Cell Phone Radiation And Health Risks Part 1

Cell Phone Radiation, wireless radiation

http://www.emfnews.org/qlinks.html

Qlink Pendant

Home Radiation Protection

Envi Headsets

In the year 2000, a Maryland doctor, Chris Newman, filed an $800 million lawsuit against Motorola and Verizon. He claims using his cellular phone caused his brain cancer. That striking story, and other recent events, suggest that the rules are changing in the cellular world. Will public pressure force cell phone makers to do something about their phone’s radiation?
Ironically, the cell phone radiations issue has started exactly the same way: According to Newsweek, in 1993, a man alleged that his wife had died of brain cancer from cell-phone use. He then sued the manufacturer but the case was dismissed.

But since then, many other newsstories have been published on cell phone risks and manufacturers are probably starting to sense the public’s worries, since we now see initiatives coming from the industry. At the beginning of July, shortly after the World Health Organization (WHO) called for more cell phone studies, the Cellular Telecommunications Industry Association (CTIA) announced that phone makers would be starting to include radiation level information on their products, thus potentially allowing us to select a phone depending on its radiation level.

It’s an important step, compared to their traditional attitude, which has always been to say: “There is no proof that cell phones involve a health risk.” No proof… yes, but does that mean there are no risks? Certainly not! There might be risks but we can’t prove it yet, and that’s all their “reassuring” statements say.

What we really need is more studies… and stronger studies. There have been some but their scientific method is criticized. The stronger the upcoming studies, the more useful they will be. It’s a very open field for researchers cause there are many things we need to know: do the phones harm us?; What about the base stations?; Are protective devices efficient?; Is this less damageable to wear your phone at your belt and use a headset?

In my opinion, we will soon see tens of initiatives burgeoning among the industry itself. As concerns about health risks raise and news stories continue to pile up, phone makers and network operators will have to do something else than just say “There is no proof” if they want to meet their exponential growth forecasts… It is said that worldwide cell phone users will skyrocket from 450 million in 1999 to 1.2 billion by 2003!

Such a market should motivate them to find workable solutions quickly if they don’t want their potential customers to change their mind… before they boil it.

Benin, Porto-Novo,
Swan Hill, Victoria,
City of Shoalhaven, Australia,
Rwanda, Kigali,
Brazil, Brasilia,
Cairns, Queensland,
Tonga, Nuku’alofa,
Egypt, Cairo: city limits,
Tunisia, Tunis,
Zimbabwe, Hararesssss

Click on any of the pictures below

to learn more

Anti-Radiation Air-tube Headset

EMF Harmonization Products

Are People Dangerously Ignorant Of Wireless Electronic Radiation Part 3

Wireless Electronic Radiation, Wireless Radiation Protection

Are People Dangerously Ignorant Of Wireless Electronic Radiation Part 4

http://www.emfnews.org/headset.html

Smart Safe Hollow Air Tube

Cell phone radiation protection

Radiation Protection Products

Risk factors for cancer and tumors caused by radiation sources are directly proportional to exposure levels and accumulated dosage, or time. Localized HEATING of brain tissue near cell and cordless phone antennas is a well documented fact. If you have used any form of wireless telephone for any length of time and felt warmth or a throbbing in the side of your head, that can be the cause of it. And if cancer runs in your family? Look out!

If you are cooking meat, what difference does it make if you cook something on medium heat for fifteen minutes, or cook it all day on low heat in a crock pot? It’s still cooked. Your internal tissues, brain and organs are no different.

RF damage doesn’t begin and end with telephones. Biological damage and sleep problems by Wi-fi network antennas are only now becoming widely known. Some areas inEurope have already banned these networks after numerous research studies have established real risks.

Now we have Bluetooth everywhere. Here’s a recent example from CNN of the tremendous ignorance people have about RF radiation and how they ignorantly welcome it into their lives, putting their full faith and trust in Uncle:

” Murphy said he plans on spending more this year, about $3,000 to $4,000 total on stuff such as video games and “anything with Bluetooth.”[1]

There is a perfect combination of madness and ignorance. How many millions of people around the world are thinking just like him? Would anyone spend any money on a product, knowing they will make themselves seriously SICK? Probably not.

Perhaps RF electronic toys are the new addiction and have replaced cigarettes.

What good will it do anyone to work their entire life and see retirement coming – only to learn from their doctor they have a massive inoperable brain tumor, lymphoma, organ damage or other cancer as a result of cell phones or other toys?

Armadale, Victoria,
Norway, Oslo,
Maldives, Male,
Armenia, Yerevan,
Iraq, Baghdad,
City of Lithgow, Australia,
Bosnia, Sarajevo,
Belize, Belmopan,
Dominican Republic, Santo Domingo,
Iceland, Reykjavik

Click on any of the pictures below

to learn more

Anti-Radiation Air-tube Headset

EMF Harmonization Products