U.S. Agency Wants Rethink on Cellphone Radiation

Envi Headsets

Home Radiation Protection

August 08, 2012

ITWORLD CANADA CURATED: The General Accountability Office says regulator should consider that other countries have tougher exposure laws than the U.S.

People who worry that RF radiation from cellphones could be harmful got a boost Wednesday when the U.S. Government Accountability Office, a spending watchdog that reports to Congress, said the American telecommunications regulator should take another look at its regulations for exposure to mobile phones.

As this report says , the GAO acknowledged that there’s no scientific proof exposure hurts people. But, it added, the area is still under study and other countries have adopted stiffer rules than the regulator, the Federal Communications Commission.

It’s a sticky area. There is no absolute proof cellphones damage health, but there are suspicions about any device that issues RF signals that is close to a person’s body. A number of long-term studies are expected to be finished this year, the GAO noted.

Last October Health Canada encouraged parents to reduce their children’s radio frequency exposure from cell phones since children are typically more sensitive to a variety of environmental agents . As well, it said, there is currently a lack of scientific information regarding the potential health impacts of cell phones on children.

Unfortunately the GAO hasn’t added much to the debate on this issue. Advice to the FCC to “”take another look”” isn’t much help in the absence of scientific evidence. All it does is gain headlines.

Gabon, Libreville
Rwanda, Kigali
Brazil, Brasilia
France, Paris,
Kenya, Nairobi
Kuwait, Kuwait (City)
Visalia California USA
Kyrgyzstan, Bishkek
City of Canterbury Australia
Dodoma (legislative)

Qlink Pendant

Electromagnetic Field Meter

Cell Phone Radiation, Cell Phone Radiation Protection

Click on any of the pictures below

to learn more

 

Anti-Radiation Air-tube Headset

EMF Harmonization Products

 

GAO Criticizes FCC’s Standards For Cellphone Radiation

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ff7QDjTjrKo[/youtube]

http://www.emfnews.org/headset.html

Lifebluetube Headset

Cell Phone Radiation Protection

The Government Accountabil­ity Office on Tuesday called on federal regulators to revamp standards that measure the impact of radiation from cellphones.

The year-long review by the GAO, which was done at the urging of lawmakers, did not suggest that cellphone use causes cancer. But the GAO was critical of the way the Federal Communications Commission has managed its standards, noting that the rules, which had not changed since 1996, lagged behind those of the international community.

The FCC’s regulations “may not reflect the latest evidence on the the effects” of cellphones, the GAO’s report said.

What’s more, when testing cellular radiation exposure on someone using an earpiece, the FCC assumed that people would place their phones at a distance, say, on a nearby table, the GAO noted. But many keep their phones in their pockets or on belt buckles.

The FCC “may not be identifying the maximum exposure, since some users may hold a mobile phone directly against the body while in use,” the GAO said. It recommended that the FCC reexamine both its exposure limits and the way it conducts tests.

In response to the report, the FCC said it will ask federal health agencies and others for input as it assesses its regulations. The FCC said in June that it was contemplating whether it needed to update its rules, but the agency has noted that reputable health experts dismiss fears that cellphones are dangerous.

“The U.S. has among the most conservative standards in the world,” FCC spokesman Neil Grace said in a statement. “We look forward to reviewing today’s GAO report as part of that consideration.”

Rep. Edward J. Markey (D-Mass.), who had asked the GAO to study the matter, said the study shows that the FCC is behind the curve.

“With mobile phones in the pockets and purses of millions of Americans, we need a full understanding of the long-term impact of mobile phone use on the human body, particularly in children, whose brains and nervous systems are still developing,” Markey said.

Ahead of the study’s release, there had been renewed interest in the area of cellphone radiation.

Last year, a World Health Organization report found that cellphone radiation might be carcinogenic. A separate study from the National Institutes of Health, done in early 2011, found that 50 minutes of cellphone use altered activity in the part of the brain closest to where the device antennas were located.

On Monday, Rep. Dennis J. Kucinich (D-Ohio) introduced a bill that would put warning labels on cellphones and tap the Environmental Protection Agency — not the FCC — to lead the way in examining the effects that radiation has on the human body.

In a statement, Kucinich said that cellphone users have a right to know how much radiation their phones give off, particularly as people spend more time with them. They shouldn’t have to wait for scientists to prove whether there are harmful effects.

“It took decades for scientists to be able to say for sure that smoking caused cancer,” Kucin­ich said. “We must allow consumers to have enough information to choose a phone with less radiation.”

The city of San Francisco is looking at a labeling measure similar to the one proposed by Kucinich. CTIA, the wireless industry’s trade group, has filed a lawsuit against the proposed ordinance.

Slovakia, Bratislava,
Togo, Lome,
Portugal, Lisbon,
Greece, Athens,
Holland, Amsterdam,
Kiribati, South Tarawa,
Panama, Panama City,
Mozambique, Maputo,
Venezuela Caracas Iceland Reykjavik
Luxembourg, Luxembourg City,

Trifield Electromagnetic Field Meter

Cell Phone Radiation, Cell Phone Radiation Protection

Click on any of the pictures below

to learn more

 

Anti-Radiation Air-tube Headset

EMF Harmonization Products