Dangers Of EMF’S And Mobile Phone Masts And How They Can Affect Our Health Part 7

http://www.emfnews.org/headset.html

Lifebluetube Headset

Cell Phone Radiation Protection

Mobile Phone Radiation Protection

Trifield Electromagnetic Field Meter

However, these Schumann waves can be interfered with or altered in towns and cities and even the countryside by technical interference frequencies from all forms of radio and other communication transmitters, railway networks and high-tension power lines et al. There is another signal spectrum that we humans integrate with and this is known as the electron plasma waves of trace elements and crystals in the lithosphere. Although these electromagnetic radiations are far weaker in intensity, they are in precise resonance with the organism, in which the same trace elements also occur, particularly in the blood. These too can be interfered with by communications transmitters.

“We have already shown how inextricably the human body is bound to Nature, both in relation to the Earth and the Cosmos. We are controlled by both and we can only live in common, rhythmical oscillations. Unfortunately the modern world is heavily polluted by microwaves, which have increased exponentially in recent years. The many new radio and TV broadcasting stations, the increase in CB radio, in radar for air traffic, satellites or military installations alone are flooding the aether, which has a knock-on effect on biological frequencies. If we consider that the body transfers biological information ranging from 1 Hz right through to well above light frequencies, we can see how this type of pollution, which can be classed as more harmful than exposure to pollutant substances, is certainly a major reason why acute disorders are relatively rare nowadays… This is clearly supported by the increase in chronic disorders in recent years.”

In disease, which is a disturbance or interference in the ‘energy field’, the body “…is forced to produce the mirror-image counter oscillations of the interference field at the same time, by neutralising them… It succeeds in doing this with the corresponding expenditure of energy. We also refer to ‘holding work’, which it must perform, because it has to constantly expend energy in order to neutralise these constantly recurring oscillations from the interference field. If the organism is weakened…it can no longer perform the holding work and is no longer able to neutralise the pathological oscillation. ” This is the onset of illness and disease as we know it biologically.

Professor Smith of Salford University in England discovered that “favourable information is absorbed [by the body] very quickly. Whereas unfavourable information” – such as chaotic EMF’s, microwaves and radio waves – “is blocked for some time, i.e. for ten to fifteen seconds, and may only cause damage after a longer (chronic) period of exposure.” We obviously have sufficient external pathogenic factors over which we primarily do not have any influence. Amongst these contaminants such as heavy metals, we have radioactivity and microwave pollution. The body does not become ill because it has been infected but because the defence system – the energy field – has become weakened. Professor Popp discovered that the cells of living organisms store and emit light (photons) and this light controls vital processes. If this mechanism does not function correctly, the organism is diseased.

Indonesia, Jakarta City,
Spain, Madrid,
Liberia, Monrovia,
Estonia, Tallinn,
Germany, Berlin
Belgium, Brussels
Wichita, Kansas, USA
Wilmington, North Carolina, USA
Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur,
Holland, Amsterdam

Click on any of the pictures below to learn more

Anti-Radiation Air-tube Headset Q-Link Products EMF Harmonization Products

http://www.emfnews.org/headset.html

Lifebluetube Headset

Cell Phone Sensitivity

EM Field Meter

Cell Phone Towers Health Effects

It has been established through numerous scientific experiments that all living things are constantly sharing information and interacting with each other and that certain man-made electromagnetic frequencies can have a detrimental effect on the health and growth of living organisms. In effect the human organism is composed of a multitude of electromagnetic waves. The Human organism has a broad spectrum from below 10 to over 1015 Hertz.

A Human in many respects is literally an “open system and constantly receives from his environment information from biotic and abiotic environmental factors. Plants, animals and people and their vital expressions and mutual relationships are among the biotic environmental factors. Soil, air, water, sunlight, sound, crystals, trace elements, Schumann waves and other electromagnetic oscillations of the atmosphere are natural abiotic factors. All these natural items of information are largely disturbed in our modern age by artificial environmental factors created by Man” – such as microwaves and radio waves, chemicals and so forth – which can “…lead to a modification of the natural environmental situation and environmental information and imperceptibly, but to an increasingly worsening extent, the human organism.”

The science of biophysics has established that all life is firmly imprinted with the stamp of the environment: “The body is thus firmly integrated into our environment, is in constant exchange with it and is controlled by it, i.e. all our various biorhythms, our organ and metabolic functions (normally) run synchronously with the ‘pulse rhythm’ of the universe. If this coordination is disturbed, disease and possibly death occur.” Control pulses come firstly from what are referred to as Schumann waves, arising in the ionosphere with a frequency of 7.83Hz that corresponds precisely with the frequency of the hippocampus in the brain of all mammals. The hippocampus in humans is responsible for our memory and survival among other factors.

Our nervous system also responds to the electromagnetic pulses of the Schumann waves. These induce miniature potentials in the nerve loops, which on repetition add up to action potentials and can actively intervene in cybernetic control circuits of the body. The autonomic nervous system is autonomic but adapted to the environment and resonates with it. It becomes very clear that we are an electrical or energy system and depend on and interact with balanced and natural energies around us for our health, wellbeing and survival. The importance of this and the importance of the Earth’s Schumann waves, as an example, are evidenced by the fact that NASA builds Schumann wave generators into its manned space flights to keep their astronauts physiologically and psychologically healthy.

Togo, Lome
Boise, Idaho
Palau, Koror
Zambia, Lusaka
Albania, Tirana
Lincoln Nebraska USA
Belgium, Brussels,
City of Holroyd Australia
New Zealand
Fujairah, United Arab Emirates, Fujairah, UAE

Click on any of the pictures below to learn more

Anti-Radiation Air-tube Headset Q-Link Products EMF Harmonization Products

http://www.emfnews.org/headset.html

Lifebluetube Headset

Cell Phone Sensitivity

EM Field Meter

Cell Phone Towers Health Effects

A symposium in Vienna attended by many of the world’s foremost independent scientists looking into the mobile phone health debate, signed a resolution in January 1999, to the effect that biological effects caused by low level exposure to radio wave/microwave EMR, particularly those emitted by mobile phones and their base transmitting stations were now contrary to the views expressed by government protection bodies such as the UK’s National Radiological Protection Board (NRPB). Scientifically established, the Group (of scientists), which included the likes of Carl Blackman of the USA’s Environment Protection Agency, voted overwhelmingly in favour of the above resolution.

The Human Body contains electrolytes and ions, which are positively or negatively charged. The water molecule is a polar molecule – it has positive and negative charges separated by a dipole length. A water molecule has a positive and negative pole and is therefore, an electric dipole. As we are made up of approximately 65-70% water, electrolytes and ions, it follows that the human body has its own weak electromagnetic field and each of our cells has its own EM Field too. Basic science shows us this is so. It follows that strong and even weak Electromagnetic Fields emitted from any electrical or electronic equipment will interact with and affect the human body’s own weak electromagnetic fields, and, therefore, interfere with the body’s natural healing processes.

From my Document on the Dangers of EMF’s we can see it has been established that biological systems have the property of storing electromagnetic oscillations [information] and incorrect oscillations can also occur [i.e. not endogenous - not originating within the body], or be introduced through the environment, which stubbornly remain in the organism and lead to incorrect regulation (more info on this later) – which we know from biochemistry can lead to illness and disease. In other words it establishes that our health depends on balance being maintained in our cell’s electromagnetic field, that our cells store information in the form of electromagnetic oscillations (information within our DNA for e.g. is ‘electronically’ stored in this way) and information from incorrect or non endogenous oscillations (not of the body – EMF’s/ELF’s being typical examples) can be stored within our cells energy fields leading to disturbance, disorder and incoherence (loss of equilibrium – balance) which can lead to genetic damage, damage to our DNA, illness and disease.

In other words, our own electromagnetic frequencies essential to our health, the repair, reproduction and replication of DNA can be altered by storing, or ‘taking on board’ information (oscillations) from other outside sources of energy such as electromagnetic and electrical radiation.

City of Shoalhaven Australia
Blue Mountains Australia
Abilene Texas USA
Port Lincoln, South Australia
Zambia, Lusaka,
Finland, Helsinki,
City of Maitland Australia
Palmdale California USA
Columbus Georgia USA
Sao Tome and Principe Sao Tome

Click on any of the pictures below to learn more

Anti-Radiation Air-tube Headset Q-Link Products EMF Harmonization Products

Dangers Of EMF’S And Mobile Phone Masts And How They Can Affect Our Health Part 4

http://www.emfnews.org/headset.html

Lifebluetube Headset

Cell Phone Radiation Protection

Mobile Phone Radiation Protection

Trifield Electromagnetic Field Meter

All biochemical functions (processes) are activated and regulated by our body’s own electromagnetic fields. The fact that magnetic fields enter our body’s own energy fields is well documented by biophysicists and can easily be measured. Electromagnetic frequencies are man-made and therefore unnatural, chaotic and disordered and biophysics has established that ‘Every kind of frequency combination which is not in order produces disease.’ Disease occurs through a disturbance of the electromagnetic field in the cells: they become disordered and incoherent. (More later)

The affects upon our health by exposure to EMF Radiation, looking from a biochemical view point, would appear to show ill health is caused by the displacement of electrolytes/ions within the body and by interfering with the body’s natural way of communicating (neurological system) and maintaining homeostasis – balance. This will weaken the defense mechanism of the body as the body expends energy attempting to redress this imbalance. If we cannot get away from these EMF fields because we live within their field of influence, the body will be unable to correct this electrical and biochemical imbalance and, as the science of Biophysics has proven that we only become ill when the defense mechanism of the body is weakened, it follows that we will undoubtedly become ill as a direct result of living or working within these EMR fields.

So it is not a question of whether these EMF fields cause health problems or not, that is not in doubt. What is uncertain is just how this ill-health will manifest in an individual; this is determined by the individual’s own constitution and health and may manifest in many ways, which is why we are seeing so many ‘new’ immune deficient disorders today. What is certain, through even the most basic understanding of physics is that EMF’s do weaken our energy fields and this will lead to some form of illness and disease in humans. Children, in particular, with their developing immune systems and ill or sick people are more prone to the effects of EM Radiation, and are, therefore, at risk the most.

Rwanda, Kigali,
Spain, Madrid,
Macedonia, Skjope,
Gambia, Banjul
Belarus, Minsk
Cameroon, Yaoundé
Paraguay, Asuncion,
Oman, Muscat,
Djibouti, Djibouti
Palm Bay, Florida, USA

Click on any of the pictures below to learn more

Anti-Radiation Air-tube Headset Q-Link Products EMF Harmonization Products

http://www.emfnews.org/qlinks.html

Qlink Pendant

Envi Headsets

Gauss Meter

Home Radiation Protection

Currently The National Radiation Protection Board (NRPB) produce guidelines (set in 1993) which provide us with supposedly safe levels of radiation – levels, however, which are considerably higher than other countries where research into this subject has led to a number of scientists and scientific bodies significantly reducing their exposure levels. The magnitude of the gulf in thinking between the NRPB and other scientific bodies/governments is alarming. It is difficult to imagine how the NRPB can continue to maintain that an investigative exposure level of 10000mW/cm2 (100W/m2) is safe when in 1995 the New Zealand Environment Court (as the Planning Tribunal) in the case of MacIntyre vs. BellSouth set a level of 2mW/cm2 as a precautionary approach – a level 5000 times less than that set by the NRPB!

I understand that Council’s, when faced with these planning applications, are in a difficult position, between a rock and a hard place so to speak, but they may be leaving themselves wide-open to litigation in the future. However, over 50% of councils in Scotland are now operating precautionary policies to prevent masts from being sited near schools, hospitals and residential areas. In Australia many councils have introduced policies on the siting of mobile phone masts, designed to provide some protection for the public by avoiding sensitive areas. The New South Wales Minister for Education in 1997, stated “The Department of School Education objects to installation of mobile phone towers near schools, and that normally means within a radius of 500 metres. This objection is based on a policy of prudent avoidance”. Since children spend more time at home than at school, it follows that this same prudent avoidance should apply to residential areas. http://www.equilibrauk.com/emfnewinfo.shtml

Evidence has started to emerge suggesting there could be some very serious health implications, most notably an increased incidence of cancer for people working or residing in the vicinity of mobile phone base station transmitter masts. In other countries, most notably the US, Australia and New Zealand, the governments have all taken this issue sufficiently seriously, at both national and local level, to adopt the precautionary principle and introduce policies of prudent avoidance which have effectively banned the erection of these masts from school buildings and residential areas and in other densely populated locations.

Haiti, Port-au-Prince,
Goulburn, Australia
Venezuela, Caracas,
Togo, Lome
Hialeah, Florida, USA
Cotonou (de facto capital)
Congo, Brazzaville
City of Lismore, Australia,
Guinea-Bissau, Bissau,
San Antonio, Texas, USA

Click on any of the pictures below to learn more

Anti-Radiation Air-tube Headset Q-Link Products EMF Harmonization Products

Mobile Phone Masts – Microwave Radiation Protection Part 2

http://www.emfnews.org/headset.html

Lifebluetube Headset

Cell Phone Sensitivity

EM Field Meter

Cell Phone Towers Health Effects

There are a number of ways in which we can help to reduce the debilitating affects Microwave Radiation can have upon the body (emitted from Phone Masts and other sources). We can move home, which is not ideal or always possible, or we can sit tight and use certain materials available today to help to block or reduce the radiation entering our home/bedroom and/or workplace.

Firstly, before we come to what we CAN do to help, it may be prudent to offer a brief précis of why it is important to protect ourselves from this type of radiation.

The New Generation (G3/3G) and Tetra Masts pulse(phase)-modulate their signals. It is this modulation, or ‘burst repetition rate’ that seems to have the most damaging effect upon the body because the frequencies generated are very close to the body’s natural range of frequencies – which range from below 10 to over 1015 Hertz. “If we consider that the body transfers biological information ranging from 1 Hz right through to well above light frequencies, we can see how this type of pollution, which can be classed as more harmful than exposure to pollutant substances, is certainly a major reason why acute disorders are relatively rare nowadays… This is clearly supported by the increase in chronic disorders in recent years.” http://www.equilibrauk.com/microwaveprotection.shtml

In disease, which is a disturbance or interference in the ‘energy field’, the body “…is forced to produce the mirror-image counter oscillations of the interference field at the same time, by neutralising them… It succeeds in doing this with the corresponding expenditure of energy. We also refer to ‘holding work’, which it must perform, because it has to constantly expend energy in order to neutralise these constantly recurring oscillations from the interference field. If the organism is weakened…it can no longer perform the holding work and is no longer able to neutralise the pathological oscillation.” This is the onset of illness and disease as we know it biologically.

It has been established that there is a constant equilibrium between photons and the growth of a cell association, and if the EM field of the cell is disturbed its coherence (balance) is affected too and if this coherence is disturbed, all the functions, including immune defence, are blocked; but above all – and this is the most important thing – the repair capacity of the cell, the ability to restore order to genetic damage is blocked. From this point of view the concept of disease should be reconsidered: disease, before it is manifested in physical symptoms, is manifested as a disturbance in or to the electromagnetic field.

The first steps to the body healing itself are to “… restore the rhythms of the organism and synchronise and re-adapt to a normal, undisturbed control programme.” In other words, deal with and eliminate the frequencies responsible for causing imbalance. This of course cannot be achieved when one lives in close proximity to a static and immovable mobile phone mast that is constantly emitting the very chaotic frequencies or incoherent oscillations (information) which create a disturbance in Human EM fields in the first place, and which we now know can lead to illness in the human organism.

Melville, Victoria,
Iceland, Rekyavik,
Ipswich, Queensland,
City of Hawkesbury Australia
Memphis Tennessee USA
Gambia, Banjul,
Arlington Texas USA
Greece Athens
Uganda, Kampala,
Luxembourg Luxembourg City

Click on any of the pictures below to learn more

Anti-Radiation Air-tube Headset Q-Link Products EMF Harmonization Products

http://www.emfnews.org/headset.html

Lifebluetube Headset

Cell Phone Sensitivity

EM Field Meter

Cell Phone Towers Health Effects

Start Here: Separate Fact From Fantasy

Debate and controversy, surrounding the potential cell phone health risks, have grown new legs in the last decade. Fill the world with millions of portable radio wave emitters and some people grow jumpy. Technically speaking wireless hand held phones emit low levels of radio frequencies (RFs) into the environment around us. The culprit for most emissions is the phone’s antenna, internal or external, which sits very close to the user’s head when used as a hand-held device.
Understand the Basics of Cell Phone Emissions

To understand the proposed health and safety risks you must understand the basics of wireless communications. Electromagnetic radiation is a complex topic for most typical consumers to dip into too deeply. The very term “radiation” sparks fears. All types of electronic devices, particularly those that run on radio waves, emit levels of radio frequencies. The rates at which these frequencies are absorbed by the human body are measured by the Specific Absorption Rate (SAR), a number assigned to every model of cell phone sold in the U.S. The acceptable SAR rate is anything under 1.6 watts per kilogram. Confused? You’re not alone.

The Food and Drug Administration, in concert with the Federal Communications Commission, controls the flow of most mainstream consumer information in the U.S. on this topic. Both agencies maintain closely allied policies on the matter: as far as scientific studies show the kind of low-level RFs released by cell phones seem to pose no significant health risks, but further research is necessary.

About Studies, Research, and Scare Tactics

You’ve likely heard a scare story—that someone’s cell phone gave him or her brain cancer. Stories like these surface occasionally in mainstream media only to impel yet another round of short-term studies. Scientists and researchers are constrained by limited studies that bypass theoretical scientific research, which is most successful when carried out over the long term. The only conclusive argument is that further studies on cell phone emissions are necessary.
Safety Precautions You Need to Know About

The mixed sentiment from the FCC and FDA drives other sources such as Consumer Reports to recommend consumers take safety precautions with cell phone products and educate their children on the potential risks. But to what sources do you ally yourself?

Debunk Cell Phone Health Information

There is a cacophony of information on cell phone emissions, RFs, and SAR metrics. Learn to employ critical thinking to everything you read and hear on the subject. Even the FDA—an authority figure—waffles on the subject of cell phone emissions. You must learn to tiptoe your way through the minefield of outlandish “medical” allegations, scientific aberrations, inconclusive research projects, and even crackpot urban legends that prey on human fears.

Mauritania, Nouakchott,
Yugoslavia, Belgrade,
City of Canada Bay, Australia,
Maldives, Male,
Geelong, Victoria,
Guinea, Conakry,
Wichita Falls, Texas, USA
Charters Towers, Queensland,
Devonport, Tasmania,
City of Holroyd, Australia

Click on any of the pictures below to learn more

Anti-Radiation Air-tube Headset Q-Link Products EMF Harmonization Products

http://www.emfnews.org/headset.html

Lifebluetube Headset

Cell Phone Towers Health Effects

Cell Phone Sensitivity

EM Field Meter

“I hope you’re talking to me on a speakerphone,” Devra Davis barks at me when I call her on my cell phone. “You’d better not be holding that phone up to your head.”

Indeed, I’m not. This is a good thing, because you don’t want to get into an argument with Davis on this subject. She’s the director of the University of Pittsburgh’s Center for Environmental Oncology, and her group recently put out
recommendations that we should be using a speakerphone or ear piece. The report says children, who have thinner skulls and developing brains, should use cell phones only in case of emergency.

And heaven forbid anyone should carry a cell phone in a pocket or clipped to a belt. “You’re just roasting your bone marrow,” Davis said.

Oh, boy. Another thing to worry about. Or maybe Davis is an alarmist. It’s so hard to tell. Although there are many large studies showing no connection between mobile phones and cancer, there are a few that do. As Davis puts it, do you really want to play Russian roulette with your head?

But if you do buy the cellphones-cause-cancer argument, you have to figure out the best way to talk on a cell phone, seeing as how most of us can’t live without them. Should you use the wired headset that came with your phone? A Bluetooth earpiece? iReport.com: Does your kid have a cell phone?

I embarked on a journey this past week to answer these questions and at many points have been very sorry I did. This is the mother of all “the jury is still out” issues.

Cell phones have been wildly popular for only a matter of years, and it can take at least a decade for cancers to show up. Studies contradict each other, and scientists bicker: Some will tell you with great conviction that there’s nothing to worry about. Others will tell you with equal conviction that an epidemic of brain tumors may be just around the corner.

The cell phone industry itself says “the overwhelming majority of studies that have been published in scientific journals around the globe show that wireless phones do not pose a health risk.” You can this week.So what are we all to do until they figure it out? After enough interviews with physicists, engineers and doctors to make me want to stick my head in a microwave oven, one common line of reasoning emerged.

Cell phones do emit radiation. No one knows definitively whether it’s enough to worry about.

Mobile phones meet federal safety limits, but if you’re still worried, there are some simple steps you can take to lower your exposure to radiation.

Dayton Ohio USA
Saudi Arabia Riyadh
Barbados, Bridgetown,
Clarksville Tennessee USA
Yonkers New York USA
United Kingdom London
Chile, Santiago,
Suriname Paramaribo
Mobile Alabama USA
City of Canada Bay Australia

Click on any of the pictures below to learn more

Anti-Radiation Air-tube Headset Q-Link Products EMF Harmonization Products

http://www.emfnews.org/qlinks.html

Qlink Pendant

Home Radiation Protection

Envi Headsets

Gauss Meter

About 4 billion people worldwide use cellphones. Researchers have been debating for years on whether the radiation from cellphone use leads to health hazards such as cancer and other illnesses.

Perhaps, in no greater proof of how hot the debate is, infomercial peddlers such as Kevin Trudeau and television doctors such as Andrew Weil have declared that cellphone use are one of the risk factors for brain cancer.

Researchers are divided on whether radiation from cellphones poses health risks or not. Now, one non-profit organization adds some hard data to the argument: the radiation emission profiles of more than 1,200 cellphone models. The data won’t resolve the debate, but does give concrete information to consumers to help them make their buying decisions.

American cellphone radiation standards don’t make enough of an allowance for safety and ignore the impact of electromagnetic radiation on children, says the Environmental Working Group, which analyzed the radiation emissions from 1,268 cellphones. The group also looked at a number of recent research studies and supporting documentation from the handset makers to arrive at its conclusions.

“We think that based on current standards there’s increased risk of developing brain tumours in long term users — people who have used cellphones for more than 10 years — from radiation in cellphones,” says Olga Naidenko, a senior scientist at EWG, who worked on the report for about 10 months. The group has created a database of feature phones and smartphones that lists the maximum radiation each of the devices emits. “We want consumers to take steps they can take to minimize potential risks,” says Naidenko.

More scientific studies have tried to assess both short term and long term impact of cellphone usage. Yet there has been no conclusive evidence so far. That’s because earlier research studies didn’t have a pool of users available who had been on their cellphones long enough, says Naidenko.

“A lot of the studies that came out in 2000 and 2001 only looked at short term exposure, which is about four to five years and they didn’t see any risks from radiation,” she says. “But now that we see results from long term studies, we are seeing more evidence to the contrary.” Still Naidenko says the EWG’s data doesn’t conclusively prove a link between cellphone radiation and health risks. Until the evidence will prove with many cancers examples the actual situation will go further.

Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
Botswana, Gaborone
Czech Rep, Prague
Samoa, Apia,
Italy, Rome
Maryborough, Queensland,
Romania, Bucharest,
Mauritania, Nouakchott
Grafton, Australia
Columbus, Ohio, USA

Click on any of the pictures below to learn more

Anti-Radiation Air-tube Headset Q-Link Products EMF Harmonization Products

Health Hazards of Cell Phone Radiation Part 2

http://www.emfnews.org/headset.html

Lifebluetube Headset

Cell Phone Towers Health Effects

Cell Phone Sensitivity

EM Field Meter

It is now inconceivable that our world could function without the 5 billion cell phones used globally. The new book by Devra Davis “Disconnect” deserves your attention. Indeed, if you use a cell phone a lot it should be mandatory reading.

It also seems inconceivable that the trillion dollar cell phone industry and governments worldwide could have pushed this technology without ever having solid research results proving the safety of cell phones. If true that would be deadly frightening. But that is exactly the reality.

Is this a bizarre slip up or an intentional conspiracy between corporate and government interests? The more you learn the more you fear. Nightmarishly, cell phone technology has become too big to fail, no matter its deadly risks. Government won’t protect you, so you have to protect yourself.

Let me note that I rarely use my cell phone. Very few people have my number and I rarely turn it on, except when I need to make a call. As a former professor of engineering I have always seen technology as offering risks, not just heavily commercialized benefits. The risks are often dismissed, poorly studied or just plain ignored.

And by now everyone should be concerned that neither government regulations nor corporate responsibility protect us very well from harmful foods, prescription drugs and manufactured products.

Facing the truth is often painful, but if you care about protecting your health and the health of people you love, then this is a book you definitely want to read and get others to read. Make no mistake, what you learn will upset you, but beyond getting angry at companies and the government for not adequately protecting against a man made public health disaster, you will be motivated to change your behavior. The subtitle sums up the theme: The Truth About Cell Phone Radiation, What the Industry Has Done to Hide It, and How to Protect Your Family.

Here are some of the eye-popping facts and insights I picked up from reading of this book.

Tests show young men who keep their phones in a pants pocket have reduced sperm counts.

Townsville, Queensland,
Elk Grove California USA
Burkina Faso, Ouagadougou,
City of Coffs Harbour, Australia,
Joondalup Victoria Australia
Kiribati South Tarawa
Beaumont Texas USA
City of Rockdale Australia
Chile, Santiago,
Sao Tome and Principe Sao Tome

Click on any of the pictures below to learn more

Anti-Radiation Air-tube Headset Q-Link Products EMF Harmonization Products