http://www.emfnews.org/store/

Qlink Pendant

Home Radiation Protection

Envi Headsets

Electromagnetic Field Meter

Jan 19, 2012

Children are growing up in a sea of radiofrequency radiation that has never existed in human history.
A cellphone is a two-way microwave radio with intermittent and destabilizing pulses that disrupt DNA, weakens the brain’s protective barrier, and releases highly reactive and damaging free radicals. A five-year old’s brain, healthy or otherwise, is encased in a thinner skull and contains more fluid than an adult brain. The bone marrow of a child’s head absorbs 10 times more radiation than an adult, while those of infants and toddlers will absorb even more.

Every major well-designed study ever conducted has found that those who use cell phones regularly for half an hour a day or more for a decade have a doubled risk of brain cancer, and those who began using cell phones as teenagers have four to five times more disease, in less than 10 years. Exposure to radiation from cell phones may also play a role for a growing spate of serious problems, including attention and hearing deficits, autism, behavioral changes, insomnia, ringing of the ears or tinnitus, Parkinsons, Alzheimer’s and a broad array of disturbances to the nervous system.

Experimental work completed by teams working with two distinguished experts in male reproductive health, Prof. Ashok Agarwal of the Cleveland Clinic and by Sir Robert John Aitken of Australia’s Newcastle University, have shown that cellphone radiation exposed human sperm die three times faster, swim significantly more poorly, become more deformed and develop significantly more damage to sperm DNA. With one in every five couples having problems reproducing when they chose to do so, the wisdom of the fine print warnings that come with all smartphones to not keep phones in the pocket and avoid contact with the pregnant abdomen or those of teenagers should become standard medical advice.

There is no known safe dose standard of cellphone radiation for pregnant women, their developing babies, men who wish to become fathers, or for young children. All safety warnings for cell phones (e.g., keep 2.54 inches from the abdomen) are modeled on a very large fellow with a big head who talks less than half an hour a day. The average toddler’s head weighs about half as much as the one for whom standards have been set.

Cell phones are just one source for microwave radiation exposure. iPads and other wireless tablet systems emit radiation as well, although the former comes with automatic proximity sensors that reduce radiation whenever the device comes close to the body. The safety material that comes with an iPad recommends users hold it eight inches from an adult body—a distance far greater than most toddlers’ arms. Yet nowadays even babies and toddlers are learning to read from wired devices and falling asleep to white noise played from phones placed under their pillows and connected to wireless routers.

What can you do to protect yourself from radiation emitted from high tech gadgets? When it comes to using electronic devices, those hidden safety warnings have it right, so remember: distance is your friend.

Don’t hold a cell phone directly up to your head. Use a headset or speakerphone to talk on the phone.

Pregnant women should keep cell phones away from their abdomen and men who wish to become fathers should never keep phones on in their pocket.

Don’t allow children to play with or use your cell phone. Older children should use a headset when talking on a cell phone.
Turn off your wireless router at night to minimize exposure to radiation (turn off the wireless on your ipad and other devices)
Eat green vegetables and get a good night’s sleep in a dark room to enhance natural repair of DNA that may have been damaged by radiation.

Tuvalu, Funafuti,
Bulgaria, Sofia,
Romania, Bucharest,
Finland, Helsinki,
Angola, Luanda,
Nauru, Yaren,
Mozambique, Maputo,
Malta, Valletta,
St. Kitts and Nevis, Basseterre,
Hayward California USA

Click on any of the pictures below to learn more

Anti-Radiation Air-tube Headset Q-Link Products EMF Harmonization Products

http://www.emfnews.org/headset.html

Lifebluetube Headset

Cell Phone Radiation Protection

Trifield Electromagnetic Field Meter

16 January 2012 by Steve

Noisy . 90′s my spouce and i sold cumbersome safety covers for mobile phone devices. We attended markets and demonstrated the microwave radiation using a machine that measures this. A woman came accumulating to our own site and stated that she wanted a protective cover immediately as she’d just visited an associate with cancer in the kidney and his mobile phone ‘lived’ on his belt approximately his kidney. Within the same ward there was another man whose mobile phone ‘lived’ in the pocket and he had cancer with the testes. Did we feel there was a keyword rich link between mobile phone radiation and cancer? What’s your opinion?? I would recommend that you just quest for a free tracfone promo codes prior to you buy the car.

Many months later even as we were promoting these covers in the major capital city, the CEO of an huge car company welcomed me immediately and quickly laughed and said which he had just taken on his position as CEO once the death of his 45 year-old predecessor who passed away of an brain tumour – and he had used a mobile phone to his ear about 16+ hours a day. Did we feel there was a keyword rich link between mobile phone radiation and brain cancer? Yes! Also, it is recommended that you weight and dimensions tiger direct coupons or more information.

We had arrived buying house during this same time even as we were moving for this city and frequently got reports from Realtors on how their ears ‘burned’, their eyes were problematic and they had frequent headaches. They did not doubt that this mobile phone devices were what’s causing it.

So, could there be scientific proof? Yes, there are actually studies. Below are a few with the findings of one study of 500 cellular telephone users designed in Israel the place that the individuals have been quick to embrace cellular telephone technology and have been heavy users. This study was published in the American Journal of Epidemiology.
Tumours have developed assisting the certainly where an cellular telephone has been used heavily – both brain tumours and salivary gland tumours.
People in rural areas were at greater risk because there were fewer antennas plus the phones was required to emit more radiation speak effectively.
Children were more at stake – younger the child, the deeper light. Children’s skulls are thinner.

We have seen extensive research in Bombay’s department of electrical engineering and they’ve got found out that there’s a “400% boost in the danger of brain cancer among teenagers using cell phones”. Additionally say that using a cellular telephone for upwards of 30 minutes per day for Ten years adds to the probability of brain cancer. There exists much more now we can easily learn

Were susceptible to brain tumours when we finally utilize a cellular telephone near to our head. We could use speakers and hands-free devices so we can limit the calls we make on our phone. We need to support the phone off the body whenever possible.

Armadale, Victoria
Morocco, Rabat
Berkeley, California
Uzbekistan, Tashkent,
Dubbo, Australia
Kuwait, Kuwait City
Kalgoorlie, Victoria
Memphis, Tennessee
Fort Collins, Colorado
Papua New Guinea, Port Moresby

Click on any of the pictures below to learn more

Anti-Radiation Air-tube Headset Q-Link Products EMF Harmonization Products

http://www.emfnews.org/store/

Qlink Pendant

Home Radiation Protection

Envi Headsets

Electromagnetic Field Meter

JANUARY 18, 2012 | By Lance Winslow

Many years ago, I had an idea for cell phone which would keep them away from the skull an inch or so more than one currently holds their handset. Why you ask? Simple, due to the microwave radiation they put out, and by my calculations that extra gap would be enough to protect the users brain from being slowly cooked. Ah, now you are warming up to my idea aren’t you? Anyway, I received word that this concept has now been invented. This means we can all feel better and in the future, not have to worry about inadvertently getting brain cancer.

Okay so, let’s talk. The reason I threw that concept out into the world was that after reading the challenges of brain tumors in a Swiss Study for 3 Watt and.8 watt cell phones and the microwave frequencies they produce, and after having felt a slight sensation in my own head many years back, as I used to use 1,000 per month, back when we had the 3 watt phones, had one of the first ones as a teen ager, it made me wonder if a solution wasn’t needed.

It turns out that some microwave frequency actually has a positive effect, of course too much is not so good. In fact, I think because at the time I was running 10-miles per day, I believe my brain moved to protect itself and insulate itself from any potential damage being done, and when you are working out that hard your body is working very hard to repair muscle damage, to build it up stronger.

Of course today I am 45 and I seem to be smarter than most, so I guess everything is fine, no problems, still, I am not so sure it is wise that we are experimenting on our whole society these days with frequency pollution and with kids and their perpetual online use – WiFi phones, 3-4G phones, and here cometh “video-talk” to be announced at the CES Show, well it’s a big deal, very important.

Yes, I am somewhat concerned with frequency pollution my fellow American and for human health in general. I doubt it’s very good for folks to wear their cell phones on their hips so close to their reproductive organs either, as those are quite sensitive, and it certainly isn’t wise for pregnant mothers to wear their cell phones on their hips with Blue Tooth ear pieces, as yes, they may be protecting their brains, but what about their unborn baby’s brain or development?

Indeed, I ask that you please think on all this and realize I am not against the mobile smart phone industry, I think it has really given more freedom to Americans, and it is overall a good thing, as long as we are smart about it.

Jamaica Kingston
Vanuatu, Port Vila,
Syria, Damascus,
Estonia, Tallin,
Saudi Arabia, Riyadh,
Cuba, Havana,
Italy, Rome,
Sierra Leone, Freetown,
Austin Texas USA
Luxembourg, Luxembourg City

Click on any of the pictures below to learn more

Anti-Radiation Air-tube Headset Q-Link Products EMF Harmonization Products

http://www.emfnews.org/headset.html

Lifebluetube Headset

Cell Phone Radiation Protection

Trifield Electromagnetic Field Meter

JANUARY 14, 2012

With the recent announcement by WHO (world health organisation) around the potential dangers of mobile phone radiation, all of us are naturally concerned, specifically those individuals who use cell phones regularly and/or that have youngsters with cell phones. What’s safe, we wonder, with regards to use, mobile phone type and exposure? A few cell phones safer than others, and they are there ways in which we are able to limit the hazards by changing our usage patterns?

Whilst the email addresses are still arriving in, there are actually things we are able to do to help look after ourselves. These tips originate from several different sources, such as a brain scientist who have recovered from brain cancer (Dr. David Servan-Schreiber – individuals yet read his book, Anticancer, A different way of Life go get it! It is an excellent read for any person desiring to prevent cancer, or already managing the challenges cancer presents). Simultaneously, all of us are terrified of cancer but somehow in denial that it’ll ever touch us personally. Then it’s time we glance clearly for the rampart cancer rates with the last decade and take as numerous steps as we can personally in order to safeguard our overall health.

In terms of this health issue, all of us are subjected to radiation in varying degrees, even those of us who don’t possess a mobile phone. In America, if you don’t reside in the remote wilds and they are completely journey grid, you’re likely affected, whether or not from cell towers and criss-crossing signals via a flight. Experts are telling us that cordless phones pose similar risks, plus it s only as more studies arrive at completion that the alarming statistics are increasingly becoming available. Nonetheless, cellphones and cell phones are not going away soon, how about we do what we can considering that reality.

Rewards the advertiser ., most cellular phone manufacturers now provide a protection rating with their phones, as consumers become increasingly aware and concerned. Ask your provider concerning your specific phone and ensure to check the rating of your contact you buy. Other tips include using a headset instead of putting the cell phone right to your ear when talking, and leaving the cell phone away from your wear until someone answers; experts say the signal is stronger once the phone is ringing, before it connects. The signal can also be stronger if you find yourself between cell towers, therefore if the bond isn’t good hang up and check out later only when it’s safer. For kids and teens with developing brains, limit mobile phone use in case anything, encourage texting over speaking (the person thought anyone would declare that?).

Amarillo, Texas
Fort Wayne, Indiana
Chicago, Illinois
Solomon Islands, Honiara
Albania, Tirana
Yonkers, New York
Santa Ana, California
Geraldton, Victoria
Providence, Rhode Island
City of Greater Taree, Australia

Click on any of the pictures below to learn more

Anti-Radiation Air-tube Headset Q-Link Products EMF Harmonization Products

http://www.emfnews.org/headset.html

Lifebluetube Headset

Microwave Radiation

Trifield Electromagnetic Field Meter

January 4, 2012

All Bluetooth headsets and Technology wireless emit microwave radiation. Microwave frequencies have shorter wavelengths and the rapid rate of oscillation. This is what allows them to travel long distances without the need to bring information contained in the wire.

Short wavelength oscillation frequency microwave and quickly also makes them adept is able to penetrate living tissue to the level of cell Bluetooth Headset. This characteristic is to use microwave frequencies for weapons. By beaming microwave radiation. Using this type of wireless technology Bluetooth headsets put themselves in the field microwave radiation. Effects of exposure to microwave radiation on the body long term has been documented in countless studies over several decades.

Microwave radiation has been shown to affect biological changes in the body. These biological changes occur at the cellular level and their effects can be passed on to offspring through genetic damage (DNA, RNA). In using the Bluetooth Headset shows the brain, ear and eye for a strong field of microwave radiation. Bluetooth technology uses the same microwave radiation as cell phones to transmit data to do to receive calls. The only difference is the range. A cell phone antenna to capture signals from cell phone towers and satellites, while receiving radiation Bluetooth Headset technology from a few feet away you are using. Bluetooth radiation has been even less tested than the existing mobile phone radiation on you and you are using. The absences of formal studies have been possible that Bluetooth radiation is safe.

Bluetooth headset is not based on research that proves Bluetooth radiation is safe, but rather on the lack of research that proves it is not safe. This type of hollow safety is a technique used by companies to buy time for new technologies because time equals money in your daily life. Bluetooth Headset technology for use by consumers without regulatory or premarket testing, which is exactly how the phone has been approved. However, apparently felt the need to review the agreement on the phone as a replacement to a recent study conducted by the life work that shows mobile phone users have a greater risk of developing the same side where they use their phone. Bluetooth Headset functions in the same radio frequency as mobile phones.

Bluetooth technology (wireless keyboards, printers, etc.) emit microwave radiation the same as headsets and pose similar health problems. Bluetooth headsets are very popular now been largely for the transmission of voice and other applications such as listening to music. And although there are mobile phones more and more mobile that also offered which is also Bluetooth capable, this headset is still quite expensive. But here at Bluetooth Headset offers you a super cheap Bluetooth headset.

Bluetooth wireless headsets we meet the high standards of all other Bluetooth headset that is why you are certain that they are very capable and very efficient. Get your Bluetooth wireless headset is now only at sites that have been available and at very cheap prices. We also offer free shipping for all your orders.

Ecuador, Quito
Romania, Bucharest
Elizabeth, New Jersey
Peoria, Arizona
Thailand, Bangkok,
Gladstone, Queensland,
Moreno Valley, California
Sweden, Stockholm
Birmingham, Alabama
City of Randwick, Australia

Click on any of the pictures below to learn more

Anti-Radiation Air-tube Headset Q-Link Products EMF Harmonization Products

http://www.emfnews.org/store/

Qlink Pendant

Home Radiation Protection

Envi Headsets

Electromagnetic Field Meter

Here is an excellent article from the Safe School Committee, “Warnings from Industry” which says that manufacturers of wireless devices emitting microwave radiation have never said that this technology is safe. Unfortunately, most governments continue to downplay the risks or tell us that there is no risk at all. This article cites manufacturers’ manuals (Motorola and Blackberry) which warn about the serious dangers of their devices. See also this article from the Daily Mail, UK, “Hidden Health Risk in Mobiles: Phone Giants Accused of Burying Warnings in Small Print”".

It also includes two videoclips. One is the chief spokesperson for cellphone manufacturers (CTIA) saying, “”I want to be very clear. Industry has not said once — not once — that cell phones are safe. The federal government and various interagency working groups have said it is safe.”" The other is a brief report from the CBC (Canadian Broadcasting Corporation) about insurance companies. Most of these companies consider cell phone technology an incalculable health risk they are not willing to take (see my article “Swiss Re does not Re-insure Mobile Phones for Health Risks”").

Finally, here is the paper from one of the major telecoms operators in Switzerland, Swisscom, concerning a 2004 patent application, which clearly describes the elevated risk of cancer and genetic damage from the constant low level microwave/RF exposure from Wi-Fi.

Sweden, Stockholm,
South Africa,
Monaco Monaco
Orange Australia
Fiji, Suva,
Barbados Bridgetown
Egypt, Cairo: city limits,
Bahrain, Manama,
Cotonou (de facto capital),
Sri Jayawardenepura Kotte

Click on any of the pictures below to learn more

Anti-Radiation Air-tube Headset Q-Link Products EMF Harmonization Products

http://www.emfnews.org/headset.html

Lifebluetube Headset

Cell Phone Radiation Danger

Trifield Electromagnetic Field Meter

Mehmet Oz, MD, explains how to avoid cell phone dangers.

I got my first wireless handheld in 1990. It was as big and clunky as a brick, but the mobility it offered made it indispensable. There are now more than 270 million cell phone subscribers in America, and on average we spend about 11 hours a month with the gadgets glued to our heads. But as we’ve become more reliant on cell phones, experts have grown concerned about the health implications of heavy exposure—specifically, the radiation that the devices emit.

Cell phones expose us to a form of electromagnetic radiation called radiofrequency (RF) energy. Scientists have suspected that this radiation might increase the risk of brain cell damage leading to tumors, and in 1995 they found this to be the case in rats. Most studies since then have failed to show a similar correlation in humans, and last December the Danish Cancer Society released results from a 29-year study that found no solid association between increasing cell phone use and brain tumors. Yet just months earlier, an analysis of the most rigorous studies found convincing evidence linking the use of handheld phones to brain tumors, especially in users of a decade or longer.

The medical community is paying attention, and so is the U.S. government. Last fall a Senate hearing on cell phones and health coincided with an international conference on the same subject. While more conclusive evidence is needed before we start clamoring for the return of pay phones, there are some simple ways you and your family can limit exposure to the radiation:

Use a Headset or Speakerphone

No reliable data exist on the upper limit of safe talk time, but corded headsets can reduce any potential risk. These emit much less RF energy, and allow you to move the phone away from your body. One study shows that using a headset lowers radiation exposure eightfold.

Keep Your Phone Out of Your Pocket

A study published last year in the Journal of Craniofacial Surgery linked cell phone radiation to decreased bone density in the pelvis, and a 2008 study conducted by the Cleveland Clinic found that it lowers fertility in men.

Limit Children’s Use

Kids have a thinner skull, and their brains are still developing—which may make them more vulnerable to any potential harmful effects of RF radiation.

Stop Talking While Driving

In addition to creating a potentially deadly distraction, using your phone in the car forces your cell signal to jump between wireless towers. Since RF is highest when a connection with a tower is first established, talking while traveling can increase exposure.

Don’t Chat with a Poor Signal

The harder your phone has to work to get reception, the more radiation it emits. This is the reason you should avoid using so-called radiation shields (the shiny stickers that claim to block radiation); they actually force the phone to transmit at a higher power.

Don’t Wear Wireless Headsets As If They Were Jewelry

Earpieces don’t emit as much radiation as a phone, but they release some—even after your call ends. Remove the device between conversations.

Chad, N’Djamena
Ballarat, Victoria,
Slovakia, Bratislava
Los Angeles, California
Birmingham Alabama USA
Broken Hill, Australia
Traralgon, Victoria
Corpus Christi, Texas
Djibouti, Djibouti
Al Haybah, United Arab Emirates, Al Haybah, UAE

Click on any of the pictures below to learn more

Anti-Radiation Air-tube Headset Q-Link Products EMF Harmonization Products

http://www.emfnews.org/store/

Qlink Pendant

Home Radiation Protection

Envi Headsets

Electromagnetic Field Meters

January 7, 2012

Microwave Radiation Affects The Heart: Are The Results Real Or Are They Due To Interference?

We heard from many people who acknowledged that they experience heart palpitations in certain environments and are unable to use mobile phones and be near cell phone antennas and Wi-Fi routers. We also learned that some students in schools with Wi-Fi experience a racing heart. Cardiologist, Dr. Stephen Sinatra, believes that those who have undiagnosed heart conditions may be particularly vulnerable to radio frequency radiation.

In the past we were concerned about the radiation from a microwave oven affecting heart monitors. Those heart monitors have been improved and are now shielded against radio frequency radiation. Our hearts are NOT shielded and our exposure to radio frequency radiation includes not only microwave ovens but mobile phones, cell phone antennas, wireless routers, smart meters, wireless computer games, blue tooth, and wireless baby monitors.
Our study was criticized and the claim was made that our results were due to electromagnetic interference (EMI).

EMI refers to disruption of an electronic circuit with an electromagnetic signal. A common example is the static you hear as you drive under high voltage transmission lines with your radio tuned to an AM station. The static on the radio is EMI.

In our experiment the radiation from the cordless phone may have affected the receiver, placed near the heart, creating spurious results. If this were the case, the signal would interfere each time but that did not happen. We were convinced our results were real (i.e. that we were recording changes in the heart rather than changes in the equipment) but the criticism of EMI was worth testing.
Was there a critical distance where the radiation from the cordless phone interfered with the equipment we were using?

So we designed an experiment to test for EMI. The results are in our new video. Click here to watch the video.

Spain, Madrid,
Laos, Vientiane,
Brazil Brasilia
Iceland, Reykjavik,
Serbia, Belgrade,
Belgium, Brussels,
Western Sahara, El Aaiun,
Hungary, Budapest,
Barbados, Bridgetown,
Rochester New York USA

Click on any of the pictures below to learn more

Anti-Radiation Air-tube Headset Q-Link Products EMF Harmonization Products

http://www.emfnews.org/headset.html

Lifebluetube Headset

Cell Phone Protection

Electromagnetic Field Meters

January 8, 2012

The year 2011 was an amazing year from the standpoint of official recognition of EMF hazards–
1. The World Health Organization classified radio frequency radiation as a class 2B (possible) carcinogen, in the same category as lead and DDT.
2. The Council of Europe recognized of the potential dangers of EMF, from mobile telephones to mobile phone towers to cordless telephones to WiFi/WLAN to baby monitors to anything emitting continuous pulse waves.
3. From Canada to Russia to Spain and to the UK, came official warnings aboutchildren’s use of cell phones, children being amongst one of the most vulnerable population groups.
4. The battle against wireless smart meters has grown, with grassroots efforts in many states and in many countries worldwide. Most notably, there were at least 47 cities or counties in California and 26 cities in Canada opposed to smart meters. The right to opt-out was achieved in Maine.
5. The Council of Europe even called for special measures to protect electrosensitivepersons, acknowledging the research of Dominique Belpomme on over 200 electrosensitive persons.

At the same time, a future more ominous than ever before lies ahead.
1. At least 9 million wireless smart meters have been installed by PG&E in California alone, with approximately 85,000 customers on the list to avoid the installation, according to ABC News. That’s not to mention the other utility companies in California, the other US states, and the other countries in the world which are now getting smart meters, and those to come for 2012. How many more millions of smart meters will be deployed in 2012? With so few customers calling for opt-out, what will happen to the 99% exposed to this 24×7 radiation?

2. The new Federal wireless broadband initiative will put many more at stake. SeeThe EMR Policy Institute for more information.
3. The latest consumer wireless devices are more popular than ever before, and many are radiating more continually than before with a potentially more dangerous pulsed radiation than before. Despite official proclamations, most people are still in the dark about the dangers of EMF. 25 million tablets were sold in 2011, according to USA today. 6.8 million android and iOS devices were activated on Christmas day alone, compared to 2.8 million the year before. Stories of babies playing with iPads are not uncommon. There is still a gaping disconnect between science and public perception.

4. Wi-Fi has been deployed in increasing numbers of schools. Although some schools have removed Wi-Fi out of health concerns and public attention to the health issues have increased, e.g., in Canada, many more schools can be expected to add Wi-Fi.

5. Misleading studies continue to be advertised in the media:
A. Cell phones & brain tumors: A report on a Danish study claiming to show no link is criticized for the same gaping flaws present in the original Danish study.

B. Smart meter radiation: Again and again is the utilities’ deceptive message is that the smart meter radiation is less than typical home wireless appliances, despite a utility report which has now conceded a whopping 2.5 Watts and an average of almost 10,000 signals per day.
C. Electrosensitivity: Most stories that raise awareness of electrosensitivity are followed by a counter-response with a deceptive note, for example, stating that studies show individuals are unable to detect radiation in double-blind experiments. This is done without providing the critique of such studies, which may be industry-funded.
Although a small group of EMF activists knows the truth and continues to debunk study after study, and although they have accomplished increasing government awareness, the prospects for government regulation & reform, and mass education of the public to see past all the deception is daunting.

Will 2012 be a year of promise or a year of despair?

El Paso, Texas
Lakewood, Colorado
Russia, Moscow
Traralgon, Victoria
Gabon, Libreville
Bhutan, Thimphu
The Netherlands, Amsterdam
Saudi Arabia, Riyadh
Equatorial Guinea, Malabo,
Omaha, Nebraska

Click on any of the pictures below to learn more

Anti-Radiation Air-tube Headset Q-Link Products EMF Harmonization Products

http://www.emfnews.org/store/

Qlink Pendant

Radiation Protection Products

Envi Headsets

Electromagnetic Field Detector

04 Jan 2012
Written by Grace Rattue

A critique, entitled “”The Economist – and the Truth About Microwave Radiation Emitted from Wireless Technologies”", of a report published in the The Economist (9/3/11), “”Worrying about Wireless”", has been published by experts in public health, neurosurgery, toxicology, oncology, electronic engineering, epidemiology, and cardiology from the USA, the UK, Sweden, Austria, Finland, Slovak Republic and Australia.

According to the experts, the Economist did not include vital data regarding the materializing public health issue associated to wireless technologies and cell phones and should provide its readers with a better understanding of the science.

Ronald B. Herberman, MD, Founding Director Emeritus of the University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, Chairman of Environmental Health Trust and a distinguished cancer researcher, explains of the Economist report, “”The public the world over has been misled by this reporting.”"

In 2008, Dr. Herberman, Chief Medical Officer of Intrexon Corporation, who served as Professor of Medicine and Pathology at the University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, Hillman Professor of Oncology and Vice Chancellor for Cancer Research at the University of Pittsburgh, issued an advisory to his staff and faculty advising a range of simple steps in order to lower the possible health risks from using cell phones.
Dr. Herberman, explained:

“”A disservice has been done in inaccurately depicting the body of science, which actually indicates that there are biological effects from the radiation emitted by wireless devices, including damage to DNA, and evidence for increased risk of cancer and other substantial health consequences.

It would behoove The Economist to publicly correct the errors made in this unsigned opinion piece by publishing a retraction – and investigating how such inaccurate and unbalanced scientific reporting could have occurred in the first place.”"

According to Dr. Lennart Hardell, Professor of Oncology, Orebro Medical Center, Orebro, Sweden, and a widely published, internationally renowned neuro-oncologist:

“”The Economist has misrepresented the science indicating biological effects, links to cancers, and damage to DNA and male fertility from exposures to microwave radiation emitted by wireless technologies. Given the wide scale use of cell phones and other wireless devices globally, for the sake of public health I consider it essential that The Economist’s reporting be corrected to adequately advise readers of the risks.”"

In Dr. Hardell’s studies, he has frequently discovered that individuals who use their cell phones and/or cordless phones regularly for more than 10 years have an increased risk of developing brain cancers. In May, Dr. Hardell’s investigation was noted in the World Health Organization’s International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) landmark decision to classify wireless radiation as a Class 2B ‘Possible Carcinogen’.

Policy advocate Deborah Kopald, MBA explains:

“”It is exceedingly difficult to convince policy-makers to act in the public interest and parents and educators to give their charges proper guidance when they can point to a prestigious publication that provides false reassurance that not enough science exists to compel immediate behavior changes with wireless use.”"

Mona Nilsson, a Swedish investigative journalist, states:

“”The publication of The Economist article “”Worrying about Wireless”" was a sad day in journalism. If we cannot trust the media to accurately report the science on such an important subject in a balanced way, then who can we trust?”"

Nilsson broke the news that Anders Ahlbom did not reveal he was a member of the board of his brother’s consulting firm, Gunnar Anlbom AB, with connections with the telecom industry to the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC). Last May the IARC removed Ahlbom of the Karolinska Institute from its panel of experts.

Experts from the “”The Economist – and the Truth About Microwave Radiation Emitted from Wireless Technologies”" critique, include leading physician’s, oncologists and scientists from seven nations. They are calling for the Economist to correct its unsigned opinion piece so that it more accurately reflects the range of known biological effects and potential health risks from wireless radiation.

Chad N’Djamena
Jordan, Amman,
Tunisia, Tunis,
Lithuania, Villinus,
Malawi, Lilongwe,
Peru, Lima, City,
Macedonia, Skjope,
Canada, Ottawa, Ontario,
Moldova Chisinau
Grand Rapids Michigan USA

Click on any of the pictures below to learn more

Anti-Radiation Air-tube Headset Q-Link Products EMF Harmonization Products