Environmental Health Trust Reveals Risky Patterns of Cell Phone Use

Cell Phone Radiation, Cell Phone Radiation Protection

http://www.emfnews.org/qlinks.html

Qlink Pendant

Home Radiation Protection

Envi Headsets

Gauss Meter

9 Nov, 2011

Key figures in the arena of cell phone safety spoke today at a California City Council education forum in Berkeley. The impact of cell phones on children was a major theme of the day’s speeches. Devra Davis, PhD, MPH, founder of Environmental Health Trust (EHT), cited several studies, including a recent report that EHT coauthored, on radiofrequency exposure among children. She also highlighted an important new New Zealand study led by Mary Redmayne finding that in-pocket use of cell phones by middle schoolers exposes their reproductive organs’ to prolonged exposure to cell phone radiation. Additionally, she unveiled an important new UK report that calls for interventions to protect children from the long-term health risks of cell phone radiation.

Cell Phones and Children’ Heads
According to the EHT report, children absorb twice as much microwave radiation from cell phones as adults, and radiation from cell phones carried in shirts or pants pockets is four to seven times higher than the guidelines set by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC), which determines exposure guidelines in the United States.

The reason for the discrepancy, EHT says, is that the process to determine radiation exposure from cell phones involves the use of a mannequin model that approximates a 6-foot 2-inch tall, 220-pound man. Because this model head represents only about three percent of the population, the test will not accurately predict the radiation exposure of the other 97 percent, including children, nor does it estimate exposures from pocket use.

“The standard for cell phones has been developed based on old science, old models and old assumptions about how we use cell phones, and that’s why they need to change and protect our children and grandchildren,” said Dr. Davis. http://www.cisionwire.com/the-investor-relations-group/r/environmental-health-trust-reveals-risky-patterns-of-cell-phone-use-by-middle-schoolers,c9184463

Cell Phones and Sperm Damage
Dr. Davis also cited a New Zealand study led by researcher Mary Redmayne of the School of Geography, Environment and Earth Science at Victoria University in Wellington. Redmayne found that a majority of New Zealand adolescents carry a cell phone switched on in their pants pocket for more than six hours a day. Even where schools ban phones, more than two in five middle schoolers regularly sent texts from within a side pocket; a fifth carried one for more than 10 hours a day, and used it in-pocket. Research suggests this may impair future fertility and/or reproductive integrity.

According to the study, 43% of student participants admitted to breaking rules about cell phone use. A high-exposure group of risk-takers was identified for whom prohibited in-school use was positively associated with high texting rates, carrying the phone switched-on for more than 10 hours/day, and using them in-pocket.

The Redmayne team concluded that fertility research in humans finds important time and dose-dependent deleterious effects from cell phone exposure on sperm. Genotoxic effects have been demonstrated from “non-thermal” exposures, but not consistently. According to the study, there is sufficient evidence and expert opinion to warrant an enforced school policy removing cell phones from students during the day and promoting precautionary policies.

In response to the study’s findings, fertility expert, Ken McNatty, PhD, DSc, FRSNZ, a Professor of Cell Biology and Biotechnology at Victoria University of Wellington, NZ said “Doctors need to start asking patients with fertility problems about their cell phone use. It’s long been known that infertility in males or females can be caused by DNA damage to sperm or eggs, through exposure to X-irradiation or industrial chemicals. Now there is evidence to suggest that cell phone microwaves also cause DNA damage to sperm in a time- and dose-dependent manner.”

New Report Calls for More Safety
Dr. Davis also spoke about a new report published today by UK charity MobileWise, warning that children’s health is being jeopardized by the failure of government and phone companies to respond to the growing body of evidence linking cell phone use with health hazards. Dr. Davis and other public health experts working with MobileWise are calling on government and industry to respond to the new evidence, and to provide warnings and advice on ways to reduce the risk of health damage when using cell phones, especially for children.

The new report, “Mobile Phone Health Risks: The Case for Action to Protect Children,” brings together for the first time more than 200 peer-reviewed studies from a range of research institutions linking cell phones to serious health problems. These include brain tumors and potential damage to fertility, genes, the blood-brain barrier and melatonin production, as well as other biological effects thought to have a role in the development of cancer. Endorsed by a number of eminent doctors and scientists, the report highlights the growing and substantial body of evidence that has been obscured in the debate over these risks.

“It is better to be cautious now than it is to be sorry later,” said Dr. Davis. “We have learned this because of previous experience involving substances and products that were used indiscriminately for a long time until the health effects became undeniable. We do not want to see a future generation have to deal with fertility issues that can result from damage to sperm as well as female reproductive health. We want our children and grandchildren to have the right to produce healthy offspring when and if they chose to do so.”

Morocco, Rabat,
Dodoma,
Canada, Ottawa, Ontario,
Kyrgyzstan, Bishkek,
Monaco, Monaco,
Micronesia, Palikir,
Malta, Valletta,
Luxembourg, Luxembourg,
Qatar, Doha,
Chattanooga Tennessee USA

Click on any of the pictures below

to learn more

 

Anti-Radiation Air-tube Headset

EMF Harmonization Products

 

Are Cell Phones Potentially Dangerous?

Cell Phones Radiation, Cell Phone Radiation Protection

http://www.emfnews.org/headset.html

Lifebluetube Headset

Cell Phone Radiation Protection

Mobile Phone Radiation Protection

Trifield Electromagnetic Field Meter

11/10/2011 | by Annabel Tautou

While the debate over the impact of cell phones on human healthwould take its due time to clear the air, here comes another research which has claimed that cell phones could potentially damage human health.
It has been known that even the World Health Organization (WHO) had shared their set of concerns with people about the same, but deep examination of over 200 academic studies has exacerbated the research all in all to a different level. The percolating concern has gone to an extent that Professor Denis Henshaw, of Bristol University, feels that concrete measures should be taken so that the attached health concerns with mobile phone usage could be addressed.

With the usage of mobile phones reaching to new level, there are lingering fears in the mind of experts that this issue could become vulnerable in the time to come. If a 2008 Swedish study is to be believed, it has been claimed that children using mobile phones ate almost at five times the risk of brain tumour called a glioma. http://www.frenchtribune.com/teneur/118109-are-cell-phones-potentially-dangerous

The report titled `Mobile Phone Health Risks: the Case for Action to Protect Children’ was told to be made public by the charity Mobilewise.

The team is of the opinion that government needs to intervene in this issue to ensure that children are not being left at the risk of cancer and other health concerns. A significant need to escalate level of safety measures seems to have become a need of the hour. Though substantial claims have been made, it is being believed that a joint drive needs to be conducted by enrolling various sections of the society, including ‘schools, phone shops and the healthcare system.

There has been another view raised that more or less government is undermining the severity of the issue which has once again brought the attention of medical fraternity at the sole agenda of mobile phone usage.

Austria Vienna
Samoa, Apia,
Latvia, Riga,
Peru, Lima, City,
Paraguay, Asuncion,
Niger, Niamey,
Portugal, Lisbon,
Montenegro, Podgorcia,
Equatorial Guinea, Malabo,
Anchorage Alaska USA

Click on any of the pictures below

to learn more

 

Anti-Radiation Air-tube Headset

EMF Harmonization Products

 

Call For Mobile Phone Health Warnings Despite ‘Inconclusive’ Evidence

Mobile Phone Radiation, Mobile Phone Radiation Protection

http://www.emfnews.org/qlinks.html

Qlink Pendant

Home Radiation Protection

Envi Headsets

Gauss Meter

09 Nov 2011 | By John Bingham

Experts are calling for a campaign of health warnings about mobile phones even though they admit there is no clear evidence that using them is harmful.

A group of doctors and academics is calling for the Government and mobile industry to launch a publicity drive aimed at children and pregnant women.
They have published a report claiming that more than 200 studies now link mobile phone use to conditions such as brain tumours. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/health/healthnews/8878467/Call-for-mobile-phone-health-warnings-despite-inconclusive-evidence.html
Their report, published by the campaign group MobileWise argues that failing to act now could be “dangerous”.
It says that the risks could take decades to prove conclusively but that there is “no justification” for inaction.
Yet critics have warned of the risks of scaremongering over mobile phones without clear evidence of harm.

Successful campaigns against new mobile phone masts, fuelled by media reports of health risks, have left some areas with poor or patchy reception.
Last month George Osborne, the chancellor, announced £150 million to subsidise new mobile infrastructure insisting that a functioning mobile phone and broadband system were now “crucial to Britain’s future”.
But the report, whose authors include Kevin O’Neill, a Consultant Neurosurgeon at Charing Cross Hospital in London, argues that there is now a substantial body of evidence suggesting that mobile phone use could be harmful.
The report argues that some studies suggest a “doubling” of the risk of some brain tumours for those who use their mobile phone for about half an hour a day for 10 years.
It also highlights suggestions of a link between mobile phone use and tumours in the salivary glands.
“The fact that the evidence is not conclusive and that there are gaps in our understanding is not justification for inaction,” the report, Mobile phone health risks: the case for action to protect children, argues.
“Both the Government and phone companies could very easily do far more to alert the public, particularly children, to the emerging risks and safety measures.”
Mr O’Neill said: “Although further research is needed, it makes sense to err on the side of caution in the mean time.
“The long induction period for brain tumours and some of the other possible health effects means that it could take many years to fully understand the risks.
“We know from our experience with smoking and asbestos that waiting for certainty of harm is a dangerous policy.”

Namibia, Windhoek,
Gabon, Libreville,
Hungary, Budapest,
Syria, Damascus,
India, New Delhi,
Zambia Lusaka
Cuba, Havana,
Romania, Bucharest,
Raleigh North Carolina USA
Comoros, Moroni (on Grande Comoro)

Click on any of the pictures below

to learn more

 

Anti-Radiation Air-tube Headset

EMF Harmonization Products

 

Cordless Phones Hazard At Home

Cordless Phones Hazard, Cordless Phones Protection

http://www.emfnews.org/headset.html

Lifebluetube Headset

Cell Phone Radiation Protection

Mobile Phone Radiation Protection

Trifield Electromagnetic Field Meter

November 11, 2011

Last week we talked about the long-term hazard of microwave radiation from prolonged use of cellular phones. But it’s not only mobile phones that we should be concerned about. Another product of modern technology, which no doubt gives us a lot of convenience, can also be a source of radiation that might contribute to the development of brain tumors later on in life. We’re referring to cordless phones that we use a lot of at home.

The Swedish study we cited last week found that both cell phone and cordless phone users had increased risk of brain tumors. Cordless phones emit the same type of wireless microwave radiation as cell phones. while cell phones receive wireless signals transmitted from cell towers and satellites, cordless phones pick up signals emanating from the antenna on the phone’s base station—right in our own homes.
So the phone base should not be placed in seating areas where people would normally stay. These unsuspecting individuals who sit near the phone base are absorbing microwave radiation more than they bargained for. Insidiously, the microwave radiation is penetrating their tissues and cells, disrupting the normal cellular functioning.

Scientists say that it can cause some changes on the DNA; and it penetrates through the delicate blood-brain barrier, which is a mechanism to ward off “invaders” to the brain. But it becomes powerless with increased levels of microwave radiation.
When we use cellular and cordless phones more than we safely could,

just imagine the structures close to it—and that includes the brain, eyes, ears and even the thyroid gland in the neck—bathing harmfully in microwave frequencies. If you have these symptoms—recurring headaches, dizziness, twitching of the eyelids, burning sensation on the face and ears, sleep disturbances, vision problems, neck pain and ringing in the ears—they might be due to excessive cordless or cellular phone usage. well, not in all cases, but it might be a good precautionary measure to avoid using these phones for a while until the symptoms subside. go back to the good old wired landlines, and just send and receive messages by texting with your mobile phones.

The above symptoms are short-term effects and are likely to be only transient, but if sustained, long-term exposure to microwave radiation on and around the head has been linked to more serious consequences like brain tumors. There are less convincing data also linking it to visual problems including blindness, deafness and hair loss.
The association of microwave radiation due to these cordless and cellular phones with brain tumors is relatively stronger, with data suggesting that it could increase the risk three-fold for five years, and four-fold in 10 years. A study by the Karolinska Institute in Sweden showed a remarkably higher risk of acoustic neuroma (a type of brain tumor) from the use of mobile phones over a 10-year period.
If we have to use cordless phones at home, the base unit and remote extra handsets must be kept away from where people sit or sleep. (Although some researchers would even caution that the radiation could penetrate through nonconcrete walls.)

Use cordless phones sparingly. Unless one is bedridden or wheelchair borne, it’s much better to walk and get a little bit of exercise, going to where the corded landline is. (Cordless phones and remote control devices are contributing to increased sedentary life and obesity.)
For mobile phones, we already said the use of a hands-free accessory, keeping the cell phone farther away from the head and neck area, is preferred.
Calls must only be made when the message to be communicated cannot be done by simple SMS.
Avoid availing promo offers for unlimited calls by telephone companies, unless it’s financial expediency far outweighs the risk of being tempted to use the phone much longer than is absolutely necessary.

Manufacturers of cellular and cordless phones should be transparent to their end-users about the real and potentially serious risk of microwave radiation due to these phones. It may need legislation to achieve this, but every cell phone and mobile phone user must be properly informed about mounting scientific data linking these phones with brain tumors and other serious long-term complications.

For sure, any of these phone executives would not like their 15-year olds to talk with their friends for hours on end, as some commercials would suggest, and face the risk of a possible brain surgery or even death 10 years hence because of a brain tumor. Certainly not worth it.

Belize, Belmopan,
Nepal, Kathmandu,
Dominica Roseau
Qatar, Doha,
Moldova, Chisinau,
Austin Texas USA
Chad, N’Djamena,
Costa Rica, San Jose,
Switzerland, Bern,
St. Kitts and Nevis, Basseterre,

Click on any of the pictures below

to learn more

 

Anti-Radiation Air-tube Headset

EMF Harmonization Products

 

Warning – Your Cordless Phone May Subject You To Harmful Levels Of Emfs

Cordless Phone, Cordless Phone Protection

http://www.emfnews.org/headset.html

Lifebluetube Headset

Cell Phone Radiation Protection

Mobile Phone Radiation Protection

Trifield Electromagnetic Field Meter

November 07, 2011 by: Lenette Nakauchi

(NaturalNews) Electromagnetic fields, or EMFs, are areas of energy that form around all electrical appliances and devices. Your body is sensitive to electricity (some if its functions actually rely upon electric current), so it is understandable how you can be affected by the EMFs radiated by cells phones, microwaves, televisions, and other electrical devices. But is there one product that is worse than the others? One everyday item you may use that could be hurting your body? Yes. Research has indicated that cordless phones can be up to one hundred times more dangerous than their mobile counterparts!
http://www.naturalnews.com/034078_cordless_phones_EMFs.html

What Are EMFs?

EMFs are emitted throughout the world, both inside your home and outside of it. From your modern cooking appliances to cell phone towers and power lines, technological devices are present quite literally everywhere you go. It is true that the EMFs created by these items can cause health risks, so interacting with them as little as possible is something that everyone should strive to do.

One of the best ways to reduce your exposure to EMFs is to use items that produce less radiation than others. Consider the latest information about cordless phones: they emit considerably stronger EMFs than mobile phones. Though many people have foregone land lines altogether, if you still have your home phone you should seriously consider switching out your cordless headset for a corded model.

Cordless Phones and Your Health

Why go through the trouble of changing your home phone set? Well, the EMFs that your cordless phone releases can cause a variety of health issues. Some of these include:
* Learning Disorders
* Mood and Behavior Changes
* Nervous System Disorders
* Cancer, including Leukemia, Breast Cancer, and Brain Tumors
* Insomnia
* Headaches

Land lines have long been thought to be safer than mobile phones, and corded phones still are, but cordless land lines have the potential to emit EMFs as strong as six volts per meter. Not only are you in danger of over-exposure to EMFs while you are actively talking on the phone, but cordless phones are also able to release EMFs into your home even when they are simply sitting in the cradle. Regardless if your cordless phone is charging or not, it can unleash dangerous EMFs into your home without even being in use.

What Can You Do to Reduce Exposure?
If you have a cordless phone, think about how you can replace your current device with a corded model to cut down on EMF exposure in your home. Though you will not have the same freedom to walk around as you do with a cordless model, try putting your corded phone in the room where you often sit to talk to make the transition easier. Additionally, keep the phone away from your bed, so that you are not exposed to EMFs as you sleep.

Though you may feel silly being worried about a telephone – one of the most common devices in today’s society – remember that EMF exposure is a very real concern. Replacing your cordless phone can drastically reduce the EMF saturation in your home and allow you to provide a more health-conscious lifestyle for your family.

India, New Delhi,
Uruguay, Montevideo,
Maldives, Male,
China, Beijing,
France, Paris,
Sri Lanka, Colombo,
Vietnam, Hanoi,
Bosnia, Sarajevo,
Czech Republic, Prague,
Hamilton Victoria Australia

Click on any of the pictures below

to learn more

 

Anti-Radiation Air-tube Headset

EMF Harmonization Products

 

Cell Phones and Health Part 2

Cell Phone Radiation, Cell Phone Radiation Protection

http://www.emfnews.org/qlinks.html

Qlink Pendant

Home Radiation Protection

Envi Headsets

Gauss Meter

I don’t endure from radiation through using my individual computer generally because I possess a Dior-Mid best subsequent to my computer. The Dior-Mid could be the world’s most effective safety from electromagnetic fields. The Dior-Mid is identified getting a massive diode (and quite pricey financial-wise).

What is identified getting a diode? A diode is definitely an all-natural elemental bottom of 47 distinctive energy frequencies. It is molded into distinctive types and shapes getting employed for the whole body or positioned on products that emit electromagnetic radiation. The formula is named “diode” generally since the dictionary describes “diode” as: “a product getting a two-element electron tube or semiconductor through which a latest can pass in only one direction.” The organically produced elemental diode’s energy latest moves in one direction, which could be good and offers a good spin of energy. The elemental diode also functions getting a rectifier by keeping the body’s energies in good balance. It also corrects and filters the energies flowing to the individual whole body to deliver amplified harmony and equilibrium toward body’s electrical system.
So if I experienced a cellular phone, I’d attach only a tiny diode to it (on the back), generally because a diode converts radioactive (negative) energy into bionic (positive) energy.

Also, as I am into crystals and crystal treatment and technology, I area the crystal/element “corvette” subsequent to my computer. Corvette is identified getting a dark stone or crystal that neutralizes radiation. I also consume crystallized corvette consuming water which also safeguards my whole body from radiation in general.
And possibly most important, I consume seaweeds (in capsule form, sprinkled on my salad, etc.). Seaweed is exceptional stuff! Seaweeds that consist of Kelp, Dulles, Nora, Alafia, Irish Moss, Spiraling, Bladder wrack, Heike, Sakami, Iceland Moss, red-colored marine algae and blue-green algae reduce strontium 90 radiation by 90% Seaweeds also enhance oxygen flow toward brain, which cellular cell phone use deteriorates. Cellular mobile phones hold out a pivotal part within inundation of mind cancer scenarios in America today.
Plus, I consume a great offer of blueberries (mainly dried organically produced blueberries) and consume a great offer of blueberry juice. Blueberry is exceptional for that eye and common eyesight well being and significantly improves evening vision.

I also consume a great offer inside the herb “gout kola” in tea form. I combination it with numerous other herbal remedies which I phone call “Men-Tal-I-Tea.” Gout kola (followed by Gingko Balboa) could be the quite finest herb for that mind and mind problems. It significantly improves storage and cognitive functioning. I have exceptional storage recall generally because I don’t place unhealthy in my whole body that will destroy my brain. I have invariably been afraid to get rid of my mind, which could be why I certainly not drank booze or beer or smoked or took dope, and today, don’t consume any meat, dairy, refined grains, sugar, salt, and all inside the sleep that man-made crap for the market.

Gout Kola could be the favored foods of elephants within wild. That’s why you typically listen to people say “so and so carries a storage like an elephant.” Goat Kola enhances and improves memory. Now you understand precisely where that saying arrived from and why people say it.

So in closing, I’m not telling anybody to acquire rid of the cellular cell phone (because 99% of cellular cell phone proprietors and people wouldn’t do it anyway). I’m merely saying hold precautionary measures. That’s all!

Estonia, Tallinn,
Maldives Male
Slovakia, Bratislava,
Austria Vienna
Guyana, Georgetown,
Azerbaijan, Baku,
Slovenia, Ljubljana,
New Zealand,
Knoxville Tennessee USA
The Netherlands, Amsterdam

Click on any of the pictures below

to learn more

 

Anti-Radiation Air-tube Headset

EMF Harmonization Products

 

Cell Towers, Cell Phones, Wireless Radiation is Convenient, But Dangerous

Cell Towers, Wireless Radiation

http://www.emfnews.org/headset.html

Lifebluetube Headset

Cell Phone Radiation Protection

Mobile Phone Radiation Protection

Trifield Electromagnetic Field Meter

By jemhas on Nov-7-11

Most people are not consciously aware of the number of cell phone towers that are erected throughout their neighborhood. They are aware though that their cell phones work when they want them to, and while this type of wireless radiation exposure is convenient it is also dangerous. Small amounts of wireless radiation come from cell towers, and also from cell phones and other appliances used throughout the home and at work. All of these exposures to wireless radiation and electromagnetic fields can have a significant impact on the health of every family member.
Electromagnetic fields of radiation are prevalent throughout our daily lives, and the convenience offered by these electromagnetic radiation fields and wireless signals could pose a significant risk of tumors forming one day, especially in the inner eardrum canal that is remarkably close to the brain. Mini microwaves of radiation are emitted from cell phone towers and masts throughout the day because they are attached to buildings that we frequent each day. People are unconsciously exposed to wireless radiation when they are at home and when they go shopping. This micro exposure to radiation is prevalent at coffee shops and restaurants, and even when people go shopping at malls or mass merchandising stores. Some people experience painful side effects from continued exposure to electromagnetic radiation and find that they are limited in the number of areas that they can visit each day. Additional exposure to wireless radiation occurs when people use convenient devices such as cell phones.

These wireless devices can be taken anywhere, and pose greater dangers when they are used in the car because this use exposes all members of the family to wireless radiation exposure. Coupling that exposure to the other radiation hazards family members are exposed to each day, and that is a significant opportunity for various health concerns to form. Cell phone headsets provide a convenient method for people to talk on a cell phone while they are driving.

These convenience items are also the cause for direct exposure of electromagnetic radiation to the eardrum and wireless radiation exposure is emitted through the wireless headset continually throughout cell phone use. Airtube headsets are constructed with a blue tubing that changes electric transmissions of wireless radiation found in cell phones to sound waves, thereby reducing the exposure to electromagnetic fields of radiation by 98 percent. To achieve this percentage of protection, all cell phone users have to do is plug in the airtube headset.

The airtube headset is convenient to use, and provides cell phone users with a way to protect their body from exposure to wireless radiation An airtube headset will allow people to move cell phones away from the body while talking, which reduces the amount of wireless radiation that the body is exposed to. While wireless headsets are convenient to use while driving, they also attract wireless radiation to them. Wireless radiation exposure through wireless headsets can cause an acoustic neuroma to grow, which is a tumor of the inner eardrum. When airtube headsets are used, that amount of radiation exposure to the inner eardrum area is significantly reduced to 50 percent. Wireless devices are convenient, but as studies have shown, they are also dangerous.

Palestinian State,
Poland, Warsaw,
Nigeria, Abuja,
Austria, Vienna,
Finland, Helsinki,
Visalia California USA
Spain, Madrid,
Italy Rome
Zimbabwe, Hararesssss,
Kiribati, South Tarawa

Click on any of the pictures below

to learn more

 

Anti-Radiation Air-tube Headset

EMF Harmonization Products

 

Killer Cell Phones: Why Honeybees Are Dying Worldwide Part 2

Mobile Phone Radiation, Cell Phone Protection

http://www.emfnews.org/qlinks.html

Qlink Pendant

Home Radiation Protection

Envi Headsets

Gauss Meter

The modern handheld cell phone is a staple of globalized twenty-first century life—and it’s not hard to understand why. It’s a technological wonder, a marvel of electronic miniaturization and digital engineering, and a powerful tool of communication and entertainment whose convenience can’t be beat. With a typical cell phone we can not only send and receive calls but also text messages and emails; we can take pictures, make audio recordings, store textual information, listen to music, access the Internet (and all that that entails), watch videos, read e-books, play games—the capabilities are endless. Cell phones allow us to stay connected like nothing else. Who ever thought this nifty little multi-purpose gadget would pose a threat to the environment?

It’s unfortunate, but true: Within just the last ten years, the increasingly widespread and heavy global use of cell phones has placed the world’s honeybee population at risk. We are literally buzzing the bees out of existence. Meanwhile, the global pace of construction of new cell phone towers continues unabated, and worldwide cell phone transmissions continue increasing by the day, filling the Earth’s atmosphere with more and more artificial radio waves. If this trend continues into the next few years, we can expect further drastic reductions in the global honeybee population.

What would happen if honeybees became extinct? We would lose a lot more than just good-tasting natural honey. Honeybees play a critical role in the world’s food chain: they pollinate 75 percent of all the crops consumed by humans, many of which are also consumed by animals. Thus the extinction of honeybees would precipitate a global food crisis of almost unthinkable proportions. I don’t think any of us want to see that happen! Human survival is dependent on the survival of honeybees.

Given the enormity of the stakes involved, it is imperative that we take decisive measures soon to protect the endangered honeybees. This is not like trying to save the Pyrenean Ibex, the Golden Toad, the Javan Tiger, or the Alaotra Grebe (a bird of Madagascar that was officially declared extinct last year). All of these animal species have become extinct since the conservation movement began, but due to their isolated habitats and limited distribution, their extinction had little if any impact on the overall global food chain. The extinction of the honeybee would be an entirely different matter. Because of its worldwide distribution and the key role this little insect plays in crop growth, its demise would be catastrophic for a large percentage of life on earth.

So what can we do to save the honeybees? Here are a few ideas:
1) Spread the word. Tell everyone you know about what you’ve learned in this article. The more people who know about it, the better.
2) Use your cell phone less. Keep it turned off most of the time if you can. Note that you don’t have to make a call to send destructive radiation through the air—just turning the unit on will do that.
3) Buy land phones, which don’t emit harmful radio waves, for your home and office, and use your cell phone for calls only when away from those places. A cordless land phone offers the best of both worlds—it allows more mobility than a traditional corded land telephone but emits less harmful radiation than a cell phone.
4) At the local level, cities, counties and states could pass ordinances and laws preventing the construction of additional cell phone towers in certain areas (as long as this does not conflict with federal law).
5) Since honeybees continue to flourish in areas without cell phone service, it would make common sense for the governments of individual countries (especially in the United States and Europe) to review their existing communications policies and enact stricter nationwide regulations for cell phone transmissions.
6) Since more than 9 in 10 Americans now own cell phones (See “List of countries by number of cell phones in use,” http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_number_of_mobile_phones_in_use), a permanent nationwide moratorium on the construction of new cell phone towers should be seriously considered.

7) Our federal government could build on the model of the National Radio Quiet Zone, a 13,000-square-mile area straddling the Virginia-West Virginia border that was set aside in 1958 to protect the National Radio Astronomy Observatory from unwanted manmade radio interference. Within this zone, artificial radio transmissions, including cell phone services, are limited but not entirely eliminated. Similar protected zones could be established in America’s sprawling, thinly-populated agricultural regions (such as in the middle states and parts of California) where cell phone services are less in demand and where honeybees are especially needed to pollinate the crops that feed much of the world.

Such efforts to curtail cell phone transmissions, for the good of honeybees and for our own good, will likely be met with powerful opposition from the big cell phone companies like AT&T and Verizon. These huge businesses make a killing on cell phones, netting hundreds of billions of dollars annually, so their multibillionaire kings will not take kindly the least threat to the continued expansion of their global empire. They don’t really care what happens to the bees (or to us) as long as they can keep their annual profits swelling.

Thus they’ll conveniently deny any connection between cell phone use and declining bee rates (just as they denied that there was any connection between cell phone use and brain cancer). But such opposition shouldn’t discourage us—because denying an inconvenient truth doesn’t make it go away.

Paterson New Jersey USA
Kuwait, Kuwait City
Lafayette, Louisiana
Morocco, Rabat
Subiaco, Victoria
Estonia, Tallin,
Macedonia, Skjope
Launceston, Tasmania
Traralgon, Victoria
Geraldton Victoria Australia

Click on any of the pictures below

to learn more

 

Anti-Radiation Air-tube Headset

EMF Harmonization Products

 

Killer Cell Phones: Why Honeybees Are Dying Worldwide Part 1

Cell Phone Radiation, Cell Phone Radiation Protection

http://www.emfnews.org/headset.html

Lifebluetube Headset

Cell Phone Radiation Protection

Mobile Phone Radiation Protection

Trifield Electromagnetic Field Meter

FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 4, 2011

Have you heard the news? In just the last ten years or so, the world’s honeybee population has taken a huge dive—and nobody seems to know why. I found this out myself recently by reading an article called “Bees Feel the Sting: The buzz on the worldwide decline in honeybee populations,” which appeared as the lead story in the September/October 2011 issue of Science Illustrated. According to this article, a group of French biologists is attaching tiny microchips to honeybees to track their daily behavior patterns in an effort to learn what’s killing them. Suspected causes of the unprecedented global honeybee dieoff include pests, predators, disease, pesticide sprays, climate change, and mobile phones. One single factor can be enough to do the bees in, as researcher Cedric Alaux of the Laboratoire Biologie et Protection de l’abeille admitted to Science Illustrated: “We cannot rule out that there is one single factor behind it all that influences the bees in a negative way.”

To identify that factor, the key question we should ask is: What on earth has changed so drastically in the last ten years that would cause billions of honeybees to perish? There has been no drastic change in nature or the global environment that can adequately explain this occurrence. Honeybee pests and predators have been around for centuries, and although their numbers have fluctuated, their populations have not exploded recently as far as I know. Diseases have similarly come and gone. Our climate has been changing recently, but not so drastically or in such a short time period as to explain the mass disappearance of a single insect species. http://justins-corner.blogspot.com/2011/11/killer-cell-phones-why-honeybees-are.html
Thus we can reasonably rule out any natural causes for the world’s honeybee population plunge, and it makes sense to look for the culprit among possible artificial (i.e. manmade) causes. Although pesticide sprays have been in use for decades, their worldwide use has not increased dramatically in recent years; if anything, it has declined as the popularity of organic farming continues to grow.

The only other suspected manmade cause of the honeybees’ death is mobile phones (i.e. cell phones)—or, more precisely, the radio waves emitted by cell phones. Here we’re on to something, because in the last ten years the world’s use of cell phones has exploded dramatically, and an ever-growing global network of cell phone transmitter towers established to meet this demand now continuously fills much of the Earth’s air with a thick invisible web of electromagnetic radiation. Moreover, the negative effects of this artificial radiation on living organisms are already well known and documented by scientists. (Take, for example, the well-established link between increased cell phone use and increased rates of human brain cancer.) Furthermore, the steepest declines in honeybee populations have been observed in the United States and Europe—where cell phone use is greater than anywhere else in the world.
Nothing matches the worldwide decline in honeybee population like the worldwide increase in cell phone transmissions during the same time frame. Thus, it is reasonable to draw a link between the two and theorize that the former is the main cause of the latter.

But, some might say, the basis for this supposed theory is rather circumstantial. Is there any real, convincing evidence for it? Yes, there is. In a study conducted last year, researchers at Panjab University in Chandigarh, India fitted cell phones to a beehive and activated them twice a day for 15 minutes each. Within three months, honey production had ceased, the queen laid half as many eggs, and the hive population had fallen significantly. (See “Study links bee decline to cell phones,” at http://articles.cnn.com/2010-06-30/world/bee.decline.mobile.phones_1_bee-populations-cell-phone-radiation-ofcom?_s=PM:WORLD)
But the effect of cell phone towers on bees is even more drastic than that of individual phones. Barbara Hughes, a columnist for the Catholic Virginian who has been visiting the Franciscan monastery at Mission San Luis Rey in California, recently visited a Benedictine abbey near the mission. She related the following in the August 22, 2011 edition of the paper:
One of the monks, who has been a bee keeper at the Abbey for 40 years, explained how until numerous cell phone towers were constructed on the back of their property, he had been collecting 100 gallons of honey a week.

But as the use of cell phones expanded, all of his bees died within a few weeks until he discovered a small area near the base of the hill where he could not get cell phone service. Once he moved his hives to that particular area, the bees once again began to thrive and reproduce.

This anecdote is a graphic example of the danger that cell phone radiation poses to honeybees. According to researchers such as Milt Bowling, the radiation is interfering with the bees’ built-in navigational systems, disorienting them and preventing them from finding their way back to their hives. (See “Where Are the Birds and Bees?,” at http://www.newmediaexplorer.org/sepp/Milt_Bees_Birds.pdf)
The typical cell phone transmitter tower is a veritable beehive of electromagnetic activity. At any given moment it can be sending and receiving the radio transmissions of 10 to 25 different phone calls. A whole row of cell phone towers can process thousands of calls simultaneously. Try to imagine what all the radio waves from all the towers just in your local area would look like, filling the air all around you. If we had the capability to see radio waves, we would be blown away. Thus cell phone towers pose a much more serious threat to living organisms than individual cell phones because they emit much more concentrated doses of radiation. When we consider that the radiation of a single cell phone can cause brain cancer in a human being at an early age, it’s not difficult to imagine the deadly effect that thousands of times that radiation would have on a much smaller living creature.

In fact, the gradual, slight decline in world honeybee populations observed over the course of the twentieth century (which preceded the current precipitous decline) was probably due to the gradual establishment of radio stations and transmitters all over the world. Moreover, it is possible that radio waves crisscrossing our atmosphere from Earth-orbiting communications satellites as well as from more recently developed GPS satellites, satellite radio systems, and especially wireless Internet systems, all play minor contributing roles in the current honeybee population crisis. The lesson to be learned from this is that radio waves kill bees—and the world’s more than five billion cell phones combined generate more artificial radio emissions by far than all other currently operating high-tech inventions on Earth put together. (See “List of countries by number of cell phones in use,” http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_number_of_mobile_phones_in_use)

Ukraine, Kiev,
Slovenia, Ljubljana,
Swaziland, Mbabane,
Sudan, Khartoum,
Malawi, Lilongwe,
Hungary, Budapest,
Bolivia, Sucre,
Bhutan, Thimphu,
Angola, Luanda,
Scottsdale Arizona USA

Click on any of the pictures below

to learn more

 

Anti-Radiation Air-tube Headset

EMF Harmonization Products

 

Is Your Cell Phone Safe – Believe It Or Not They Are A Security Risk

Cell Phone Radiation, Cell Phone Safe

http://www.emfnews.org/qlinks.html

Qlink Pendant

Home Radiation Protection

Envi Headsets

Gauss Meter

By Adam O’Connor

Are you sure? Believe it or not, cell phones are a security risk. Not that you can possibly live without talking to your friends and playing Tetris while listening to MP3s. But yes, cell phones are a risk. Consider 5 worst case scenarios and better yet, the alternative to panicking over the situation.

1. Stolen Sidekick

So your cell phone has been stolen! Or lost, more likely. Most people simply take lost cell phones they find rather than pickpocketing them. If you have a special model, such as a Palm Treo, Razr Killer or T-Mobile Sidekick then obviously unscrupulous individuals will want to take your phone and listen to their own MP3s. The first step is to call your provider and let them know the phone has been lost. Ask them to disable any outgoing calls. Also ask about a replacement phone. Some service providers offer a replacement phone depending on the selected service plans. (Be sure that, if you have replacement phone coverage, that they are replacing your phone with a brand new one, not a refurbished one.)

2. Cell Phones In School

Misbehaving in school is a national pastime. Naturally children or teenagers with cell phones are bound to abuse their privileges sooner or later. One risk is that they get caught playing during the assignment and their luxury Sony/Ericsson or Motorola phone gets confiscated. There are also concerns for cell phone theft and robbery on school grounds. Many cell phones come with security devices or protective accessories to help people of ages keep their phones functioning and prevent loss or damage.

3. Cell Phones and Driving

Did you know that some politicians want to ban cell phone use while driving? While it’s debatable if this should take place, it is true that talking on a cell phone will hinder your ability to drive. Face it, checking your email and browsing the web on an LG Fusic or Nokia N91 can be an involved task and one second later, you could be in a car accident. For your own protection, be very careful when speaking on a cell phone in traffic, use a hands-free set, and try to limit the time as much as possible. Better yet, stop the car, then make your calls.
4. Diseased Cell Phones For Sale

Some people claim that cell phones could contribute to bad health. Some scientists even speculate that rare types of cancerous tumors could develop from heavy cellular use. However, no conclusive evidence has ever been produced that links ill health effects with cellular phones. If sure evidence of mutation or disease comes to light, surely cell phones would be done away with, much the same way American has turned its back on tobacco products.

5. Cell Phones Without Plans

Worst case scenario! A cell phone that doesn’t work for you! Don’t panic. There are several big wireless providers from Verizon to Motorola Razr and they are generously willing to accept your money. Seriously, whether you want low monthly payments with just emergency chat time, or anytime anywhere minutes at a set monthly price, there’s a plan for you. If there are cell phones for soldiers stationed halfway across the globe, then there’s a plan for you. Most service providers feature cell phone reviews on their website detailing plans as well as phone features.

Don’t panic! There’s a solution to your worries so as long as you have your Smart Phone around. Between you and the super electronic device you hold, you’re bound to figure it all out.

Greece Athens
Senegal, Dakar,
Djibouti, Djibouti,
Croatia, Zagreb,
Kenya, Nairobi,
Costa Mesa, California
Dominica, Roseau,
Warrnambool, Victoria
Brownsville Texas USA
Rockhampton Queensland Australia

Click on any of the pictures below

to learn more

 

Anti-Radiation Air-tube Headset

EMF Harmonization Products