Can Cell Damage Your Health?

Mobile Phone Radiation, Radiation Protection

http://www.emfnews.org/headset.html

Lifebluetube Headset

Cell Phone Radiation Protection

Mobile Phone Radiation Protection

Trifield Electromagnetic Field Meter

The world seems a person there is at least one person in view with a cell phone to her ear, either on the road, in a tent, in a lot of parking, walking down the street, etc. Even in places where cell phone use is prohibited, such as movie theatres or concert halls, there are occasional offenders, or more probably have at least a few people using text messaging on your phone.
Cell phone use has exploded in the last decade and continues to grow. Almost 200 million people in the United States have cell phones, and there is more than one billion users worldwide. This means that there are a lot of phones send their frequencies through waves at a given time.

There was concern about whether or not cell phone use can damage a person’s health. United States brain cancer rates have risen since the phones, leading some people to question whether the use of cell phone is the reason for the increase were introduced.

There have been reports of people develop brain tumors in the exact place where retained his cell phone. Some studies have expressed concern over the use of cell phone in the long term, believing that it may lead a person to develop cancer. This does not mean that a person who uses a cell phone will get cancer, but some studies suggest a long-term of increases risk of a person use.

Things are not all darkness and doom however. A study on Denmark half million cells showed no increase in cancer for users of cellular phone users.

However, other studies have concluded that there is an increased risk of cancer, but only with analog phone users. Some other studies conclude that any type of cell phone use may increase the risk of a person to develop cancer. There are a lot of different opinions on the subject. According to the FDA, the available data indicate not definitely there are health problems associated with the use of mobile phones, but the information passed to say that there is also no evidence that mobile phones are already to be completely secure.

What is the use of cell phone is causing concerns and numerous studies that do? Cell phones emit radiation when used. Levels are low and are of the same type of radiation emitted a furnace microwaves, but in much smaller quantities.
It has been suggested that with hands-free sets may alleviate the problem of the head are exposed to radiation. Once more opinions vary. Some studies say not decrease the amount of radiation exposure. Other studies say that significantly reduces the amount of radiation exposure.

Some people say that the greatest danger with cellular phones is potential whether real or perceived cancer only of neglect while you use your mobile phone. How many of us have seen vehicles somewhat erratically down the road, and then see when we arrived near of the vehicle that the driver is talking on a cell phone.? It is a fact verified that a driver on a cell phone is less attentive and more likely to suffer in a crash. And free sets of hands are not the answer that some people may think. Yes, frees both hands for driving and avoid that one person a painful arm, but mind the driver is still busy with the conversation and, therefore, less attentive to what is happening around him or her on the road.

Even people who are walking and talking on a cell phone at the same time can be compromised more because they are not so aware of what is happening to her around.

All contradictory reports that a person wonder what to do. The good news is that larger studies are being made to see whether the use of cell phone nor does not cause cancer. At the same time, manufacturers are working on new processes that reduce or even possibly eliminate exposure to radiation from a person. Until you receive more definitive answers, someone may want to avoid talking on a cell phone for several hours each day, but a person must not probably feel as if they had to give up your cell phone. Continues to be a great tool.

Advice on driving and talking on a cell phone is the same as it has been however. A person must pull over in a traffic safety zone of start a cell phone conversation.

Charlotte, North Carolina
Maldives, Male
Norway, Oslo
Peoria, Arizona
Irving, Texas
Holland, Amsterdam
Montgomery, Alabama
Estonia, Tallinn
Columbia, South Carolina
Athabat, United Arab Emirates, Athabat, UAE

Click on any of the pictures below

to learn more

Anti-Radiation Air-tube Headset

EMF Harmonization Products

Cell Phones and Brain Cancer: Is There a Link?

Cell Phone Radiation, Cell Phone Radiation Protection

http://www.emfnews.org/headset.html

Lifebluetube Headset

Cell Phone Radiation Protection

Mobile Phone Radiation Protection

Trifield Electromagnetic Field Meter

August 10, 2011

Expert Author Shauna Arthurs With the recent announcement by WHO (world health organisation) about the potential dangers of cell phone radiation, we are all naturally concerned, especially those of us who use cell phones regularly and/or who have kids with cell phones. What is safe, we wonder, in terms of use, cell phone type and exposure? Are some cell phones safer than others, and are there ways in which we can limit the dangers by changing our usage patterns? While the answers are still coming in, there are things we can do to help protect ourselves. These tips come from a variety of sources, including a brain scientist who has recovered from brain cancer (Dr. David Servan-Schreiber – if you have not yet read his book, Anticancer, A New Way of Life go get it! It’s an excellent read for anyone wishing to prevent cancer, or already dealing with the health challenges cancer presents).

Simultaneously, we are all terrified of cancer but somehow in denial that it will ever touch us personally. It’s time we look clearly at the rampart cancer rates of the last decade and take as many steps as we can personally to protect our health. When it comes to this health issue, we are all exposed to radiation in varying degrees, even those of us who do not have a cell phone. In North America, unless you live in the remote wilds and are completely off the grid, you’re likely affected, even if from cell towers and criss-crossing signals in the air. Experts are telling us that cordless phones pose similar risks, and it s only as more studies come to completion that the alarming statistics are becoming available.

Nonetheless, mobile phones and smart phones are here to stay, so let’s do what we can given that reality. For one thing, most mobile phone manufacturers now offer a protection rating on their phones, as consumers become increasingly aware and concerned. Ask your provider about your specific phone and be sure to check the rating of any phone you buy. Other tips include using a headset rather than putting the phone directly to your ear when talking, and leaving the phone away from your wear until someone answers; according to experts the signal is stronger when the phone is ringing, before it connects. The signal is also stronger when you are between cell towers, so if the connection is bad hang up and try later when it’s safer. For children and teens with developing brains, limit cell phone use and if anything, encourage texting over speaking (who ever thought anyone would say that?).

Elizabeth, New Jersey
St. Louis, Missouri
Romania, Bucharest
Horsham, Victoria
Boise, Idaho
Haiti, Port-au-Prince
Poland, Warsaw,
Cotonou (de facto capital)
Denmark, Copenhagen
Al Mataf, United Arab Emirates, Al Mataf, UAE

Click on any of the pictures below

to learn more

Anti-Radiation Air-tube Headset

EMF Harmonization Products

Study: Mobile Phones Increase Children’s Risk Of Brain Cancer

Mobile Phone Radiation, Mobile Phone Radiation Protection

http://www.emfnews.org/headset.html

Lifebluetube Headset

Cell Phone Radiation Protection

Mobile Phone Radiation Protection

Trifield Electromagnetic Field Meter

The Swedish study, the largest ever conducted on the hazards of cell phones, points to an alarming trend: cell phone use increases the risk of cancer, and tumors in young people under the age of 20.

Today’s young people may suffer an “epidemic” of the disease in later life, according to the study. At least nine out of 10 British 16-year-olds have their own handset, as do more than 40 percent of primary schoolchildren. And in the U.S., even more teenagers are hooked up to cell phones.
Last week the European Parliament voted by 522 to 16 to urge ministers across Europe to bring in stricter limits for exposure to radiation from mobile and cordless phones, Wi-fi and other devices, partly because children are especially vulnerable to them.

Studies like the Swedish study have prompted hearings by the United States Domestic Policy Subcommittee of the Oversight and Government Reform Committee/ The Committee announced last week their beginning examination of the link between tumors and cell phone use.

Children are more at risk because their brains and nervous systems are still developing and because — since their heads are smaller and their skulls are thinner — the radiation penetrates deeper into their brains, the study says.

Professor Lennart Hardell of the University Hospital in Orebro, Sweden headed the Swedish study. Professor Hardell told the recent conference that “people who started mobile phone use before the age of 20 had more than five-fold increase in glioma,” a cancer of the glial cells that support the central nervous system. The extra risk to young people of contracting the disease from using the cordless phone found in many homes was almost as great, at more than four times higher, he says.

Those who started using mobiles young, he added, were also five times more likely to get acoustic neuromas, benign but often disabling tumors of the auditory nerve, which usually cause deafness, Hardell says. By contrast, people who were in their twenties before using handsets were only 50 per cent more likely to contract gliomas and just twice as likely to get acoustic neuromas.

“Children under 12 should not use mobiles except in emergencies and that teenagers should use hands-free devices or headsets and concentrate on texting,” Hardell says. “At 20 the danger diminishes because then the brain is fully developed.”
He says, that the hazard to children and teenagers may be greater even than his results suggest, because the results of his study don’t show the effects of their using the phones for many years. Most cancers take decades to develop, longer than mobile phones have been on the market.

Latvia, Riga
Arvada Colorado USA,
Haiti, Port-au-Prince
Andorra Andorra la Vella
Greece, Athens
Charters Towers, Queensland,
Launceston, Tasmania,
Grenada, Saint George’s
Lao People’s Democratic Republic, Vientiane
Memphis Tennessee USA

Click on any of the pictures below

to learn more

Anti-Radiation Air-tube Headset

EMF Harmonization Products

Cell Phone Radiation Affects Hormones

Cell Phone Radiation,  Cell Phone Radiation Protection

http://www.emfnews.org/qlinks.html

Qlink Pendant

Home Radiation Protection

Envi Headsets

Gauss Meter

11 August, 2011
Charles Graham, PhD, physiologist at the Midwest Research Institute in Kansas City, MO., has conducted studies indicating that electromagnetic radiation alters hormone levels. (35)
When women were exposed to elevated levels of EMR overnight in the laboratory serum estrogen levels increased. Studies have shown that elevated estrogen levels are a risk for cancer development. Also, testosterone levels in men were reduced following exposure to EMR. Reduced testosterone levels have been linked to prostate and testicular cancers.

Much is written today about the harmful effects of “estrogen mimickers” produced from the multitude of many chemicals and pollutants in the environment. Indeed, these products that mimic the effects of estrogen have a damaging effect on the body in terms of their disruption to proper hormonal balance.
Dr. Graham believes that electromagnetic radiation may fit the description of an endocrine disruptor better than many of the known environmental hormone mimickers. He feels this occurs because EMR appears to cause its effects by acting on and through hormones as opposed to acting as a hormone as mimickers do.

For many years breast cancer patients all over the world have been prescribed a drug called tamoxifen as a means to prevent recurrence of breast cancer. In a study published in Electricity and Magnetism in Biology and Medicine in1998, it was shown that tamoxifen lost its ability to halt the proliferation of cancer cells when exposed to EMR. (36)

The amount of electromagnetic radiation used to produce this effect was only 12 milligauss. This amount of EMR is generated when commonly used appliances like hairdryers, vacuum cleaners, can openers, computers, microwave ovens, desk lamps, and electric clocks are in use in the home.
Imagine the implications of this finding. Women who were taking a drug to help prevent recurrence of breast cancer may have had their medication rendered useless by the exposure to EMR from common household appliances!

Liverpool Australia
Austria Vienna
Singapore, Singapore,
Denmark, Copenhagen,
Mongolia Ulan Bator
Trinidad and Tobago Port-of-Spain
Virginia Beach Virginia USA
Maldives Male
McAllen Texas USA
Moreno Valley California USA

Click on any of the pictures below

to learn more

Anti-Radiation Air-tube Headset

EMF Harmonization Products

Electromagnetic Fields And Public Health: Mobile Phones Part 1

Mobile Phone Radiation, Electromagnetic Fields

http://www.emfnews.org/qlinks.html

Qlink Pendant

Home Radiation Protection

Envi Headsets

Gauss Meter

Key facts
• Mobile phone use is ubiquitous with an estimated 4.6 billion subscriptions globally.
• The electromagnetic fields produced by mobile phones are classified by the International Agency for Research on Cancer as possibly carcinogenic to humans.
• Studies are ongoing to more fully assess potential long-term effects of mobile phone use.
• WHO will conduct a formal risk assessment of all studied health outcomes from radiofrequency fields exposure by 2012.

Mobile or cellular phones are now an integral part of modern telecommunications. In many countries, over half the population use mobile phones and the market is growing rapidly. At the end of 2009, there were an estimated 4.6 billion subscriptions globally. In some parts of the world, mobile phones are the most reliable or the only phones available.

Given the large number of mobile phone users, it is important to investigate, understand and monitor any potential public health impact.

Mobile phones communicate by transmitting radio waves through a network of fixed antennas called base stations. Radiofrequency waves are electromagnetic fields, and unlike ionizing radiation such as X-rays or gamma rays, can neither break chemical bonds nor cause ionization in the human body.

Exposure levels
Mobile phones are low-powered radiofrequency transmitters, operating at frequencies between 450 and 2700 MHz with peak powers in the range of 0.1 to 2 watts. The handset only transmits power when it is turned on. The power (and hence the radiofrequency exposure to a user) falls off rapidly with increasing distance from the handset. A person using a mobile phone 30–40 cm away from their body – for example when text messaging, accessing the Internet, or using a “hands free” device – will therefore have a much lower exposure to radiofrequency fields than someone holding the handset against their head.

In addition to using “hands-free” devices, which keep mobile phones away from the head and body during phone calls, exposure is also reduced by limiting the number and length of calls. Using the phone in areas of good reception also decreases exposure as it allows the phone to transmit at reduced power. The use of commercial devices for reducing radiofrequency field exposure has not been shown to be effective.

Mobile phones are often prohibited in hospitals and on airplanes, as the radiofrequency signals may interfere with certain electro-medical devices and navigation systems.

Are there any health effects?
A large number of studies have been performed over the last two decades to assess whether mobile phones pose a potential health risk. To date, no adverse health effects have been established as being caused by mobile phone use.

Short-term effects
Tissue heating is the principal mechanism of interaction between radiofrequency energy and the human body. At the frequencies used by mobile phones, most of the energy is absorbed by the skin and other superficial tissues, resulting in negligible temperature rise in the brain or any other organs of the body.

A number of studies have investigated the effects of radiofrequency fields on brain electrical activity, cognitive function, sleep, heart rate and blood pressure in volunteers. To date, research does not suggest any consistent evidence of adverse health effects from exposure to radiofrequency fields at levels below those that cause tissue heating. Further, research has not been able to provide support for a causal relationship between exposure to electromagnetic fields and self-reported symptoms, or “electromagnetic hypersensitivity”.

Ballarat, Victoria,
Corona, California
Barbados, Bridgetown
Lithuania, Vilnius
Hartford, Connecticut
Qatar, Doha
Bolivia, Sucre
New Zealand
Erie, Pennsylvania
Al Haybah, United Arab Emirates, Al Haybah, UAE

Click on any of the pictures below

to learn more

Anti-Radiation Air-tube Headset

EMF Harmonization Products

Warning Kids are at High Risk of Developing Brain Cancer Part 1

Cell Phone Radiation, Warning Cell Phone Radiation

Warning Kids are at High Risk of Developing Brain Cancer Part 2

http://www.emfnews.org/headset.html

Lifebluetube Headset

Cell Phone Radiation Protection

Mobile Phone Radiation Protection

Trifield Electromagnetic Field Meter

I know what you are considering. There is no way that talking on my cellphone can possibly lead to cancer, correct. Wrong. Yes, I have a cellphone too and use it all the time, but I do use speaker telephone as considerably as achievable. These are just some statistics and studies that have been done just lately to make you consider twice about not using your speakerphone. I don’t just think that making use of my cell phone can cause cancer, I know it to be true.

If you can get cancer by standing inside three to four feet of your microwave, then how about radio waves currently being emitted proper up coming to your earlobe. The causes of cancer are numerous, but let us appear at all the warnings and possibly see if there is some validation to the so known as claims. Very first of all, why would the United Nations warn us in a report that electromagnetic radiation emitted by cell phones, computer systems, ipads and other wireless devices could possibly lead to cancer.

Secondly, why the the World Well being Organization warn us that according to scientific investigation the following conclusion to distinct types of cancer have been ascertained. According to building Glioma which is a rare but frequently deadly kind of brain tumor, electromagnetic fields are a extremely strong possibility of being carcinogenic to humans. In other words, electromagnetic waves emitted by factors we use each and every day, such as our computers and cell phones are extremely cancer leading to.

Now right here is one for you, why would makers place warning labels on the devices that they sell, as far as maintaining the device a minimum distance away from the body to minimize cell telephone radiation. Blackberry suggests to keep at least .98 inches away from the body. The IPhone Security Manual says to maintain the cellphone at least 15 millimeters away from the physique. The most radiation that is emitted by cell phones and computers is when they are attempting to connect to towers.

Also a moving mobile phone or mobile phone in an place with a weak signal, has to perform harder to connect thereby giving off much more radiation. So avoid making use of out of the way places when speaking on your cellphone like elevators, factories, apartment buildings and rural regions that have a weak signal thereby limiting your danger of greater exposure to cell phone radiation.

Saint Lucia, Castries
Belarus, Minsk
Czech Republic, Prague,
Gabon, Libreville
Bhutan, Thimphu
Ethiopia, Addis Ababa
Luxembourg, Luxembourg
Port Pirie, South Australia
Trinidad and Tobago Port-of-Spain
Rochester New York USA

Click on any of the pictures below

to learn more

Anti-Radiation Air-tube Headset

EMF Harmonization Products

New study from Louisiana State University

EMF hypersensitivity, EMF exposure Protection

http://www.emfnews.org/qlinks.html

Qlink Pendant

Home Radiation Protection

Envi Headsets

Gauss Meter

Dr. Andrew Marino and his colleagues at Louisiana State University have just published a study proving the existence of electromagnetic hypersensitivity as an organic syndrome. They did a thorough medical workup on a subject (a female physician) who claimed to have EHS, and showed that she reacted within 100 seconds of being exposed to low-level pulsed electromagnetic fields with headache, muscle twitching, skipped heartbeats and other symptoms. This was a carefully designed double-blind test, repeated many times. Although the subject could not consciously perceive the field, her body reacted every time it was turned on. This has just been published in the International Journal of Neuroscience. The abstract is here: http://informahealthcare.com/doi/abs/10.3109/00207454.2011.608139

ABSTRACT
Objective: We sought direct evidence that acute exposure to environmental-strength electromagnetic fields could induce somatic reactions (EMF hypersensitivity).

Methods: The subject, a female physician self-diagnosed with EMF hypersensitivity, was exposed to an average (over the head) 60-Hz electric field of 300 V/m (comparable to typical environmental-strength EMFs) during controlled provocation and behavioral studies.

Results: In a double-blinded EMF provocation procedure specifically designed to minimize unintentional sensory cues, the subject developed temporal pain, headache, muscle-twitching, and skipped heartbeats within 100 s after initiation of EMF exposure (P < 0.05). The symptoms were caused primarily by field transitions (off-on, on-off) rather than the presence of the field, as assessed by comparing the frequency and severity of the effects of pulsed and continuous fields in relation to sham exposure. The subject had no conscious perception of the field as judged by her inability to report its presence more often than in the sham control.

Discussion: The subject demonstrated statistically reliable somatic reactions in response to exposure to subliminal EMFs under conditions that reasonably excluded a causative role for psychological processes.

Conclusion: EMF hypersensitivity can occur as a bona fide environmentally-inducible neurological syndrome.

Read More: http://informahealthcare.com/doi/abs/10.3109/00207454.2011.608139

New Orleans, Louisiana
Arvada, Colorado
Kiribati, South Tarawa
Waterbury, Connecticut
Suriname, Paramaribo,
Palestinian State
Montgomery, Alabama
Albury, Australia
Salt Lake City, Utah
Al Haybah, United Arab Emirates, Al Haybah, UAE

Click on any of the pictures below

to learn more

Anti-Radiation Air-tube Headset

EMF Harmonization Products

Study On Cancer Risk From Cell Phones Is Questioned

Cell Phone Radiation, Cell Phone Radiation Protection

http://www.emfnews.org/headset.html

Lifebluetube Headset

Cell Phone Radiation Protection

Mobile Phone Radiation Protection

Trifield Electromagnetic Field Meter

Aug. 9, 2011

COLUMBUS – Kids who use cell phones have no greater risk of brain cancer than non-users, according to a new study published in the Journal of the National Cancer Institute . But parents shouldn’t breathe a sigh of relief, according to Joel Moskowitz, a director in the School of Public Health at the University of California-Berkeley. He’s reviewed the research and claims the results actually verify higher tumor risks for children, but those findings are down-played.

“They did report a number of significant associations between cell phone use, in terms of number of years of use, with brain tumor risk in children,” Moskowitz said. “And they try to dismiss those, as well.”

Another issue for parents to consider: Moskowitz said regular cell phone users in the study were described as those using a phone once a week for six months. He calls that frequency “barely even using a phone,” and in the U.S., usage by children and teens is much higher. The study was conducted in Denmark, Switzerland, Sweden and Norway.

The researchers did note that because mobile phone usage among kids has increased over the years, a careful watch on the trend is needed. Retired electronics engineer Lloyd Morgan has been doing just that and has himself written several reports on links between the radio frequency (RF) radiation exposure from cell phones and brain tumors.

He’s analyzed the newest report which, he said, like the highly-criticized Interphone study a year ago, considers radiation exposures not reflective of typical use, and therefore downplays brain tumor risk.

“They contradict their own conclusion when you read the paper. It isn’t what the abstract says it is.”
On a related RF radiation health safety note, several public health watchdogs, as well as the American Academy of Environmental Medicine, sent a request to Congress this week asking it to direct the U.S. Federal Communications Commission to update obsolete cell-phone tower safety regulations. The groups cite a growing body of science showing RF biological effects, such as links to cancer, and other health issues, including memory ability.

Belize, Belmopan
Guinea, Conakry
Subiaco Victoria Australia
Spain, Madrid
Ecuador, Quito
United Arab Emirates, Abu Dhabi
Italy, Rome
Turkey, Ankara
Sierra Leone, Freetown
St. Paul Minnesota USA

Click on any of the pictures below

to learn more

Anti-Radiation Air-tube Headset

EMF Harmonization Products

Cell Phones and Children

Cell Phone Radiation, Cell Phone Radiation Protection

http://www.emfnews.org/qlinks.html

Qlink Pendant

Home Radiation Protection

Envi Headsets

Gauss Meter

http://willtaft.com/6368/health/cell-phones-and-children

This is the sort of news story that can drive you crazy! Now I have written enough times on the speculation of a link between cell phone use and cancer for regular readers to know that I am not sure what to believe. Those same readers also know that main-stream media articles on almost any subject can drive me to pull my hair out. Actually it looks like I’ve pulled out a lot of it already and probably should find a new way of venting my frustration with these articles. So let me vent with this post!

USA Today recently published an article titled “Cellphones don’t increase cancer risk in kids, study says“. This article goes on and on about how researchers have shown that “using cellphones doesn’t increase children’s cancer risk. The article reads more like a press release from the cell phone manufacturers association than it does like an independent assessment of the study. Now maybe it is just poor writing in the USA Today article, but there appears to be either incomplete information in the article, or a total contradiction in relaying the results.

You can read the article and see for yourself but what caught my attention was this… After stating several ways to Sunday that there is no increased childhood cancer risk from cell phone use, there is this gem about 3/4ths of the way through the article:

In a subset of children, researchers found a higher risk of brain tumors in children whose cellphone subscriptions had begun more than 2.8 years ago.

What that means exactly I cannot tell. I read the abstract of the article but that “subset” is not addressed. To read the full study you either have to be a paying subscriber to the Journal of the National Cancer Institute, or buy one-day access to the study online. I did find a good summary of the study written by two epidemiologists but that also did not seem to directly address this subset of children who did have increased cancer rates.

Dominican Republic Santo Domingo
Malta Valetta
Dominica Roseau
Djibouti Djibouti
Cote d’Ivoire Yamoussoukro
France Paris
Morocco Rabat
Peru Lima City
Chattanooga Tennessee USA
Mobile Alabama USA

Click on any of the pictures below

to learn more

Anti-Radiation Air-tube Headset

EMF Harmonization Products

World Health Organization Study Links Cell Phone Use to Cancer Risk

Cell Phone Radiation, Cell Phone Radiation Protection

http://www.emfnews.org/headset.html

Lifebluetube Headset

Cell Phone Radiation Protection

Mobile Phone Radiation Protection

Trifield Electromagnetic Field Meter

Aug. 10, 2011
Interview with Devra Davis, Environmental Health Trust founder and president, conducted by Scott Harris

After years of speculation about the health hazards of mobile phone use, a panel of scientists at the World Health Organization reported on May 31 that they’ve concluded using cell phones may increase the risk of developing certain types of brain tumors. A working group of 31 scientists from 14 countries meeting at the WHO’s International Agency for Research on Cancer announced that their review of all the available scientific evidence suggested cell phone use should be classified as “possibly carcinogenic.”

While some scientists had previously warned about the dangers of cell phone use, the WHO study marks the first time a major health organization has made a connection between mobile phones and cancer. While the study does not definitively show that cell phone use increases the risk of cancer, the health implications are enormous considering that an estimated five billion people, nearly three-quarters of the world’s population, now use mobile phones.

As the WHO study has increased public concern about cell phone safety, the wireless phone industry has attempted to debunk the group’s warning by funding research of its own, which some critics have labeled as blatant propaganda. Between The Lines’ Scott Harris spoke with Devra Davis, founder and president of the group Environmental Health Trust, who discusses the importance of the World Health Organization’s report on the health hazards associated with cell phones and what can be done to reduce the risk.

Sri Lanka, Democratic Socialist
Senegal, Dakar
Iran, Tehran
Serbia, Belgrade
Comoros, Moroni
Cameroon, Yaoundé
Tuvalu, Funafuti
Grand Rapids Michigan USA
Congo, Democratic Republic of the Kinshasa,
Papua New Guinea, Port Moresby

Click on any of the pictures below

to learn more

Anti-Radiation Air-tube Headset

EMF Harmonization Products