Dangerous Radiation From Hidden Cell Phone Towers Part 3

Dangerous Radiation, Cell Phone Towers

http://www.emfnews.org/headset.html

Blue tube headsets

Radiation Protection Products

Cell phone towers health effects

WHY RF IS SIMILAR TO RADIOACTIVITY

For those familiar with radiation exposure hazards, the striking parallels to radioactivity are obvious here. RF Frequency is similar to the radiation type, like Alpha, Beta or Gamma. In fact, each of these particles move as a frequency above that of ultraviolet light, and are actually composed of high speed particles. Each of the particle types affects the human body and systems in different ways. RF power level is like the number of particles per second of a radioactive source. Both duration and distance also translate into the realm of radiation exposure.

We know that certain radioactive particles from Alpha particle emitters cause the most damage to lung cells when inhaled. Alpha particle ionizing radiation alters DNA in cells, and can create pre-cursor changes leading to cancer. Tissues and structures in the body that appear on scans and x-rays are sometimes diagnosed as a “pre-cancerous condition” by doctors. Older camping mantle lanterns were very radioactive, because they were made from the element thorium. (The author of this paper found such a radioactive mantle in an older propane lantern. It is believed that most of these are now off the market.)

The reason for discussing the above subject, is to show that anything which alters cellular DNA can be extremely unhealthy. And this is both nuclear radiation and RF. There are also chemical and effects from ultraviolet as well.

Moldova, Chisinau,
Panama, Panama City,
Solomon Islands, Honiara,
Pakistan, Islamabad,
Greece, Athens,
Maryborough, Queensland,
Horsham, Victoria,
Central African Republic, Bangui,
Slovenia, Lujblijana,
City of Lake Macquarie, Australia

Click on any of the pictures below

to learn more

Anti-Radiation Air-tube Headset

EMF Harmonization Products

THE RF SPECTRUM – What Different RF Frequencies do to the human body

RF Frequencies, RF SPECTRUM

http://www.emfnews.org/qlinks.html

Qlink Pendant

Home Radiation Protection

Envi Headsets

For our European friends, please note that all the frequencies referenced below are for the American and Canadian radio spectrum. The lowest frequencies are radio waves, that are actually the same as frequencies as the audio sound which comes out of your speakers. This called VLF, or Very Low Frequency. These waves have wavelengths measured in thousands of miles. They pass through the body without damage.

Commercial AM radio signals, use waves that are also quite long and pass through the body with relative ease. These are also waves, whose wavelengths are measured in hundreds of feet. Shortwave signals are also very long, and this part of the spectrum reaches up to a part of the miltary band, located below TV channel 2.

Decades ago, people could go to a doctor for aches and pains and be treated with a Diathermy machine. This machine was essentially a shortwave radio transmitter, and operated with a curved antenna that fits the human body. When placed against the skin, the antenna radiated energy that was absorbed deep in the body’s tissues. A sufficient power level of RF energy will cause currents of electricity to flow in these tissues, thereby creating warmth. These machines are probably outlawed by now and died a quiet death in America. RF energy causes molecules to collide with one another creating heat. This occurs in tisuues like muscles, as well as blood.

FM stations (located in the radio band near TV channel 6) and over the air television channels 2 through 13 are all in the VHF band. These signals can also pass through the human body without harm. These waves are measured in several feet.
When you look at any TV antenna, multiply the width of the antenna by four, and that will be the wavelength of the wave from the TV transmitter. Hence the term 1/4 wavelength, which is a design rule for most antennas.

Television channels 14 through 83 are in the UHF region. Channel 83 is actually just below analog cell phone frequencies. Progammable police scanners scan police channels that are very close to cell phone frequencies.
(Privacy laws force scanners to block the cell phone band. )

San Marino, San Marino,
City of Fairfield, Australia,
Slovakia, Bratislava,
Cambodia, Phnom Penh,
City of Hawkesbury, Australia,
Bunbury, Victoria,
Sweden, Stockholm,
Belgium, Brussels,
Peru, Lima, City,
Palmerston, Northern Territory

Click on any of the pictures below

to learn more

Anti-Radiation Air-tube Headset

EMF Harmonization Products

Study Reveals How Much Cellphone Radiation You’re Getting Part 5

Mobile Phone Radiation Tips, Immune System Protection

http://www.emfnews.org/headset.html

Blue tube headsets

Radiation Protection Products

Cell phone towers health effects

The FCC limit for the head (SAR of 1.6 W/kg) is just two-and-a-half times lower than the level that caused behavioral changes in animals (SAR of 4 W/kg),” says the representative. “Thus, the brain receives a high exposure, even though the brain may well be one of the most sensitive parts of human body … and should have more protection.”

There’s also just one one standard for “general population exposure” which is same for adults and children. The FCC also does not have strict enforcement against violators, alleges EWG.

“The U.S. government is not paying enough attention to this health problem,” agrees Lai.

But policy makers in Washington D.C. are starting to take notice. Experts will present evidence at a conference in mid-September, arguing for and against the impact of radiation from cellphones on health, and its implications for public policy. But no cellphone companies or handset makers are expected to be present. Independent of the conference, Sen. Arlen Specter (D-Pennsylvania) is expected to chair a Sept. 14 congressional hearing on cellphones.

Still EWG’s research is just the beginning, says Lai. “It is a not a scientific paper and there are mistakes with over-interpretation and bias in use of some of the literature to support their conclusions,” he says. “But it does serve the purpose of raising awareness of the problems stemming from cellphone use.”

Croatia, Zagreb,
Czech Republic, Prague,
Djibouti, Djibouti,
Caloundra, Queensland,
Italy, Rome,
Uganda, Kampala,
Geraldton, Victoria,
Malawi, Lilongwe,
City of Randwick, Australia,
Andorra, Andorra la Vella

Click on any of the pictures below

to learn more

Anti-Radiation Air-tube Headset

EMF Harmonization Products

Study Reveals How Much Cellphone Radiation You’re Getting Part 4

Mobile Phone Radiation Tips, Immune System Protection

http://www.emfnews.org/headset.html

Smart Safe Hollow Air Tube

Cell phone radiation protection

Radiation Protection Products

The Federal Communications Commission sets the acceptable U.S. radiation standards for cellphones. The effects of the radiation depend on the rate at which energy is absorbed by a mass of tissue. This is called as the Specific Absorption Rate (SAR) and measured in watts per kilogram (W/kg). Most handset makers use private certification companies to test the SAR on their devices.

Based on a recommendation from industry group, IEEE, the FCC limits SAR levels for partial-body exposure (including head) to up to 1.6 W/kg, and whole body exposure to up to 0.08 W/kg. For hands, wrists, feet, and ankles, the limit is up to 4 W/kg, averaged over 10 grams of tissue.

In general, the lower the SAR the better the phone, from a potential health hazard point of view. For instance, Apple’s iPhone 3G has a maximum SAR of 1.39 W/kg when held at the ear. Compare that to the 1.19 W/kg SAR for the iPhone 3G S.

The best phone on EWG’s list, the Samsung Impression, has a maximum radiation of just 0.35 W/kg.

But FCC’s current standards are inadequate, says EWG. FCC standards allow 20 times more radiation to reach the head than the rest of the body, says an EWG representative, and they don’t provide an adequate margin of safety for cell phone radiation exposure.

Melville, Victoria,
Denmark, Copenhagen,
Kuwait, Kuwait City,
Andorra, Andorra la Vella,
Jordan, Amman,
Benalla, Victoria,
Hungary, Budapest,
Tamworth, Australia,
Senegal, Dakar,
Russian Federation, Moscow City

Click on any of the pictures below

to learn more

Anti-Radiation Air-tube Headset

EMF Harmonization Products

Study Reveals How Much Cellphone Radiation You’re Getting Part 2

Mobile Phone Radiation Tips, Immune System Protection

Study Reveals How Much Cellphone Radiation You’re Getting Part 3

http://www.emfnews.org/headset.html

Blue tube headsets

Radiation Protection Products

Cell phone towers health effects

The group has created a database of feature phones and smartphones that lists the maximum radiation each of the devices emits. (You can look up your phone’s radiation level using the form embedded in this story, below.)

“We want consumers to take steps they can take to minimize potential risks,” says Naidenko.

About 4 billion people worldwide use cellphones. Researchers have been debating for years on whether the radiation from cellphone use leads to health hazards such as cancer and other illnesses. Perhaps, in no greater proof of how hot the debate is, infomercial peddlers such as Kevin Trudeau and television doctors such as Andrew Weil have declared that cellphone use are one of the risk factors for brain cancer.

More scientific studies have tried to assess both short term and long term impact of cellphone usage. Yet there has been no conclusive evidence so far. That’s because earlier research studies didn’t have a pool of users available who had been on their cellphones long enough, says Naidenko.

“A lot of the studies that came out in 2000 and 2001 only looked at short term exposure, which is about four to five years and they didn’t see any risks from radiation,” she says. “But now that we see results from long term studies, we are seeing more evidence to the contrary.”

Still Naidenko says the EWG’s data doesn’t conclusively prove a link between cellphone radiation and health risks.

Barbados, Bridgetown,
Austria, Vienna,
Kiribati, South Tarawa,
Sierra Leone, Freetown,
Switzerland, Bern,
Traralgon, Victoria,
Cote d’Ivoire, Yamoussoukro,
Joondalup, Victoria,
Australia, Canberra,
Western Sahara, El Aaiun

Click on any of the pictures below

to learn more

Anti-Radiation Air-tube Headset

EMF Harmonization Products

Study Reveals How Much Cellphone Radiation You’re Getting Part 1

Mobile Phone Radiation Tips, Immune System Protection

http://www.emfnews.org/headset.html

Smart Safe Hollow Air Tube

Cell phone radiation protection

Radiation Protection Products

Researchers are divided on whether radiation from cellphones pose health risks or not. Now, one nonprofit organization adds some hard data to the argument: the radiation emission profiles of more than 1,200 cell phone models. The data won’t resolve the debate, but does give concrete information to consumers to help them make their buying decisions.

American cellphone radiation standards don’t make enough of an allowance for safety and ignore the impact of electromagnetic radiation on children, says the Environmental Working Group, which analyzed the radiation emissions from 1,268 cellphones. The group also looked at a number of recent research studies and supporting documentation from the handset makers to arrive at its conclusions.

“We think that based on current standards there’s increased risk of developing brain tumors in long term users — people who have used cellphones for more than 10 years — from radiation in cellphones,” says Olga Naidenko, a senior scientist at EWG, who worked on the report for about 10 months.

Tanzania, Dar es Salaam,
Colombia, Bogota,
Norway, Oslo,
Bulgaria, Sofia,
Russia, Moscow,
Townsville, Queensland,
Georgia, Tbilisi,
Launceston, Tasmania,
Hungary, Budapest,
Codrington (capital of Barbuda)

Click on any of the pictures below

to learn more

Anti-Radiation Air-tube Headset

EMF Harmonization Products

Cell Phone Radiation And Health Risks Part 1

Cell Phone Radiation, wireless radiation

http://www.emfnews.org/qlinks.html

Qlink Pendant

Home Radiation Protection

Envi Headsets

In the year 2000, a Maryland doctor, Chris Newman, filed an $800 million lawsuit against Motorola and Verizon. He claims using his cellular phone caused his brain cancer. That striking story, and other recent events, suggest that the rules are changing in the cellular world. Will public pressure force cell phone makers to do something about their phone’s radiation?
Ironically, the cell phone radiations issue has started exactly the same way: According to Newsweek, in 1993, a man alleged that his wife had died of brain cancer from cell-phone use. He then sued the manufacturer but the case was dismissed.

But since then, many other newsstories have been published on cell phone risks and manufacturers are probably starting to sense the public’s worries, since we now see initiatives coming from the industry. At the beginning of July, shortly after the World Health Organization (WHO) called for more cell phone studies, the Cellular Telecommunications Industry Association (CTIA) announced that phone makers would be starting to include radiation level information on their products, thus potentially allowing us to select a phone depending on its radiation level.

It’s an important step, compared to their traditional attitude, which has always been to say: “There is no proof that cell phones involve a health risk.” No proof… yes, but does that mean there are no risks? Certainly not! There might be risks but we can’t prove it yet, and that’s all their “reassuring” statements say.

What we really need is more studies… and stronger studies. There have been some but their scientific method is criticized. The stronger the upcoming studies, the more useful they will be. It’s a very open field for researchers cause there are many things we need to know: do the phones harm us?; What about the base stations?; Are protective devices efficient?; Is this less damageable to wear your phone at your belt and use a headset?

In my opinion, we will soon see tens of initiatives burgeoning among the industry itself. As concerns about health risks raise and news stories continue to pile up, phone makers and network operators will have to do something else than just say “There is no proof” if they want to meet their exponential growth forecasts… It is said that worldwide cell phone users will skyrocket from 450 million in 1999 to 1.2 billion by 2003!

Such a market should motivate them to find workable solutions quickly if they don’t want their potential customers to change their mind… before they boil it.

Benin, Porto-Novo,
Swan Hill, Victoria,
City of Shoalhaven, Australia,
Rwanda, Kigali,
Brazil, Brasilia,
Cairns, Queensland,
Tonga, Nuku’alofa,
Egypt, Cairo: city limits,
Tunisia, Tunis,
Zimbabwe, Hararesssss

Click on any of the pictures below

to learn more

Anti-Radiation Air-tube Headset

EMF Harmonization Products

Are People Dangerously Ignorant Of Wireless Electronic Radiation Part 3

Wireless Electronic Radiation, Wireless Radiation Protection

Are People Dangerously Ignorant Of Wireless Electronic Radiation Part 4

http://www.emfnews.org/headset.html

Smart Safe Hollow Air Tube

Cell phone radiation protection

Radiation Protection Products

Risk factors for cancer and tumors caused by radiation sources are directly proportional to exposure levels and accumulated dosage, or time. Localized HEATING of brain tissue near cell and cordless phone antennas is a well documented fact. If you have used any form of wireless telephone for any length of time and felt warmth or a throbbing in the side of your head, that can be the cause of it. And if cancer runs in your family? Look out!

If you are cooking meat, what difference does it make if you cook something on medium heat for fifteen minutes, or cook it all day on low heat in a crock pot? It’s still cooked. Your internal tissues, brain and organs are no different.

RF damage doesn’t begin and end with telephones. Biological damage and sleep problems by Wi-fi network antennas are only now becoming widely known. Some areas inEurope have already banned these networks after numerous research studies have established real risks.

Now we have Bluetooth everywhere. Here’s a recent example from CNN of the tremendous ignorance people have about RF radiation and how they ignorantly welcome it into their lives, putting their full faith and trust in Uncle:

” Murphy said he plans on spending more this year, about $3,000 to $4,000 total on stuff such as video games and “anything with Bluetooth.”[1]

There is a perfect combination of madness and ignorance. How many millions of people around the world are thinking just like him? Would anyone spend any money on a product, knowing they will make themselves seriously SICK? Probably not.

Perhaps RF electronic toys are the new addiction and have replaced cigarettes.

What good will it do anyone to work their entire life and see retirement coming – only to learn from their doctor they have a massive inoperable brain tumor, lymphoma, organ damage or other cancer as a result of cell phones or other toys?

Armadale, Victoria,
Norway, Oslo,
Maldives, Male,
Armenia, Yerevan,
Iraq, Baghdad,
City of Lithgow, Australia,
Bosnia, Sarajevo,
Belize, Belmopan,
Dominican Republic, Santo Domingo,
Iceland, Reykjavik

Click on any of the pictures below

to learn more

Anti-Radiation Air-tube Headset

EMF Harmonization Products

Are People Dangerously Ignorant Of Wireless Electronic Radiation Part 2

Wireless Electronic Radiation, Cell Phone Danger

http://www.emfnews.org/qlinks.html

Qlink Pendant

Home Radiation Protection

Envi Headsets

What is the legal limit of radiation for microwave oven door radiation leakage on your oven? FIVE THOUSANDTHS of a watt, or .005 watts.

What is the microwave power level for a typical cell phone? About EIGHTY TIMES that amount of energy, or typically .400 watts

Wireless lovers will cry out, “But that’s not the same thing!” But in a way it is. Radiation damage over time applies to ALL forms of radiation, from radio frequencies (RF) up through ultraviolet. Damage pathology is well known and there are ANSI standards for exposure to almost all forms of electromagnetic energy. Strict safety standards have been established to light entering the eye – including ultraviolet wavelengths at almost energy level. With shorter wavelengths there is a higher the risk of developing cataracts fairly quickly. Various radio and light wavelengths have well established safe exposure levels.

Consider Pierre and Madame Curie, well known for their discovery of Radium and Polonium. No radiation standards existed for them yet when Madame died July 4th 1934from radiation sickness. Pierre died in 1906. His demise hastened by ill health and did not recover from being run over by a horse drawn carriage. Microwaves, ultraviolet, alpha, beta and gamma radiation are ALL part of the same electromagnetic spectrum. All of these forms of radiation will damage the body, just in different ways and at different dose levels.

Cell phone companies do not want you to even remotely think about any of these facts.

How many cell phone and Blue Tooth users must DIE before people wake up and a safety standard is established? Don’t hold your breath waiting ­ cell phone corporations are very powerful and they will make certain no such standard will ever be established. Period. And don’t lie to yourself by counting on Uncle to protect you. If the government can’t protect itself ­ how can it protect us from anything? Perhaps it doesn’t want to protect you, in the name of population control.

Lithgow, Australia,
Bayswater, Victoria,
Chad, N’Djamena,
Victor Harbor, South Australia
The Hague, Netherlands,
Morwell, Victoria,
Honduras, Tegucigalpa,
Geelong, Victoria,
Bulgaria, Sofia,
United Arab Emirates, Abu Dhabi

Click on any of the pictures below

to learn more

Anti-Radiation Air-tube Headset

EMF Harmonization Products

Are People Dangerously Ignorant Of Wireless Electronic Radiation Part 1

Wireless Electronic Radiation, Cell Phone Danger

http://www.emfnews.org/headset.html

Blue tube headsets

Radiation Protection Products

Cell phone towers health effects

Would anyone be crazy enough defeat microwave oven interlock switches, put their head in the oven and press COOK? Not likely. What would happen? Since the body is composed of about 80% electrically conductive salt water, it won’t be pleasant. Lenses in both eyes will be the first to go, as both of them will rapidly cloud over with serious cataracts and the vitreous humor in both eyes would start to boil, causing permanent blindness.

All this will happen in a matter of seconds. And this is only the beginning of the agony. This damage would quickly be followed by searing internal heating inside the skull, creating unimaginable pain. Death would be sure to follow after untold agony.

Remember that new area denial toy the pentagon has which creates a burning sensation in crowds so severe that no reporter could stand it for more than a few seconds? Now imagine this happening INSIDE your head from exposure to 700 watt microwave oven power levels, as a long and agonizing death would follow.

About forty years ago, a man innocently walked briefly past a telephone microwave dish located on the roof of a tall building in Rochester, NY. He died an agonizing death just a few days later in the hospital from massive organ failure.

Although his exposure was only a fraction of a typical microwave oven, it was only about twenty times the radiation of a cell phone.

Bundaberg, Queensland,
Cameroon, Yaounde,
Wodonga, Victoria,
Iceland, Rekyavik,
Somalia, Mogadishu,
Ipswich, Queensland,
St. Kitts and Nevis, Basseterre,
Madagascar, Antananarivo,
Liberia, Monrovia,
Adelaide, South Australia

Click on any of the pictures below

to learn more

Anti-Radiation Air-tube Headset

EMF Harmonization Products