Mobile Phone Cell Towers Have An Effect On Property Values


Cordless Phones Health Risks

Blue Tube Headset

Cell Tower Radiation

Click here to find out more!
Recommend on Facebook
others also read…

* Residents will fight cell tower
* Feedback sought on South Langley cell tower
* Mature tress have value
* Horse properties not so hot
* HST starting to have an effect

* Suites: Clash of values
* Students exemplify value of community
* LETTER: Value in BC Hydro

Published: July 29, 2010 4:00 PM

Editor: Regarding the proposed Cascadia cell tower for South Langley (The Times, July 28), I am offering Fernridge residents my best wishes now for the battle that will soon be upon them.

These towers are grotesque and I hope the local residents fight this one with all they’ve got. Companies have been trying to penetrate further into South Langley for a very long time. We fought two tower applications in our neighbourhood (South Otter) some years ago, one successfully, one not. Only by putting pressure on the landowner did we win (he finally withdrew his permission to host it after all the resistance by neighbours and the deceptions from the cell company).

The bottom line — it will affect property values, though the Township and the company will assert otherwise. I read out loud two testimonials from real estate agents stating that all our properties would be worth about 20 per cent less due to the perception of a health risk, real or not. The message, however, fell on deaf ears at the Township office.

On 16 Avenue, you can be sure that the towers will primarily be serving truckers and other vehicle operators who use their phones while driving. Is this something which the Township wants to see more of? Time will tell when the mayor and council cast their votes.

I had understood that, after all the grief caused to residents on the last two rounds, council had passed a motion to refuse further cell tower applications for South Langley. What happened? Perhaps Councillors Richter, Kositsky and Long can recall the details.

Waterbury, Connecticut
Albania, Tirana
Garland, Texas
Russia, Moscow
Jordan, Amman
Indianapolis, Indiana
Garden Grove, California
Lansing, Michigan, USA
India, New Delhi
Gabon, Libreville

Click on any of the pictures below

to learn more

Anti-Radiation Air-tube Headset

EMF Harmonization Products

Is there a Scientific Basis of Cell Phone Warnings


Protection Against Cell Phone Radiation

Cell Phone Radiation Protection

Radiation Protection Products Cellphones

Despite industry’s reluctance to admit the scientific basis of placing a prominent warning on every cell phone sold, the legislation was indeed prompted by such scientific findings.

I’ve reported on a number of them in the past, such as:

A study by Dr. Siegal Sadetzki linking cell phone use to salivary gland tumors

Wearing a cell phone on your hip – either on your belt or in a pocket – has been linked to decreased bone density in the pelvic region. (All the other vital organs located in your pelvic region – your liver, kidney, bladder, colon and reproductive organs – are also susceptible to radiation damage)

Proximity to cell phone towers causes an increase in the symptoms of electromagnetic hypersensitivity, including fatigue, sleep disturbances, visual and auditory disturbances, and cardiovascular effects

The REFLEX report, which concluded there is real evidence that non-thermal hyperfrequency electromagnetic fields can have geno-toxic effects and can damage DNA, which is an underlying cause of cancer

The BioInitiative Report, which includes studies showing evidence for:
Effects on Gene and Protein Expression (Transcriptomic and Proteomic Research)
Genotoxic Effects – RFR and ELF DNA Damage
Stress Response (Stress Proteins)
Effects on Immune Function
Effects on Neurology and Behavior
Brain Tumors, Acoustic Neuromas, and childhood cancers like leukemia
And much more

The 2009 special EMF issue of the Journal of Pathophysiology, which contains over a dozen different studies on the health effects of electromagnetic fields and wireless technology

In addition, a review of 11 long-term epidemiologic studies published in the journal Surgical Neurology revealed that using a cell phone for 10 or more years approximately doubles the risk of being diagnosed with a brain tumor on the same side of the head where the cell phone is typically held.

Another noted brain cancer authority, Australian Dr Vini Gautam Khurana, published a paper in 2008 titled: Mobile Phones and Brain Tumors, which also covers more than 100 sources of recent medical and scientific literature on this topic.

Geelong, Victoria,
Bolivia, Sucre,
Bosnia, Sarajevo,
Poland, Warsaw,
Townsville, Queensland,
Lithuania, Villinus,
Thailand, Bangkok,
Bundaberg, Queensland,
The Hague, Netherlands,
City of Gosford, Australia,

Click on any of the pictures below

to learn more

Anti-Radiation Air-tube Headset

EMF Harmonization Products