Red blood cells lump by Cell phones

Cell Tower Articles

Cell Phone Protection Products

Wireless Radiation Dangers

http://www.news-medical.net/?id=8629

Two students of the Gymnasium high school in Spaichingen (Germany) have investigated the influence of using a mobile phone on the red blood cells. With a microscope they made 255 pictures of the blood of 51testees. The students, Maria Ritter and Wasgan Wolski, received a regional award for young researchers, reports the Schwäbische Zeitung of March 7, 2005.

The testees were not allowed to use their mobile phones for 24 hours. Afterwards the researchers took blood from a finger tip and earlobe. Then the testees had to use a phone for 20 seconds. Immediately after that the researchers took blood again and ten minutes later again. The result: After using the mobile phone it was clearly visible that the red blood cells lumped together in ‘rolls of coins’. First found in 1927!

***Also ten minutes afterwards the ‘rolls of coins’ still were clearly visible. **The lumping raises the risk of thrombosis. Moreover the cells take up and transport less oxygen, report Ritter and Wolski. The research was directed by their teacher Dr. Markus Ziegler.
Full source of this article in German:

http://www.szon.de/lokales/spaichingen/stadt/200503070146.html

http://www.emfnews.org

EMF Neutralizer

Cell Phone Health

Are Cell Phones Dangerous

Cell Phone Radiation Bluetooth

Cell phone towers, telecommunication towers

Cell Tower Articles

Cell Phone Protection Products

Wireless Radiation Dangers

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kCaX62luPd0[/youtube]

http://www.emfnews.org/qlinks.html

mobile phone radiation, cell tower construction, radiation detectors, computer radiation, radiation monitor, phone radiation, emf shielding, emf shield, emf pendant, cell phone protection, emf protection, emf radiation,

http://www.emfnews.org

Electromagnetic Hypersensitivity: A Systematic Review of Provocation Studies Part 1

Cell Tower Articles

Cell Phone Protection Products

Wireless Radiation Dangers

http://www.emfnews.org/chipcategory.html

G. James Rubin, PhD, Jayati Das Munshi, MBBS and Simon Wessely, MD From the Mobile Phones Research Unit, Division of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry and Guy’s, King’s and St. Thomas’ School of Medicine, King’s College London, UK. Address correspondence and reprint requests to Gideon James Rubin, BSc, MSc, PhD, Mobile Phones Research Unit, New Medical School Building, Bessemer Road, London SE5 9PJ, UK. E-mail: g.rubin@iop.kcl.ac.uk. read the full story…..

ABSTRACT Objectives: The objectives of this study were to assess whether people who report hypersensitivity to weak electromagnetic fields (EMFs) are better at detecting EMF under blind or double-blind conditions than nonhypersensitive individuals, and to test whether they respond to the presence of EMF with increased symptom reporting. Methods: An extensive systematic search was used to identify relevant blind or double-blind provocation studies. This involved searching numerous literature databases and conference proceedings, and examining the citations of reviews and included studies. The results of relevant studies were tabulated and metaanalyses were used to compare the proportions of “hypersensitive” and control participants able to discriminate active from sham EMF exposures. Results: Thirty-one experiments testing 725 “electromagnetically hypersensitive” participants were identified.

Twenty-four of these found no evidence to support the existence of a biophysical hypersensitivity, whereas 7 reported some supporting evidence. For 2 of these 7, the same research groups subsequently tried and failed to replicate their findings. In 3 more, the positive results appear to be statistical artefacts. The final 2 studies gave mutually incompatible results. Our metaanalyses found no evidence of an improved ability to detect EMF in “hypersensitive” participants. Conclusions: The symptoms described by “electromagnetic hypersensitivity” sufferers can be severe and are sometimes disabling.

However, it has proved difficult to show under blind conditions that exposure to EMF can trigger these symptoms. This suggests that “electromagnetic hypersensitivity” is unrelated to the presence of EMF, although more research into this phenomenon is required.

Key Words: electromagnetic hypersensitivity • provocation studies • systematic review Abbreviations: EHS = electromagnetic hypersensitivity; EMF = electromagnetic field; SMD = standardized mean difference; UMTS = universal mobile telecommunications system (a “third-generation” mobile phone signal); VDU = visual display unit.

http://www.emfnews.org

EMF Neutralizer

Cell Phone Health

Are Cell Phones Dangerous

Cell Phone Radiation Bluetooth

Cell phone electromagnetic radiation

Cell Tower Articles

Cell Phone Protection Products

Wireless Radiation Dangers

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ceAWBNG4ni4[/youtube]

http://www.emfnews.org/qlinks.html

cell phone radiation reduction,radiation in cell phone,cell phone radiation pocket,

http://www.emfnews.org

Cell Tower Phone mast allergy “in the mind” Part 4

Cell Tower Articles

Cell Phone Protection Products

Wireless Radiation Dangers

Dr James Rubin, of the Mobile Phone Research Unit, King’s College London, said the findings were in line with those from most other previous experiments. “This should be reassuring news for anyone who is concerned about the possible short-term health effects of masts,” he said. But Mast Sanity declared “history has shown that many now commonly accepted physical conditions were initially dismissed as psychological”. “Isn’t it time that the government woke up to the reality of electrosensitivity instead of attempting to persuade sufferers that it is all in their minds?” said spokeswoman Yasmin Skelt.

But another campaign group, Powerwatch, commended the research as “one of the best designed and executed studies to date” while stressing that the number of dropouts was unfortunate. “So whilst it cannot be entirely ruled out that a small minority are truly sensitive, the proportions of any truly sensitive people are likely to be far lower than the 3-35% that has been quoted.”

http://www.emfnews.org

EMF Neutralizer

Are Cell Phones Dangerous

Cell Phone Radiation Bluetooth

Electromagnetic Radiation Mobile Phones

Wireless Cell Phone Radiation Dangers

Cell Tower Articles

Cell Phone Protection Products

Wireless Radiation Dangers

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TapnOQ6SKug[/youtube]

http://www.emfnews.org/qlinks.html

cell wireless,cell tower land,cancer cell,radiation cancer,solar radiation,radiation effects,cell phones,radiation safety

http://www.emfnews.org

Cell Tower Phone mast allergy ‘in the mind’ Part 3

Cell Tower Articles

Cell Phone Protection Products

Wireless Radiation Dangers

http://www.emfnews.org/qlinks.html

http://www.emfnews.org/chipcategory.html

Modern appliances

It is unclear how many people in the UK suffer from “electro-sensitivity”, an allergy they believe can be triggered by a range of modern day appliances from hair driers to mobile phone masts.

This should be reassuring news for anyone who is concerned about the possible short-term health effects of masts

Dr James Rubin,
King’s College London

In 2005, the Health Protection Agency (HPA) said there was no scientific evidence to link their ill health with electrical equipment, while acknowledging sufferers could have real and unpleasant symptoms. But the HPA research did not consider the effects of waves from phone masts, as most of the studies looking at electrical sensitivity were carried out before they were widely introduced.

A number of studies subsequently have looked at the mobile effect, but the Essex experiments are some of the largest and most detailed to date.

After 12 of the sufferers dropped out of the trial, researchers tested a total of 44 people with a history of symptoms against a control group of 114 people who had never reported ill effects from masts. When the signal was being emitted, and they were told of this, sensitive individuals reported lower levels of well-being.

This was true for exposure to both forms of mobile systems – GSM and UMTS (3G).
However, when tests were carried out in which neither the experimenter or participant knew if the mast was on or off, the number of symptoms reported was not related to whether a signal was being emitted or not.

http://www.emfnews.org

Cell Phone Health Hazards

Are Cell Phones Dangerous

Electromagnetic Radiation Mobile Phones

Dangers of Wireless Radiation

Cell Tower Articles

Cell Phone Protection Products

Wireless Radiation Dangers

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZsKedJSE-iw[/youtube]

http://www.emfnews.org/qlinks.html

mobile phone radiation,cell tower construction,radiation detectors,computer radiation,radiation monitor,

http://www.emfnews.org

Wi Fi Dangers in Schools

Cell Tower Articles

Cell Phone Protection Products

Wireless Radiation Dangers

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zv6xX9X0yso[/youtube]

http://www.emfnews.org/qlinks.html

cell site,wireless towers,emf,radiation,radiation protection,communications towers,radiation shield,

http://www.emfnews.org

Cell Tower Phone mast allergy ‘in the mind’ Part 2

Cell Tower Articles

Cell Phone Protection Products

Wireless Radiation Dangers

http://www.emfnews.org/qlinks.html

http://www.emfnews.org/chipcategory.html

Modern appliances It is unclear how many people in the UK suffer from “electro-sensitivity”, an allergy they believe can be triggered by a range of modern day appliances from hair driers to mobile phone masts. This should be reassuring news for anyone who is concerned about the possible short-term health effects of masts Dr James Rubin, King’s College London In 2005, the Health Protection Agency (HPA) said there was no scientific evidence to link their ill health with electrical equipment, while acknowledging sufferers could have real and unpleasant symptoms.

But the HPA research did not consider the effects of waves from phone masts, as most of the studies looking at electrical sensitivity were carried out before they were widely introduced. A number of studies subsequently have looked at the mobile effect, but the Essex experiments are some of the largest and most detailed to date. After 12 of the sufferers dropped out of the trial, researchers tested a total of 44 people with a history of symptoms against a control group of 114 people who had never reported ill effects from masts. When the signal was being emitted, and they were told of this, sensitive individuals reported lower levels of well-being.

This was true for exposure to both forms of mobile systems – GSM and UMTS (3G). However, when tests were carried out in which neither the experimenter or participant knew if the mast was on or off, the number of symptoms reported was not related to whether a signal was being emitted or not.

http://www.emfnews.org

http://www.emfnews.org/Why-a-Air-tube-Head-set-is-Safer-Than.html

http://www.emfnews.org/Invisible-Radiation-Dangers-Of-Cell-Towers.html