Warning: Your Cell Phone May Be Hazardous to Your Health Part 1

Cell Phone Hazard, Cellphone Radiation Protection

http://www.emfnews.org/qlinks.html

Qlink Pendant

Home Radiation Protection

Envi Headsets

Ever worry that that gadget you spend hours holding next to your head might be damaging your brain? Well, the evidence is starting to pour in, and it’s not pretty. So why isn’t anyone in America doing anything about it?

EARLIER THIS WINTER, I met an investment banker who was diagnosed with a brain tumor five years ago. He’s a managing director at a top Wall Street firm, and I was put in touch with him through a colleague who knew I was writing a story about the potential dangers of cell-phone radiation. He agreed to talk with me only if his name wasn’t used, so I’ll call him Jim. He explained that the tumor was located just behind his right ear and was not immediately fatal—the five-year survival rate is about 70 percent. He was 35 years old at the time of his diagnosis and immediately suspected it was the result of his intense cell-phone usage. “Not for nothing,” he said, “but in investment banking we’ve been using cell phones since 1992, back when they were the Gordon-Gekko-on-the-beach kind of phone.”

When Jim asked his neurosurgeon, who was on the staff of a major medical center in Manhattan, about the possibility of a cell-phone-induced tumor, the doctor responded that in fact he was seeing more and more of such cases—young, relatively healthy businessmen who had long used their phones obsessively. He said he believed the industry had discredited studies showing there is a risk from cell phones. “I got a sense that he was pissed off,” Jim told me. A handful of Jim’s colleagues had already died from brain cancer; the more reports he encountered of young finance guys developing tumors, the more certain he felt that it wasn’t a coincidence. “I knew four or five people just at my firm who got tumors,” Jim says. “Each time, people ask the question. I hear it in the hallways.”

It’s hard to talk about the dangers of cell-phone radiation without sounding like a conspiracy theorist. This is especially true in the United States, where non-industry-funded studies are rare, where legislation protecting the wireless industry from legal challenges has long been in place, and where our lives have been so thoroughly integrated with wireless technology that to suggest it might be a problem—maybe, eventually, a very big public-health problem—is like saying our shoes might be killing us.

Except our shoes don’t send microwaves directly into our brains. And cell phones do—a fact that has increasingly alarmed the rest of the world. Consider, for instance, the following headlines that have appeared in highly reputable international newspapers and journals over the past few years.

From summer 2006, in the Hamburg Morgenpost: ARE WE TELEPHONING OURSELVES TO DEATH? That fall, in the Danish journal Dagens Medicin: MOBILE PHONES AFFECT THE BRAIN’S METABOLISM. December 2007, from Agence France-Presse: ISRAELI STUDY SAYS REGULAR MOBILE USE INCREASES TUMOUR RISK. January 2008, in London’s Independent: MOBILE PHONE RADIATION WRECKS YOUR SLEEP. September 2008, in Australia’s The Age: SCIENTISTS WARN OF MOBILE PHONE CANCER RISK.

Spain, Madrid
Germany, Berlin
Burundi, Bujumbura
Libya, Tripoli,
Burkina Faso, Ouagadougou
Congo, Brazzaville,
Bhutan, Thimphu
Algeria, Algiers
Brazil, Brasilia
Arlington, Texas, USA

Click on any of the pictures below

to learn more

Anti-Radiation Air-tube Headset

EMF Harmonization Products

Cell Phone Dangers Exposed At Last Part 1

Cell Phone Danger, Cellphone Radiation Protection

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ff7QDjTjrKo[/youtube]

http://www.emfnews.org/headset.html

Life Bluetube Headset

Cell Phone Radiation Protection

Mobile Phone Radiation Protection

Hidden illness risk in mobiles: Phone giants indicted of burying warnings in tiny print

By Sean Poulter
10 Oct 2010

Health risk: Mobile phone firms have been indicted of concealing warnings about their handsets
Mobile phone firms have been indicted of concealing warnings about a illness risks of regulating their handsets. A notice which Apple’s renouned iPhone should be kept during slightest 15mm divided from a physique is buried low inside a manual. BlackBerry goes even further, observant business should have have have have have have make use of their inclination hands-free or keep them an in. from a physique ‘including a stomach of profound women as good as a reduce stomach of teenagers’. Again, this recommendation is dark in a direction booklet.

All alternative manufacturers, together with Nokia as good as HTC, lift identical small-print warnings notwithstanding insisting which land mobiles opposite a ear as good as conduct is harmless. Health campaigners as good as politicians upon both sides of a Atlantic have been job for transparent warnings to be put upon handset boxes.They have been additionally perfectionist a open preparation campaign, starting in schools, to suggest upon a stable have have have have have have make use of a devices.

Alasdair Philips, of Powerwatch, an eccentric organisation which investigates a reserve of mobile phones, said: ‘Most people have no thought about these warnings.‘The reserve recommendation should be enclosed upon a boxes as good as distant some-more prominently in a “getting started” territory of user guides as good as not usually in a item during a behind which frequency any one reads.

‘This should be usually partial of a most wider open preparation debate which starts in a schools.’ The reserve recommendation in manuals is written to extent supposed Radio Frequency exposure. This is pronounced to feverishness physique hankie as good as a little – vague – investigate suggests it is related to tumours in a brain.

Argentina Buenos Aires City
Hamilton Victoria Australia
Hobart Burnie Tasmania Australia
Wodonga, Victoria,
Redcliffe Queensland Australia
Germany, Berlin,
Papua New Guinea, Port Moresby,
Nigeria, Abuja,
Hollywood Florida USA
Gladstone Queensland Australia

Click on any of the pictures below

to learn more

Anti-Radiation Air-tube Headset

EMF Harmonization Products

Kids and Cell Phones: Hazard? Part 2

Cell Phones Hazard, Cellphone Radiation Protection

Kids and Cell Phones: Hazard? Part 2

http://www.emfnews.org/qlinks.html

Qlink Pendant

Envi Headsets

Home Radiation Protection

More helpful than harmful

The researchers found that children speaking on a cell were 43 percent more likely to be hit or to have a close call in the simulated street crossings than kids who weren’t on the phone. They also kept track of how many times a child would look left and right before stepping into the street and found that number fell by 20 percent when a phone conversation was going on.

There was no difference whether the participant was a boy or girl.

One weakness of the study is that it relied on a virtual realty simulator. But, Schwebel says, the simulator has been validated in other experiments in which the researchers compared VR results to tests run in a real world.

Kids don’t need to be banned from chatting on the phone when outside, however. Instead, parents simply should instruct them to finish their conversations before crossing the street.

“I don’t think this means parents should take phones away from their kids,” says Schwebel. “I encourage families to get cell phones for their children. They’re more helpful than harmful, if they’re used in a safe way.”

Other distractions, such as conversations with friends, listening to music, and text messaging, may also cause problems for children in this age group. The University of Alabama researchers expect to study the impact of those types of distractions in the future.

Experts in child safety applauded the cell phone study.

“If you’re talking on a cell phone, you’re not paying as much attention to the environment around you,” says Susan Baker, a professor at Johns Hopkins School of Public Health, Baltimore.

Brooke Carlson, a 44-year-old mom from Morgan Hill, Calif., has noticed how riveted her 9-year-old son is when he’s talking on the cell phone. Although she’d never thought of the dangers of crossing traffic while on the phone, Carlson says, “Now that I know about it, it makes total sense.” She plans to have a chat with her child about cell phones and street safety.

The preteen study adds to the mounting evidence that cell phones can be a big problem when mixed with motor vehicles. Other studies have shown that any kind of distraction can adversely impact teen driving, so it’s not surprising that preteens might not do such a good job crossing streets while chatting on the phone, says Dr. Barbara Gaines, director of the Benedum Pediatric Trauma Program at the Children’s Hospital of the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center.

For younger kids, parents might consider purchasing a phone with a plan that only allows the child to dial up his or her parents, suggests Gaines. That way the cell can be used for emergencies, but not for chatting with friends for hours.

Yemen, Sana
Antigua and Barbuda, St. John’s,
Horsham, Victoria,
City of Griffith, Australia,
Peru, Lima, City,
Afghanistan, Kabul,
Monaco, Monaco
Qatar, Doha
Korea (North), Pyongyang
Indianapolis, Indiana, USA

Click on any of the pictures below

to learn more

Anti-Radiation Air-tube Headset

EMF Harmonization Products

http://www.emfnews.org/articles/kids-and-cell-phones-hazard-part-2/

Cell Phone Damage Your Eyes

Cell Phone Damage, Cellphone Radiation Protection

http://www.emfnews.org/headset.html

Smart Safe Hollow Air Tube

Cell phone radiation protection

Radiation Protection Products

Cell phones can damage eyes: Study
Prashant Rupera, TNN, Jun 23, 2010

VADODARA/ANAND: While scientists across the globe are still debating whether usage of cell phones results in heart diseases, a new study carried out by scientists at Charotar University of Science and Technology (CHARUSAT) has revealed that mobile phones also affect eyes.

The scientists, who have studied the impact of electromagnetic waves on human eye, say that usage of mobile can also lead to early cataract in lens apart from affecting retina, cornea and other ocular systems of the eye.

“We are in ocean of electromagnetic signals and hundreds of signals are hitting human body every moment. It is affecting all our body parts, but we are not realising it,” says professor Ved Vyas Dwivedi, head of department of ECE at CHARUSAT, who along with dean of the faculty of engineering and technology Y P Kosta and lecturer Dhara Patel carried out the study based on a mathematical model.

“The wavelength of wireless signals (which is about 2 to 2.5 cm) used for mobile phones and other wireless terminals matches with that received by the human eye. The dielectric constant (absorption capacity) of eye tissues is around 70 which is greater than unity (above 50). This means that the eye can absorb electromagnetic energy very quickly,” explains Dwivedi.

During the study, scientists computed the specific absorption rate (SAR) and maximum temperature increase in the eye because of electromagnetic radio frequency fields generated by wireless terminals such as a mobile phones. SAR and temperature rise depend on the distance between eye and radio frequency transceiver (the mobile phone) and the angle between the line of sight and shortest normal path.

“The problem is not that the eye absorbs the energy, but that the heat absorbed by the eye does not get transmitted or radiated out of the body,” says Dwivedi, adding that prolonged usage of mobile phones can affect retina, sclera, lens, cornea as well as vitreous humour which are parts of the human eye.

These scientists have also recommended that a mobile handset should be kept as far as possible from the eye. “It should not be used more than is necessary. A user should avoid use of mobile in rural areas or a car where the cell phone uses more power and the SAR value can be ten or hundred times higher than the normal,” they suggest. This group of scientists is also planning to approach the government in collaboration with a hospital to get license to conduct tests on human to further study mobiles affect on human eye.

Canning, Victoria,
Yugoslavia, Belgrade,
Topeka Kansas USA
Traralgon Victoria Australia
Korea South) Seoul, City
West Covina California USA
Burundi Bujumbura
Mildura, Victoria,
Arvada Colorado USA,
St. Kitts and Nevis, Basseterre

Click on any of the pictures below

to learn more

Anti-Radiation Air-tube Headset

EMF Harmonization Products

Mobile Phone Masts and Public Health Part 1

Mobile Phone Masts, Cellphone Radiotion Protection

http://www.emfnews.org/headset.html

Cell Phone Sensitivity

Life Blue tube headsets

Cell Phone Towers Health Effects

Mobile phone masts have attracted enormous controversy because of concern about the health risks of living in proximity to one, but is there really any truth to the scare stories?

Public Heath Problems

Despite ongoing concerns about the potential long-term health risks of mobile phones, most people are still happy to press a mobile up to their ears, but try suggesting putting up a mobile mast somewhere near their home and you will likely be met with a look of abject horror. Why is it people are convinced that mobile base stations are dangerous but mobiles aren’t?

Mobile phone base stations and their radioactive emissions have been accused of causing leukaemia, brain tumours and a syndrome known as electromagnetic hypersensitivity (EH). Those people that live in close proximity to one of the UK’s over 50,000 mobile phone masts have attributed all manner of health problems to the local antenna including heart palpitations, headaches, nose bleeds, itchy burning skins and severe depression. . http://www.mobilephonesandsafety.co.uk/mobile-phone-masts-public-health.html

Are Mobile Phone Masts Harmless?

However, despite such complaints, the reality is that, just as with mobile phones themselves, there is just no conclusive evidence to prove that mobile masts are in any way dangerous. The majority of evidence now available suggests there are no adverse health effects from exposure to radio frequency (RF) waves. When the first Government-funded research into potential dangers of mobile masts was carried in 2008, the results found them to be harmless.

Saudi Arabia, Riyadh
Sri Jayawardenepura Kotte,
Cote d’Ivoire, Yamoussoukro,
Newark, New Jersey, USA
Botswana, Gaborone
Armidale, Australia
Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur
Guyana, Georgetown,
Papua New Guinea, Port Moresby,
Brunei, Darussalam Bandar Seri Begawan

Click on any of the pictures below

to learn more

Anti-Radiation Air-tube Headset

EMF Harmonization Products

Mobile Phone Use While Pregnant Causes Neurological Problems in Babies Part 2

Mobile Phone Radiation Tips, Immune System Protection

http://www.emfnews.org/headset.html

Blue tube headsets

Radiation Protection Products

Cell phone towers health effects

One of the lead researchers, Leeka Kheifets of UCLA, had previously stated in writing that there was “no consistent evidence of a causal relationship between exposure to radiofrequency fields [including those from mobile phones] and any adverse health effect.” A well-known skeptic of the connection between mobile phone use and health or behavioral problems, Kheifets admitted to being surprised by the current study’s findings.

The researchers attempted to demonstrate that some other confounding factor – such as smoking during pregnancy, socioeconomic status or a family history of mental illness – had caused the behavioral effects observed. But when they corrected for these factors, the contribution of mobile phones actually became statistically stronger.

Saying that they did not know of any biological mechanism by which mobile phones could cause behavioral problems, the researchers urged that their results “should be interpreted with caution.” They also suggested that there might be some correlation between cellular phone use and some other factor that leads to behavioral difficulties – such as neglect by a mother that spends too much time on the phone.

But they conceded that “if [the results] are real they would have major public health implications.”

Sam Millham of the Mount Sinai School of Medicine and the University of Washington School of Public Health, said that he is certain the study results are accurate. Recent research conducted in Canada on pregnant rats demonstrated that radiation similar to that from mobile phones caused structural changes to the brains of the fetuses, he said.

Millham is considered a pioneer in researching the connection between mobile phone use and negative health effects.

The study’s results came not long after the Russian National Committee on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection released new warnings about the use of mobile phones by pregnant women and children. Use of cellular phones by children can lead to short-term “disruption of memory, decline of attention, diminishing learning and cognitive abilities, increased irritability,” while long-term use can cause “depressive syndrome [and] degeneration of the nervous structures of the brain.”

The committee counseled pregnant women and children to limit their exposure to mobile phones, warning that the health risk from the devices “is not much lower than the risk to children’s health from tobacco or alcohol.”

New Zealand,
Chile, Santiago,
Dubbo, Australia,
Benin, Porto-Novo,
Laos, Vientiane,
Bahrain, Manama
Uzbekistan, Tashkent,
Sierra Leone, Freetown,
Kenya, Nairobi,
Cleveland, Ohio, USA

Click on any of the pictures below

to learn more

Anti-Radiation Air-tube Headset

EMF Harmonization Products

Children Affected by Cell Phone Radiation

Mobile Phone Radiation, Cell Phone Radiation Protection

http://www.emfnews.org/headset.html

Blue tube headsets

Radiation Protection Products

Cell phone towers health effects

A study of 110 adults at the Australian Centre for Radiofrequency Bioeffects Research, partly funded by the Federal Government, confirmed mobile phones cause a change in brain function by altering brainwaves known as alpha waves.

The centre, at Melbourne’s Swinburne University of Technology, is now investigating the effect on 40 children aged 12 to 13, and 20 people aged 55 to 75 years. Associate Professor Rodney Croft, from the centre, said while studies had been conducted on adults, the effect on children had, until now, remained untested. “Although there’s a tiny effect on healthy young adults, there is a possibility that it could be much stronger in children or the elderly,” Professor Rodney Croft said.

There was no indication from the adult tests if the effect on health was positive or negative.
Scientists worldwide agree there is no evidence linking electromagnetic radiation emitted by mobile phones to adverse health effects, but claims that frequent use can cause headaches, nausea, problems with concentration, cancer and brain tumours still persist.

The new Australian study comes as France’s health ministry warned parents to prevent children using mobiles when reception is poor or during high-speed travel.

Authorities in France advised limiting the use of mobiles overall. Last week the National Research Council of US called for more studies into the possible health hazards of wireless devices and base stations on children, unborn babies and pregnant women.

Researchers fear children may be more vulnerable because the exposure dose received by a child’s brain is higher than an adult’s and their nervous system is still developing.

With one in four Australians aged six to 13 now having a mobile phone, children will also be exposed to radiation for longer than their parents. http://www.impactlab.net/2008/01/26/children-affected-by-cell-phone-radiation/

A British study noted many cancers take 10 to 15 years to appear, and most testing so far had included few participants who had used mobile phones for longer than a decade.

Professor Croft said Australian studies using unborn or newborn mice had failed to find significant changes in growth rate, brain function and behavioural development.

The professor of public health at the University of Sydney, Bruce Armstrong, said the French decision against excessive use by children was prudent. “We don’t know that use of mobile phones causes harm to children but we don’t know with certainty that it is safe in all circumstances,” he said.

A spokesman for federal Health Minister Nicola Roxon said: “We have no plans to restrict usage at this point. Of course we monitor any developments in medical research as a matter of course.”

Hayward, California
Pasadena, Texas
Albania, Tirana,
UK, London,
Lichtenstein, Vaduz
Ukraine, Kiev
Launceston, Tasmania,
Germany, Berlin
Bathurst, Australia,
Al Qir, United Arab Emirates, Al Qir, UAE

Click on any of the pictures below

to learn more

Anti-Radiation Air-tube Headset

EMF Harmonization Products

Can Mobiles Really Damage your Health? Part 2

Mobile Phone Radiation Tips, Immune System Protection

http://www.emfnews.org/headset.html

Cell Phone Sensitivity

Cell Phone Towers Health Effects

Life Blue Tube Headsets

Are You Willing to Take the Risk?

When a six-year Mobile Telecommunications and Health Research (MTHR) study commissioned by the government and the mobile phone industry – the largest such study in the UK – found mobiles to harmless, only admitting a ‘very faint hint’ of a link between long-term mobile use and brain tumours, it was criticised for failing to fully investigate those people who had used their phones for over a decade.

More recently, a group of scientists found there to be a much stronger link between mobile use and risk of brain tumour than the report suggested. After surveying the results of 11 different studies, the scientists concluded that those who have used their mobile for a decade are twice as likely to develop a tumour on a nerve linking the ear to the brain.
There may not yet be a definite answer to the question of mobile phone health risks, but with many experts nevertheless inclined to support the theory that there are long-term dangers, are you willing to take the chance they are wrong?

Risking the Health of Your Children

Perhaps an even more pertinent question is, are you willing to risk the health of your children by allowing them to use mobiles? This is an even more worrying concern because research has shown that, as children have thinner skulls and nervous systems that are still developing, they are three times as vulnerable to radiation as adults. A professor at Orbero University in Sweden, who conducted research into the subject, said that children should not be allowed to use mobiles.

Vanuatu Port Vila
Grafton, Australia,
Eugene Oregon USA
Rwanda Kigali
Bolivia Sucre
Fiji, Suva,
Luxembourg, Luxembourg,
Guinea, Conakry,
Nicaragua, Managua,
Sacramento California USA

Click on any of the pictures below

to learn more

Anti-Radiation Air-tube Headset

EMF Harmonization Products

Low-Radiation Cell Phones: Good or Bad? Part 3

Cellphone Low-Radiation, Cellphone Radiotion Protection

Low-Radiation Cell Phones: Good or Bad? Part 4

http://www.emfnews.org/headset.html

Cell Phone Sensitivity

Life Blue tube headsets

Cell Phone Towers Health Effects

Industry response

The FCC’s 1.6 watt per kilogram level for damage to tissue is set up as a threshold, meaning that any levels below it, whether 0.1 or 1.5, are supposed to be equivalently safe.

Accordingly, groups that represent cell phone makers say that pitting one phone against another safety-wise based on SAR is a false choice.

“Rather than inform, the ordinance will potentially mislead consumers with point of sale requirements suggesting that some phones are ‘safer’ than others based on radiofrequency emissions,” said John Walls, vice president of public affairs for the Cellular Telecommunications and Internet Association, in a statement.

Generally, no manufacturer or particular kind of cell phone tends to produce more radiation than competitors or other devices, Naidenko said.

In other words, an advanced, features-laden smartphone such as the Apple iPhone can (and does) emit fewer radio waves than a basic budget cell phone, like a Nokia Surge. (The SAR level of the iPhone 3GS is 0.24 to 1.03 watts per kilogram and the Surge’s is 1.31 watts per kilogram. The iPhone 4 SAR is not yet publicly available.)

Swan Hill Victoria Australia
Spain, Madrid,
Ghana Accra
Simi Valley California USA
Tunisia, Tunis,
Cyprus, Nicosia,
Tajikistan Dushanbe
Newcastle, Australia,
Brisbane Queensland Australia
Tanzania Dar es Salaam Dodoma

Click on any of the pictures below

to learn more

Anti-Radiation Air-tube Headset

EMF Harmonization Products

Can Mobiles Really Damage your Health? Part 1

Mobile Health Damage, Cellphone Radiotion Protection

http://www.emfnews.org/headset.html

Cell Phone Sensitivity

Life Blue tube headsets

Cell Phone Towers Health Effects

Mobile phones and mobile phone masts are being blamed for all manner of serious health problems but is it just groundless scaremongering or can mobiles really damage your health?

The Damage to Your Health

By regularly speaking on your mobile phone you are putting yourself at risk of a brain tumour, leukaemia, as well as severe headaches, memory loss, extreme fatigue and a catalogue of other complaints. If you try to avoid it by opting for hands-free then mobile in your belt case will expose your liver and kidney areas to harmful radiation. At least this is if you believe the various studies that have been conducted over the last decade.

As people slowly wean themselves off last century’s major threat to the nation’s health, the cigarette, many believe millions of us are already dangerously addicted the 21st century equivalent – the mobile phone.

It is believed that low-level exposure to the radio frequency (RF) waves emitted by mobiles when holding the phone close to the head, or by local mobile phone masts, may cause biological problems and even seriously harm the brain. But if that’s the case, where are the health warnings, where is the massive health crisis, why are mobiles as possible as ever – isn’t anybody worried?

No Evidence for Health Risks

The truth of the matter is that despite the regular stream of news stories, there is yet to be concrete proof that mobiles are unsafe. Well known for their cynicism and suspicion of hype and scaremongering, Brits are waiting for some direct evidence before they are convinced.

The problem faced by scientists is that it is currently hard to research the danger of mobiles because as the technology is relatively new, the effects might have yet to surface. For instance it takes a minimum of 10 years for cancer to develop. http://www.mobilephonesandsafety.co.uk/can-mobiles-really-damage-your-health.html

Sierra Leone, Freetown
Tajikistan, Dushanbe
Sri Jayawardenepura Kotte
Mackay, Queensland,
Argentina, Buenos Aires City
Bahrain, Manama
Gladstone, Queensland,
Palestinian State,
Afghanistan, Kabul
Anaheim, California, USA

Click on any of the pictures below

to learn more

Anti-Radiation Air-tube Headset

EMF Harmonization Products