New Research Shows Cell Phones are Dangerous Part 1

Cell Phone Radiation, Cell Phone Danger

http://www.emfnews.org/headset.html

Smart Safe Hollow Air Tube

Cell phone radiation protection

Radiation Protection Products

Devra Davis, PhD, professor, Department of Epidemiology at the Graduate School of Public Health, University of Pittsburgh has written a new book — Disconnect — in which she exposes research showing that radiation from cell phones has been linked to:

• DNA damage
• Memory loss
• Alzheimer’s disease
• Cancer
• Break down of your brain’s defenses
• Reduced sperm count

Then there were the results of the massive Interphone study, which was meant to finally provide definitive evidence on the safety, or lack thereof, of cell phones. It cost more than $30 million (funded in part by the mobile phone industry) to carry out, and involved nearly 50 scientists from 13 countries, along with more than 14,000 people.

It turns out that the study was a massive PR campaign by the telecommunications industry to provide reassurance that cell phones are safe so they can continue to generate hundreds of billions of dollars of profits.

That is why it is no surprise, now that the data has finally been released, that it turns out the study is seriously flawed. The study is filled with ludicrous and disturbing findings such as “heavy users” of cell phones have an approximately doubled risk of glioma, a life threatening and often-fatal brain tumor, after 10 years of cell phone use.

Lansing Michigan USA
Orlando, Florida
Killeen, Texas
Azerbaijan Baku
Lithgow, Australia
Guinea-Bissau Bissau
Victor Harbor South Australia
Dodoma
Tunisia Tunis
Bosnia and Herzegovina Sarajevo

Click on any of the pictures below

to learn more

Anti-Radiation Air-tube Headset

EMF Harmonization Products

New Dangers of Cell Phone Radiation Part 3

Cell Phone Radiation, Cell Phone Danger

http://www.emfnews.org/qlinks.html

Qlink Pendant

Home Radiation Protection

Envi Headsets

Did You Know that Cell Phone Manufacturers Warn You to NOT Hold the Phone to Your Head?

Cell phones are so common nowadays that it may take you a minute to wrap your head around the fact that studies are showing they may not be safe. But remember, it wasn’t long ago when doctors gladly endorsed cigarette companies and smoking was commonplace even in hospitals.

Many are now suggesting that cell phones will be the cigarettes of the 21st century … and one day we will look back on all the photos of people, including children, walking around pressing these radiation-releasing devices directly to our heads and wonder what we were thinking.

But for now most people are in a state of ignorant bliss, assuming that cell phones must be safe if they’re being used so extensively and there are no public health warnings about them.. The reality is, however, that even cell phone manufacturers do not advise using your cell phone the way you probably use it – pressed up against your ear.

Many cell phones actually contain package inserts that warn you to hold the cell phone away from your head when in use. Apple recommends keeping your iPhone at least 5/8 of an inch from your head, while BlackBerry recommends about an inch.

Why might these companies be quietly warning you to keep your phone away from your head?

Lithuania, Villinus,
Macedonia, Skjope,
Luxembourg, Luxembourg,
Israel, Jerusalem,
Haiti, Port-au-Prince,
Germany, Berlin,
Perth Albany, Victoria,
Gambia, Banjul,
Whyalla, South Australia
St. Vincent and The Grenadines, Kingstown

Click on any of the pictures below

to learn more

Anti-Radiation Air-tube Headset

EMF Harmonization Products

Where Does Microwave Radiation Begin?

Mobile Phone Radiation Tips, Immune System Protection

http://www.emfnews.org/qlinks.html

Qlink Pendant

Home Radiation Protection

Envi Headsets

We are now entering the realm where RF begins to affect the human body at a distance. It is generally considered that any frequency above TV channel 83 is microwave. There is a “fuzzy” line between microwave and non-microwave radio signals. In fact, the upper channels of the UHF band in America are considered the near microwave band. Radio signals operating with short wavelengths measured in centimeters, can increase the temperature of water and tissues at a distance. Although most people equate this only with microwave ovens, this effects happens at lower frequencies. Complex proteins present in blood also break down into toxic materials. These invisible, toxic compounds can cause increasing muscle, joint and nerve pain in people over time as toxins build up in the body. Alteration of proteins and toxin generation not only happens to the body when exposed to RF, but also to food in microwave ovens. Many people have put their microwave ovens on the curb, when they discovered their pain was linked to microwaved food. The effects of microwaved food on the immune system are largely unexplored by mainstream science,
but are well known by those that suffer from them.

In reality, Diathermy treatments work on the same principle that microwave ovens operate on, except that microwave ovens use higher power levels and higher frequencies. In later years after Diathermy became popular, it was found that higher RF frequencies allowed heating at a distance, without direct electrode contact. The story about the microwave oven invention is that it was discovered by accident, by an engineer working in an electronics lab. He found the radiation from the equipment melted a candy bar in his pocket. Amana is credited with building and selling the first commonly available oven – the infamous RadarRange. The discovery reminds one of the sticky-note origin story. Another accidental discovery – found while 3M was trying to create a better adhesive..

For many years, everyone treated microwaves as nothing to be concerned about. No one learned from the lessons of Madam and Pierre Curie who tinkered with radium a century ago, and died from radiation poisoning. Remember the comparison of RF with radioactiviting above ? Several decades ago, a man walked past the front of a telephone relay dish on the roof of a building. He suffered no immediate ill effects, but died some days later in the hospital as his organs began to fail. His organs had absorbed the microwave radiation, and were permanently and fatally damaged. He was essentially cooked and didn’t know it. If he has walked past a sufficient amount of Plutonium, the same thing would happen but in a different way. He would have still died.

Argentina Buenos Aires City
Richardson Texas USA
Independence, Missouri
Cory R. New Jersey
Athens, Georgia
Swan Hill Victoria Australia
Mount Gambier, South Australia
Atlanta Georgia USA
Sterling Heights Michigan USA
Ash Sha’m, United Arab Emirates,Ash Sha’m, UAE

Click on any of the pictures below

to learn more

Anti-Radiation Air-tube Headset

EMF Harmonization Products

CELL PHONES Radiation Studies Part 3

Cell Phone Radiation Protection, CELL PHONES Radiation Studies

http://www.emfnews.org/qlinks.html

Qlink Pendant

Home Radiation Protection

Envi Headsets

In general, all of us MUST keep in mind that the human body is an electrical system. It will be, and is affected by, outside RF energy fields that can promote unwanted nerve stimulation, cancer, heating effects, and many other unwanted effects.

A comparison table for telephone effective radiation head exposure has been developed to provide reference values. [4] This value varies considerably for dozens of different cell phone models tested. DNA breakdown is among the most disturbing findings of studies done, which can lead to illness and tumors. There are now new links to brain cancer being uncovered as you read this. There is new concern over those that wear cell phones on their belts, because of the close proximity of the antenna to kidneys. The liver which can rebuild itself to some degree after being damaged, but your kidneys cannot.

One notices that RF exposure studies in the media from Europe are much more common and considerably more vocal than those done in America. Publishing negative study results in North America will have a negative effect on the billion dollar market, and subsequently affect stock in cell phone companies. Cell companies have managed to keep the lid nailed shut on the box, in so far as mainstream media are concerned, but this can only last for so long. I personally was not convinced of the damage potential of low level RF radiation for more than 20 years. That is, until reading a number of test results, all saying very much the same thing about observed detrimental effects on living organisms.

City of Griffith, Australia
Rockford, Illinois
Phoenix Arizona USA
Richardson, Texas
Tallahassee Florida USA
Peoria, Arizona
El Salvador San Salvador
Chesapeake, Virginia
Irving, Texas
Mount Isa Queensland Australia

Click on any of the pictures below

to learn more

Anti-Radiation Air-tube Headset

EMF Harmonization Products

Here Is A Quick List Of Common Sources Of Wireless Radiation Part 1

Wireless Radiation, WIRELESS DEVICES

http://www.emfnews.org/headset.html

Smart Safe Hollow Air Tube

Cell phone radiation protection

Radiation Protection Products

1. CELL PHONES – Here the antenna is very close to the brain, and many studies have been done on this. Recent studies done in Europe show that tumors can be induced in rats, which are exposed to the same power levels and distances that normal cell phone users are from the phone’s antenna.

2. CORDLESS PHONES – In reality, these are as detrimental as cell phones because they operate near the microwave frequencies of cell phones (microwave.) In some ways, they could be worse than cell phones because many people spend more time on these.

3. GARAGE DOOR OPENERS – A source of radiation when the button is pressed.

4. WIRELESS PDAs and NOTEBOOK COMPUTERS – These work very much like cell phones, with the same potential effects.

5. MICROWAVE ALARM SYSTEM SENSORS – This is one area NO ONE talks about. These are common in homes and businesses. Although the power level is in the microwatt realm, one may sit exposed to it all day, every day, sometimes just a few feet away. Again, think about it in terms of exposure time vs. energy levels.

6. BLUE TOOTH WIRELESS DEVICES – Operate in the lower microwave region.

7. WIRELESS VIDEO CAMERAS – Operate in the microwave region above analog cell phones.

8. TV EXTENDERS – Used to transmit video and sound without wires from one room to another in a home. These also operate
in the microwave region above analog cell phones.

9. SATELLITES – Walk outside, anywhere, and you will be bombarded with RF from satellites, both civilian and military. If you could visibly “see” these sources, you would see points of “light” from the 22,500 mile high Clarke belt of stationary satellites. This belt of satellites rise from the western horizon and arcs across the sky to the east. There will also be hundreds of moving lights in the sky from lower geosynchronous orbits. Some of these are also satellites the military uses that send signals to earth, too. Many military satellites have high-powered optical sensors, with huge telephoto lenses that watch everything from orbit. These satellites orbit about 200 miles up and contrary to public belief, can actually read a newspaper headline from orbit. The portrayal of distant fuzzy images as seen in “Patriot Games” is far from the truth. And these satellites bombard the earth with more RF radiation as they send their data to earth.

Ireland, Dublin,
Cuba, Havana,
Port Lincoln, South Australia
Holland, Amsterdam,
Mandurah, Victoria,
Vietnam, Hanoi
Romania, Bucharest,
Jamaica, Kingston,
Niger, Niamey,
Redcliffe, Queensland

Click on any of the pictures below

to learn more

Anti-Radiation Air-tube Headset

EMF Harmonization Products

Dangerous Radiation From Hidden Cell Phone Towers Part 2

Mobile Phone Radiation Tips, Immune System Protection

http://www.emfnews.org/headset.html

Smart Safe Hollow Air Tube

Cell phone radiation protection

Radiation Protection Products

We will concentrate on the latter in this esay – UNCONTROLLED RF EXPOSURE. RF
signals are without a doubt an invisible form of pollution. Most people see a smokestack smoking and scream “OH ! Look at that pollution !” But as we will see, this is not really the most immediate, serious health hazard. What IS known about RF, is that unhealthy effects from it are related to an almost infinte combination of each of the five following factors:

1. FREQUENCY – Certain frequencies are absorbed in the body more than others. For example, the new riot control weapons the Pentagon have operates in the Super-High Frequency (SHF) region. This frequency is about 15 times higher than a conventional microwave oven. Although SHF is not absorbed into the skin, it boils perspiration on the skin causing pain.

2. DURATION – How long you are exposed to the radiation, or how long the transmitter is “on.”

3. DISTANCE – How close you are to the antenna. Energy levels decrease with the square of the distance.

4. POWER LEVEL – What the strength of the signal is. This is measured in microwatts, milliwatts and watts. One microwatt is a millionth of a watt, One milliwatt is one-thousandth of a watt. For example, 1,000 milliwatts is one watt.

Cell phone power levels are often in the 100 milliwatt to 4 watt class. In the past, older bag type cell phones people carried around, were up near 4 watts of power. Getting a strong signal was no problem. Today’s pocket cell phones are in the 100 milliwatt area. Reducing the power goes with size reduction and a smaller battery. This also reduces cell size, which actually is beneficial
as I’ll explain latter.

5. SUSCEPTABILITY – Like tobacco smoke, you cannot tell if you will or will not become ill from RF exposure. But RF heating of body tissues and possible DNA alteration (mutation) happens to 100% of the people exposed to RF. The amount of heating is determined by a combination of the four factors above. The immune system is responsible for cleaning up mutant DNA. But can the immune system clean it out all the defective DNA and dead cells, and do this indefinitely ? Modern medical science knows there are limits to how much of an assault on the body the immune system can deal with.

Bangladesh, Dhaka City,
Chile, Santiago,
Croatia, Zagreb,
Orange, Australia,
Bhutan, Thimphu,
Czech Rep, Prague,
Canada, Ottawa, Ontario,
Mount Isa, Queensland,
Goulburn, Australia,
City of Coffs Harbour, Australia

Click on any of the pictures below

to learn more

Anti-Radiation Air-tube Headset

EMF Harmonization Products

THE RF SPECTRUM – What Different RF Frequencies do to the human body

RF Frequencies, RF SPECTRUM

http://www.emfnews.org/qlinks.html

Qlink Pendant

Home Radiation Protection

Envi Headsets

For our European friends, please note that all the frequencies referenced below are for the American and Canadian radio spectrum. The lowest frequencies are radio waves, that are actually the same as frequencies as the audio sound which comes out of your speakers. This called VLF, or Very Low Frequency. These waves have wavelengths measured in thousands of miles. They pass through the body without damage.

Commercial AM radio signals, use waves that are also quite long and pass through the body with relative ease. These are also waves, whose wavelengths are measured in hundreds of feet. Shortwave signals are also very long, and this part of the spectrum reaches up to a part of the miltary band, located below TV channel 2.

Decades ago, people could go to a doctor for aches and pains and be treated with a Diathermy machine. This machine was essentially a shortwave radio transmitter, and operated with a curved antenna that fits the human body. When placed against the skin, the antenna radiated energy that was absorbed deep in the body’s tissues. A sufficient power level of RF energy will cause currents of electricity to flow in these tissues, thereby creating warmth. These machines are probably outlawed by now and died a quiet death in America. RF energy causes molecules to collide with one another creating heat. This occurs in tisuues like muscles, as well as blood.

FM stations (located in the radio band near TV channel 6) and over the air television channels 2 through 13 are all in the VHF band. These signals can also pass through the human body without harm. These waves are measured in several feet.
When you look at any TV antenna, multiply the width of the antenna by four, and that will be the wavelength of the wave from the TV transmitter. Hence the term 1/4 wavelength, which is a design rule for most antennas.

Television channels 14 through 83 are in the UHF region. Channel 83 is actually just below analog cell phone frequencies. Progammable police scanners scan police channels that are very close to cell phone frequencies.
(Privacy laws force scanners to block the cell phone band. )

San Marino, San Marino,
City of Fairfield, Australia,
Slovakia, Bratislava,
Cambodia, Phnom Penh,
City of Hawkesbury, Australia,
Bunbury, Victoria,
Sweden, Stockholm,
Belgium, Brussels,
Peru, Lima, City,
Palmerston, Northern Territory

Click on any of the pictures below

to learn more

Anti-Radiation Air-tube Headset

EMF Harmonization Products

Study Reveals How Much Cellphone Radiation You’re Getting Part 4

Mobile Phone Radiation Tips, Immune System Protection

http://www.emfnews.org/headset.html

Smart Safe Hollow Air Tube

Cell phone radiation protection

Radiation Protection Products

The Federal Communications Commission sets the acceptable U.S. radiation standards for cellphones. The effects of the radiation depend on the rate at which energy is absorbed by a mass of tissue. This is called as the Specific Absorption Rate (SAR) and measured in watts per kilogram (W/kg). Most handset makers use private certification companies to test the SAR on their devices.

Based on a recommendation from industry group, IEEE, the FCC limits SAR levels for partial-body exposure (including head) to up to 1.6 W/kg, and whole body exposure to up to 0.08 W/kg. For hands, wrists, feet, and ankles, the limit is up to 4 W/kg, averaged over 10 grams of tissue.

In general, the lower the SAR the better the phone, from a potential health hazard point of view. For instance, Apple’s iPhone 3G has a maximum SAR of 1.39 W/kg when held at the ear. Compare that to the 1.19 W/kg SAR for the iPhone 3G S.

The best phone on EWG’s list, the Samsung Impression, has a maximum radiation of just 0.35 W/kg.

But FCC’s current standards are inadequate, says EWG. FCC standards allow 20 times more radiation to reach the head than the rest of the body, says an EWG representative, and they don’t provide an adequate margin of safety for cell phone radiation exposure.

Melville, Victoria,
Denmark, Copenhagen,
Kuwait, Kuwait City,
Andorra, Andorra la Vella,
Jordan, Amman,
Benalla, Victoria,
Hungary, Budapest,
Tamworth, Australia,
Senegal, Dakar,
Russian Federation, Moscow City

Click on any of the pictures below

to learn more

Anti-Radiation Air-tube Headset

EMF Harmonization Products

Study Reveals How Much Cellphone Radiation You’re Getting Part 1

Mobile Phone Radiation Tips, Immune System Protection

http://www.emfnews.org/headset.html

Smart Safe Hollow Air Tube

Cell phone radiation protection

Radiation Protection Products

Researchers are divided on whether radiation from cellphones pose health risks or not. Now, one nonprofit organization adds some hard data to the argument: the radiation emission profiles of more than 1,200 cell phone models. The data won’t resolve the debate, but does give concrete information to consumers to help them make their buying decisions.

American cellphone radiation standards don’t make enough of an allowance for safety and ignore the impact of electromagnetic radiation on children, says the Environmental Working Group, which analyzed the radiation emissions from 1,268 cellphones. The group also looked at a number of recent research studies and supporting documentation from the handset makers to arrive at its conclusions.

“We think that based on current standards there’s increased risk of developing brain tumors in long term users — people who have used cellphones for more than 10 years — from radiation in cellphones,” says Olga Naidenko, a senior scientist at EWG, who worked on the report for about 10 months.

Tanzania, Dar es Salaam,
Colombia, Bogota,
Norway, Oslo,
Bulgaria, Sofia,
Russia, Moscow,
Townsville, Queensland,
Georgia, Tbilisi,
Launceston, Tasmania,
Hungary, Budapest,
Codrington (capital of Barbuda)

Click on any of the pictures below

to learn more

Anti-Radiation Air-tube Headset

EMF Harmonization Products

Cell Phone Radiation And Health Risks Part 1

Cell Phone Radiation, wireless radiation

http://www.emfnews.org/qlinks.html

Qlink Pendant

Home Radiation Protection

Envi Headsets

In the year 2000, a Maryland doctor, Chris Newman, filed an $800 million lawsuit against Motorola and Verizon. He claims using his cellular phone caused his brain cancer. That striking story, and other recent events, suggest that the rules are changing in the cellular world. Will public pressure force cell phone makers to do something about their phone’s radiation?
Ironically, the cell phone radiations issue has started exactly the same way: According to Newsweek, in 1993, a man alleged that his wife had died of brain cancer from cell-phone use. He then sued the manufacturer but the case was dismissed.

But since then, many other newsstories have been published on cell phone risks and manufacturers are probably starting to sense the public’s worries, since we now see initiatives coming from the industry. At the beginning of July, shortly after the World Health Organization (WHO) called for more cell phone studies, the Cellular Telecommunications Industry Association (CTIA) announced that phone makers would be starting to include radiation level information on their products, thus potentially allowing us to select a phone depending on its radiation level.

It’s an important step, compared to their traditional attitude, which has always been to say: “There is no proof that cell phones involve a health risk.” No proof… yes, but does that mean there are no risks? Certainly not! There might be risks but we can’t prove it yet, and that’s all their “reassuring” statements say.

What we really need is more studies… and stronger studies. There have been some but their scientific method is criticized. The stronger the upcoming studies, the more useful they will be. It’s a very open field for researchers cause there are many things we need to know: do the phones harm us?; What about the base stations?; Are protective devices efficient?; Is this less damageable to wear your phone at your belt and use a headset?

In my opinion, we will soon see tens of initiatives burgeoning among the industry itself. As concerns about health risks raise and news stories continue to pile up, phone makers and network operators will have to do something else than just say “There is no proof” if they want to meet their exponential growth forecasts… It is said that worldwide cell phone users will skyrocket from 450 million in 1999 to 1.2 billion by 2003!

Such a market should motivate them to find workable solutions quickly if they don’t want their potential customers to change their mind… before they boil it.

Benin, Porto-Novo,
Swan Hill, Victoria,
City of Shoalhaven, Australia,
Rwanda, Kigali,
Brazil, Brasilia,
Cairns, Queensland,
Tonga, Nuku’alofa,
Egypt, Cairo: city limits,
Tunisia, Tunis,
Zimbabwe, Hararesssss

Click on any of the pictures below

to learn more

Anti-Radiation Air-tube Headset

EMF Harmonization Products