EMF Protection Cellphone Radiation Mobile Phone SAR Electromagnetic Prevention EMF Qlink Protect EMF Cell Phone Radiation

cell phone radiation research, hyperelectrosensitivity from cell phone radiation


Facts About the EarthCalm® Home Protection System:

home radiation protection

Only $298.00

Read the Earthcalm® FAQ to learn more



Specialty Air Tube Headset



airtube headset, bluetube headset, anit-radiation headset for driving


Airtube Headset info




Cellphone radiation killing you?

Airtube Headsets, Bluetube headsets

Cell Tower

Life Bluetube Headsets

Cell Phone Towers Health Effects

 EM Field Meter

Cell Phone Sensitivity

June 12, 2011

The potential impact of mobile phone radiation on your health has made headlines recently, but what are the facts?

The International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), an arm of the World Health Organisation (WHO), recently classified the radiation associated with mobile phones use as Group 2B: “possibly carcinogenic to humans”.
This essentially put cellphone radiation in the same category as the pesticide DDT, gasoline engine exhaust fumes and coffee.

Classifying agents as “possibly carcinogenic” doesn’t mean they automatically cause cancer and some experts said the ruling shouldn’t change people’s cellphone habits.
Despite the lack of conclusive evidence that mobile phone users may be at increased risk of brain cancer, sensationalist headlines linking cellphone use and cancer have littered the media since the WHO’s report.

South Africa is no exception, with Carte Blanche tackling the question as to whether cellphones are as safe as current research suggests.
Carte Blanche aired many voices which included activists questioning the lack of recourse for citizens to block towers in their area and hence prevent possible adverse health effects because of long term cellphone radiation exposure.
Government officials and mobile providers however reiterated the prevailing international view that radiation from cellular towers is safe.
With all the differing views it can be challenging to establish the truth about the health impact of cellular radiation.

Is there real danger?
Various media reports highlighted that the WHO’s classification puts radio frequency electromagnetic fields in the same category as DDT (the pesticide), gasoline engine exhaust fumes and coffee.
It should however be noted that carpentry and joinery, bracken fern (the plant), certain pickled vegetables and occupational exposure in dry cleaning are also examples of agents with a Group 2B classification.
CTIA-The Wireless Association, an international wireless telecommunications industry association spoke out against the WHO report, saying that the IARC working group only reviewed already published studies and did not conduct any new research.
This has not prevented organisations such as Occupational Care South Africa (OCSA) from saying that South African employers need to be cognizant of the WHO’s new warning.

OCSA believes that employers should use questionnaires to inform, educate and screen any employees issued with cellphones for company use.
Fortune magazine asked the question “Cell phone use is way up. So why did brain cancer rates fall?” in a recent article.
They concluded that we’ll only know for sure whether there is a link between cellphone use after a few more decades when the radiation dose in the population stabilises at a high level and brain cancer rates either jump or continue to decline.
According to the Fortune magazine article this stabilization appears to have already happened in the US during 2010.
Many industry experts seem to agree with this view, saying that the IARC report, though new, doesn’t really offer any new conclusions about the dangers of cellphone usage.

Mauritania Nouakchott
Finland Helsinki
Holland Amsterdam
Barbados Bridgetown
Korea, (South), Seoul, City,
Kuwait, Kuwait City,
Latvia, Riga,
Lebanon, Beirut,
Indonesia Jakarta City
Benalla Victoria Australia



"Revolutionary New Technologiess
Protect You from the Harmful Effects of Cell Phone Radiation,

Computers, Bluetooth Headsets, Microwave Ovens,

Cordless Phones, and other Wireless Technologies."


Click on any of the pictures below to learn more

Research Center For Wireless Technology



Copyright 2006-2015 All rights reserved

| Privacy | Disclaimer | Returns

Try any Q-Link or cell chip for 3 months, absolutely  RISK-FREE If you do not feel Q-Link improves your focus, energy, or well-being, simply return it for a full refund. Airtube headsets have 30  a day refund.

Research Center For Wireless Technology


Copyright ©2006-2015 All rights reserved
| Privacy | Disclaimer |

Other Language Tools