http://www.emfnews.org/qlinks.html

Qlink Pendant Reviews

Home Radiation Protection

Aircom Headsets

Mobile Phones and Tumors

In August 2001 the Office of the Deputy Prime Minister under John Prescott issued planning guidance to Councils which included PPG8 -Telecommunications. Regarding the health aspect of masts, this guidance contained three paragraphs:
Health Considerations & Cell Towers

29. Health considerations and public concern can in principle be material considerations in determining applications for planning permission and prior approval. Whether such matters are material in a particular case is ultimately a matter for the courts. It is for the decision-maker (usually the local planning authority) to determine what weight to attach to such considerations in any particular case.

30. However, it is the Governments firm view that the planning system is not the place for determining health safeguards. It remains central Governments responsibility to decide what measures are necessary to protect public health. In the Governments view, if a proposed mobile phone base station meets the ICNIRP guidelines for public exposure it should not be necessary for a local planning authority, in processing an application for planning permission or prior approval, to consider further the health aspects and concerns about them.

31. The Governments acceptance of the precautionary approach recommended by the Stewart Groups report “mobile phones and health”1 is limited to the specific recommendations in the Groups report and the Governments response to them. The report does not provide any basis for precautionary actions beyond those already proposed. In the Governments view, local planning authorities should not implement their own precautionary policies e.g. by way of imposing a ban or moratorium on new telecommunications development or insisting on minimum distances between new telecommunications development and existing development.

Paragraphs 29 and 30 practically contradict each other. This piece of Government advice has been the subject of two court battles:

The first, on the 26th of September 2003 -Yasmin Skelt -v- The First Secretary of State and Three Bridges District Council and Orange PCS Limited: The First Secretary of State conceded the case which allowed a mast to be removed from Grove Way, Chorleywood on the basis that being within the ICNIRP guidelines did not stop the council from considering other scientific evidence with regard to the possible future health effects on the population close to the mast.

Then in November 2004 – T-Mobile UK Ltd v First Secretary of State: The First Secretary of State also lost the case, however this time the solicitors for The First Secretary of State were in The Court of Appeal fighting against a mobile phone operator. The ruling, which dismissed the appeal, effectively said that other than in exceptional circumstances, the council must accept being within ICNIRP guidelines as being safe, and cannot consider any further health evidence when deciding whether or not to give planning approval to a base station (mast). Observers have said that the case made by The First Secretary of State was very weak and did not offer any evidence that showed the limitations of the ICNIRP guidelines. “It was if they wanted to lose the case”. The First Secretary of State declined to the appeal the decision. And as the previous case was settled before judgement, this became the case that is now cited in similar situations.

There is much evidence that the ICNIRP guidelines are not adequate for determining the health risk of mobile phones, masts or other wireless technology. The ICNIRP guidelines only take into account the heating effects of the radiation while many new studies show that health effects are caused through non thermal mechanisms, at levels far lower than the ICNIRP guidelines (See the Bioinitiative report, Reflex report and others). There are epidemiological studies that show that health problems increase proportionally the closer people (and animals) live to a mast. This would not be the case if the ICNIRP guidelines were ‘safe’.

Given that such evidence exists, it is farcical that the law can say that the ICNIRP guidelines = safe. It is like having a law that states “Bristol is on the moon”. Sadly it is not only farcical, it is also harmful to those people, such as my own family, who are adversely affected by this.

Argentina, Buenos Aires City
Seychelles, Victoria
Jersey City, New Jersey, USA
Somalia, Mogadishu
Romania, Bucharest
Cote d’Ivoire, Yamoussoukro
Guatemala, Guatemala City
Latvia, Riga
Gold Coast, Queensland
City of Lismore, Australia

Click on any of the pictures below to learn more

Anti-Radiation Air-tube Headset Q-Link Products EMF Harmonization Products

http://www.emfnews.org/headset.html

Cordless Phones Health Risks

Blue Tube Headset

Cell Phone Tower Radiation

One might reasonably ask “where’s the money to investigate these risks FIRST’? The public doesn’t want smart meters forced on them. At least not before the US National Toxicology Program finishes up the study on RF that is not due out until 2014 (and, yes, we ARE wondering why if this program started in 1999, its taking 15 years to complete).

The early evidence points to multiple and serious impacts ranging from health effects (sleep disruption, heart arrhythmias and chest pain, headache, extreme fatigue, memory and concentration problems, disorientation and dizziness, etc.) to hacking of personal information, to interference with critical care equipment and medical implants to electrical fires.
And, it especially rankles when you consider that the CPUC has for decades ignored the health risks from transmission line EMF, even in the face of WHO IARC’s decision in 2001 that EMF is classifiable as a Group 2B (Possible) Carcinogen, right there with DDT and lead.

The bulk of the $3.4 billion in federal stimulus dollars for ’smart metering’ will do nothing more than supercharge the building of more transmission lines and add a layer of radiofrequency radiation (RF) to the system for monitoring and reporting. And, not a penny for or a single word about potential health effects. Now, your electrical power lines can bring you two potential carcinogens, instead of one. The CPUC has had sufficient scientific evidence since 1993 that EMF from power lines poses health risks, but has done essentially nothing to modify the way utilities are allowed to site, construct and operate power lines in communities. The CPUC should be out in front of the public safety questions about blanket wireless before it launches a universal assault on communities with it.

Horsham, Victoria, Australia
Gabon, Libreville
Ecuador, Quito
Estonia, Tallinn
Kiribati, South Tarawa
Greece, Athens
Luxembourg, Luxembourg,
Shepparton, Victoria
Spain, Madrid
Port Lincoln, South Australia

Click on any of the pictures below to learn more

Anti-Radiation Air-tube Headset Q-Link Products EMF Harmonization Products

http://www.emfnews.org/qlinks.html

Qlink Pendant Reviews

Home Radiation Protection

Aircom headsets

My Motorola digital wireless telephone User’s Guide states that “The available science does not allow us to conclude that mobile phones are absolutely safe.”

The same User’s Guide goes on to list several studies showing that wireless phones can have negative consequences for the user’s health. It says, for example, that “A few animal studies, however, have suggested that low levels of RF could accelerate the development of cancer in laboratory animals. In one study, mice genetically altered to be predisposed to developing one type of cancer developed more than twice as many such cancers when they were exposed to RF energy compared to controls [emphasis added].”

Besides these statements about laboratory animals, the User’s Guide provides some studies on humans! In a paragraph on brain tumors the guide’s author states: “When tumors did exist in certain locations, however, they were more likely to be on the side of the head where the mobile phone was used [emphasis added].” The guide’s author goes on to say that “…an association was found between mobile phone use and one rare type of glioma, neuroepithellomatous tumors [emphasis added].”

Savannah, Georgia
Solomon Islands, Honiara
Topeka, Kansas
Colorado Springs, Colorado
Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
Uruguay, Montevideo
Nedlands, Victoria
Al Hayrah, United Arab Emirates, Al Hayrah, UAE
Papua New Guinea, Port Moresby
Bakersfield, California, USA

Click on any of the pictures below to learn more

Anti-Radiation Air-tube Headset Q-Link Products EMF Harmonization Products

http://www.emfnews.org/headset.html

Cordless Phones Health Risks

Blue Tube Headset

Cellular Towers

Efforts are being made to install WiFi in schools throughout British Columbia in the name of progress. School boards need to be made aware that this is a technology which has never been tested, and, therefore, has never been proven to be safe. It uses the same type of radiation that has been shown in thousands of independent peer-reviewed studies to be hazardous, especially to children.

When asked to investigate whether WiFi is dangerous, school boards and the IT specialists quite naturally look to Health Canada for guidance. Unfortunately Health Canada has established a guideline which is inadequate because it is based on another type of radiation. The levels of exposure allowed by Health Canada are among the highest (worst) in the world. Several scientists met the Parliamentary Sub-Committee in charge of Health Canada (HESA) in Ottawa in April to present evidence to confirm this statement. Please see the attached transcripts of that meeting. Therefore, when school boards receive assurance that the radiation levels associated with WiFi will be below the levels in Safety Code 6 (the guideline), they are being mislead into believing this means WiFi is safe. Harm has been shown to occur at levels drastically below those allowed by Safety Code 6.

Barrie Trower, a physicist and former British Secret Service member who specialized in microwave weapons for the UK government, was interviewed this week in Toronto about the dangers of wireless technology, especially WiFi in schools. Following is a link to that 6 minute interview. Mr. Trower refers to a previously classified government document which instructs that the information obtained through experiments be hidden from the public. http://www.cbc.ca/video/news/audioplayer.html?clipid=1573543914

Please know that despite statements to the contrary by the wireless companies, WiFi provides no advantage other than convenience. In addition to being safer from a health viewpoint, wired connection to the internet is faster, carries more data, and is more difficult to be hacked into. Is this worth jeopardizing the health of our greatest asset — our children, or their teachers? I think not.

I implore you and your office to take charge of the issue. WiFi is not in Federal jurisdiction so it becomes a Provincial responsibility. It is imperative that the harm associated with prolonged exposure of children to WiFi be examined carefully before it is installed in school rooms. Scientific evidence shows that children are especially vulnerable to the radiation. It is your departments’ and the schools’ responsibility (in loco parentis) to ensure their safety.

Denmark, Copenhagen
The Hague, Netherlands
Morwell, Victoria
Sweden, Stockholm
Taiwan, Taipei
Kuwait, Kuwait City
Eritrea, Asmara
Tunisia, Tunis
Holland, Amsterdam
Equatorial Guinea, Malabo

Click on any of the pictures below to learn more

Anti-Radiation Air-tube Headset Q-Link Products EMF Harmonization Products

http://www.emfnews.org/qlinks.html

Qlink Pendant Reviews

Home Radiation Protection

Aircom headsets

Experiments conducted found that the exposed animals were much more likely to have albumin leaking from blood vessels in inappropriate locations, shown as dark dots in the exposed brain above on the right. Control animals, in contrast, showed either no albumin leakage or occasional isolated spots, as seen in the figure on the left.

A closer look at the cells within the brain also revealed that exposed animals had scattered and grouped dark neurons often shrunken with loss of internal cell structures. Neuronal damage of this kind may not have immediate consequences but in the long run, it may result in reduced brain reserve capacity that might be unveiled by other later neuronal diseases.
These experiments have been repeated and the same results were obtained, consistently for 18 years, confirming microwave radiation, at doses equal to a cell phone’s emissions, causes albumin to be found in brain tissue. It must be noted that the blood-brain barrier is the same in a rat and a human being.

In another research, a single two-hour exposure to a cell phone, just once during its lifetime, permanently damaged the blood-brain barrier and, on autopsy 50 days later, was found to have damaged or destroyed up to 2 percent of an animal’s brain cells, including cells in areas of the brain concerned with learning, memory and movement (Salford et al, 2003). It is known that this barrier is damaged in Parkinsons disease and in Alzheimers dementia. So there is a risk that disruption of this protection barrier may damage the brain.

In fact similar mechanisms protect the eye (the blood-vitreous barrier) and the fetus (the placental barrier), and the work of Allen Frey and others indicates that microwave radiation damages these barriers also (Allan et al 1988). The implication: No pregnant woman should ever be using a cell phone and if at all they have to use in emergency, it should be for minimal duration.

Blue Mountains, Australia
Topeka, Kansas
Sao Tome and Principe, Sao Tome
Charlotte, North Carolina, USA
Seychelles, Victoria
Gladstone, Queensland
Aurora, Colorado
Poland, Warsaw
Miami Gardens, Florida
Al Masafirah, United Arab Emirates, Al Masafirah, UAE

Click on any of the pictures below to learn more

Anti-Radiation Air-tube Headset Q-Link Products EMF Harmonization Products

http://www.emfnews.org/headset.html

Cordless Phones Health Risks

Blue Tube Headset

Cell Tower Radiation

Exposed To A Saudi Arabian study found a relationship between headache, fatigue, dizziness, tension and sleep disturbances in subjects exposed to mobile phones emissions (Thamir AlKhlaiwi et al 2004). The use of mobile phones was considered to be is a risk factor for health hazards suggesting avoidance of excessive use of mobile phones.

• Mobile phone radiation wrecks your sleep

The Independent (20.1.2008) According to research by mobile phone makers own scientists, use
of the handsets before bed, delays and reduces sleep, and causes headaches, confusion and depression.
The findings were especially alarming for children and teenagers, as it may lead to mood and personality changes, ADHD-like symptoms, depression, lack of concentration and poor academic performance.

Redcliffe, Queensland
Mozambique, Maputo
Sri Lanka, Colombo
Broken Hill, Australia
Slovakia, Bratislava
Liberia, Monrovia
Namibia, Windhoek
France, Paris
Cleveland, Ohio
Luxembourg, Luxembourg City

Click on any of the pictures below to learn more

Anti-Radiation Air-tube Headset Q-Link Products EMF Harmonization Products

http://www.emfnews.org/qlinks.html

Protection Against Cell Phone Radiation

Cell Phone Radiation Protection

Electrosensitivity

Additional effects from MSS: a. Blood brain barrier (BBB) that functions normally to protect the sensitive brain from biochemical invasion, but instead, the Endothelial cells cannot communicate and remain apart ( door open) can ’t close to protect brain from external toxins , such as protein s b. Blood cells that use communication as sonar, cannot communicate and then clump together making the transfer of oxygen and carbon dioxide difficult c. Leaky Gut Syndrome – the gut lining that functions normally to protect the body from bacteria, pesticides, other stuff in the gut, but instead, the gut lining cells cannot communicate and remain a par t (do or op en) an d a ll o w “ leak s ” into th e bo d y d. Micronuclei . Damaged mRNA and DNA form a new organelle  Free radicals inside cells interfere with DNA repair .Damaged DNA can be surrounded by a cell membrane forming a micronuclei  Due to lack of nutrition – the cell either undergoes mitosis or apoptosis if apoptosis, then the micronuclei is released into the nutrient-rich interstitial which is the precursor to a tumor if mitosis, then the daughter cell thinks a closed-down cell membrane is normal. This is environmentally induced genetic change.

According to Dr. Carlo, there is no safe level for this radiation – no acceptable threshold. We are all being affected not only by personal cell phone usage, but also as by-standers subject to radiation from nearby cell phone users and cell phone antennas. In large metropolitan areas there is no break from this assault. The effect will be devastating as reflected in the ever-increasing level of electromagnetic allergies.

James Oschman, PhD, describes the process as the cell communication responding as semiconductors, more specifically, piezoelectric devices, that reach resonance with the external vibration (see Section E.2).

In summary, radio frequency radiation as encountered in everyday life is less often critical because of its level of power density, but rather because of its ELF modulation. However, in some rare circumstances, the power density is sufficiently high to cause heating of local body tissues, as can be the case while using a cellular phone held near the head.

The body temperature increases about 6 degrees within a few minutes. Between 1,000,000 and
100,00,000 W/m2 the following biological effects could be observed: increased enzyme activity, changes in the calcium ion transport system of the cells, inhibition of T-lymphocytes and changes in the flight behavior of the animals. At about 25,000,000 W/m2 human thermoregulation kicks in. From 500,000,000 W/m2 birth defects and other genetic disorders are to be expected; 2,000,000,000 W/m2 are deadly. Neurological disorders can be demonstrated from (1,000 W/m2) and changes in the EEG were observed with pulse-modulated HF radiation as low as 1,000,000,000 W/m2 . Changes in the growth of yeast cultures can be observed from 100 W/m2.

Wagga Wagga, Australia
Egypt, Cairo: city limits
Chesapeake, Virginia
Tuvalu, Funafuti
Round Rock, Texas
Santa Clarita, California
Glendale, California
Libya, Tripoli
Overland Park, Kansas
Thousand Oaks, California

Click on any of the pictures below to learn more

Anti-Radiation Air-tube Headset Q-Link Products EMF Harmonization Products

http://www.emfnews.org/qlinks.html

Qlink Pendant Reviews

Home Radiation Protection

SmartMeters

Looking at only the first 5 years, there was no significant increased risk of getting cancer in the inner area. However, for the period 1999 to 2004, the risk for getting cancer was 3.4 times greater in the inner area compared to the outer area. Breast cancer topped the list, and the average age of contracting this disease was considerably lower, 50.8 years compared to 69.9 years in the outer area, but cancers of the prostate, pancreas, bowel, skin melanoma, lung and blood cancer were all increased

• Mumbai facing Radiation

Cell Tower Radiation: LiveIndia.com (05.8.2008) A recent study revealed that the electromagnetic radiations emitted from phone towers in Mumbai were way beyond safety levels. According to the study, the safe limit of radiations for human beings is up to 50 µW/m microwatts per square meter and the upper limit is 100 microwatts per square meter. The study revealed that the radiation readings in several residential areas were more than 1000 microwatts per square meters.

Mumbai has witnessed a spurt in the number of phone towers in the recent past exposing people to dangerously high levels of radiations. Being exposed to such radiation, this leads to problems like loss of appetite, irritation, fatigue, difficulty in concentrating, headaches, problems in vision, infertility and deformity of foetus. Medical experts feel it is a ‘slow and invisible killer’.

“If you are using a headset or hands free close to your ear while talking or put it in the pockets, the radiation is directly affecting this tissue and because it is heating up, even though very minimally, the cellular tissue is being heated,” said Dr Pratima Rajan, Department of Cardiac Rehabilitation and Preventive Cardiology, Jaslok Hospital.

So while technology invasion has happened at a rapid pace in India, stringent laws are still to be in place against the risks that they come with.

Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
Israel, Jerusalem
Congo, Brazzaville
Bahamas, Nassau
Kazakhstan, Astana
Gambia, Banjul
Paraguay, Asuncion
Latvia, Riga
Nigeria, Abuja
Whyalla, South Australia

Click on any of the pictures below to learn more

Anti-Radiation Air-tube Headset Q-Link Products EMF Harmonization Products

http://www.emfnews.org/qlinks.html

Protection Against Cell Phone Radiation

Cell Phone Radiation Protection

Electrosensitivity

George Carlo observed biological effect from the “ pulsed” signal is the impact to the vibratory protein receptors within the cell wall that control the exchange of nutrients and toxins into and out of the cell. As the information-carrying radio wave comes in the vicinity of the cell, the vibration protein recognizes it within milliseconds. But because in the evolution of man there are no information carrying radio waves – they are not natural – the body interprets the information-carrying radio wave as a foreign invader.

When that interpretation happens, a message goes inside the cell that says: “We are under siege; we need to protect ourselves.” First, the active transport channels, which are the avenues where nutrients pass into the cell and waste products pass out, begin to close down. As the active transport channels begin to close down, you have a circumstance where nutrients that are in the river between the cells are not able to get into the cell. When nutrients cannot get into the cell, the cell becomes nutrient and energy deficient. An energy deficient cell is not able to communicate with surrounding cells, so that you have a disruption in what we call intercellular communication. Ionic intercellular communication is also impacted – causing confusion within the cells as to how and when to divide.

This disruption leads to a cascade of effects effect due to this Sympathetic response, that we refer to as Membrane Sensitivity Syndrome (MSS) Less nutrients lead to loss of biophoton communication Waste build up in cells (free radicals attracted to energy in the mitochondria, mitochondrial death or cellular dysfunction) Loss of inter and intracellular communication

Russia, Moscow
Phoenix, Arizona
Solomon Islands, Honiara
Topeka, Kansas
Cyprus, Nicosia
Hungary, Budapest
Garland, Texas
Tanzania, Dar es Salaam
Round Rock, Texas
As Sur, United Arab Emirates, As Sur, UAE

Click on any of the pictures below to learn more

Anti-Radiation Air-tube Headset Q-Link Products EMF Harmonization Products

http://www.emfnews.org/headset.html

Cordless Phones Health Risks

Blue Tube Headset

Cell Tower Radiation

Sun Sentinel, Florida (1.2.2006) Three European research groups in separate studies have found an increased risk of brain tumors in people who have used the phones for 10 years or more. Two of the studies found a correlation between the tumor’s location and the side of the head where people reported they held the phone (Hardell et al 2003).
One also suggests the greatest risk is in people who began using the phones before age of 20. Lennart Hardell found that the use of cell phones before age of 20 increased the risk of brain tumors by 5.2, compared to 1.4 for all ages.

•Brain cancer risk increased at the side one holds the phone A study by Jonas Hardell, professor of Oncology, Sweden suggests that the risk for developing brain tumors increases significantly for the people who use the phone more intensely and for more years. Also a significantly increased risk of brain cancer was observed on the same side as one held the phone, but not on the other side.

In addition, the risk was increased by 30% for developing Acoustic Neurinoma, a benign tumor in the brain on a nerve related to hearing that may cause permanent deafness if not removed in time. (Hardell L 2009)

Campbelltown, Australia
New Zealand
Grenada, St. George’s
Armidale, Australia
Russia, Moscow
Peru, Lima, City
Portland, Oregon, USA
Bulgaria, Sofia
Andorra, Andorra la Vella
Ballarat, Victoria, Australia

Click on any of the pictures below to learn more

Anti-Radiation Air-tube Headset Q-Link Products EMF Harmonization Products