However, if we are to believe the conflicted results of
numerous studies delivered by various scientists that radio
waves from cell phones cause cancer are (and conversely, are
not) powerful enough to cause us to investigate this. The
introduction of "protection" that is now becoming more
readily available against all manner of cancer-causing
electromagnetic radiation (EMR) suggests it is a more
serious concern than ever before. But, if this is the case
why are the studies and controversy continuing?
While the answer may simply lie in the fear of the unknown,
public pronouncements that seem to be ever more prevalent in
print and other media, abound. Week after week, more and
more mainstream publications, like TIME, NEWSWEEK,
GENTLEMEN's QUARTERLY and even POPULAR SCIENCE have
published article that "appear to validate the fact" that
the effects of electromagnetic radiation (EMR) pollution is
indeed a valid risk that we cannot ignore, no matter our
views.
In essence it is virtually akin to the medical posture taken
a century or so ago when the surgeons of the day performed
their "miracle" in circumstances and places that would
thoroughly appall us today. It certainly begs the same
question, "could it be that we simply cannot envision the
risk, that today's incomplete science blinds us to the
truth?" When we look back a century from now will our minds
still be as closed or will the revelations make us consider
then that which we should have done now, in the 21st
Century?
Roseville, California
Dubbo, Australia
Scottsdale, Arizona
Tulsa, Oklahoma
Fort Wayne, Indiana
Des Moines, Iowa
Chad, N'Djamena
Baqal, United Arab Emirates, Baqal, UAE
Poland, Warsaw
Papua New Guinea, Port Moresby
Try any
Q-Link or
cell chip
for 3 months, absolutely
RISK-FREE If you do not feel Q-Link improves your
focus, energy, or well-being, simply return it for a full
refund.
Airtube headsets have
30 a day refund.