Cellphone Masts Damaging Our Brains?

Cell Phone Radiation, Cell Phone Radiation Protection

http://www.emfnews.org/store/

Qlink Pendant

Home Radiation Protection

Envi Headsets

Electromagnetic Field Meter

February 13 2012
By Sheree Bega

The ultimatum from the teachers at Eldorado Park Senior Secondary School in Joburg was clear: either the planned cellphone mast went, or they did. For Lionel Billings, it wasn’t a hard decision to make.
“I thought that I could rather lose the mast but not the teachers,” says Billings, the chairman of the school’s governing body. “My kids also attend the same school.”

The school entered into a contract with Cell C more than two years ago and a mast would provide a guaranteed income. “The thought of radiation was in the back of my mind… but some of the schools in the area do have these towers and I thought it can’t be that bad.”
But when construction started towards the end of last year, everything changed. “The teachers told me if the mast went up, they would leave. They had done their research and were concerned about the dangers of cellphone masts.

“Some of the research was very inconclusive, but the bottom line was that the word radiation was mentioned in every article. That was enough for them to say we don’t need this at our school. I don’t want to put our school’s 1 600 learners and 50 teachers at any risk. We don’t even allow cellphones at the school.”

Tracey-Lee Dorny, the chairwoman of the Electromagnetic Radiation Research Foundation of SA, applauds the school’s move, noting that a village in Spain has just removed a cellphone mast after 50 villagers contracted cancer or suffered from headaches, insomnia and depression.

Too many schools in SA allow the erection of cellphone masts on their grounds, says Dorny, despite “burgeoning” scientific evidence about the potential health effects of electromagnetic fields emitted by cellular base stations.
“There are thousands of papers showing possible links to cancer, and now increasing incidents of attention-deficit disorder, Alzheimer’s and diabetes from cellphone radiation,” she says.

“When I give talks to schools, the first thing I ask is who is sleeping with their cellphones under their pillows. Almost all the hands go up. You find our children hiding their cellphones on their bodies so that they don’t miss an SMS while their poor little breasts are being fried.
“I teach the children how dangerous phones are and not to put them in their bras or panties, sleep with them under their pillows and walk with them in their pockets.”
Like most South Africans, Dorny, an events organiser, was using her cellphone regularly two years ago. But when she and her family, who live in the upmarket suburb of Craigavon, Joburg, started to fall ill, they looked at the iBurst mast just metres from their home.
“I was actually using iBurst,” recalls Dorny. “But I ended up starting to vomit until I brought up blood. I had a rash from head to toe. It felt like my eyes were melting in my head. My husband had bleeding headaches. My son would wake up screaming in the middle of the night holding his head, which he said felt like a rocket had gone off.”

Dorny says the effects were so severe that the family could not live in their home for 18 months. Eventually, iBurst dismantled the mast, which had been illegally erected, but its former chief executive maintained it had been switched off for weeks at a time and denied it could be the cause of similar illnesses affecting scores of residents in the suburb.

Dorny believes she has another battle on her hands. She says MTN’s testing of 4G LTE (long term evolution) is “scorching” trees in her garden and the surrounding area, and is the source of growing reports of illnesses, including tinnitus, headaches, shooting pains, nausea and dizziness, in the suburbs where it is being conducted.
4G is the fourth generation of wireless communication standard for an era of ultra-fast broadband internet access.
“People ask me if we’ve had a fire here,” says Dorny, pointing to a cluster of some of the 60 burnt and blistered pine trees in her garden – she has numbered each one.

She says 4G has higher penetration levels into buildings, and “therefore into our bodies”. “My big concern is that we’ve got so many service providers rolling out waves and levels of radiation… but they are actually clueless about the damage they are causing… The only reason we have 4G is purely to now flog a whole generation of gadgets to the public. What sort of powers and frequencies are being transmitted to do this and what is it doing to people?”
But Dr Walter Meyer, a senior lecturer in the physics department at the University of Pretoria, disagrees. “In principle, electromagnetic radiation can cause heating effects. The best example is the microwave oven, but the kind of effect to scorch a tree would imply a serious health hazard to people.

“You actually start heating people up, cooking them. It’s certainly possible… but the power output of such a transmitter would be much higher than that which is used for cellphone communication. I doubt whether this scorching is due to cellphone radiation. To have those kinds of thermal effects you should in principle feel the heat.”
Ivan Booth, a former Vodacom spokesman, lashed out at Dorny’s “pseudo-science”.

“I’m willing to put a R1 million bounty out there to anyone who can prove that cellular base stations scorch pine trees,” he wrote.
But Dorny says several studies point to the deterioration of trees around masts. “I’m not an alarmist. I wish I could shout louder. What’s happening now with the mass of towers and all the different layers of technology on top of each other is you’re being exposed to electromagnetic radiation 24/7. You’re not having a choice of ‘I don’t want this coming into my home, it’s making me ill’. You can’t switch it off like you can your cellphone.”

SA is guided by the World Health Organisation (WHO) and the exposure guidelines published by the International Commission on Non-Ionising Radiation Protection (ICNIRP). SA authorities say that there is no risk to the health of the general public from exposure to the microwave emissions of cellular base stations, for example.
Barrie Trower, a military scientist from the UK, on a visit to King Kgafela II of the Bakgatla tribe in Botswana, notes how there are at least 11 international committees that “vehemently” oppose both the WHO’s and ICNIRP’s safety levels.

“This is mostly due to the former’s safety levels being based… on thermal levels, whereas other international studies recognise responses to electrochemical interactions between microwaves and cellular biochemistry and set safety levels according to lower rates.”
The king had invited Trower to speak because he blamed the death of his father from a brain tumour on a cellphone mast erected near the royal residence.
Last May, the International Agency for Research on Cancer and the WHO reclassified radio frequency electromagnetic fields as a Class 2B carcinogen – possibly carcinogenic to humans – because of links to some types of brain cancer.

“But this has been ignored by the industry,” says Dorny. “They will keep quoting the ICNIRP. But those guidelines have been declared obsolete by several governments, because it’s only based on six minutes of thermal heating on an adult male… not one organisation has yet declared what they feel is a safe level for children… We’re sitting in 2012 with masses of new technology and huge cellphone use.”

Late last year, a Danish study, billed as the largest of its kind, found that there were no increased risks of brain cancer from cellphone use after tracking 350 000 users for 18 years.
SA, says Dorny, should err on the side of caution and follow the example of Sweden, Canada, France and Switzerland, which have adopted safer radiation limits for their citizens and even prevented wireless fidelity (wi-fi) in schools.

She accuses government departments of passing the buck and leaving SA’s cellphone industry “unregulated” and uncontrolled.
The departments of Health, Environmental Affairs and Communications and the Independent Communications Authority of SA failed to respond to the IOS’s queries.

Last year, Olle Johansson, an associate professor at the department of neuroscience at the Karolinska Institute in Sweden, and a scientific adviser to Dorny’s foundation, wrote an impassioned plea to the SA government. He said several studies had demonstrated “cellular DNA damage, disruptions and alterations” because of exposure to electromagnetic fields.

The ICNIRP/WHO public safety limits were inadequate and obsolete with respect to prolonged, low-intensity exposures, he said, and the precautionary principle should be in force in the implementation of this new technology, especially when it came to the exposure of children.

Dorny says her exposure to the iBurst mast made her electrosensitive, which means she becomes ill when exposed to electromagnetic radiation. She wears specially made nets to shield her from radiation at home and when she travels. According to her foundation, 3 percent of the world’s citizens are electrosensitive, and the number is surging.

Dorny is not averse to the use of technology but says that a properly planned fibre-optic network, “from backbone to final source”, is safer if broadband is to be expanded.

She even owns a cellphone. “It’s an ancient thing but I only use it for emergencies. It’s never on. I used to use my phone quite avidly. But I don’t feel well when I do use one. If I have to pick up a smartphone, it actually burns my hand.”

She adds: “Anything… that is going to make you sick is of concern. If it’s going to give you rashes, make you vomit, give you blurry vision, memory loss… that either happens till the signal goes down or you take yourself away.” – Saturday Star

Midland, Texas
Colombia, Bogota
Yemen, Sana
Palau, Koror
Augusta, Georgia
Miami, Florida
Chandler, Arizona
City of Rockdale, Australia
Andorra, Andorra la Vella,
Lafayette, Louisiana

Click on any of the pictures below

to learn more

 

Anti-Radiation Air-tube Headset

EMF Harmonization Products

 

Cellular Phones And Brain Most Cancers – The Reality Be Advised

Cell Phone Radiation, Cell Phone Radiation Protection

http://www.emfnews.org/headset.html

Lifebluetube Headset

Cell Phone Radiation Protection

Trifield Electromagnetic Field Meter

February 12, 2012 by chris

It truly is intriguing that we have observed a fantastic deal about the issues of Cell phones inside the press recently. I have mentioned articles or blog posts in the USA Currently, Ny Times, Wall Road Journal, Reuters, and on Television on CNN, CNBC, and MSNBC. What issues me is the fact that there were scientific studies in Switzerland in 1996, 1997, 1998, and 1999 and yet it had been just as if there was a press blackout here inside the US. And comprehend this was back again when cellular phones were changing over in the 3 Watt telephones which is lots far more energy and thus, extra micro-wave intensity.

That’s to mention, they had been considerably even worse back then to the human bio technique, plus the antennas were extra strong too, and also the cell towers were further apart averaging 7-miles or extra, right now a lot more like 3-miles. This higher energy environment and larger antennas means much more mind cookage! Back then we were informed there was nothing to worry about; completely harmless, now we locate out, nicely, truly they weren’t.

There was an intriguing guide review post on Kurzweil’s Accelerating Intelligence on the web lately on May 24, 2011 titled “Disconnect: The reality About Mobile phone Radiation, What the Industry Has Done to Disguise It, and Ways to Guard Your Family” – Devra Davis, published by Dutton Adult, 2010. The e book review states;
“Much-anticipated, explosive expose of how cellular phone use damages mind cells, especially in children, by one of several world’s foremost scientific specialists within the area – an array of recent and extended suppressed investigation in this timely bombshell. Cell phone radiation is usually a national unexpected emergency. Stunningly, essentially the most common gadget of our age has now been proven to harm DNA, stop working the brain’s defenses, and decrease sperm count while escalating memory loss, the risk of Alzheimer’s disease, and also most cancers.”

You see, right here is often a gentleman who wrote a entire book on the subject, not only a cutesy write-up for mainstream media. It is bought all the scientific studies, investigation, which includes these most current research every person is reading about displaying how the cellular phone radiation is causing DNA to breakdown, and the cellular phones are carcinogenic.

That’s just scary things, and how about pregnant moms with their cell phones strapped to their hips using the blue-tooth on their ear. Their brains are secure in that situation, but how is their unborn infant undertaking there, I inquire? Still more concerns, but if you want some true solutions, I guess I would suggest this book to you as well. Remember to take into account all this.

Ukraine, Kiev,
Albania, Tirana,
Serbia, Belgrade,
Bulgaria, Sofia,
Estonia, Tallin,
Hungary, Budapest,
Athens Georgia USA
Lichtenstein, Vaduz,
Rockhampton Queensland Australia
Denmark, Copenhagen

Click on any of the pictures below

to learn more

 

Anti-Radiation Air-tube Headset

EMF Harmonization Products

 

Cell Phones Shown to Negatively Influence Fetal Brains

Cell Phone Radiation, Cell Phone Radiation Protection

http://www.emfnews.org/store/

Qlink Pendant

Home Radiation Protection

Envi Headsets

Electromagnetic Field Meter

Mike Barrett
08 Feb 2012

Cell phones – an incredibly convenient device that make our lives infinitely easier. While these phones have created great steps forward in communication, talking on them comes at a price.

The massive increase in cellular phone use in our current society has resulted in a large degree of research examining the potential negative health effects they have on humans. Very recent research has shown that microwave radiation emitted by cellular devices negatively influences fetal brains.

The experiment took 32 pregnant rats and divided them into 4 different groups, with one of them receiving no exposure to microwave radiation. The other three groups were exposed to different intensities of microwave radiation from cellular phones, with each of them being subjected for different amounts of time.

Group 1 was radiated for 10 minutes each time, group 2 was radiated for 30 minutes, group 3 for 60 minutes, and group 4 not at all. Each of the groups receiving radiation were radiated 3 times a day from the first day of pregnancy, then for 20 days thereafter. On day 21, the rats’ brains were tested.

The primary purpose of the study was to evaluate intensity of oxidative stress and the level of neurotransmitters in the brains of pregnant rats exposed to cell phones. The study concluded with:
Through this study, we concluded that receiving a certain period of microwave radiation from cellular phones during pregnancy has certain harm on fetal rat brains.

This research comes just before Greek scientists demonstrated how frequency electromagnetic fields, namely cell phones, portable phones, WiFi, and wireless computer equipment alter important protein changes in the brains of animals.

Angola, Luanda
South Perth, Victoria
Malta, Valletta
Springfield, Missouri
Riverside, California
Haiti, Port-au-Prince
Arvada, Colorado
Warrnambool, Victoria
Paraguay, Asuncion
Dominican Republic, Santo Domingo

Click on any of the pictures below

to learn more

 

Anti-Radiation Air-tube Headset

EMF Harmonization Products

 

Do Mobile Phones Lead To Mind Most Cancers?

Mobile Phone Radiation, Mobile Phone Radiation Protection

http://www.emfnews.org/headset.html

Lifebluetube Headset

Cell Phone Radiation Protection

Trifield Electromagnetic Field Meter

February 12th, 2012

A part of me wishes we definitively understood the solution to this question just to acquire people to refrain from speaking on their cellular phones whilst driving. Nothing at all is a lot more irritating on the street than seeing bad driving procedures only to determine the driver blabbing on a phone. Additionally, we realize that driving even though speaking on the cell telephone is equivalent to driving with an illegal blood booze degree with regards to response time and focus around the street. Men and women have been killed in car accidents by a person speaking on the telephone. I used to be inside a vehicle accident about three years ago when I had been rear-ended by a woman speaking on her cell phone. It’s now illegal to speak on a mobile phone whilst driving in California and other states are catching on too. We also understand that a headset or speaker telephone will not minimize the threat of an collision. But I digress, we had been meant to become speaking about brain cancer.

According to the Mobile Telecommunications and Internet Association Americans spent two.2 trillion minutes on their cell phones in 2008 which was a a hundred billion moment boost in the previous year. Mobile phones are turning into far more and extra advanced in their capabilities and simultaneously, rising their radio frequency output. A handful of research have proven an raise in mind tumors on the same side with the head where the consumer holds the telephone, but other research have shown no affiliation.

A 2009 research looked at 23 research of 38,000 persons and found no link between mobile phone use and mind tumors. Nevertheless, there was a subset evaluation of 8 scientific studies which showed a 10-30% improve inside the risk of tumors from long-term use compared to men and women who seldom employed a cellular phone.

The European Environment Company has stepped up and warned in opposition to the usage of cell phones in children due to the fact they have their whole lives in advance of them with exposure to radio frequencies and radiation. John Bucher, the connect director from the National Toxicology Program, testified prior to the Senate’s Health and Human Companies Committee. He said that cellular phone radiation penetrates deeper into a child’s mind due to the configuration of the young, developing skull.

Professor Lennart Hardell is really a Swedish researcher who is at the leading edge of mobile phone radiation and mind cancer threat investigation. He has found an improved risk of brain tumors from 10 or much more years of mobile telephone use. Numerous research of his have been revealed using the following crucial findings:
For just about every one hundred hours of cellular phone use, the danger of mind cancer boosts by 5%. For each and every 12 months of use, the threat of mind cancer boosts by 8%.
Soon after 10 or a lot more many years of digital cellular phone use, there was a 280% elevated threat of brain cancer.
For digital cell phone customers who were youngsters or youthful when they very first started using cellphones, there was a 420% improved risk of brain cancer.
Why is there conflicting proof? Is there special interest concerned and who funded the scientific studies in query? Dr. Hardell’s study is really persuasive and I are likely to trust European studies more than American studies since there’s commonly much less of a money-trail in Europe. There’s quite a bit of funds to become made on cellular phone use and we reside inside a nation exactly where the bottom line means every little thing.

Furthermore, why is it plainly stated inside the fine print of cellular phone manuals to use caution with regards to radio frequencies and warnings about maintaining the phone as far away in the physique as achievable? Radiation decreases as the square of the distance in the phone. The farther the phone is from your physique, the less radiation exposure. A single example could be the Blackberry 8300 which obviously states: “When using any data function with the Blackberry gadget, with or without having a USB cable, keep the gadget a minimum of.98 inches from your physique and it shouldn’t be worn or carried around the physique.” This is apparent enough for me that the cellular phone manufacturers know the potential potential risks of radiation.

Dr. Devra Lee Davis would be the director of the Heart for Environmental Oncology in the College of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute and writer from the e book Disconnect: The facts About Cellular phone Radiation, What the Business Has Completed to Hide it, and The way to Shield Your Loved ones. She has testified just before congress relating to this topic and has published a lot of content articles as well. She suggests the next to cut down your danger:
Place your telephone within the “flight” or “off-line” mode when carrying, storing, or charging it. This stops the electromagnetic emissions.

Stay clear of carrying your mobile phone in your body or storing it close to your body at evening.
Utilize a wired headset (not Bluetooth!) or even the speaker-phone mode to help keep the telephone as much out of your physique as feasible when speaking.

Change sides of the head on a regular basis even though talking.
Use text messaging as an alternative to speaking.
Choose a gadget using the lowest SAR doable. SAR stands for certain absorption price, a evaluate in the strength of electromagnetic fields.

Youngsters need to only use cellular phones close to their heads for emergencies. Texting away in the physique is less hazardous for kids than speaking on the cell phone.

Stay away from making use of the telephone though the signal is weak or when moving at large speeds as in a car or prepare. This raises the power towards the phone because it tries to remain connected.
Till far more research is done that is definitely not funded by the phone industry I will treat this just as if cellular phone radiation is in truth detrimental to my well being. It is superior to become secure than sorry along with the scientific studies that show an increased threat of brain tumors are merely also compelling to ignore. Make use of the uncomplicated steps outlined in this article and decide on a phone using a lower SAR to defend yourself from potential harm.

Dr. Nikolas Hedberg can be a holistic doctor specializing in thyroid problems, hormone imbalances, allergic reactions, chronic tiredness, digestive issues and fibromyalgia. His definitely exceptional and innovative follow is in Asheville, NC where individuals vacation from all more than the globe to seek his services. Dr. Hedberg makes use of state-of-the-art scientific laboratory diagnostic screening to uncover the underlying will cause of disease. He utilizes many different all-natural medicines, diet and life style modifications to right the imbalances located on screening. His aim with every patient is to uncover the underlying result in, correct it without having harmful medicines and train each and every patient ways to keep an optimum state of wellness and well-being.

Togo, Lome
Bhutan, Thimphu
Lithuania, Villinus,
Austria, Vienna,
Portsmouth Virginia USA
Chad, N’Djamena
Los Angeles, California
Hungary, Budapest,
Gold Coast, Queensland
Luxembourg, Luxembourg City

Click on any of the pictures below

to learn more

 

Anti-Radiation Air-tube Headset

EMF Harmonization Products