Microwave Radiation, Cell Phone Radiation and Smart Meters, Hypersensitivity Symptoms Part 3

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RKgWPrbyQA8[/youtube]

http://www.emfnews.org/qlinks.html

Qlink Pendant Reviews

Home Radiation Protection

Aircom headsets

The precautionary principle dictates that only utility meters that do not increase public exposure to microwave and radiowave radiation and “dirty” power should be used while conservative standards to protect the health of the general population during continuous exposure are researched and established. Safe technology is available that can be used to perform the same functions as transmitting “smart” meters. There are non-transmitting meters that can do variable rates and meter both incoming and outgoing power. Meters can easily be engineered that do not put high frequencies on electrical wiring either inadvertantly or deliberately, while still performing all necessary functions.

Directly wired connections could be used to shut off key loads. Alternate technologies may cost a bit more up front, but the precautionary principle should apply. In fact, the Health Department in New Mexico agrees. They recently pursuaded a local water utility to use wired connections between monitoring stations, instead of wireless, based on the precautionary principle. If you have questions, you can contact John McPhee, Childhood Injury Prevention Coordinator for the New Mexico Department of Health (505-827-2582).

The only “cure” for radiofrequency sickness is not to be exposed to radiofrequency radiation. People with radiofrequency sickness often become ill almost immediately upon exposure, although the severity of the illness depends on how often the exposure occurs, the frequency and amplitude of the radiation signal and the duration of the exposure. Studies show pulsed microwaves, as utilized by modern communication devices, including transmitting electrical meters, are very potent biologically.1,2,3,4

In fact, data presented at the recent conference “Electromagnetic Radiation Impacts

on Human Health” sponsored by The EMR Policy Institute showed that radiofrequencies, specifically pulsed modulated microwaves from a DECT cordless telephone base unit can have an instantaneous effect on heart rhythm in susceptible individuals. This technology is the same as that used by cellphones, WiFi internet access, and transmitting utility meters. See: http://www.youtube.com/user/EMRPolicyInstitute presentation of Prof. Magda Havas in three segments.
A number of studies show that electromagnetic radiation, including radiofrequency radiation, alters heart rate variability, blood pressure (including inducing hypertension with microwave exposure – smart meters transmit in the microwave range) and increases risk of arrhythmia related heart disease and heart attack.4,5

Denmark Copenhagen
Gambia Banjul
Poland Warsaw
Darwin Northern Territory Australia
Madagascar Antananarivo
Chattanooga Tennessee USA
Vietnam Hanoi
Moldova Chisinau
Antigua and Barbuda St. John’s
City of Botany Bay Australia

Click on any of the pictures below

to learn more

Anti-Radiation Air-tube Headset

EMF Harmonization Products

Microwave Radiation, Cell Phone Radiation and Smart Meters, Hypersensitivity Symptoms Part 1

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xSOwtOep8Fg[/youtube]

http://www.emfnews.org/headset.html

Cordless Phones Health Risks

Blue Tube Headset

Cell Tower Radiation

Radiofrequency sickness results from overexposure to radiofrequency radiation. (ee Appendix 1 for symptoms.) Radiofrequency sickness is not a disease. It is an environmentally induced functional impairment. Radiofrequency sickness has real and disabling consequences. People with radiofrequency sickness experience illness (or even death) upon exposure to radiofrequency radiation.1,2,3,4 The most common sources are electrical pollution – high frequencies that travel on building wiring – and transmitters – all wireless devices.

Detrimental biological effects, distinct from tissue heating effects, have been extensively documented in studies at a range of different frequencies and at levels below the current United States safety standard.5

Our current safety regulations are not designed to protect people from the non-thermal hazards posed by transmitting meters or other devices. The FCC “safety” guidelines are solely designed to protect a 6 ft 185 lb man from tissue heating during a short (6 minute) exposure. They are not designed to protect even a 6 ft man from biological effects during a continuous exposure.6,7 Exposures from transmitting utility meters and other transmitters are continuous, so these “safety” standards are meaningless. Transmitting devices compliant with current safety standards should not be allowed to portray themselves as “safe”.

The fact that these transmitters are represented as being “safe” because they comply with FCC guidelines is part of the reason that people are being required to have transmitting utility meters. Additional studies are now available. The data warrant complying with the precautionary principle and establishing lower exposure standards for safe levels of exposure for chronic exposures to radio frequency radiation for the population as a whole.8 Exposure is often involuntary. For instance, exposure to radiofrequency radiation from neighbors often causes sensitive people in town to be chronically ill, unable to recover.

Albury, Australia
Palestinian State
Slovenia, Ljubljana
Horsham, Victoria
United Kingdom, London
Denmark, Copenhagen
Nedlands, Victoria
Yugoslavia, Belgrade
Rockingham, Victoria
City of Canada Bay, Australia,

Click on any of the pictures below

to learn more

Anti-Radiation Air-tube Headset

EMF Harmonization Products

Court May Rule In Favor Of Disabled Man Who Worked Long Hours Using A Mobile and Cordless Phone

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PODJbsJJ3ls[/youtube]

http://www.emfnews.org/qlinks.html

Qlink Pendant Reviews

Home Radiation Protection

Aircom headsets

Today, for the first time, a Labour Tribunal recognized the occupational origin of the illness of a man who for ten years was a company executive in Brescia. He worked for long hours using a mobile and a cordless phone.

Today, for the first time, a Labour Tribunal recognized the occupational origin of the disease of a man who for ten years was a company executive in Brescia. He worked for long hours using a cell phone and a cordless phone. The man, Innocenzo Marcolini, 57, had a benign tumor on the trigeminal nerve. Surgery saved him but the consequences on his quality of life are terrible. He is partially compensated by this victory against INAIL (the Italian Labour Insurance) that recognizes the 80% of disability caused by his occupation. This is the first time a judge has recognized the causal link and the subsequent declaration of disability due to occupational exposure to EMFs.

The information on this court case comes from the biologist Angelo Levis, Professor of Mutagenesis at the University of Padua, an authority on the effects of EMFs on human health. He and Joseph Grasso, a neurosurgeon from Brescia, were called as expert witnesses for the plaintiff. He recounts that he was contacted three years ago by two people, one from Brescia and one from Cremona, who had very similar jobs to that of Mr Innocenzo Marcolini. They worked in customer services, and made extensive use of cordless and mobile phones. While writing with the right hand, they kept the telephone to the left ear. The man from Cremona developed a malignant parotid tumour, while the man from Brescia had a benign tumour involving the trigeminal ganglion. In both cases the tumour developed on the left side of the head. Levis says that he prepared his evidence using data from the scientific literature (“very alarming data, despite the optimistic surveys often financed by telephone companies”) and his report was presented along with that of the neurosurgeon who described the various surgical procedures. The expert witness nominated by the Court (as third party) recognized the validity of their report, and a few days ago the Court of Appeal finally recognized the causal connection.

The exact grounds of this decision are not yet known but they will be published in three weeks. Moreover the Supreme Court will have to rule on the case (not on the facts, but on the legitimacy of the process). In any case what has happened in the Brescia Labour Tribunal is sensational. “Given the fact that there was no literature on the subject, the expert appointed by the Court has accepted the claims of the two expert witnesses asserting that it is plausible that there is a relationship between the illness suffered and EMF irradiation”. Professor Levis – who has founded a campaign group called Applelettrosmog (“apple/application electrosmog”) – adds, “Such cases are becoming more and more frequent, but few doctors are informed about these issues

The epidemiologist Valerio Gennaro from Genoa, who has enthusiastically welcomed the Brescia sentence, comments: “Nowadays there are fewer and fewer of us epidemiologists. At the Institute of Genoa we are five, all on short-term contracts, as if this vital work of prevention was not important. It is clear that our job is not just to collect data but to interpret it and to understand why people get sick.” Professor Levis adds that there are one million cases of brain tumours in the world every year. “We calculate that it is a disease with ten years of latency, so only now we are beginning to get the first data on the consequences of certain habits. Very soon we will be faced with the effects of over-using a mobile phone on young people, such as those who had a mobile in their school satchel when they were eight years old. I fear these will be very serious.”

United States Washington, D.C.
Kuwait Kuwait City
Flint Michigan USA
Costa Mesa California USA
Mauritius, Port Louis,
Campbelltown Australia
Hervey Bay Queensland Australia
Azerbaijan Baku
Canada Ottawa Ontario
Buffalo New York USA

Click on any of the pictures below

to learn more

Anti-Radiation Air-tube Headset

EMF Harmonization Products

Electromagnetic Radiation and Wi-Fi Technology Dangers

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FiaExzGu2Q0[/youtube]

http://www.emfnews.org/qlinks.html

Protection Against Cell Phone Radiation

Cell Phone Radiation Protection

Radiation Protection Products Cellphones

Havas showed a brief film on Mountainview School in Collingwood, Canada, where students spoke of headaches, dizziness, displacement and the inability to concentrate after Wi-Fi technology was installed in their school. These students had never experienced the symptoms before wireless networking was installed, and did not have these symptoms after leaving campus.

“Children absorb more energy, have weaker immunes systems and grow more rapidly than adults,” Havas said. “This makes them more susceptible to developing problems from all of this exposure. It is imperative that we get cell phone antennas and Wi-Fi out of our schools.”

Havas was joined by Elizabeth Kelley, who spoke about the implications of new cell phone “right-to-know” legislation in San Francisco, and proposed cell phone research and labeling legislation in Congress.

Havas and Kelley answered questions from residents after their presentations. The talk was scheduled for 8 to 9 p.m., but Havas and Kelley stayed past 10:30 p.m. to answer questions from the audience.

“You can be sure that the cell phone industry is just as motivated to keep you in the dark about the dangers of electromagnetic radiation,” Havas said, likening telecommunication companies to the tobacco industry. “One hundred years from now, society is going to look back at the dangers of this technology and say, ‘What were those people thinking?

Uganda, Kampala
St. Paul, Minnesota, USA
Zambia, Lusaka
Angola, Luanda
Hungary, Budapest
Czech Rep, Prague
Bulgaria, Sofia
Shepparton, Victoria
Equatorial Guinea, Malabo
Wagga Wagga, Australia

Click on any of the pictures below

to learn more

Anti-Radiation Air-tube Headset

EMF Harmonization Products

Mobile Phone Cell Towers Have An Effect On Property Values

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=knLrfcVjiaY[/youtube]

http://www.emfnews.org/headset.html

Cordless Phones Health Risks

Blue Tube Headset

Cell Tower Radiation

Click here to find out more!
Recommend on Facebook
others also read…

* Residents will fight cell tower
* Feedback sought on South Langley cell tower
* Mature tress have value
* Horse properties not so hot
* HST starting to have an effect

* Suites: Clash of values
* Students exemplify value of community
* LETTER: Value in BC Hydro

Published: July 29, 2010 4:00 PM

Editor: Regarding the proposed Cascadia cell tower for South Langley (The Times, July 28), I am offering Fernridge residents my best wishes now for the battle that will soon be upon them.

These towers are grotesque and I hope the local residents fight this one with all they’ve got. Companies have been trying to penetrate further into South Langley for a very long time. We fought two tower applications in our neighbourhood (South Otter) some years ago, one successfully, one not. Only by putting pressure on the landowner did we win (he finally withdrew his permission to host it after all the resistance by neighbours and the deceptions from the cell company).

The bottom line — it will affect property values, though the Township and the company will assert otherwise. I read out loud two testimonials from real estate agents stating that all our properties would be worth about 20 per cent less due to the perception of a health risk, real or not. The message, however, fell on deaf ears at the Township office.

On 16 Avenue, you can be sure that the towers will primarily be serving truckers and other vehicle operators who use their phones while driving. Is this something which the Township wants to see more of? Time will tell when the mayor and council cast their votes.

I had understood that, after all the grief caused to residents on the last two rounds, council had passed a motion to refuse further cell tower applications for South Langley. What happened? Perhaps Councillors Richter, Kositsky and Long can recall the details.

Waterbury, Connecticut
Albania, Tirana
Garland, Texas
Russia, Moscow
Jordan, Amman
Indianapolis, Indiana
Garden Grove, California
Lansing, Michigan, USA
India, New Delhi
Gabon, Libreville

Click on any of the pictures below

to learn more

Anti-Radiation Air-tube Headset

EMF Harmonization Products

Is there a Scientific Basis of Cell Phone Warnings

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L7-YFNVXdYc[/youtube]

http://www.emfnews.org/qlinks.html

Protection Against Cell Phone Radiation

Cell Phone Radiation Protection

Radiation Protection Products Cellphones

Despite industry’s reluctance to admit the scientific basis of placing a prominent warning on every cell phone sold, the legislation was indeed prompted by such scientific findings.

I’ve reported on a number of them in the past, such as:

A study by Dr. Siegal Sadetzki linking cell phone use to salivary gland tumors

Wearing a cell phone on your hip – either on your belt or in a pocket – has been linked to decreased bone density in the pelvic region. (All the other vital organs located in your pelvic region – your liver, kidney, bladder, colon and reproductive organs – are also susceptible to radiation damage)

Proximity to cell phone towers causes an increase in the symptoms of electromagnetic hypersensitivity, including fatigue, sleep disturbances, visual and auditory disturbances, and cardiovascular effects

The REFLEX report, which concluded there is real evidence that non-thermal hyperfrequency electromagnetic fields can have geno-toxic effects and can damage DNA, which is an underlying cause of cancer

The BioInitiative Report, which includes studies showing evidence for:
Effects on Gene and Protein Expression (Transcriptomic and Proteomic Research)
Genotoxic Effects – RFR and ELF DNA Damage
Stress Response (Stress Proteins)
Effects on Immune Function
Effects on Neurology and Behavior
Brain Tumors, Acoustic Neuromas, and childhood cancers like leukemia
And much more

The 2009 special EMF issue of the Journal of Pathophysiology, which contains over a dozen different studies on the health effects of electromagnetic fields and wireless technology

In addition, a review of 11 long-term epidemiologic studies published in the journal Surgical Neurology revealed that using a cell phone for 10 or more years approximately doubles the risk of being diagnosed with a brain tumor on the same side of the head where the cell phone is typically held.

Another noted brain cancer authority, Australian Dr Vini Gautam Khurana, published a paper in 2008 titled: Mobile Phones and Brain Tumors, which also covers more than 100 sources of recent medical and scientific literature on this topic.

Geelong, Victoria,
Bolivia, Sucre,
Bosnia, Sarajevo,
Poland, Warsaw,
Townsville, Queensland,
Lithuania, Villinus,
Thailand, Bangkok,
Bundaberg, Queensland,
The Hague, Netherlands,
City of Gosford, Australia,

Click on any of the pictures below

to learn more

Anti-Radiation Air-tube Headset

EMF Harmonization Products

Health Considerations and Cell Towers

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lbeywqu5_n8[/youtube]

http://www.emfnews.org/qlinks.html

Qlink Pendant Reviews

Home Radiation Protection

Aircom Headsets

Mobile Phones and Tumors

In August 2001 the Office of the Deputy Prime Minister under John Prescott issued planning guidance to Councils which included PPG8 -Telecommunications. Regarding the health aspect of masts, this guidance contained three paragraphs:
Health Considerations & Cell Towers

29. Health considerations and public concern can in principle be material considerations in determining applications for planning permission and prior approval. Whether such matters are material in a particular case is ultimately a matter for the courts. It is for the decision-maker (usually the local planning authority) to determine what weight to attach to such considerations in any particular case.

30. However, it is the Governments firm view that the planning system is not the place for determining health safeguards. It remains central Governments responsibility to decide what measures are necessary to protect public health. In the Governments view, if a proposed mobile phone base station meets the ICNIRP guidelines for public exposure it should not be necessary for a local planning authority, in processing an application for planning permission or prior approval, to consider further the health aspects and concerns about them.

31. The Governments acceptance of the precautionary approach recommended by the Stewart Groups report “mobile phones and health”1 is limited to the specific recommendations in the Groups report and the Governments response to them. The report does not provide any basis for precautionary actions beyond those already proposed. In the Governments view, local planning authorities should not implement their own precautionary policies e.g. by way of imposing a ban or moratorium on new telecommunications development or insisting on minimum distances between new telecommunications development and existing development.

Paragraphs 29 and 30 practically contradict each other. This piece of Government advice has been the subject of two court battles:

The first, on the 26th of September 2003 -Yasmin Skelt -v- The First Secretary of State and Three Bridges District Council and Orange PCS Limited: The First Secretary of State conceded the case which allowed a mast to be removed from Grove Way, Chorleywood on the basis that being within the ICNIRP guidelines did not stop the council from considering other scientific evidence with regard to the possible future health effects on the population close to the mast.

Then in November 2004 – T-Mobile UK Ltd v First Secretary of State: The First Secretary of State also lost the case, however this time the solicitors for The First Secretary of State were in The Court of Appeal fighting against a mobile phone operator. The ruling, which dismissed the appeal, effectively said that other than in exceptional circumstances, the council must accept being within ICNIRP guidelines as being safe, and cannot consider any further health evidence when deciding whether or not to give planning approval to a base station (mast). Observers have said that the case made by The First Secretary of State was very weak and did not offer any evidence that showed the limitations of the ICNIRP guidelines. “It was if they wanted to lose the case”. The First Secretary of State declined to the appeal the decision. And as the previous case was settled before judgement, this became the case that is now cited in similar situations.

There is much evidence that the ICNIRP guidelines are not adequate for determining the health risk of mobile phones, masts or other wireless technology. The ICNIRP guidelines only take into account the heating effects of the radiation while many new studies show that health effects are caused through non thermal mechanisms, at levels far lower than the ICNIRP guidelines (See the Bioinitiative report, Reflex report and others). There are epidemiological studies that show that health problems increase proportionally the closer people (and animals) live to a mast. This would not be the case if the ICNIRP guidelines were ‘safe’.

Given that such evidence exists, it is farcical that the law can say that the ICNIRP guidelines = safe. It is like having a law that states “Bristol is on the moon”. Sadly it is not only farcical, it is also harmful to those people, such as my own family, who are adversely affected by this.

Argentina, Buenos Aires City
Seychelles, Victoria
Jersey City, New Jersey, USA
Somalia, Mogadishu
Romania, Bucharest
Cote d’Ivoire, Yamoussoukro
Guatemala, Guatemala City
Latvia, Riga
Gold Coast, Queensland
City of Lismore, Australia

Click on any of the pictures below

to learn more

Anti-Radiation Air-tube Headset

EMF Harmonization Products

Smart Meter Dangers or Blessings Part 2

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7XjRhLetttY[/youtube]

http://www.emfnews.org/headset.html

Cordless Phones Health Risks

Blue Tube Headset

Cell Phone Tower Radiation

One might reasonably ask “where’s the money to investigate these risks FIRST’? The public doesn’t want smart meters forced on them. At least not before the US National Toxicology Program finishes up the study on RF that is not due out until 2014 (and, yes, we ARE wondering why if this program started in 1999, its taking 15 years to complete).

The early evidence points to multiple and serious impacts ranging from health effects (sleep disruption, heart arrhythmias and chest pain, headache, extreme fatigue, memory and concentration problems, disorientation and dizziness, etc.) to hacking of personal information, to interference with critical care equipment and medical implants to electrical fires.
And, it especially rankles when you consider that the CPUC has for decades ignored the health risks from transmission line EMF, even in the face of WHO IARC’s decision in 2001 that EMF is classifiable as a Group 2B (Possible) Carcinogen, right there with DDT and lead.

The bulk of the $3.4 billion in federal stimulus dollars for ’smart metering’ will do nothing more than supercharge the building of more transmission lines and add a layer of radiofrequency radiation (RF) to the system for monitoring and reporting. And, not a penny for or a single word about potential health effects. Now, your electrical power lines can bring you two potential carcinogens, instead of one. The CPUC has had sufficient scientific evidence since 1993 that EMF from power lines poses health risks, but has done essentially nothing to modify the way utilities are allowed to site, construct and operate power lines in communities. The CPUC should be out in front of the public safety questions about blanket wireless before it launches a universal assault on communities with it.

Horsham, Victoria, Australia
Gabon, Libreville
Ecuador, Quito
Estonia, Tallinn
Kiribati, South Tarawa
Greece, Athens
Luxembourg, Luxembourg,
Shepparton, Victoria
Spain, Madrid
Port Lincoln, South Australia

Click on any of the pictures below

to learn more

Anti-Radiation Air-tube Headset

EMF Harmonization Products

Mobile Phones and Tumors

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zzrgtp2niNI[/youtube]

http://www.emfnews.org/qlinks.html

Qlink Pendant Reviews

Home Radiation Protection

Aircom headsets

My Motorola digital wireless telephone User’s Guide states that “The available science does not allow us to conclude that mobile phones are absolutely safe.”

The same User’s Guide goes on to list several studies showing that wireless phones can have negative consequences for the user’s health. It says, for example, that “A few animal studies, however, have suggested that low levels of RF could accelerate the development of cancer in laboratory animals. In one study, mice genetically altered to be predisposed to developing one type of cancer developed more than twice as many such cancers when they were exposed to RF energy compared to controls [emphasis added].”

Besides these statements about laboratory animals, the User’s Guide provides some studies on humans! In a paragraph on brain tumors the guide’s author states: “When tumors did exist in certain locations, however, they were more likely to be on the side of the head where the mobile phone was used [emphasis added].” The guide’s author goes on to say that “…an association was found between mobile phone use and one rare type of glioma, neuroepithellomatous tumors [emphasis added].”

Savannah, Georgia
Solomon Islands, Honiara
Topeka, Kansas
Colorado Springs, Colorado
Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
Uruguay, Montevideo
Nedlands, Victoria
Al Hayrah, United Arab Emirates, Al Hayrah, UAE
Papua New Guinea, Port Moresby
Bakersfield, California, USA

Click on any of the pictures below

to learn more

Anti-Radiation Air-tube Headset

EMF Harmonization Products

Cellular Towers, Mobile Tower Hazards

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LhnIoaCJEBA[/youtube]

http://www.emfnews.org/headset.html

Cordless Phones Health Risks

Blue Tube Headset

Cellular Towers

Efforts are being made to install WiFi in schools throughout British Columbia in the name of progress. School boards need to be made aware that this is a technology which has never been tested, and, therefore, has never been proven to be safe. It uses the same type of radiation that has been shown in thousands of independent peer-reviewed studies to be hazardous, especially to children.

When asked to investigate whether WiFi is dangerous, school boards and the IT specialists quite naturally look to Health Canada for guidance. Unfortunately Health Canada has established a guideline which is inadequate because it is based on another type of radiation. The levels of exposure allowed by Health Canada are among the highest (worst) in the world. Several scientists met the Parliamentary Sub-Committee in charge of Health Canada (HESA) in Ottawa in April to present evidence to confirm this statement. Please see the attached transcripts of that meeting. Therefore, when school boards receive assurance that the radiation levels associated with WiFi will be below the levels in Safety Code 6 (the guideline), they are being mislead into believing this means WiFi is safe. Harm has been shown to occur at levels drastically below those allowed by Safety Code 6.

Barrie Trower, a physicist and former British Secret Service member who specialized in microwave weapons for the UK government, was interviewed this week in Toronto about the dangers of wireless technology, especially WiFi in schools. Following is a link to that 6 minute interview. Mr. Trower refers to a previously classified government document which instructs that the information obtained through experiments be hidden from the public. http://www.cbc.ca/video/news/audioplayer.html?clipid=1573543914

Please know that despite statements to the contrary by the wireless companies, WiFi provides no advantage other than convenience. In addition to being safer from a health viewpoint, wired connection to the internet is faster, carries more data, and is more difficult to be hacked into. Is this worth jeopardizing the health of our greatest asset — our children, or their teachers? I think not.

I implore you and your office to take charge of the issue. WiFi is not in Federal jurisdiction so it becomes a Provincial responsibility. It is imperative that the harm associated with prolonged exposure of children to WiFi be examined carefully before it is installed in school rooms. Scientific evidence shows that children are especially vulnerable to the radiation. It is your departments’ and the schools’ responsibility (in loco parentis) to ensure their safety.

Denmark, Copenhagen
The Hague, Netherlands
Morwell, Victoria
Sweden, Stockholm
Taiwan, Taipei
Kuwait, Kuwait City
Eritrea, Asmara
Tunisia, Tunis
Holland, Amsterdam
Equatorial Guinea, Malabo

Click on any of the pictures below

to learn more

Anti-Radiation Air-tube Headset

EMF Harmonization Products