Mobile Phones And Cancer Risks: Scientists Manipulated Research – Played Down Braintumour Risks In Children

Mobile Phone Radiation, Mobile Phone Radiation Protection

Qlink Pendant

Home Radiation Protection

Envi Headsets

Gauss Meter

October 2, 2011

A new industry-sponsored study on brain tumour risks in children who use mobilephones was presented to the media in July 2011. The press-release claimed that theresults were ”reassuring” whereas the study itself indicated an increased risk. Apart fromplaying down the results, there is evidence that the scientists also manipulated theresearch in order to underestimate the risks, especially of cordless phones.
The CEFALO study on the possible link between brain tumours and mobile phone use amongchildren showed an increased risk for children and adolescents who used a mobile phoneregularly.
Cefalo indicates in fact significantly increased risks, and the risks increase withincreased use,
says the Swedish oncologist and epidemiologist Lennart Hardell one of theexperts who participated in the recent WHO evaluation on mobile phone radiation and cancer.The increased risks of which some were statistically significant are mentioned neither by theCefalo scientistsMartin RöösliandMaria Feychting, nor by the Journal of the National CancerInstitute (JNCI

Their press-releases give reassuring messages as if no risk had been observed.
– Results are reassuring because they are non-significant and thus are compatible with chance
,states for example Martin Röösli

This interpretation of non-significant results differs fromnormal, straightforward presentations like the one a Norwegian Cefalo researcher put forwardin 2005: “
We found an elevated risk for residential exposure to magnetic fields and braintumours, although the risk was not significant”.

It is also noteworthy that the JNCI let aconsultant from the International Epidemiology Institute (IEI) express the reassuring messagein their press-release. IEI has been identified as a
product-defence firm
.Other intriguing facts about the Cefalo study include the small size of the sample, the lowinterest in other sources of non-ionizing radiation (EMF) that the children might have beenexposed to, and the incomplete study of the impact of cordless phones. Mobile and cordlessphones emit the same kind of radiation, and were both taken into consideration by the WHOevaluation mentioned above. Martin Röösli, the coordinator of Cefalo and a board member of the industry funded Swiss Research Foundation on Mobile communication gives the followingexplanation of why the Cefalo team only studied the first three years of cordless phone use:
– You cannot prove all hypotheses with one study, unless you make a very long interview.
This is puzzling as the Cefalo questionnaire was rather long (267 questions) and Röösli wasaware of the role of cordless phones as shows the following quotation :
“Mobile and cordless phone radiation is an important exposure source”.
A large number of questions treatedconfounding factors including the test persons’ contacts with cigarette smoke (38 questions),snakes and goats. Only five questions focused on cordless phones. According to Röösli one of them was:
“How often did (child) speak on cordless phone in the first 3 years he/she used it regularly?
Curiously, the questionnaire sent to the Karolinska Institute’s ethical review boardin 2005

did not include this question, but one that was not restricted to the first 3 years of use:“
How often does (child) speak on a cordless phone? (calling and receiving altogether)”

Whyand when did the Cefalo scientists decide to limit the study of cordless phone use, and is this methodologically and ethically acceptable?

– Restricting the study to the first three years of usewill lead to an underestimation of risks. We know that telephone use increase with age and that teenagers talk more than children
, says Lennart Hardell.The elusive press-releases and the sudden restriction of cordless phone use have raisedsuspicions of an intentional underestimation of the health risks. Professor Joel Moscowitz,Director of Center for Family and Community Health, School of Public Health University of California, questions the conclusions of the Cefalo scientists and the IEI, and claims that thestudy was biased. His conclusion finds support in recent history. Several studies reveal that ithas become a widespread practice to use outcome-oriented science to create doubt in order topostpone regulation and protect the manufacturers.
The manufacturer that would be protected in this case is the mobile phone industry.
“Any perceived risk or new scientific findings of adverse health effects of mobile communicationdevices and equipment could adversely affect us through a reduction in sales or throughliability claims.”

The mobile phone industry’s interest groups are very active in Brussels andWashington, they are also investing huge amounts in research on health effects, including theCefalo study. A large majority of the industry-sponsored studies conclude that EMF radiationis harmless, while most independent studies conclude that there is a risk.
Cefalo might have been designed to play down risks, but instead of challenging the findings of the international Interphone group and the Swedish Hardell group, it reconfirms them. Thesestudies made IARC, the cancer research agency of the World Health Organisation, classifymobile phone radiation as “possibly carcinogenic” in May 2011.There is now more than enough evidence for an application of the precautionary principleaccording to the International EMF Alliance, a public interest NGO representing some 60grassroots organisations advocating for a regulation and a reduction of electro-pollution.

– The irrational “zero-risk” interpretation of the Cefalo scientists creates doubts and could postpone preventive measures and cause unnecessary suffering. Mobile phone use hasincreased massively among children and teenagers the last decade, and even a small increaseof brain tumour risks is of great concern
, says Alex Swinkels, IEMFA board member.

Slovenia Ljubljana
Sierra Leone, Freetown
Sudan Khartoum
Belgium Brussels
Greece, Athens
Guinea-Bissau, Bissau
City of Ryde Australia
Mobile Alabama USA
Luxembourg, Luxembourg City,
Zimbabwe Hararesssss

Click on any of the pictures below

to learn more


Anti-Radiation Air-tube Headset

EMF Harmonization Products


The Electro Magneitc Radiation Solution From Your Cell Phone And Computers

Electro Magneitc Radiation, Electro Magneitc Radiation Protection

Lifebluetube Headset

Cell Phone Radiation Protection

Mobile Phone Radiation Protection

Trifield Electromagnetic Field Meter

October 4th, 2011
Electromagnetic pollution may be the most significant form of pollution human activity has produced in this century, all the more dangerous because it is invisible and insensible.”
– Andrew Weil? M.D., author of Spontaneous Healing and 8 Weeks to Optimum Health

With growing global concern surrounding electro pollution, specifically electromagnetic field (EMF) radiation, consumers are becoming more aware of the health issues associated with cell phone use. There is a solution to this and is simple. a bio technical company, announces the international distribution of the remeby, a personal protection device that neutralizes the harmful effects of EMF radiation.
this is a proprietary blend of activated paramagnetic and diamagnetic organic and inorganic materials that neutralize the biological effects of man-made EMF exposure. Flat, circular and one-inch in diameter, with an adhesive backing, adheres to the back or battery of cell phones, or other electronic devices, without added weight and without interfering with their functions. We all need to know as much as we can in todays world .and not just take someones word, research for yourself and then make the best decision for you.

Several studies have confirmed that cell phone radiation causes damage to DNA. A landmark study by Dr. Henry Lai of the University of Washington showed that even at low levels, exposure to EMF/RF caused DNA damage to brain cells of rats. Similar studies have been done with human immune cells. Additionally, human studies have demonstrated a direct link between cell phone use and the incidence of brain tumors. Even the FDA has expressed uncertainty when it comes to cell phones.

Dr. David Feigal, MD., director of the FDA’s Center for Devices and Radiological Health said, “…we need more definite answers about the biological effects of cell phone radiation, and about the more complicated questions of whether cell phones might cause even a small increase in the risk of developing cancer.” This concern was the catalyst for to develop an answer and with the referral you can go to links and get a lot more information on the studies to now.
This pioneered research demonstrated what many health professionals have claimed: that EMF radiation, particularly that emitted from cell phones, has an adverse effect on bodily health. Quantum Biological Lab recently completed a study confirming that cell phone radiation affected human DNA, but cell phones that have been neutralized completely prevented this effect.

“We’re beginning to see an increase in both media attention and scientific research with regard to the effect that cell phones have on humans. With 2 billion cell phones already in use, and 750 million projected to be sold , this is not a localized threat, and it is hopeful to inform the world about EMF radiation, especially parents who give cell phones to their children.

Strong research suggests that children are most susceptible to EMF radiation as their bodies are still growing. Interestingly, the British chairman of the National Radiological Protection Board advised that parents should not give cell phones to children age 8 or younger as a precaution against the potential harm of radiation from the devices.
The neutralizer is the only product on the market with in-vitro studies that prove human DNA can be protected from the damaging effects of EMF/RF radiation, and can be used on cell phones, desktop computers, laptops, microwaves, cordless telephones, televisions and video game equipment.

This is real and all have know this exist but no one realized it could actually affect our DNA, so do take the step and make yourself safer and keeping healthy. Your future depends on your choices, so just make the right one now?

I hope this has caused every one to think wisely and protect yourself and loved ones and let all you know aware of the complications that can arise from this health hazard.

Estonia, Tallinn
India New Delhi
San Marino San Marino
Estonia, Tallin,
Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur,
Liverpool, Australia,
Tajikistan, Dushanbe
Nauru Republic of Nauru, Yaren District
Overland Park Kansas USA
Solomon Islands, Honiara

Click on any of the pictures below

to learn more


Anti-Radiation Air-tube Headset

EMF Harmonization Products