Texting While Driving More Dangerous Than Drugs Or Alcohol

EMF Protection Products
Airtube Headsets
http://www.emfnews.org/chipcategory.html
http://www.emfnews.org/cell-phone-radiation-book.html
Texting behind the wheel is more dangerous than driving while under the
influence of alcohol or cannabis, researchers said Thursday.
Research carried out on 17 young drivers (aged 17-24) using a simulator
found that reaction time slowed by 35% when they were writing or
reading text messages while driving. In comparison, reaction time
deteriorated by 21% for those under the influence of cannabis, and by 12% at the
legal alcohol limit.
Transport Research Laboratory (TRL) — which carried out the study for
the RAC Foundation — also found that steering control worsened by 91%
for those who were distracted by texts, compared to 35% when cannabis
was involved.
The tests also showed that texters were less able to maintain safe
distances from other cars and they tended to drift out of their lane more
often.
RAC Foundation director Stephen Glaister said the research “clearly
shows that a motorist who is texting is significantly more impaired than a
motorist at the legal limit for alcohol.”
TRL researcher Nick Reed added: “When texting, drivers are distracted
by taking their hand off the wheel to use their phone, by trying to read
small text on the phone display, and by thinking about how to write
their message. This combination of factors resulted in the impairments to
reaction time and vehicle control that place the driver at a greater
risk than having consumed alcohol to the legal limit for driving.”
Nearly half of all drivers aged 18 to 24 in Britain admit to texting
while driving, according to an earlier RAC poll of over 2000 young
drivers.
http://www.emfnews.org/productinfo.html
http://www.emfnews.org/chipcategory.html
httpv://ca.youtube.com/watch?v=BzlCw4MDIHk

Sign up for our FREE newsletter
“10 FREE Tips to Protect Yourself from

Cell Phone and In Home Radiation”

E-mail Address:
Name:
Phone:

Doctors warn of rash from mobile phone use

Tower Protection
EMF Protection Products
LONDON (Reuters) – Doctors baffled by an unexplained rash on people’s
 ears or cheeks should be on alert for a skin allergy caused by too much
 mobile phone use, the British Association of Dermatologists said on
 Thursday.

Citing published studies, the group said a red or itchy rash, known as
 “mobile phone dermatitis,” affects people who develop an allergic
 reaction to the nickel surface on mobile phones after spending long periods
 of time on the devices.

“It is worth doctors bearing this condition in mind if they see a
 patient with a rash on the cheek or ear that cannot otherwise be explained,”
 it said.

The British group said many doctors were unaware mobile phones could
 cause the condition.

Safety concerns over mobile phones has grown as more people rely on
 them for everyday communication, although the evidence to date has given
 the technology a clean bill of health when it comes to serious
 conditions like brain cancer.

“In mobile phone dermatitis, the rash would typically occur on the
 cheek or ear, depending on where the metal part of the phone comes into
 contact with the skin,” the group said in a statement.

“In theory it could even occur on the fingers if you spend a lot of
 time texting on metal menu buttons.”

Nickel is a metal found in products, ranging from mobile phones to
 jewelry to belt buckles and is one of the most common causes of allergic
 contact dermatitis, according to the Mayo Clinic in the United States.

Earlier this year Lionel Bercovitch of Brown University in Providence,
 Rhode Island and colleagues tested 22 popular handsets from eight
 different manufacturers and found nickel in 10 of the devices.
(Reporting by Michael Kahn; Editing by Opheera McDoom)
Tower Protection
EMF Protection Products
httpv://ca.youtube.com/watch?v=s7bOgERJLfA

Sign up for our FREE newsletter
“10 FREE Tips to Protect Yourself from

Cell Phone and In Home Radiation”

E-mail Address:
Name:
Phone:

Scientists Warn Congress About Cell Phones and Cancer

http://www.emfnews.org/qlinks.html
http://www.emfnews.org/products.html
Two scientists told the U.S. House Subcommittee on Domestic Policy that use of cell phones may raise the risk of brain cancer. The concern came from Dr. Ronald Herberman, director of the University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, and Dr. David Carpenter, director of the Institute for Health and the Environment at the University of Albany.
The two scientists cited a major study recently presented by Dr. Lennart Hardell of Örebro University in Sweden, which stated that people using cell phones doubled their risk of developing brain cancer and acoustic neuromas, a tumor that damage the hearing nerve.
The study also showed that people who started using cell phone before the age of 20 years were more than five times as likely to develop brain cancer.
The European Parliament recently voted 522 to 16 to urge ministers across Europe to impose stricter limits for exposure to radiation from mobile and cordless phones, wi-fi and other radiation-generating devices — in part because children are particularly vulnerable to the risk.
http://www.emfnews.org/headset.html
http://www.emfnews.org/productinfo.html
Cell Tower Protection
Educational
Cell Phone Ebook

httpv://ca.youtube.com/watch?v=5C0dZ_j_i6k

Sign up for our FREE newsletter
“10 FREE Tips to Protect Yourself from

Cell Phone and In Home Radiation”

E-mail Address:
Name:
Phone:

Air Tube Headset Stops Cell Phone Radiation from Reaching Your Brain

EMF Protection Products
http://www.emfnews.org/headset.html
http://www.emfnews.org/productinfo.html
As seen on CNN – Use a “Hollow Tube” Earpiece. In 1995, our parent
company responded to the claim that cellphones were harmful by inventing
the worlds first Radiation Free Antenna for cellular phones. Raising over
20M, the company emerged as RangeStar and launched the Worlds first
innovative antenna manufacturing and R&D company with nine antiquate
testing chambers and manufacturing partners in USA, China, and Taiwan.

The RF3 is the “Original” and Patented solution that effectively
eliminates the effects of harmful radiation during use. We tested this on
“RICK” our dummy head during our SAR “Standard Absorption Rate” tests and
we effectively measured ZERO.

No kidding, the reviews are AWESOME when it comes to sound quality. We
rate this product in our TOP FIVE for customer satisfaction. Kevin
http://www.emfnews.org/chipcategory.html
http://www.emfnews.org/cell-phone-radiation-book.html
Airtube Headsets
httpv://ca.youtube.com/watch?v=xmSqgfAvPzY

Sign up for our FREE newsletter
“10 FREE Tips to Protect Yourself from

Cell Phone and In Home Radiation”

E-mail Address:
Name:
Phone:

Buying a House with Low EMF Radiation Exposure Reduce Your EMF Sensitivity Part 3 of 4

http://www.emfnews.org/headset.html
http://www.emfnews.org/productinfo.html
Before purchasing or renting a house to live in, look carefully at the Construction of the house and the materials with which the house has been built.
Both the Location and the Construction of a house will determine the EMF exposure of a house.
A) House Construction: Walls
The walls of your house are your primary protection from surrounding towers. Materials that provide shielding from EMFs include:
1.Stucco (covering chicken wire)
2.Brick
3.Cement block
4.Stone
5.Metal
Houses that are made of wood should be avoided.
B) House Construction: Insulation
Insulation can offer significant protection for an EMF sensitive individual. Select a foil covered insulation such as foil backed rigid insulation. This may be available in your local hardware store, or through companies that install insulation in houses in your area.
C) House Construction: Doors
Steel doors can help mitigate EMFs from room to room. They can be purchased inexpensively through Home Depot, for example, and can be customized to fit the size of your existing door frames.
D) House Construction: Solar Power
An ideal house for an individual with EMF Sensitivity is one that is solar powered. The power grid is considered to provide “dirty power,” that is, with frequencies above and beyond the 50-60 Hz that the electricity company is supposed to deliver to your house. To the extent that you use solar power, you will reduce any effect from dirty power.
http://www.emfnews.org/chipcategory.html
http://www.emfnews.org/cell-phone-radiation-book.html

httpv://ca.youtube.com/watch?v=sSJ14lf5VGM

Sign up for our FREE newsletter
“10 FREE Tips to Protect Yourself from

Cell Phone and In Home Radiation”

E-mail Address:
Name:
Phone:

Buying a House with Low EMF Radiation Exposure Reduce Your EMF Sensitivity Part 2 of 4

http://www.emfnews.org/headset.html
http://www.emfnews.org/productinfo.html
C) Location: Power Lines
Finally, look for housing on smaller roads, away from highways where cell towers tend to proliferate. If you are on a dead end road, chances are there will be fewer power lines in your area as well.
Any location that has buried power lines, will usually be more easily tolerated by a person with EMF Sensitivity.
D) Location: The Urban Paradox
Depending on your location, sometimes the safest place for an EMF Sensitive individual is in the middle of a city.
Buildings themselves act as shields from ElectroMagnetic Fields. This is particularly true of commercial buildings which are usually very solidly built.

http://www.emfnews.org/chipcategory.html

httpv://ca.youtube.com/watch?v=ew5HG7_wAQA

Sign up for our FREE newsletter
“10 FREE Tips to Protect Yourself from

Cell Phone and In Home Radiation”

E-mail Address:
Name:
Phone:

Buying a House with Low EMF Radiation Exposure Reduce Your EMF Sensitivity Part1 of 4


                       httpv://ca.youtube.com/watch?v=HpA5r8CiBBM

EMF Protection Products
Airtube Headsets
http://www.emfnews.org/headset.html
http://www.emfnews.org/productinfo.html
B) Location: Topography
You should drive the few blocks around the house to understand the topography of the region.
The Topography of the region will dictate the strength of the signals that you will receive from surrounding towers. Some signals require Line of Sight in order to affect your area. So, if there is a large hill between you and a tower, there is a reasonable chance that the signal from the tower might not be able to reach you.
Houses are most protected at the bottom of a hill, where the house is situated as close as possible to a hill or mountain side.
You should also consider areas that are less urban, as there will naturally be fewer towers and less electricity in these areas. With the rise of WiMax, many urban centers have become very difficult for EMF sensitive individuals to support. You may find that you have to leave an entire valley, in order to escape a WiMax network.
http://www.emfnews.org/chipcategory.html
http://www.emfnews.org/cell-phone-radiation-book.html
Cell Tower Protection
Educational
Cell Phone Ebook

 
Sign up for our FREE newsletter
“10 FREE Tips to Protect Yourself from

Cell Phone and In Home Radiation”   

 

E-mail Address:
Name:
Phone:
 

Severe Health Dangers These Mobile Base Stations Pose To A Community


httpv://ca.youtube.com/watch?v=9_wU6u9B8DA

EMF Protection Products
Airtube Headsets
http://www.emfnews.org/chipcategory.html
http://www.emfnews.org/cell-phone-radiation-book.html
Since more and more people world-wide are becoming aware of the severe health dangers these base stations pose to a community, the CTIA is simply attempting to attain an unhindered power to quickly and efficiently erect base stations whereever they like before this increasing number of people (and governments) who are becoming aware of the dangers start to take action, since once they are up it becomes that much more difficult to legally take them down.

The CTIA made a similar attempt in the fall of 1997 to completely remove all zoning authority over cell-phone base station sites in the USA. (See “National Zoning Nanny” for the history.) However, a letter writing campaign from US citizens was fortunately able to block this and the FCC did not grant the CTIA their wish.
http://www.emfnews.org/headset.html
http://www.emfnews.org/productinfo.html
Cell Tower Protection
Educational
Cell Phone Ebook

Sign up for our FREE newsletter
“10 FREE Tips to Protect Yourself from

Cell Phone and In Home Radiation”

E-mail Address:
Name:
Phone:

Made Extremely Sick From Living Within 300 Meters Of Two Cell-Phone Base Stations


                       httpv://ca.youtube.com/watch?v=ksA48Hq4TTc

http://www.emfnews.org
Cell Tower Protection
Educational
Cell Phone Ebook

I developed a host of bizarre symptoms including insomnia, fatigue, inability to concentrate or remember things, a weakened immune system, swollen lymph nodes, chronic diarrhea, nausea, anxiety attacks, loss of appetite and rapid weight loss. It took me six months before I was even able to imagine the cause. When I removed myself from this place and found a log house up in the mountains with no TV or cell phone coverage, 50% of my symptoms disappeared within 24 hours. It took another 2 months before I was able to get off sleeping pills and another 4 months for my body to be about 80% better. I had what is conventionally called “Chronic Fatigue Syndrome” (CFS) in the US or “Myalgic Encephalomyelitis” (ME) in the UK. However, the symptoms are more appropriately in line to what is has been called “Microwave Sickness.” The research I looked at with regards to how microwave and other forms of electromagnetic radiation (EMR) affect human and animal physiology and biology can perfectly explain all of the symptoms and abnormalities found in CFS/ME. Furthermore, there are numerous research studies that show that people living around these cell phone base stations start to exhibit these symptoms and then that after a few years cancer clusters start to form. EMF Protection Products
Airtube Headsets

Sign up for our FREE newsletter
“10 FREE Tips to Protect Yourself from

Cell Phone and In Home Radiation”   

 

E-mail Address:
Name:
Phone:
 

Kids , Cancer The Sutro Cell Phone Tower in San Francisco


                   httpv://ca.youtube.com/watch?v=0MBhRcYwQ9M

EMF Protection Products
Airtube Headsets
http://www.emfnews.org/qlpw.html
http://www.emfnews.org/qlpb.html
There have been several attempts to measure the health risks associated with exposure to RF, and I can summarize the findings with a graph from the study by Dr. Neil Cherry of all childhood cancers around the Sutro Tower in San Francisco between the years 1937 and 1988. Similar studies with similar results were done around broadcasting antennas in Sydney, Australia and Rome, Italy, and there are now studies of effects of cellphones on brain cancer. The Sutro tower contains antennas for broadcasting FM (54.7 kW) TV (616 kW) and UHF (18.3 MW) signals over a fairly wide area, and while the fields are not uniform, and also vary during the day, the fields were measured and average values estimated, so that one could associate the cancer risk with the degree of EMF exposure.
The data in the figure are the risk ratios (RR) for a total of 123 cases of childhood cancer from a population of 50,686 children, and include a 51 cases of leukaemia, 35 cases of brain cancer and 37 cases of lymphatic cancer. It is clear from the results that the risk ratio for all childhood cancers is elevated in the area studied, and while the risk falls off with radial distance from the antennas, as expected, it is still above a risk ratio of 5 even at a distance of 3km where the field was 1μW/cm2. This figure is what we can expect from prolonged RF exposure. In the Bioinitiative Report, we recommended 0.1μW/cm2 as a desirable precautionary level based on this and related studies, including recent studies of brain cancer and cellphone exposure.
http://www.emfnews.org/productinfo.html
http://www.emfnews.org/chipcategory.html
Cell Tower Protection
Educational
Cell Phone Ebook

Sign up for our FREE newsletter
“10 FREE Tips to Protect Yourself from

Cell Phone and In Home Radiation” 

 

E-mail Address:
Name:
Phone: