivity would presumably include Mrs. Janice Tunnicliffe of the United Kingdom. The Telegraph reports that the Nottinghamshire woman “cannot bear to be anywhere near electromagnetic fields of any kind,” including television sets, radio, or mobile phones.
iPhones “make me feel really sick within about 20 minutes of being near one,” Tunnicliffe told the newspaper. “Wifi makes me feel like I have a clamp at the back of my head which is squeezing the life out of me.”

Unblinded by science
This Council report is no doubt being read with interest here in San Francisco—my neck of the Ars Orbiting HQ. The city has been in a tizzy over the mobile phone radiation question for about a year, but recently backtracked on its cell phone emissions disclosure law, which would have required mobile phone retailers to display the Specific Absorption Rates of their devices in the show rooms. Fear of lawsuits from the mobile phone industry appears to have been the reason for taking the ordinance back to the drawing board.
The Euro-draft says that skepticism about the safety of these devices is understandable, given the recent past.

“It is certain that one cause of public anxiety and mistrust of the communication efforts of official safety agencies and governments lies in the fact that a number of past health crises or scandals,” the document notes, “such those involving asbestos, contaminated blood, PCBs or dioxins, lead, tobacco smoking and more recently H1N1 flu were able to happen despite the work or even with the complicity of national or international agencies nominally responsible for environmental or health safety.”

Other recommendations include encouraging governments to “pay heed to and protect ‘early warning’ scientists” and formulating “a human rights oriented definition” of precautionary ALARA (“as low as reasonably achievable”) emissions principles.

Kenya, Nairobi,
Slovenia Lujblijana
Japan, Tokyo City,
Jordan, Amman,
Wollongong Australia
Salinas California USA
Kazakhstan, Astana,
Portland Oregon USA
Kiribati, South Tarawa,
Korea (North), Pyongyang,

Click on any of the pictures below

to learn more

Anti-Radiation Air-tube Headset

EMF Harmonization Products