Cell-Phone Cancer Warning Met with a Shrug

Cell Phone Cancer, Cell Phone Cancer Protection


Lifebluetube Headset

Cell Phone Radiation Protection

Mobile Phone Radiation Protection

Trifield Electromagnetic Field Meter


By Peter Svensson
A mostly lackadaisical attitude greeted the World Health Organization’s warning that cell phones may be carcinogenic. Some people vowed to get headsets to shield themselves from radiation, but most seemed to either dismiss the warning as too vague, or reason that if the most useful device in modern life poses a slight health risk, then so be it.

News last week that an arm of the World Health Organization said cell phones might raise the risk of brain cancer has been greeted by Americans mostly with a shrug of the shoulder — one that’s pinning a cell phone to the ear.
Google searches for “cancer” and “cell phones” spiked this week. And some people vowed to get headsets to shield themselves from radiation. But most seemed to either dismiss the warning as too vague, or reason that if the most useful device in modern life poses a slight health risk, then so be it.

“I was watching the news about it, and I thought, `I’m already screwed because I’ve been talking on the phone for seven years,'” said Genevieve Chamorro, a 31-year-old New Yorker who was shopping for a phone.
John Gottani, a manager at a cell phone store in New York, said he’s been selling phones for six years and has never heard anyone ask if they cause cancer. The only things customers really care about, Gottani said, are “if it works, and if it texts.”

The International Agency for Research on Cancer reviewed dozens of published studies on cell phones and cancer before classifying cell phones as “possibly carcinogenic” on Tuesday. It’s a risk category that includes night-shift work, engine exhaust and coffee.
Studies haven’t been able to rule out a link between cell phones and cancer. But experts say that if there is a link, it’s unlikely to be strong. Cell phones emit weak radio waves, which, under the conventional understanding of physics, can’t wreak the same sort of cellular changes that sunlight and radioactivity can.

A common tip offered to those who want to reduce their exposure to cell phone radiation is to use a headset. Even wireless Bluetooth headsets reduce radiation exposure. Though they emit radio signals of their own, they’re much weaker than cell phone signals.
But there seems to be little rush to get Bluetooth headsets. They’ve been declining in popularity for at least four years, according to research firm Strategy Analytics. It’s also found that most headset owners don’t intend to replace the one they have when it wears out.
According to Strategy Analytics analyst Chris Schreiner, the main reason is that when you’re wearing a Bluetooth headset, you look like a person who’s wearing a Bluetooth headset.
“Style has always been a huge issue in terms of Bluetooth headsets,” Schreiner said.

On Twitter this week, the most common posts mentioning “headset” and “cancer” have been repeats of a joke from humor site Someecards.com: “I can’t decide between being seen wearing a Bluetooth headset or just getting brain cancer.”
Cell phones differ in how much radiation they emit. Proposals in a few states would force cell phone stores to display these radiation ratings.
But CTIA-The Wireless Association, the cell phone industry trade group, is fighting these moves. It says there’s no evidence the measured ratings have any correlation with risks. And cell phone manufacturers and carriers are showing no sign of breaking ranks with each other to use the ratings to their advantage — for instance, by touting “low-radiation phones.”

Spokesman John Walls said CTIA wouldn’t fight a manufacturer that wanted to market a “low-radiation phone.” But claiming a phone to be safer than any other would cross the line, he said.
“They’re all deemed safe by science,” Walls said.
Americans on average talk about 700 minutes a month on their cell phones, making them some of the most talkative people in the world, well ahead of Europeans.

In San Francisco, Chuck Luter, 42, said he doesn’t plan to change his habits as a result of the radiation warning. When the advertising-shoot prop stylist talks on his Sidekick phone, he usually uses the speakerphone, so it’s not close to his head. ‘
And in any case, he texts more than he talks. Besides, he added, there are few alternatives to owning a cell phone.
“What are the other options? To not have one? To try to keep it all in your head? There are so many bad things for you — just add this to the pile.”‘

Somalia, Mogadishu,
Swaziland, Mbabane,
Sweden, Stockholm,
Tanzania, Dar es Salaam,
Thailand, Bangkok,
Togo, Lome,
Lubbock Texas USA,
Tonga, Nuku’alofa,
Cessnock Australia

Click on any of the pictures below

to learn more

Anti-Radiation Air-tube Headset

EMF Harmonization Products

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *