Danger Of Cell Phones – Protecting Our Homes From Cell Phone Radiation

Cell Phone Radiation, Cell Phone Dangers

http://www.emfnews.org/headset.html

Lifebluetube Headset

Cell Phone Radiation Protection

Mobile Phone Radiation Protection

Trifield Electromagnetic Field Meter

October 9th, 2011
There are over 4 billion cell phone users throughout the world today – that’s about 4 people out of every 6 living on this planet and owning a cell phone, subscribed to a cellular phone plan, or living with someone who owns a mobile phone. The ubiquity of wireless phones brings to the fore certain issues related to this device, like cell phone dangers to human health.

All mobile phones, when turned on, emit electromagnetic radiation in the microwave radio frequency range. It is this cell phone radiation, as it is absorbed by human tissue (most commonly in the head, as you place the phone next to your ear when you talk) that has come under intense scrutiny this past decade. Several epidemiological and experimental studies have associated prolonged cell phone use to sleeping disorder, cognitive problems, headaches, stress, brain tumors, and cancer.

Experiment Without Controls
On the other hand, studies with opposing results and observations have also been published. CTIA, the wireless industry’s lobbying association pointed out to studies or statements from the World Health Organization (WHO), the American Cancer Society, and the FDA downplaying potential cell phone dangers, “all have concurred that wireless devices are not a public health risk.”
But, as Professor Devra Davis, at the University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute explains, “the latency between exposure and brain cancer could be 20 or 30 years” and by using cellular devices without any clear understanding of cell phone dangers, “we are basically treating ourselves like lab rats in an experiment without any controls”
The verdict is still out, obviously, but are you willing to take the risk?

Protect Yourself
Today, at the Consumer Electronics Show 2010 in Las Vegas, a company called Pong Research has announced the availability of a product called Pong(TM) BlackBerry Curve(TM) Case which claims to reduce users’ exposure to mobile phone radiation by 60%. Until this product is introduced by other manufacturers to cover other brands and will be marketed widely, however, we all just have to take certain precautionary measures to protect ourselves from suspected cell phone dangers:
Keep your cell phone away from your body. The greatest exposure to cellular phone radiation is when it is 6 inches or less from any body part.

Text more, talk less. Take only the most important calls or make the least amount of calls on your phone and transmit messages through SMS.
Use headset or speakerphone function. wireless phone radiation is emitted directly from a unit’s built-in antenna. Using a headset ensures that the actual cell phone is located away from your head, which can easily absorb EMF radiation.
Use your land line. It’s definitely safer to talk on the land line than on a mobile phone, because this lessens your exposure to radiation.

Turn off your cell phone while charging. Not only will you charge your phone faster, it will also cut down on radiation emission from your cell to which everyone in your house or office is exposed to.
Purchase or use phones that have been certified or tested to emit the least amount of radiation. The Environmental Working Group has prepared an exhaustive list covering over 1,000 phones currently in the market, and they have come up with a list of the 10 best phones (with least radiation output) to use.

Keep cellular phones away from children. Children’s skulls are thinner and their brains are less dense than adult brains, radio frequency signals can penetrate deeper into a child’s brain than in an adult’s.
“There’s a greater concern for children because the life-time exposure will be much higher,” says Jane Houlihan of the Environmental Working Group. In the United States, as many as seven in ten children between the ages of 12 and 17 own a mobile phone, and half use them daily, according to the New York Times.

At the moment, there is no conclusive, peer-reviewed evidence that points to cell phone dangers from radiation exposure. The science is evolving on this subject, but if we must err, it should be on the side of caution. When it comes to our health and those of our children, nothing should be left to chance, let’s always protect ourselves.
Michael Arms contributes articles on cell phone dangers and other mobile phone-related issues at the Pacebutler Recycling and Environment Blog. You can sell, recycle, or donate cell phones through Pacebutler Corporation, a US-based cellular phone trading and refurbishing company.

Lithgow Australia
Tanzania, Dar es Salaam
Liechtenstein Vaduz
Turkey, Ankara
Lithgow, Australia,
Eritrea, Asmara
Barbados, Bridgetown
El Salvador, San Salvador,
Escondido California USA
Trinidad and Tobago, Port-of-Spain

Click on any of the pictures below

to learn more

 

Anti-Radiation Air-tube Headset

EMF Harmonization Products

 

Mobile Phones And Cancer Risks: Scientists Manipulated Research – Played Down Braintumour Risks In Children

Mobile Phone Radiation, Mobile Phone Radiation Protection

http://www.emfnews.org/qlinks.html

Qlink Pendant

Home Radiation Protection

Envi Headsets

Gauss Meter

October 2, 2011

A new industry-sponsored study on brain tumour risks in children who use mobilephones was presented to the media in July 2011. The press-release claimed that theresults were ”reassuring” whereas the study itself indicated an increased risk. Apart fromplaying down the results, there is evidence that the scientists also manipulated theresearch in order to underestimate the risks, especially of cordless phones.
The CEFALO study on the possible link between brain tumours and mobile phone use amongchildren showed an increased risk for children and adolescents who used a mobile phoneregularly.
1
Cefalo indicates in fact significantly increased risks, and the risks increase withincreased use,
says the Swedish oncologist and epidemiologist Lennart Hardell one of theexperts who participated in the recent WHO evaluation on mobile phone radiation and cancer.The increased risks of which some were statistically significant are mentioned neither by theCefalo scientistsMartin RöösliandMaria Feychting, nor by the Journal of the National CancerInstitute (JNCI

Their press-releases give reassuring messages as if no risk had been observed.
– Results are reassuring because they are non-significant and thus are compatible with chance
,states for example Martin Röösli

2
This interpretation of non-significant results differs fromnormal, straightforward presentations like the one a Norwegian Cefalo researcher put forwardin 2005: “
We found an elevated risk for residential exposure to magnetic fields and braintumours, although the risk was not significant”.
3

It is also noteworthy that the JNCI let aconsultant from the International Epidemiology Institute (IEI) express the reassuring messagein their press-release. IEI has been identified as a
product-defence firm
4
.Other intriguing facts about the Cefalo study include the small size of the sample, the lowinterest in other sources of non-ionizing radiation (EMF) that the children might have beenexposed to, and the incomplete study of the impact of cordless phones. Mobile and cordlessphones emit the same kind of radiation, and were both taken into consideration by the WHOevaluation mentioned above. Martin Röösli, the coordinator of Cefalo and a board member of the industry funded Swiss Research Foundation on Mobile communication gives the followingexplanation of why the Cefalo team only studied the first three years of cordless phone use:
– You cannot prove all hypotheses with one study, unless you make a very long interview.
This is puzzling as the Cefalo questionnaire was rather long (267 questions) and Röösli wasaware of the role of cordless phones as shows the following quotation :
“Mobile and cordless phone radiation is an important exposure source”.
2
A large number of questions treatedconfounding factors including the test persons’ contacts with cigarette smoke (38 questions),snakes and goats. Only five questions focused on cordless phones. According to Röösli one of them was:
“How often did (child) speak on cordless phone in the first 3 years he/she used it regularly?
Curiously, the questionnaire sent to the Karolinska Institute’s ethical review boardin 2005

did not include this question, but one that was not restricted to the first 3 years of use:“
How often does (child) speak on a cordless phone? (calling and receiving altogether)”

5
Whyand when did the Cefalo scientists decide to limit the study of cordless phone use, and is this methodologically and ethically acceptable?

– Restricting the study to the first three years of usewill lead to an underestimation of risks. We know that telephone use increase with age and that teenagers talk more than children
, says Lennart Hardell.The elusive press-releases and the sudden restriction of cordless phone use have raisedsuspicions of an intentional underestimation of the health risks. Professor Joel Moscowitz,Director of Center for Family and Community Health, School of Public Health University of California, questions the conclusions of the Cefalo scientists and the IEI, and claims that thestudy was biased. His conclusion finds support in recent history. Several studies reveal that ithas become a widespread practice to use outcome-oriented science to create doubt in order topostpone regulation and protect the manufacturers.
6
The manufacturer that would be protected in this case is the mobile phone industry.
“Any perceived risk or new scientific findings of adverse health effects of mobile communicationdevices and equipment could adversely affect us through a reduction in sales or throughliability claims.”
7

The mobile phone industry’s interest groups are very active in Brussels andWashington, they are also investing huge amounts in research on health effects, including theCefalo study. A large majority of the industry-sponsored studies conclude that EMF radiationis harmless, while most independent studies conclude that there is a risk.
8
Cefalo might have been designed to play down risks, but instead of challenging the findings of the international Interphone group and the Swedish Hardell group, it reconfirms them. Thesestudies made IARC, the cancer research agency of the World Health Organisation, classifymobile phone radiation as “possibly carcinogenic” in May 2011.There is now more than enough evidence for an application of the precautionary principleaccording to the International EMF Alliance, a public interest NGO representing some 60grassroots organisations advocating for a regulation and a reduction of electro-pollution.

– The irrational “zero-risk” interpretation of the Cefalo scientists creates doubts and could postpone preventive measures and cause unnecessary suffering. Mobile phone use hasincreased massively among children and teenagers the last decade, and even a small increaseof brain tumour risks is of great concern
, says Alex Swinkels, IEMFA board member.

Slovenia Ljubljana
Sierra Leone, Freetown
Sudan Khartoum
Belgium Brussels
Greece, Athens
Guinea-Bissau, Bissau
City of Ryde Australia
Mobile Alabama USA
Luxembourg, Luxembourg City,
Zimbabwe Hararesssss

Click on any of the pictures below

to learn more

 

Anti-Radiation Air-tube Headset

EMF Harmonization Products

 

The Electro Magneitc Radiation Solution From Your Cell Phone And Computers

Electro Magneitc Radiation, Electro Magneitc Radiation Protection

http://www.emfnews.org/headset.html

Lifebluetube Headset

Cell Phone Radiation Protection

Mobile Phone Radiation Protection

Trifield Electromagnetic Field Meter

October 4th, 2011
Electromagnetic pollution may be the most significant form of pollution human activity has produced in this century, all the more dangerous because it is invisible and insensible.”
– Andrew Weil? M.D., author of Spontaneous Healing and 8 Weeks to Optimum Health

With growing global concern surrounding electro pollution, specifically electromagnetic field (EMF) radiation, consumers are becoming more aware of the health issues associated with cell phone use. There is a solution to this and is simple. a bio technical company, announces the international distribution of the remeby, a personal protection device that neutralizes the harmful effects of EMF radiation.
this is a proprietary blend of activated paramagnetic and diamagnetic organic and inorganic materials that neutralize the biological effects of man-made EMF exposure. Flat, circular and one-inch in diameter, with an adhesive backing, adheres to the back or battery of cell phones, or other electronic devices, without added weight and without interfering with their functions. We all need to know as much as we can in todays world .and not just take someones word, research for yourself and then make the best decision for you.

Several studies have confirmed that cell phone radiation causes damage to DNA. A landmark study by Dr. Henry Lai of the University of Washington showed that even at low levels, exposure to EMF/RF caused DNA damage to brain cells of rats. Similar studies have been done with human immune cells. Additionally, human studies have demonstrated a direct link between cell phone use and the incidence of brain tumors. Even the FDA has expressed uncertainty when it comes to cell phones.

Dr. David Feigal, MD., director of the FDA’s Center for Devices and Radiological Health said, “…we need more definite answers about the biological effects of cell phone radiation, and about the more complicated questions of whether cell phones might cause even a small increase in the risk of developing cancer.” This concern was the catalyst for to develop an answer and with the referral you can go to links and get a lot more information on the studies to now.
This pioneered research demonstrated what many health professionals have claimed: that EMF radiation, particularly that emitted from cell phones, has an adverse effect on bodily health. Quantum Biological Lab recently completed a study confirming that cell phone radiation affected human DNA, but cell phones that have been neutralized completely prevented this effect.

“We’re beginning to see an increase in both media attention and scientific research with regard to the effect that cell phones have on humans. With 2 billion cell phones already in use, and 750 million projected to be sold , this is not a localized threat, and it is hopeful to inform the world about EMF radiation, especially parents who give cell phones to their children.

Strong research suggests that children are most susceptible to EMF radiation as their bodies are still growing. Interestingly, the British chairman of the National Radiological Protection Board advised that parents should not give cell phones to children age 8 or younger as a precaution against the potential harm of radiation from the devices.
The neutralizer is the only product on the market with in-vitro studies that prove human DNA can be protected from the damaging effects of EMF/RF radiation, and can be used on cell phones, desktop computers, laptops, microwaves, cordless telephones, televisions and video game equipment.

This is real and all have know this exist but no one realized it could actually affect our DNA, so do take the step and make yourself safer and keeping healthy. Your future depends on your choices, so just make the right one now?

I hope this has caused every one to think wisely and protect yourself and loved ones and let all you know aware of the complications that can arise from this health hazard.

Estonia, Tallinn
India New Delhi
San Marino San Marino
Estonia, Tallin,
Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur,
Liverpool, Australia,
Tajikistan, Dushanbe
Nauru Republic of Nauru, Yaren District
Overland Park Kansas USA
Solomon Islands, Honiara

Click on any of the pictures below

to learn more

 

Anti-Radiation Air-tube Headset

EMF Harmonization Products

 

Health Canada Advises Cellphone Users To Reduce Cancer Risk

Cell Phone Radiation, Cell Phone Radiation Protection

http://www.emfnews.org/qlinks.html

Qlink Pendant

Home Radiation Protection

Envi Headsets

Gauss Meter

OCTOBER 4, 2011
OTTAWA — Health Canada released guidelines Tuesday on how cellphone users can reduce the risk of certain types of cancer, despite scientific evidence it says is “far from conclusive” that cancer and cellphone use are linked.

The department recommends users limit the length of their calls, make use of text messaging or hands-free accessories and encourage children under the age of 18 to limit their usage all together. The new advice is targeted primarily at heavy users and children.
Children were mentioned specifically because they are “typically more sensitive to a variety of environmental agents,” according to Health Canada. There is also a dearth of data studying the effects of cellphone use on children.

The advice comes after a study, released in May by the World Health Organization’s International Agency for Research on Cancer, found that radio-frequency electromagnetic fields from cellphones could be “possibly carcinogenic to humans” based on the increased risk for glioma, a type of brain cancer, associated with wireless phone use.
“There are a small number of epidemiology studies that have shown brain cancer rates might be elevated in long-term/heavy cellphone users,” Health Canada said in Tuesday’s news release. “Other epidemiology studies on cellphone users, laboratory studies and animal cancer studies have not supported this association.”

Health Canada characterized the WHO’s finding of “possibly carcinogenic” as meaning that there is a limited amount of data to suggest there is a cancer link to cellphones, but there is a need for more research to reach a definitive conclusion.

The WHO study, using data from adults from 13 countries, including Canada, found “no increase of risk” of either glioma or meningioma — two types of brain cancer — associated with the use of cellphones. However, there were “suggestions” of an increased risk of glioma at the highest exposure levels.
Health Canada says the guidelines are part of an ongoing review of research looking at the health effects of radio-frequency emissions — including cellphones, radio signals and TV broadcasts. The department updated its guidelines in 2009 and the next update is expected in 2012.

Canada’s health agency said the number of cellphone users in the country grew to 24 million people at the end of 2010, up from only 100,000 in 1987.

Morocco Rabat
Peru Lima City
Kyrgyzstan, Bishkek
Guinea, Conakry
Dubbo Australia
Belize, Belmopan
Guinea Conakry
Wichita Falls Texas USA
City of Randwick Australia
Antigua and Barbuda, Saint John’s

Click on any of the pictures below

to learn more

 

Anti-Radiation Air-tube Headset

EMF Harmonization Products

 

Radiation From Mobile Phones Delays And Reduces Sleep And Causes Headaches And Confusion According To A New Study

Cell Phone Radiation, Cell Phone Radiation Protection

http://www.emfnews.org/headset.html

Lifebluetube Headset

Cell Phone Radiation Protection

Mobile Phone Radiation Protection

Trifield Electromagnetic Field Meter

Oct 04, 2011
The research, sponsored by the mobile phone companies themselves, shows that using the handsets before bed causes people to take longer to reach the deeper stages of sleep and to spend less time in them, interfering with the body’s ability to repair damage suffered during the day.
The findings are especially alarming for children and teenagers, most of whom – surveys suggest – use their phones late at night and who especially need sleep. Their failure to get enough can lead to mood and personality changes, ADHD-like symptoms, depression, lack of concentration and poor academic performance.
The study – carried out by scientists from the blue-chip Karolinska Institute and Uppsala University in Sweden and from Wayne State University in Michigan, USA – is thought to be the most comprehensive of its kind.
Published by the Massachusetts Institute of Technology’s Progress in Electromagnetics Research Symposium and funded by the Mobile Manufacturers Forum, representing the main handset companies, it has caused serious concern among top sleep experts, one of whom said that there was now “more than sufficient evidence” to show that the radiation “affects deep sleep”.

The scientists studied 35 men and 36 women aged between 18 and 45. Some were exposed to radiation that exactly mimicked what is received when using mobile phones; others were placed in precisely the same conditions, but given only “sham” exposure, receiving no radiation at all.

The people who had received the radiation took longer to enter the first of the deeper stages of sleep, and spent less time in the deepest one. The scientists concluded: “The study indicates that during laboratory exposure to 884 MHz wireless signals components of sleep believed to be important for recovery from daily wear and tear are adversely affected.”

The embarrassed Mobile Manufacturers Forum played down the results, insisting – at apparent variance with this published conclusion – that its “results were inconclusive” and that “the researchers did not claim that exposure caused sleep disturbance”.

But Professor Bengt Arnetz, who led the study, says: “We did find an effect from mobile phones from exposure scenarios that were realistic. This suggests that they have measurable effects on the brain.”
He believes that the radiation may activate the brain’s stress system, “making people more alert and more focused, and decreasing their ability to wind down and fall asleep”.

About half of the people studied believed themselves to be “electrosensitive”, reporting symptoms such as headaches and impaired cognitive function from mobile phone use. But they proved to be unable to tell if they had been exposed to the radiation in the test.
This strengthens the conclusion of the study, as it disposes of any suggestion that knowledge of exposure influenced sleeping patterns. Even more significantly, it throws into doubt the relevance of studies the industry relies on to maintain that the radiation has no measurable effects.

A series of them – most notably a recent highly publicised study at Essex University – have similarly found that people claiming to be electrosensitive could not distinguish when the radiation was turned on in laboratory conditions, suggesting that they were not affected.
Critics have attacked the studies’ methodology, but the new findings deal them a serious blow. For they show that the radiation did have an effect, even though people could not tell when they were exposed.
It also complements other recent research. A massive study, following 1,656 Belgian teenagers for a year, found most of them used their phones after going to bed. It concluded that those who did this once a week were more than three times – and those who used them more often more than five times – as likely to be “very tired”.
Dr Chris Idzikowski, the director of the Edinburgh Sleep Centre, says: “There is now more than sufficient evidence, from a large number of reputable investigators who are finding that mobile phone exposure an hour before sleep adversely affects deep sleep.”

Dr William Kohler of the Florida Sleep Institute added: “Anything that disrupts the integrity of your sleep will potentially have adverse consequences in functioning during the day, such as grouchiness, difficulty concentrating, and in children hyperactivity and behaviour problems.”

David Schick, the chief executive of Exradia, which manufactures protective devices against the radiation, called on ministers to conduct “a formal public inquiry” into the effects of mobile phones.

Bulgaria Sofia
Guatemala, Guatemala
Palau, Melekeok
Lichtenstein Vaduz
Monaco, Monaco,
Latvia Riga
Lebanon, Beirut
Burundi Bujumbura
Tacoma Washington USA
City of Maitland Australia

Click on any of the pictures below

to learn more

 

Anti-Radiation Air-tube Headset

EMF Harmonization Products

 

Limiting Children’s Cellphone Time A Healthy Choice, Says Health Canada

Cell Phone Radiation, Cell Phone Radiation Protection

http://www.emfnews.org/qlinks.html

Qlink Pendant

Home Radiation Protection

Envi Headsets

Gauss Meter

Description

Click on any of the pictures below

to learn more

 

Anti-Radiation Air-tube Headset

EMF Harmonization Products

 

San Francisco Cellphone Retailers Must Issue Warnings

Cell Phone Radiation, Cell Phone Warning

http://www.emfnews.org/headset.html

Lifebluetube Headset

Cell Phone Radiation Protection

Mobile Phone Radiation Protection

Trifield Electromagnetic Field Meter

Oct 4, 2011
Mobile phone companies are fighting back after San Francisco passed new requirements for cellphone retailers to warn customers about limiting their exposure to radiation.
Among the requirements that kick in this week, stores will have to display “informational posters” explaining that cellphones emit radio frequency energy that’s absorbed by the head and body.
The posters will also have to explain how to reduce that exposure risk — by doing things like using a headset or speaker phone, texting instead of talking, and limiting use by children.
The CTIA — a trade group representing cellphone companies — is filing a lawsuit in federal court, claiming the new law violates cellphone companies’ First Amendment Rights of freedom of speech.
The cellphone industry is arguing that the legislation makes cellphone makers say something they don’t want to say.
It’s the first cellphone ordinance in the United States, created after numerous studies examined by the International Agency for Research on Cancer led the organization to classify cellphones as possibly carcinogenic to humans.
Leading epidemiologists who have studied how cellphone radiation is absorbed by the body have also recommended that the public be warned of potential risks, particularly with children.
On Tuesday, Health Canada said that while “at present, the scientific evidence is far from conclusive and more research is required” about any cellphone links to cancer, it issued warnings about cellphone usage.
The new regulations are somewhat watered down, after earlier proposed regulations were stalled due to a different lawsuit by the cellphone industry.
Phone companies argued that phones should not have to display their SAR rating — the Specific Absorption Rate of radiation emitted by each phone.
The industry claims that since all levels fall within a range considered safe by federal health regulators, providing that information to customers might make them think one phone is “safer” than another.
Under the new regulations, SAR ratings do not have to be posted, but should be listed in the phone’s manual — usually located inside the cellphone box, and available to read only once the purchase has been made.
When Marketplace told people about SAR ratings last year, most said they wanted that information readily available, to make their own decisions.
In Canada, there are no mandatory requirements for retailers or cellphone manufacturers to alert customers of any potential concerns regarding cellphone radiation.
When Marketplace asked the Canadian Wireless Telecommunications Association about San Francisco’s new regulations, spokesperson Marc Choma said, “All wireless devices sold in Canada are deemed to be safe by the federal government and no public safety warnings at point of sale are required or warranted.”
Part of the controversy revolves around how cellphones are tested for radiation levels.
Few people know that cellphone guidelines are based on tests primarily done by cellphone manufacturers.
Scientists perform tests on a “dummy,” representing the “average user” — a mould of a human head and torso, filled with a fluid mixture designed to simulate the electrical properties of human tissue.
But critics argue that the dummy is not representative of the average person. It weighs 200 pounds, is 6-2″ tall, and only makes six-minute phone calls. The test is also done with the cellphone held at least one inch from the ear, a practice seldom employed by people making a cellphone call.

Somalia, Mogadishu
Thornton Colorado USA
Malaysia Kuala Lumpur
Cuba, Havana,
Italy, Rome,
India, New Delhi
Congo Brazzaville
Slovenia, Ljubljana
Niger Niamey
City of Shellharbour Australia

Click on any of the pictures below

to learn more

 

Anti-Radiation Air-tube Headset

EMF Harmonization Products

 

Can Cell Phones Harm Your Health?

Cell Phone Radiation, Cell Phone Radiation Protection

http://www.emfnews.org/qlinks.html

Qlink Pendant

Home Radiation Protection

Envi Headsets

Gauss Meter

By Wesley Mcgowan

It seems like everywhere a person goes there is at least one person in view with a cell phone to their ear whether it is on the road, in a store, in a parking lot, walking down the street, etc. Even in places where cell phone usage is banned such as concert halls or movie theaters there is the occasional offender, or more likely, at least a few people using the text messaging feature on their phone.
Cell phone usage has exploded over the past decade and continues to rise. Nearly two hundred million people in the United States have cell phones and there are well over one billion users worldwide. That means there are a lot of phones sending their frequencies over the airwaves at any given time.

Concern has arisen over whether or not cell phone usage can harm a person’s health. Brain cancer rates in the United States have risen since cell phones were introduced, leading some people to wonder if cell phone usage is the reason for the increase.

There have been reports of people developing brain tumors in the exact same spot where they held their cell phone. Some studies have expressed concern over long-term cell phone use, believing it can lead to a person to develop cancer. That is not to say a person who uses a cell phone is going to get cancer, but some studies suggest long-term use increases a person’s risk.

Over the years, rates to Germany has declined steadily. Offers between 2 cents per minute to 4 cents per minute to call Germany are now very common among long distance providers and phone card companies. What is the catch? Again, have you heard of connection fees, monthly charges and maintenance fees? These can add up big time and can easily double the rates as promised by these phone companies. And one more thing, while Germany’s phone system is one of the most advanced in the world, be aware that there are cheap long distance carriers that can actually make the connections frustrating to consumers.

No matter your reason for calling, personal, business, or leisure call to Germany. Find a long distance telecom service provider that offers a flexible prepaid calling plan that is hassle-free and requires no switching over phone companies, cumbersome PIN dialing or paying unnecessary, hidden costs generally associated with most phone cards. With these in mind, you should be able to call Germany – and don’t bother about how you call, when you call or how much you talk.

Mackay, Queensland
Liberia, Monrovia
Denton, Texas
Pompano Beach, Florida
Norway, Oslo,
Czech Rep, Prague,
Long Beach, California
Lincoln, Nebraska
City of Fairfield Australia
Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates, Abu Dhabi, UAE

Click on any of the pictures below

to learn more

 

Anti-Radiation Air-tube Headset

EMF Harmonization Products

 

Is Cell Phone Radiation a Real Concern?

Cell Phone Radiation, Cell Phone Radiation Protection

http://www.emfnews.org/headset.html

Lifebluetube Headset

Cell Phone Radiation Protection

Mobile Phone Radiation Protection

Trifield Electromagnetic Field Meter

The explosion in mobile phone use across the world has some scratching their head when it comes to the once-thought deadly radiation coming from cell phones. So are cell phones really dangerous to your health, or is this just a bunch of hot air?

As of 2009 there were 4.3 billion mobile phones in use around the world. These phones emit a type of radiation in the microwave range called electromagnetic radiation. This type of radiation is emitted from many home electronics and digital networking systems, so unless you’re a cabin-dwelling hermit living off the grid, this radiation is all around us in our everyday lives as it is. http://www.gloucesterpharma.com/is-cell-phone-radiation-a-real-concern/

According the World Health Organization, the radiation from cells phone could possibly be carcinogenic depending on the level of use and amount radiation it emits. Since cell phones, especially modern smart phones like the iphone 5, have only been around for a relatively short amount of time, researchers have not been able to come to a unanimous conclusion on phone radiation. If the radiation is carcinogenic, it will take a long period of usage to uncover, which in essence makes us, the first-generation cell phone users, the guinea pigs of a massive-scale experiment in radiation exposure.

Mongolia, Ulan Bator
Armenia, Yerevan
Traralgon, Victoria
France, Paris
City of Hawkesbury, Australia
Cape Coral, Florida
Mauritania, Nouakchott,
Pakistan, Islamabad
Senegal, Dakar
Mina’ Zayid, United Arab Emirates, Mina’ Zayid, UAE

Click on any of the pictures below

to learn more

 

Anti-Radiation Air-tube Headset

EMF Harmonization Products

 

How to Understand Cellphone Radiation and Cancer Risk

Mobile Phone Radiation, Cell Phone Frequencies

http://www.emfnews.org/qlinks.html

Qlink Pendant

Home Radiation Protection

Envi Headsets

Gauss Meter

Alarmed by news reports that cellphones could possibly cause brain tumors? Here’s what we know so far. To complete this how-to, you will need: Facts Precautions

Step 1: Understand cellphone radiation Know what “cellphone radiation” is. Cellphones emit radiofrequency energy, a form of non-ionizing radiation. Ionizing radiation, the kind produced by X-ray machines, has been linked to cancer; nonionizing radiation has not.

Step 2: Understand a research finding Understand the classification of the International Agency for Research on Cancer, which evaluates environmental and lifestyle factors for possible links to cancer. The IARC classifies cellphones as a “possible” carcinogen, meaning it’s not certain whether they pose a cancer risk. The International Agency for Research on Cancer also lists coffee and pickled vegetables as possible carcinogens.

Step 3: Understand the confusion Understand why the IARC classification is confusing. Some studies into possible links between cellphones and cancer have found a higher risk of brain tumors, while others have found a lower risk. Some scientists point out that cellphones have been in use for years with no subsequent increase in brain tumors; others say there hasn’t been enough time to determine the effect on younger generations who began using cellphones in childhood.

Step 4: Play it safe Play it safe by reducing your exposure to cellphone radiation. Use speakerphone or a wired earpiece — a ferrite bead will lower your exposure …

Maldives, Male,
Libya, Tripoli,
Lebanon Beirut
Hungary, Budapest,
Yugoslavia Belgrade
McAllen Texas USA
Lithuania, Vilnius
Mauritius, Port Louis,
Jordan, Amman,
Newcastle, Australia

Click on any of the pictures below

to learn more

 

Anti-Radiation Air-tube Headset

EMF Harmonization Products