Is Mobile Phone Tower Radiation A Health Threat Part 1

Mobile Phone Tower Radiation, Cell Tower Health Threat

http://www.emfnews.org/qlinks.html

Qlink Pendant Reviews

Home Radiation Protection

Aircom Headsets

Dr. Gerard Hyland, physicist, says existing safety guidelines for cell phone towers are completely inadequate, since they focus only on the thermal effects of exposure.15 Hyland, twice nominated for the Nobel Prize in Medicine, says existing safety guidelines “afford no protection” against the non-thermal influences. “Quite justifiably, the public remains skeptical of attempts by governments and industry to reassure them that all is well, particularly given the unethical way in which they often operate symbiotically so as to promote their own vested interests.”

“Existing safety guidelines for cell phone towers are completely inadequate.” Dr. Gerard Hyland, Physicist two-time nominee, Nobel Prize in Medicine

The industry lobbied Congress with $39 million in 1996 to ensure passage of a law which essentially gives them the right to place these towers in our neighborhoods, and makes it next to impossible to oppose them based on health reasons. It is no coincidence that EPA funding was also cut in 1996 for electromagnetic radiation health studies. Citizens and communities across the country are angered, and are protesting this imposition of involuntary, 24-hour-a-day microwave exposure, without proven safety levels. As one citizen stated, “There’s no place left to escape.”
The industry lobbied Congress with $39 million in 1996 to pass a law that took away citizen’s rights to oppose cell towers based on health reasons.

Also, once a cell tower is erected, it has proved very difficult to verify the radiation is within legal limits. There are no safety measures in place to ensure that the towers are not emitting higher radiation levels than legally allowed. One frustrated resident finally spent $7,000 purchasing his own equipment to test a cell phone tower near his home, and found it emitting radiation at levels 250% over the legal limit. 16

Property values have also been known to drop once a cell tower is erected, due to the perceived risk of negative health effects. Cellular phone frequencies have also seriously disrupted local emergency and law enforcement radio communications.

Victor Harbor, South Australia
Norway, Oslo,
Gresham Oregon USA
Albania Tirane
Bulgaria, Sofia,
Ethiopia Addis Ababa
Horsham, Victoria,
Malaysia Kuala Lumpur
Gainesville Florida USA
Port Augusta, South Australia

Click on any of the pictures below

to learn more

Anti-Radiation Air-tube Headset

EMF Harmonization Products

Cell Phone Radiation and Health Effects Part 1

Cell Phone Radiation, Cell Phone Radiation Health Effects

http://www.emfnews.org/headset.html

Protection Against Cell Phone Radiation

Cell Phone Radiation Protection

Radiation Protection Products

Cell phone towers expose the public to involuntary, chronic, cumulative Radio Frequency Radiation. Low levels of RFR have been shown to be associated with changes in cell proliferation and DNA damage. Some scientific studies show adverse health effects reported in the .01 to 100 mW/cm2 range at levels hundreds, indeed, thousands, of times lower than the U.S. standards. These harmful low levels of radiation can reach as far as a mile away from the cell tower location. Reported health problems include headache, sleep disorders, memory impairment, nosebleeds, an increase in seizures, blood brain barrier leakage problems, increased heart rates, lower sperm counts, and impaired nervous systems. 11

Long term and cumulative exposure to cell tower radiation has no precedent in history. There are no conclusive studies on the safety of such exposures, and the growing body of scientific evidence reports such bioeffects and adverse health effects are possible, if not probable.

Dr. Neil Cherry, Ph.D. biophysicist from New Zealand, reports that “there is no safe level of ER radiation.” Dr. Cherry wrote a 120-page review of 188 scientific studies. He said the standards are based on thermal effects, but important non-thermal effects also take place, such as cell death and DNA breakdown. “The electromagnetic radiation causes cells to change in a way that makes them cancer forming.” It can increase the risk of cancer two to five times, he said. “To claim there is no adverse effect from phone towers flies in the face of a large body of evidence.”
“To claim there is no adverse effect from phone towers flies in the face of a large body of evidence.” Dr. Neil Cherry, biophysicist

Public health officials caution that we err on the side of conservatism, given the massive public health risk that is possible.
Other federal health agencies disagree that safe levels of exposure have been identified, much less built into the FCC standard. The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) does not agree with the FCC standards, and analysts have recommended that EMR be classified as a “probable human carcinogen”. 12

Congo, Brazzaville,
Jordan, Amman,
Czech Rep, Prague,
Germany, Berlin,
Cairns, Queensland,
City of Bankstown, Australia,
Chile, Santiago,
Albury, Australia,
Cote d’Ivoire Yamoussoukro
Italy Rome

Click on any of the pictures below

to learn more

Anti-Radiation Air-tube Headset

EMF Harmonization Products