As there are very few valid epidemiological studies on cell
towers and health – The World Health Organization has only
14 studies that meet their criteria in their database – it
is necessary to examine evidence of exposures that are of a
similar level as one would receive from RFR antennas on a
cell tower. I have included some of these studies.
Included in Dr. Magda Havas’ WiFi report for San Francisco,
Dr. Henry Lai, PhD, compiled a list of studies that document
biological effects of RFR at low intensities. (See
07_Havas_WiFi_SNAFU.pdf)
All of the 40 reports, reviewed by Dr. Henry Lai, document
biological effects or associations, many of them adverse or
undesirable, at exposure to RFR below the FCC guidelines for
both power density (1000 µW/cm2) and specific absorption
rate (0.08 W/kg). Of the 12 studies that provide power
density data, 11 document effects below 41 µW/cm2
(scenario of woman using her laptop computer on her
balcony); 6 document effects below 6 µW/cm2
(exposure to multiple Wi-Fi antennas); and 3 document
effects below 1µW/cm
(exposure to 1 Wi-Fi antenna).”2
Epidemiological evidence also shows cause for concern over
RFR exposure from cell towers.
In fact 10 out of the 14 peer-reviewed studies analyzed, and
conforming to the specified WHO/ICNIRP standards of
scientific quality, including their assessment criteria of
consistency and replication found significant increases in
ill health effects. Included in this database are only those
studies that are about cell tower exposures. (Kundi, 2008 at
the London EMF International Conference). Populations close
to cellular antennas show an increase in the effects of ill
health in those closest to the antennas with the risks
factors dropping off as distance and RFR levels decrease.
Symptoms ranged from sleeps disturbances to breast and brain
cancers.
Researchers at Powerwatch UK found that 23 out of 31
epidemiological studies that met their criteria show
significant health risks.
Epidemiological studies are not proof of cause, however they
do show associations and are used to set policy on many
environmental exposures. In fact there is very little
scientific proof that tobacco causes lung cancer or even for
ionizing radiation and ill health effects. For the most part
we rely on epidemiological studies to show the strong
correlation between environmental exposures and ill health.
Portland, Oregon
Nigeria, Abuja
Elizabeth, New Jersey
San Marino, San Marino
Topeka Kansas USA
Warren, Michigan
Chesapeake, Virginia
Victor Harbor, South Australia
Savannah, Georgia
Ash Sha'm, United Arab Emirates,Ash Sha'm, UAE
Try any
Q-Link or
cell chip
for 3 months, absolutely
RISK-FREE If you do not feel Q-Link improves your
focus, energy, or well-being, simply return it for a full
refund.
Airtube headsets have
30 a day refund.