Electromagnetic Simulation of Microwave for Early Detection of Breast Cancer

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GrJsmUwIEkQ[/youtube]

http://www.emfnews.org/qlinks.html

Qlink Pendant

Electromagnetic Simulation

Envi Headsets

EM field meter

Nov. 28, 2011

[Abstract]
Breast cancer is one of the most common diseases among women, which will not only harm the health of women, but also hinder the development of social. Therefore, it has great significance to study and develop the related technology in theoretical and practical. Near-field microwave probe of the disease has getting great attention in medical imaging profession all over the world. Under the influence of microwave, normal breast tissue has much different with malignant tumors in the field of dielectric constant and conductivity. This feature is the physical basis of the detection of breast cancer tumors in the Near-field microwave.

The main contents of this paper are the following:
(1) Research on the technology of UWB (Ultra Wideband) and analyze the microwave imaging system.
(2) This paper used the three-dimensional electromagnetic simulation software CST MICROWAVE STUDIO (referred to as the CST MWS, Chinese name ” CST Microwave Studio “) to structure modeling of breast tissue, through research on the electromagnetic properties of the breast tissue under different conditions, and the results show that it is feasible in theory to use the UWB microwave technology based on near field imaging method to detect early-stage breast cancer tumors. http://www.rescancer.com/pancreatic-cancer/9811.html

(3) Considering the actual situation of early breast cancer detection, this paper not only introduces several microwave testing imaging technology, but also discusses the finite element confocal imaging algorithm and presented the algorithm process; we discussed some existing problems of the microwave testing, and puts forward some solutions.The technology of UWB near-field microwave can provide mm-level and high resolution precision targeting to the detection of breast cancer, and provide a method of more safely and accurate to detect breast cancer patients at early stage, which is a detection technology with many advantages.

Bulgaria, Sofia,
Italy, Rome,
Afghanistan Kabul
Ecuador, Quito,
Nigeria, Abuja,
Namibia, Windhoek
Fayetteville, North Carolina
Bahamas, Nassau,
Chile, Santiago,
Wichita Falls Texas USA

Click on any of the pictures below

to learn more

 

Anti-Radiation Air-tube Headset

EMF Harmonization Products

 

How Cordless Phones, Wi-Fi And Other Forms Of High-Frequency Electromagnetic Radiation Cause Cancer

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TBEvJUSw8m8[/youtube]

http://www.emfnews.org/headset.html

Lifebluetube Headset

Cell Phone Radiation Protection

Electromagnetic Radiation

November 29, 2011 by: Connie Strasheim

(NaturalNews) Many people are aware that prolonged cell phone use has been associated with brain cancer, but most don’t realize how other sources of high-frequency electromagnetic radiation (EMR) also radically increase cancer risk.

Until recently, EMR has been given scant attention. It’s a toxin that can’t be seen or often felt; flawed telecommunication industry-sponsored studies have revealed that current EMR exposure levels are safe, so it has been mostly ignored in medicine. Furthermore, the US government, which receives massive tax revenue from telecom industries, has established faulty guidelines for EMR exposure. It has deemed safe levels to be thousands of times higher than what disinterested scientists have proven as safe. Indeed, studies from such scientists reveal that current amounts of EMR from telecom towers and antennas radically alter the body’s cellular communications’ processes, leading to cancer and other diseases. These scientists believe that the dramatic increase in cancer in recent years has been due in part to the growing prevalence of EMR in our environment. And the amount of radiation that we are exposed to doubles yearly. http://www.naturalnews.com/034268_cordless_phones_electromagnetic_radiation.html

New telecom towers are constructed every day. Average city-dwellers have anywhere between 30-100 microwave towers/antennas within a four-mile radius of their home. All of these towers emit high-frequency electromagnetic fields that have been linked to cancer development. For example, one Germany study reported that living within 1300 feet of two microwave towers over ten years triples cancer risk. Other studies in Australia, UK and Italy revealed significant increases in leukemia among people who live near such towers. Many other similar findings have been reported.

EMR outside the home isn’t the only type of high-frequency radiation we are exposed to. Wi-Fi routers, baby monitors, and cordless phones emit high-frequency radiation that has also been linked to cancer. When in use, cordless phones emit an amount of radiation similar to that of a cell phone. (One study revealed that thirty minutes of daily cell phone use, over ten years, increases the risk of brain cancer by 140%). Wi-Fi routers are similarly dangerous. G. Blackwell, PhD, Chartered Engineer and advisor to WiredChild, states, “Having a digital wireless device in your home, office, or school is like having a mini-base station (cell tower) indoors with you.” And with Wi-Max (Worldwide Interoperability for Microwave Access) now being implemented across the globe, entire regions will be blanketed in cancer-causing high-frequency electromagnetic radiation.

How to Avoid Dangerous EMR
While avoiding all EMR is impossible, the risk for radiation exposure can be decreased by taking the following measures:

1) Eliminating Wi-Fi in the home and using instead a hard-wired broadband connection.

2) Replacing cordless phones (which give off dangerous levels of radiation even when not in use, because their base is constantly looking for a signal), with a hard-wired phone.

3) Reducing/eliminating cell phone use. Using the speaker phone option on the phone slightly reduces EMR exposure. Blue tooth devices and headsets do not protect the brain from EMR, contrary to popular belief.

4) Draping a Faraday cage over the bed. This is a silver-lined mosquito net that filters out 99% of high-frequency EMR.

5) Considering purchasing scientifically-proven EMR protective devices for the home and body, such as EMR-protective clothing for the body and shielding paint for the home.

Doing these things can significantly reduce cancer risk from sources of high-frequency electromagnetic radiation.

Gambia Banjul
Midland, Texas
Hialeah Florida USA
Omaha, Nebraska
Reno, Nevada
Latvia, Riga
Concord, California
St. Louis, Missouri
Savannah, Georgia
Al Qir, United Arab Emirates, Al Qir, UAE

Click on any of the pictures below

to learn more

 

Anti-Radiation Air-tube Headset

EMF Harmonization Products

 

7 Ways Your Cellphone Is Screwing With Your Body and Mind

Cell Phone Radiation, Cell Phone Radiation Protection

http://www.emfnews.org/headset.html

Lifebluetube Headset

Cell Phone Radiation Protection

Trifield Electromagnetic Field Meter

By:Andrew Martin November 22, 2011

There’s been a lot of hubbub in the news recently about the potential risks of cellular phones. Do they cause cancer? How much cancer are they going to cause? Will the cancer roll over from month to month?
Well, the cancer thing seems to have been overblown, but apparently the jury is still out on a whole host of much weirder effects your phone could (could) be having on you right now. For instance …

#7. It Might Be Killing Your Sperm
All cellphones, if you haven’t heard, emit electromagnetic radiation. The study of what this radiation does to the body is relatively new. So for instance, for a while people thought maybe holding a phone up to your head all day caused brain tumors, and that wasn’t dispelled until very recently, when somebody finally did a huge study that found that they don’t.
So when you see all of these headlines on the Internet about the negative health effects of cellphones, what we have are smaller studies that indicate some kind of weird effect (i.e., a phone can fry a man’s balls), and we’re all waiting for somebody to fund a larger, longer-term study to find out for sure (if cellphones are frying men’s balls). http://www.cracked.com/article_19538_7-ways-your-cellphone-screwing-with-your-body-mind.html
Which brings us to a couple of studies that indicate cellphones might be frying men’s balls.

It started a few years ago when researchers at the Cleveland Clinic found that men who used cellphones a lot (more than four hours a day) consistently had lower sperm quality. OK, that could be something other than the phones themselves — maybe low-sperm guys just like phones, where more virile dudes like to conduct all of their meetings face to face because there is a better chance of spontaneous sex.

So, they tested it. They gathered sperm from a few dozen men and, while keeping it all at the same temperature/conditions, put half of it in front of a cellphone and left the other half alone. On average, the doctors found an 85 percent increase in the amount of free radicals in the phone semen (if you don’t remember what free radicals are from chemistry class, just know that sperm don’t like them).
We know what you’re thinking: “I don’t put my phone up to my crotch except for when I’m having phone sex! Because I don’t know how phone sex works!” But the problem is headsets — when you are using a headset or earpiece, you tend to leave the phone in your pocket, or in your lap. If you’re a dude, that’s next to your nuts.

Again, that’s just one study, and they admit the conditions in the lab didn’t perfectly imitate those you find inside a human ball sack. Further study is needed, so they’re probably looking for irradiated scrotum subjects if you know anyone who wants to volunteer. Maybe you’ll turn into some kind of testicle-themed superhero!
#6. It Could Be Ruining Your Children
A huge study has shown that women who regularly expose their children to cellphone emissions, both while pregnant and after birth, are 50 percent more likely to have children with behavioral problems. And we’re talking about numbers that held up across a study of almost 100,000 mothers and nearly 30,000 children. That’s a hell of a lot to write off to coincidence.

Now, our readers are smart people, and we realize 80 percent of you have already asked your computer, “Could it be that phone users have bad kids because these horrible mothers are on their phones all the time instead of raising their goddamned children?” But their experiments tried to control for that; it didn’t matter how much or how little time the mother spent giving direct attention to the kid, or whether or not they were breast fed, or anything else. The only difference was phone usage.

The theory goes that cellphone emissions are causing an excess of melatonin (a hormone that regulates several bodily functions) in the mother. This can affect the mother’s metabolism and doodle with the development of the fetus’s brain.

Meanwhile, there are still scientists insisting that cellphone radiation can disrupt DNA strands, even though conventional wisdom has always been that microwave radiation can’t do that. They say they can show the results in mice and rabbits and that, you guessed it, further study is needed.
#5. Your Cellphone Is Destroying Your Senses
So as we alluded to, the problem is that science is trying to understand the long-term effects of a technology that hasn’t been around long term. The “every human has a phone pressed to their skull for six hours a day” era only started recently. There could be all sorts of effects that simply take longer to show up — maybe using a cellphone every day for 40 years gives you telekinesis. How would we know, until we finally had a large enough population that has been using them that long?

So it’s hard to immediately dismiss it when, for instance, somebody says your phone might be very slowly cooking your eyeballs.
Several years ago, a team in Israel did a study exposing cow eyes to the kind of heat and radiation given off by phones (cow eyes are similar to human eyes). They found that if you do it long enough, tiny bubbles start to form in the lens of the eye — a precursor to cataracts.

Then a year ago, researchers in India said the same thing, pointing out that the problem isn’t just that the radiation heats up your eyeball, but that your eye doesn’t have a good way to dissipate the heat into the rest of your body, since it’s kind of a self-contained orb up there. You’ve seen how easy it is to just pluck them out in horror movies.
Not that your hearing is getting off any easier; another study found that using your phone for 60 minutes a day over the course of four years can lead to inner ear damage, which leads to high-frequency hearing loss. What does that look like? It looks like not being able to make out consonant sounds like S, F, T and Z. The vowels are still understood, but unless you plan on taking up permanent residence in Hawaii, you’re going to need those consonants to communicate.

What would cause that? They’re not sure; the researchers who did that study guessed that maybe the radiation affects the inner ear somehow, while an audiologist says listening to anything that long can damage your hearing. You don’t think of a phone conversation as loud, but cramming a little speaker against your ear is harder on your hearing than having the same conversation in person. You know, the same reason ear doctors have been warning us about our iPod ear buds since the things were invented.

#4. Your Phone Is Encrusted With Germs
We have previously pointed out how everyday objects around your house become germ sponges, especially anything that comes in constant contact with your hands (let’s put it this way — you should take a break after you read this and wipe down your keyboard). And one of the germiest parts of your body is your mouth — this is why you freak out when a homeless man licks your face.

Now think about your phone. In addition to spending hours getting covered in your breath and tiny flecks of spit, ask yourself where your hand was before you answered it. Picking something from your teeth? Or nose? Handling some raw chicken? In other words, your phone is getting bombarded with germs every time it’s used. So, knowing that … how often do you disinfect your phone? Have you ever?

We don’t have to speculate about how filthy it is; let’s let Andy Felton, director of a microbial sterilization systems company in England, explain the research to you: “Based on these findings, holding your phone to your mouth is as dangerous as placing your face on a toilet bowl.”
And if you think that all you’re doing is giving your own germs back to yourself, think about the next time you see a doctor. Hospitals and clinics are sterile environments, right? There are cleaning stations everywhere, people put on gloves before handling sick patients. It’s just too bad that doctors are wiping their asses with their cellphones. Or, to put it more scientifically:
“A new study checked out the mobile phones of 200 doctors and nurses, and found that 95 percent of them were contaminated with bacteria, while 1 in 8 had the MRSA staph bug.”
The doctors, like you, don’t regard their phones as being filth magnets. They touch their phones, then they touch your junk. All of those safety measures and precautions are flung out the door when doctors smear their hands and faces with bacteria that includes superbugs like MRSA, which are resistant to one or more commonly used antibiotics.

Only 10 percent of the health care professionals involved in the study actually admitted to cleaning their phone on a routine basis, which really makes you wonder what the other 90 percent of them were doing during the lecture on germs in medical school.

Dr. Charles Gerba, a microbiologist at the University of Arizona, has come to the same funktastic conclusion. “We have found [the superbug] MRSA on several cellphones,” he said. “So we certainly find a lot of stuff on them — particularly the flip kind, since they have surfaces that do not dry out.” So not only are flip phone owning doctors behind on the technological curve, they’re also rubbing their face bacteria all over you.

#3. Texting Has Hacked Our Subconscious
This one is so bizarre that we had difficulty believing it. Then again …
Pretty much everyone under 30 is living in the text generation. At this point the average teenager sends more than a 100 damned texts a day. Last year, an astounding 6.1 trillion text messages were sent worldwide. Yes, we said trillion, with a “T.” Now think about the sheer repetition of the thumb motions a person makes while texting on a number pad phone — the average 16-year-old can probably send a text in her sleep.
So a study in Germany has found that dialing certain numbers into your phone triggers a subconscious reaction based on the word you would be spelling out if you were texting. A reaction strong enough to, as weird as this sounds, actually affect your mood.
In the experiment, the test subjects were given cellphones with the letters covered up, so that only the numbers were visible. They were then told to type in certain sequences of numbers and rate how pleasurable they found that typing experience.

And bizarrely, their emotional responses coincided with the word they would have been texting every time. Without seeing the letters themselves, people who typed in 5683 (which translates to the German word for “love” in text speak) rated that experience more pleasurable than typing in 26478 (which translates to “fear”). And the interesting part was that they didn’t have to dial the number multiple times for the concept to take hold.
To make sure it wasn’t just some weird coincidence, they tried it from another angle. They found the test subjects were able to accurately pick words off a computer screen that were subconsciously suggested by the numbers they just dialed. So, let’s say they were asked to dial 9834, and the corresponding German letters spell “zeitgeist.”
“Zeitgeist” would be the word the subjects picked off the board.
This obviously only applies to people who still use number pads for texting (or grew up doing it) and, as we said, it seems too weird to be real. But then you realize how many thousands and thousands of times a heavy texter hits the 2 key when they want to type “B” and how the two characters become permanently linked in their minds. So if it seems like the guy you just met dislikes you for no reason, take a moment to make sure your phone number doesn’t accidentally spell out “douche.”

#2. It’s Distracting You More Than You Think
Anybody who has nearly died at the hands of a driver talking on their cellphone (that is, all of you) knows that talking on the phone can make a person a little oblivious to their surroundings. But experiments show it’s worse than you think.

In one study, researchers at Western Washington University set out to prove just how drastic and ridiculous this effect could be. They arranged for a clown to unicycle up and down one of the streets on a busy college campus, all day, juggling and doing other clown-related activities.

Surveyors then asked pedestrians on the street if they had noticed anything unusual that day. About half noticed the clown. No matter what they were doing in terms of distraction — walking and talking with friends, or listening to their iPod, or just walking alone — it was about the same rate for all of them.
All but the cellphone users. Only 25 percent of the students talking on cellphones had noticed the clown at all.
Again, they weren’t asked to remember what color the clown’s wig was, or if he was wearing pants. Three in four didn’t register that he was there at all, as if having the phone pressed to their ear somehow rendered them blind.

Not only did the researchers find that talking on cellphones magically turned circus performers invisible, they also noticed the cell users had trouble walking in a manner acceptable for sentient beings. People talking on their phones moved more slowly, were more reckless with the traffic hurtling past them and were more prone to weaving and abrupt direction changes. Really, it’s amazing none of them ran into the clown.
Millions of years of evolution has shaped us into efficient walkers, yet two decades of talking on cellphones has turned us into aimless, bumbling idiots. Well, watch your backs, chatty pedestrians. Evolution sort of has a way of correcting these things.

#1. Your Cellphone Is Breaking Up Your Family
Thanks to cellphones, husbands and wives and boyfriends and girlfriends are never truly apart. At the office? At the store? Hanging out with the guys or girls? Your significant other is never more than 11 digits away. You would think that this constant, instant communication would strengthen relationships. You’d be wrong.
Recent studies show that the problem is mood spillover between your work and home life. Your cellphone ends up as a sort of rage transporter, allowing for the instant ruination of your loved one’s day.

Those different parts of our lives used to be more contained. Work was work and home was home. When the mister had a bad day, he came home, got his whiskey and coke and locked himself in the den. The day was over, the last thing he wanted to do was dwell on it. And when the family went on vacation, they were truly on vacation — there weren’t no damned phones on the beach in 1975. But now? Look around the restaurant the next time you’re eating. How many people are checking their email? That is, assuming you’re not one of them.

Sure, it might not be required that you reply to the boss’s emailed question instead of having sex with your partner. But if you don’t do it, you’ll be distracted the whole time. Before you know it, you’re carrying around the office in your pocket, everywhere you go. So now, when there is a disaster at work, that disaster shows up right there at your son’s birthday party at Chuck E. Cheese’s.

The survey showed that for women, the news was double bad. Not only were they inclined to use the cellphone to transfer work problems to home, but also the phone was the method of bringing home problems into the office. Problems with school or the baby sitter don’t wait for her to come home, they show up right there at her desk, distracting her for the rest of the day. And if you’ve ever worked with someone struggling with personal problems from a cubicle, you know it’s not pretty.

Not that we’d ever considering going back. In a survey, 20 percent said that losing their cellphone would be equally if not more stressful than breaking up with their partner. Another part of the survey showed that 40 percent of iPhone owners would forgo spending time with their significant other as long as they could keep their iPhone.
And a staggering 33 percent of people would rather give up sex than give up their cellphone.
Yeah, let that sink in. All these health problems the phones may or may not cause? They better find a way to fix it, because we’re damned well not going to give up our phones.

Peru, Lima, City,
Saudi Arabia, Riyadh,
Somalia, Mogadishu,
Cambodia, Phnom Penh,
Poland, Warsaw,
San Marino, San Marino,
Korea, (South), Seoul, City,
Mauritius, Port Louis,
Mobile Alabama USA
United States, Washington, D.C.,

Click on any of the pictures below

to learn more

 

Anti-Radiation Air-tube Headset

EMF Harmonization Products

 

How To Prevent The Microwave Radiation

Microwave Radiation, Microwave Radiation Protection

http://www.emfnews.org/qlinks.html

Qlink Pendant

Home Radiation Protection

Gauss Meter

If the microwave produced in the cell phone exceeds over the national health customary for microwave, it will do harm to your health.
In order to cut back or keep away from the harm to the human health brought by the microwave radiation, it is best to do as follows:
First, select the telephone that has the community entry license, in addition to equipped with qualified electromagnetic safety set, which might block 80 percent of the microwave radiation.

Second, the cellphone shouldn’t be put around the waist, so as to stop the microwave radiation from doing hurt to the inner organs (resembling ovarian, liver and other organs).

Third, try to use the phone as a lot as doable, as a way to decrease the frequency of the attainable microwave radiation.
Fourth, children, pregnant ladies, girls within the period of menses should not use the mobile phone.

Fifth, the telephone users should eat the food that’s rich in excessive-high quality protein, lipid, Nutritional vitamins-B.
Sixth, you should keep the phone away from your head for about 5 seconds earlier than it is connected, since the radiation will improve markedly when it is not connected.

Seventh, you’d better not use the mobile phone for a very long time, if you have to use it for a long time, you’d better change the ear that’s close to the cellphone each other one or two minute.
The microwave is possibly among the finest inventions for busy people. Permitting us to cook food in a fraction of the time it would absorb an oven, the microwave has made cooking simple for thousands and thousands of people worldwide. Nonetheless, the quantity of radiation we’re uncovered to in our day to day lives has turn into a fear for a lot of people.

How Microwaves Work
Microwaves warmth food by sending out waves that cause the water molecules in a meals merchandise to vibrate rapidly. This creates an power that presents itself as warmth to cook dinner the food. Ideally, the waves are contained throughout the microwave as a result of the door is closed as it is turned on, releasing waves and cooking the food.
Issues come up when dwelling pores and skin tissue is exposed to these waves. This sort of radiation is barely present while the microwave is operating and if it has a leak. This leak is undetectable to the human eye, as microwaves are colorless and odourless.
Microwave Radiation Well being Considerations
The radiation from your microwave could cause potentially serious well being problems.
These problems embrace:
Pores and skin Cancer, Cataracts, Dizziness and Complications, Blood Problems, Momentary Sterility in Men
Specialists fear that children are extra inclined to possible injury attributable to microwave resonance. It’s because a child’s cells are still dividing quickly as they grow and any interference with that pure biological course of might trigger mobile mutation and presumably long run damage.

Sadly, the studies which were finished to find out the “secure” levels of exposures to microwave radiation examined subjects uncovered to a high degree of radiation for a comparatively short period of time. The effects of low-stage publicity over a number of many years is unknown.
The hazard is compounded when individuals are bombarded with radiation not solely from their microwave, however from cell telephones, wi-fi networks, radio towers and more. It is laborious to pinpoint precisely which know-how could possibly be inflicting the extent of environmental radiation to rise to an unsafe level. Without actually figuring out what that unsafe degree is because of an absence of strong analysis, one can only attempt to restrict their exposure.

Easy methods to Avoid Harmful Microwave Exposure?
Research performed by microwave repair servicemen signifies that over 50% of microwaves which are at the very least two years outdated leak round 10% larger radiation ranges than what’s beneficial by the FDA. The good news is that by doing a slight readjustment, the problem could be solved. Should you do have a microwave that more than two years outdated, have it serviced to see whether it is protected to use.

In 2004 my eleven 12 months previous daughter moved to a nice rural high school. The college had a great status and she or he was much looking ahead to a brand new life as a giant girl contemporary out of junior faculty and certainly she did love her time at Tarleton High College, Lancashire. Nevertheless fairly an odd phenomenon began to happen when every Wednesday afternoon she got here house from school complaining of severe complications, nausea and would often vomit. She would go to bed early on the Wednesday and never be fit for college on Thursday morning. It was a little bit like she had a hangover and surprisingly once more like a hangover, by lunchtime she would feel well and need to return to the college she now loved.

One Thursday while taking her into college at lunchtime, we stopped on the native printers. Noticing her Tarleton High School uniform and really pale complexion the printer enquired as to why she was going to highschool at lunchtime and what the matter was. When we explained the state of affairs he informed us that his opinion was that she was suffering from microwave radiation poisoning. You see on a Wednesday, she had double arithmetic and a free interval within the maths building. On high of the maths building just eight toes away from the kids’s heads had been the mobile phone masts that have been emitting cell phone radiation immediately into the little children.

I went to go to the headmaster and his board of governors at Tarleton Excessive Faculty and explained my concerns. The head himself was concerned also but found it very tough to extract himself from the contract the school had with the cell phone operators, though they did succeed and finally had them removed after four years of harassment from many parents concerned that their youngsters shouldn’t be a statistic within the cellular phone cancer debate. I moved Hannah to a different faculty and the strange bouts of sickness went away. She later returned to the varsity with out suffering any further symptoms. She was by now older and didn’t have the a number of periods within the constructing on which the cellular phone towers sat.

Iceland Rekyavik
Samoa, Apia,
Paraguay, Asuncion
Taiwan, Taipei,
Uzbekistan, Tashkent,
Belize Belmopan
Ghana, Accra,
Chattanooga Tennessee USA
Panama, Panama City,
City of Shoalhaven, Australia

Click on any of the pictures below

to learn more

 

Anti-Radiation Air-tube Headset

EMF Harmonization Products

 

Does YOUR Cell-Phone Emit Radiation?

Cell-Phone Emit Radiation, Cell Phone Radiation Protection

http://www.emfnews.org/qlinks.html

Qlink Pendant

Home Radiation Protection

Envi Headsets

Gauss Meter

By Ruchira

We all are extremely fond of our Cell-phones! Can’t imagine a life with out it. Besides, having the world in our hands (smart phone) it is also a very handy gadget especially in times of distress or loneliness.
Life without Cell Phone
Have you imagined life without your cell-phone? This hub talks about experimenting yourself without your cell phone and other topics regarding the above. Try it! http://ruchira.hubpages.com/hub/Phones-that-emit-Radiation
But, did we know that Cell phones emit electromagnetic radiation. X-rays is another example of electromagnetic radiation.
Radiation is energy that comes from a source and travels through material. This ionizing radiation produces charged particles in matter. Ionizing radiation is produced by unstable atoms and have excess of energy.
World Health Organization (WHO) has classified radiation coming from mobiles as carcinogenic. Additional research is being done into the long term usage of this instrument to gather information regarding the above statement.
Every phone has to pass a Federal Communication Commission (F.C.C) certification. A cell phone’s maximax SAR level must be less than 1.6W/kg (watts per kilogram). In Europe, the level is 2 W/kg, while Canada allows a maximum of 1.6 W/kg.
The SAR level listed in the charts represents the HIGHEST SAR level with the phone next to the ear. SAR level varies between different transmission bands and different testing bodies can obtain different results. It is also possible for results to vary between different editions of the same cell phone.
The table below includes lists of cellphones by brand name.
Highest Radiation Cell phones courtsey CNET Reviews

Lowest Radiation Cell-phones courtsey CNET Reviews

IF your phone is in the high emission range, it is wise to change it or try to use a blue-tooth to talk. Avoid keeping this phone near your body.

Qatar, Doha,
Sweden, Stockholm,
Zambia, Lusaka,
Kiribati South Tarawa
Syria, Damascus,
Iceland, Rekyavik,
Vanuatu, Port Vila,
Holland, Amsterdam,
Birmingham Alabama USA
Marshall Islands, Majuro,

Click on any of the pictures below

to learn more

 

Anti-Radiation Air-tube Headset

EMF Harmonization Products

 

‘Strict Norms To Check Mobile Tower Radiation Needed‘

Mobile Tower Radiation, Mobile Radiation Protection

http://www.emfnews.org/headset.html

Lifebluetube Headset

Cell Phone Radiation Protection

Mobile Phone Radiation Protection

Trifield Electromagnetic Field Meter

November 23, 2011

Next week, doctors at KJ Nair Hospital will sit for a session on mobile phone and mobile tower radiation, conducted by the Indian Institute of Technology-Bombay (IIT-B) professor Girish Kumar. Last year, Kumar had submitted a report to the government on radiation emitted from mobile phone towers.

“My goal is to convince people that the government needs to be more stringent on radiation norms permitted for mobile phone towers,” said Kumar. http://www.hindustantimes.com/India-news/Mumbai/Strict-norms-to-check-mobile-tower-radiation-needed/Article1-772804.aspx

However, representatives of Cellular Operators’ Association of India (COAI) have cited studies that pointed out mobile phone tower radiations were well within the guidelines.

A study by the Indian Institute of Technology, Madras, and Thiagarajar College of Engineering, Madurai, commissioned by COAI indicated that radiation readings in various parts of the city were far below the norms.
The study conducted at 96 locations across the city showed that emission levels were anywhere between two times to 11,000 times lower that the permissible emission level of 4.7 watts/ m2.

“We work with the government and the department of telecom and ensure that we are well below the norms,” said Rajan Mathews, director general, COAI. “Our customers are our concern… There has been no credible evidence linking radiation as a health hazard.”
Concern over mobile phone tower radiation has been gathering steam, with groups protesting against towers near buildings, hospitals and schools.

On criticism that the Indian norms were too lenient, Mathews said, “Too lenient by whose standards? Arbitrarily reducing the norms doesn’t satisfy anybody. Reducing norms will not reduce number of cancer cases and headaches.”

Kalgoorlie, Victoria
Lithuania, Villinus,
Bathurst Australia
Croatia, Zagreb
Kenya, Nairobi
Norway, Oslo,
Malta Valetta
Corpus Christi, Texas
New Zealand
Turkmenistan, Ashgabat

Click on any of the pictures below

to learn more

 

Anti-Radiation Air-tube Headset

EMF Harmonization Products

 

Cell Phone Radiation Drastically Underestimated for Children

Cell Phone Radiation, Cell Phone Radiation Protection

http://www.emfnews.org/qlinks.html

Qlink Pendant

Home Radiation Protection

Envi Headsets

Gauss Meter

The scholarly journal Electromagnetic Biology and Medicine released an article online last month concluding that 97% of the population is exceeding current FCC guidelines for cell phone radiation exposure because of flaws in the current measuring system when testing cellphones for the market. The findings for children using cell phones are grim:
Children’s radiation absorption rates compared to adults
Twice the amount to their heads
Up to three times the amount in the their brain’s hippocampus and hypothalamus
As much as ten times more in their bone marrow http://ecodynamiclivingsolutions.com/cell-phone-radiation-drastically-underestimated-for-children/

It’s enough to make me wonder whether we will begin to see an epidemic of childhood and young adult leukemia in the next decade or so, as the long-term effect of this DNA-damaging radiation begins to express itself in the form of cancer.

For the most part, though, the largely uninformed public hasn’t heard about this. Why? Because they either don’t want to know, or they just don’t care. It doesn’t help that the cellphone industry designed the cellphone certification standards and is in clear conflict of interest with any alternative standard that would force them to lower the radiation emissions on their products.

A Better Way to Measure Absorbed Cellular Radiation
The good news is an alternative system exists, based on MRI imaging that can measure the amount of radiation being absorbed into all tissues on people of different sizes. Called the “Virtual Family,” it can measure absorption rates on a 5-year-old girl, a 6-year-old boy, an 8-year-old girl, an 11-year-old girl, a 14-year-old boy, a 26-year-old female, a 35-year-old male, an obese adult male, and a pregnant woman at various stages of her pregnancy.

The irony about this new system? It’s already FCC approved, and yet it has never been used for certification purposes. Instead, the FCC continues to use an outdated 1991 method for occupational exposure that is completely out of touch with the current widespread saturation of involuntary cellular radiation exposure 24/7, and without regard to the increased vulnerability of certain populations such as children and unborn children in the womb.

Yet despite the increasing number of research studies coming out warning against the dangers of cellphone use, the American population seems to be blithely ignoring the warnings and continuing on with their daily lives, unwilling to accept the idea that their smartphone might not be the best invention since sliced bread.

The Normalcy Bias
Financial investors and psychology experts call this the normalcy bias. Even when the threat of imminent catastrophic harm comes to a town such as New Orleans in 2006 before Hurricane Katrina hit, people refuse to acknowledge the bad and continue with their normal routine until it is too late. More simply put, it’s the ostrich sticking its head in the sand.

Don’t tell me because I don’t want to know. If I don’t know that I’m buying my children the equivalent of their first carton of cigarettes at the age of eight and encouraging them to a lifetime of exposure to carcinogenic toxins, maybe I won’t have to feel guilty when they get cancer in their early 30s. Maybe I won’t be around at that time. Surely they’ll have left the house by then and I won’t be held responsible for their choices.

I know I’m being harsh. But when it comes down to it, every parent is responsible for protecting the long-term health of their child. If you know that something poses a long-term threat to them, how can you NOT do something about it, regardless of the personal inconvenience? Some parents argue that there are too many other imminent threats like car accidents, kidnappings, and accidental falls, etc. to worry about whether their child’s cell phone is going to give them cancer 20 years from now.

But doesn’t the same reasoning apply to second-hand cigarette smoke?
The Problem of Consent
The skeptical parent might say, “But no one has officially come out and banned cell phones. I’m going to wait until that happens before I do anything.”

No one has come out and banned cell phones yet, but countries like Canada, Israel, Germany, India, France, Finland, Russia and Switzerland have issued advisories to limit cell phone use for children under the age of 18.
It all boils down to informed consent. It’s irresponsible to allow young children who are not old enough to understand the long-term risks of using cell phones to bathe in toxic radiofrequency radiation 24/7.

Other Countries’ Wireless Safety Standards
Take a look at Russia, China, Italy, Switzerland, and Austria. All these countries have recently lowered their exposure limits from wireless transmitters in public places. In the case of Austria, the safe exposure limits are more than 5000 times lower than the current FCC standard. Don’t believe me? Read our article, The Wireless Human Experiment. The rest of the world is waking up to this threat and is becoming proactive in protecting the health of their most valuable asset: their children.

When is the right time to do something: before the hurricane wipes you out, or after your children have already been swept away?
Don’t you think it’s time this great country of ours did a little more to protect our own?

Yugoslavia, Belgrade
Guinea-Bissau, Bissau
Norfolk, Virginia
France, Paris,
Chicago, Illinois
Ireland, Dublin,
Topeka Kansas USA
Rochester, New York
Elizabeth, New Jersey
Charleston, South Carolina

Click on any of the pictures below

to learn more

 

Anti-Radiation Air-tube Headset

EMF Harmonization Products

 

EMF Radiation Protection Devices

EMF Radiation, EMF Radiation Protection

http://www.emfnews.org/headset.html

Lifebluetube Headset

Cell Phone Radiation Protection

Mobile Phone Radiation Protection

Trifield Electromagnetic Field Meter

November 16, 2011

EMF is an acronym for electromagnetic fields. So, EMF radiation is the resulting radiation produced by EMF. Just as environmental toxins such as heavy metals and toxic chemicals are in potentially harmful to the body, individual cells in the body can also be harmed by increased levels of EMF. Without going into a detailed scientific discussion on EMF radiation, we focus here instead on the resulting effects on individuals and steps to protect you. Because of these potential dangers to your health, it’s important to take time to understand what EMF radiation protection devices are currently on the market, learn how effective each is, and which ones you need to purchase based on your individual needs.

Health concerns with EMF
At very low levels of electromagnetic fields, the body has a defense mechanism that detects it and produces a biochemical stress response to counteract it. When these levels increase, the body can no longer produce a response to resist its effects and our health is in potential danger. Some of the health problems that are caused by it include: cancer, high blood pressure, brain tumors, and others that are continually being discovered as studies are completed. In all areas of our life we encounter EMF, so our health is at risk constantly. That’s why there are huge selections of EMF radiation protection devices that work against the effects of it.

Sources of EMF
There are several sources of EMF radiation all around us, some that you probably wouldn’t have initially considered. Understanding what these are can help you get a better idea of the huge impact it has on our lives and why EMF radiation protection devices are needed. A few of those sources are noted below:
• Power lines
• Cell phones
• Automobile electronics
• Household appliances
• Household electronics

Areas of Protection
Some of the different areas that you can use EMF radiation protection devices to protect you are listed here:
• Cell phone protection
• Home/building protection
• Tv/monitor shielding
• Appliance shielding
Protection Devices

When choosing what EMF radiation protection devices you need, you’ll need to consider exactly which sources you’d like to protect against and how much you are willing to budget for it. EMF radiation protection devices can get significantly expensive as you add more devices to your list of needs, so it’s important to consider your top concerns and work with your budget from there.

This is especially true if you are purchasing more for your entire family (which is recommended). EMF radiation protection devices are offered with several online retailers, and as with any vendor, take the time to ensure their customer service, return policy, and secure transaction protection is sufficient.
EMF radiation is a risk in several areas of our lives and it’s wise to purchase EMF radiation protection devices for you and your family. Review both your top concerns and budget to decide which ones work best for you. Health and safety are always a top concern and by implementing these devices in your lives, you can make sure you are protected.

Italy, Rome
Austria, Vienna,
Yonkers, New York
Zambia Lusaka
Macedonia, Skjope
Ukraine, Kiev,
Belgium, Brussels,
Salem, Oregon
Czech Republic, Prague
Logan City, Queensland

Click on any of the pictures below

to learn more

 

Anti-Radiation Air-tube Headset

EMF Harmonization Products

 

Our Electromagnetic World

Electromagnetic Radiation, Electromagnetic Radiation Protection

http://www.emfnews.org/qlinks.html

Qlink Pendant

Home Radiation Protection

Envi Headsets

Gauss Meter

Nov 15th 2011

Gro Harlem Brundtland was the head of the World Health Organization (WHO). Mrs. Brundtland is a medical doctor and was the former Prime Minister of Norway. In March of 2002, she reported to the Norwegian press that cell phones were banned from her office because she became ill if an active cell phone was brought within thirteen feet of her. Her concerns were published by one Norwegian newspaper, and ignored by every other newspaper in the world. Five months later she stepped down from her leadership post of the World Health Organization after just one term. It could be that she was forced to resign because of publicly exposing the ill effects that cell phones have on some people.

As technology advances there is more and more radiation around us. It is now being termed by some as “electronic smog.” There’s a new type of “allergy” that appeared because of our technological advances. An increasing number of people are becoming sick from the “electronic smog” around us. These people suffer from symptoms like nausea, dizziness, and depression. They experience difficulty in sleeping and concentrating when electromagnetic devices are brought into close proximity. Some have been so badly affected that they had to relocate to less electronically polluted environments. http://plans-cell-phone.zerocreditcards.org/our-electromagnetic-world/

The only country that currently recognizes electromagnetic sensitivity as a real medical condition is Sweden. There, government support is available to sufferers. Elsewhere, since this illness is contrary to the interests of large telecommunications companies, it is often trivialized.

Man made electromagnetic waves have been around for over one hundred years. Radio and TV towers that were present for the last century emit electromagnetic radiation similar to cell phone towers. There has always been controversy about illnesses caused to people living close to radio towers. There were only thousands of radio towers scattered throughout the country, but with cell towers there are hundreds of thousands of towers and the numbers keep climbing. There are hundreds of millions of gadgets using and creating electromagnetic energy including cell phones, computers, gps devices, satellites and all types of two way radios. It is estimated that for the average city dweller “electronic smog” has increased a thousand fold within the last fifteen years.

In Chicago, where I live, the city notifies neighborhood residents whenever a parking lot is being put up to give them the opportunity to debate the issue. But cell towers seem to sprout out of nowhere and without warning. There is a 1996 US Federal law that prevents communities from stopping the construction of cell towers based on health concerns. Not only are cell towers placed next to homes, some are being built right on top of apartment buildings and other public buildings where people work or reside.

The mayor of Chicago wants to bridge the “digital divide” by creating internet access anywhere in the city using wireless technology that could be picked up by specially enabled laptop computers. This technology is called wireless fidelity or “Wi-Fi.” For this to happen, electromagnetic radiation would have to blanket the city.

The “digital divide” is a term used to describe the lack of internet access for the poor as opposed to those that can afford it. The poor are generally also poorly educated. People with limited education tend to use the internet for entertainment rather than as an educational tool. They download music and videos, gossip in chat rooms, and surf porn sites. It would be easier for child predators and other scammers to remain anonymous using this technology. So what the mayor wants to do is fry everyone’s brains so it would be easier to keep the masses entertained and make it harder to identify crooks and perverts. Many other cities are also planning to invest in “Wi-Fi” for similar reasons. What about the people that are already sensitive to this technology?

I guess they’ll have to find someplace else to live.
Currently laptops with “Wi-Fi” cost more than desktop computers. An organization called OLPC (One Laptop per Child) plans to make hundred dollar laptops with built in “Wi-Fi.” These computers would initially be sold to governments of China, India, Brazil, Argentina, Egypt, Nigeria, and Thailand. They, in turn, would pass them on to school children in selected cities. This idea assumes that saturating their cities with electromagnetic radiation to access the internet and implement wireless networking will present no health effects. What if “electronic smog” makes some of their children ill? Many researchers say that children are more vulnerable to electromagnetic radiation than adults.

Inevitably, these laptops will be commercialized and sold to the poorer citizens of the more developed countries throughout the world. As we can see, to bridge the “digital divide” plans are being made to flood the world with electromagnetic radiation and cheap laptops.
Experts all over the world are voicing concerns about the health hazards of electromagnetic radiation even at low levels. Some are saying that there could be cumulative effects from this radiation and we may not know the damage it causes for years. We’re already saturated with cell towers, with more popping up like weeds. With the planned additions of “Wi-Fi”, people are becoming guinea pigs in a world-wide experiment.

In time, many of us that currently show no symptoms could develop electromagnetic sensitivity or other technology related illnesses. It is almost impossible to shield our homes from this type of radiation. As greedy corporate aliens saturate our world with “electronic smog” to realize ever increasing profits from modern technologies, what will happen to us, the inhabitants of our electromagnetic world?

Nigeria, Abuja
Pakistan, Islamabad
Ontario, California
El Monte, California
McKinney, Texas
Lichtenstein Vaduz
El Salvador, San Salvador
Switzerland, Bern,
The Hague Netherlands
Fujairah, United Arab Emirates, Fujairah, UAE

Click on any of the pictures below

to learn more

 

Anti-Radiation Air-tube Headset

EMF Harmonization Products

 

A Human And Environmental Disaster In The Waiting?

Electromagnetic Fields, Radiofrequency Waves

http://www.emfnews.org/headset.html

Lifebluetube Headset

Cell Phone Radiation Protection

Mobile Phone Radiation Protection

Trifield Electromagnetic Field Meter

16 NOVEMBER 2011

Out of many global explosions in the recent past, the bloom of cell phone industry has superseded all. Today there are a whopping 5.3 billion mobile subscribers worldwide which constitutes 77 percent of the world population. India had 890.2 million mobile phone subscribers at the end of Aug 2011, and is expected to have the world’s largest subscribers (around1.159 billion) by 2013. Cell phone has had major impact on our day-to-day life including tourism, travel, business, banking and healthcare. http://www.greaterkashmir.com/news/2011/Nov/16/a-human-and-environmental-disaster-in-the-waiting–30.asp

Mobile phone, a sort of complex small radio imbedded with mini transmitter, transmit radiofrequency-waves (RF-waves) when powered on. These waves are captured by nearest tower (base-station) and thus cell phone when turned on is “always online” to receive calls and texts. The term cellular phone is derived from the “cell” principle of radio transmission. Each base station provides a single “cell” or radio-signal-span-radius. Combining all of these signals in a location makes it appear as cellular compartments. Therefore, when you change your location, you go out of a single cell and enter a new one.

When a person makes a cell phone call, a signal is sent from the phone’s antenna to the nearest base-station antenna. The base-station responds to this signal by assigning it an available RF-channel. RF-waves transfer the voice information to the base-station. The voice signals are then sent to a switching center, which transfers the call to its destination. Voice signals are then relayed back and forth during the call.

RF-waves (450-2700MHz; 0.1-2W) are electromagnetic fields and unlike ionizing radiation (X-rays, gamma-rays) can neither break chemical bonds nor cause ionization in the human body. Tissue heating is the principal mechanism of interaction between RF energy and the human body. WHO/IARC has classified RF waves as possibly carcinogenic to humans (Group 2B). By definition Group 2B carcinogen is an agent possibly carcinogenic to humans or for which there is limited evidence of carcinogenicity in humans.

Towers (base-stations) may be free standing or mounted on existing structures. Guidelines (The Environment Protection Act, 1986) for erecting towers include: base structure should be 50 to 200 feet high so that antennas can adequately cover the area; first preference to erect tower should be given to forest areas or open or public places away from residential locality; towers should not occupy premises of schools or hospitals or narrow lanes and not directly facing any building.

In case of multiple antennas, sharing of the facility should be explored. Access to tower should be prohibited: “Danger! RF-radiation, Restricted area”. If above guidelines are followed human exposure to RF-waves from towers is minimal. The energy from a tower antenna is directed toward the horizon (parallel to the ground), with some downward scatter. The amount of energy decreases rapidly with increasing distance from the antenna. As a result, the level of exposure to RF-waves at ground level is very low compared to the level close to the antenna.

Problem arises when the above guidelines are flouted. Often we see towers erected on roof tops, compounds, schools, hospitals, and trees, water tanks, within narrow lanes, inside crowded residential areas, chimneys, church steeples and flagpoles; all for monetary gains. Under such circumstances it is impossible to protect general public from RF-radiation exposure. However cell phone industry for several reasons stresses that the exposure to RF-waves, even under these circumstances is negligible. Even the Federal Communications Commission believes that RF-radiation from antennas result in exposure levels on the grounds that are typically thousands of times below safety limits. Therefore, there is no reason to believe that such towers could constitute a potential health hazard to nearby residents or students. Most experts question the validity of these explanations and would like the guidelines for erecting base stations to be implemented.

The current US standard for cell site radiation in the US is 580-1000 microwatts-per-square-centimeter. Many other countries have set levels hundreds of times lower. The reason for the disparity is that no one really knows what level of cell tower radiation is safe. Current limits have been influenced more by economic and political imperatives than by research into health and safety. More important than the intensity of radiation emitted at the tower is the strength of the resulting radiation wherever people live and work. This depends on the intensity at the source – and one’s distance from it. Different cell sites emit different amounts of radiation. Radiation levels from a single cell site vary, depending on usage. Even maintenance issues can affect how much radiation a cell site is currently producing.

Measurement with a suitable meter is the only way to know how much radiation you are receiving at a particular spot. If you detect >100 mv/m in place of your work or residence, you should be concerned. If you cannot obtain a meter, tower distance of 400 meters or more from your residence or work is probably not harmful to you.

What are the possible harmful effects of RF waves emitted by the base stations? Most of the literature driven by powerful industry on this subject state that there is no evidence that RF-waves from towers is harmful to human health and there is no published convincing evidence that this leads to any form of human cancer. They often refer amongst other to a British study on more than 1000 families which found no link between mother’s exposure to towers during pregnancy and risk of childhood cancers.

In contrast, over 100 scientists and physicians at Boston and Harvard University’s Schools of Public Health have called cell phone towers a potential radiation hazard. Experts believe that individuals differ in their response to similar levels of RF-radiation. For some people, short term effects from tower radiation exposure may include headaches, sleep disorders, poor memory, mental excitation, confusion, anxiety, depression, appetite disturbance and listlessness.

In September of 2010, 10-member committee under Bombay-Natural-History-Society (BNHS) studied the impact of towers and reviewed 919 studies performed in India and abroad; 593 showed negative impact on birds, bees, humans, wildlife and plants. They pinpointed cell phone towers as a potential cause for decline of animal populations. Committee stressed an urgent need to focus more scientific attention on the subject before it was too late.

A study into the effects of a cell tower on a herd of dairy cattle conducted in Germany showed a measurable drop in milk yield. Relocating the cattle restored the milk yield and moving them back to the original pasture recreated the problem. A human study (Kempten West) in 2007 found substantial adverse effects on many hormones in persons exposed to tower radiation.

A German study on 1000 residents living within 400 meters of towers for over 10 years found prevalence of cancer 3 times higher than the control group. Breast cancer topped the list, but cancers of the prostate, pancreas, bowel, skin melanoma, lung and blood cancer were all increased. Another study from Israel found 8 cancers in 622 residents who lived within 350 meters of a cell phone tower as against 2 cancers in 1222 control patients who lived further away. In a case known as “Towers-of-Doom”, two cell masts on a five story apartment building in London caused many health problems in residents especially those living in top floors and seven detectable cancers.

I have carefully reviewed the scientific contents of the above anecdotal reports published on the safety and/or harmful effects of cell phone towers on humans and environment. One is struck with the paucity (in amount) as well as poverty (in quality) of published literature on this vital subject. Very few studies have specifically concentrated on cancer risk from cell phone towers. This lack of studies is in itself a cause for concern, especially since anecdotal evidence is plentiful. This is because of major conflict of interest by the industry. Funding agencies of future projects are the very organizations that would be at disadvantage if definite link between cell phone towers and human and environment effects are found and that is the reason this research is going at a snail’s pace.

Consequence to this, I was not convinced by either of these studies to state that cell phone towers are safe or harmful. Thus the slogan: “Cell phone towers, as distributed now, are potential and hidden human and environmental disaster in the waiting” shall need much more scientific data to prove or disprove it. Till then most exposed to RF-radiation shall have to pass through a painful wait!

Thornton, Colorado
Iran, Teheran
Spain, Madrid,
Melville, Victoria
Spain, Madrid
Holland, Amsterdam,
Slovenia, Lujblijana,
Omaha, Nebraska
Luxembourg, Luxembourg
Dhadna, United Arab Emirates, Dhadna, UAE

Click on any of the pictures below

to learn more

 

Anti-Radiation Air-tube Headset

EMF Harmonization Products