EMF Protection Cellphone Radiation Mobile Phone SAR Electromagnetic Prevention EMF Qlink Protect EMF Cell Phone Radiation

cell phone radiation research, hyperelectrosensitivity from cell phone radiation

Home  |  STORE  |  EMF METERS  |  EHS  |  FAQ  |  PRODUCTS  |  Contact UsView Cart



Facts About the EarthCalm® Home Protection System:

home radiation protection

Sale Price $298.00

Read the Earthcalm® FAQ to learn more



Specialty Air Tube Headset



airtube headset, bluetube headset, anit-radiation headset for driving


Airtube Headset info



  Cell Tower Radiation Studies Part 2

Cordless Phones Health Risks

Blue Tube Headset

Cell Phone Tower Radiation

As there are very few valid epidemiological studies on cell towers and health – The World Health Organization has only 14 studies that meet their criteria in their database – it is necessary to examine evidence of exposures that are of a similar level as one would receive from RFR antennas on a cell tower. I have included some of these studies.

Included in Dr. Magda Havas’ WiFi report for San Francisco, Dr. Henry Lai, PhD, compiled a list of studies that document biological effects of RFR at low intensities. (See 07_Havas_WiFi_SNAFU.pdf)

All of the 40 reports, reviewed by Dr. Henry Lai, document biological effects or associations, many of them adverse or undesirable, at exposure to RFR below the FCC guidelines for both power density (1000 W/cm2) and specific absorption rate (0.08 W/kg). Of the 12 studies that provide power density data, 11 document effects below 41 W/cm2
(scenario of woman using her laptop computer on her balcony); 6 document effects below 6 W/cm2
(exposure to multiple Wi-Fi antennas); and 3 document effects below 1W/cm
(exposure to 1 Wi-Fi antenna).”2
Epidemiological evidence also shows cause for concern over RFR exposure from cell towers.

In fact 10 out of the 14 peer-reviewed studies analyzed, and conforming to the specified WHO/ICNIRP standards of scientific quality, including their assessment criteria of consistency and replication found significant increases in ill health effects. Included in this database are only those studies that are about cell tower exposures. (Kundi, 2008 at the London EMF International Conference). Populations close to cellular antennas show an increase in the effects of ill health in those closest to the antennas with the risks factors dropping off as distance and RFR levels decrease. Symptoms ranged from sleeps disturbances to breast and brain cancers.

Researchers at Powerwatch UK found that 23 out of 31 epidemiological studies that met their criteria show significant health risks.

Epidemiological studies are not proof of cause, however they do show associations and are used to set policy on many environmental exposures. In fact there is very little scientific proof that tobacco causes lung cancer or even for ionizing radiation and ill health effects. For the most part we rely on epidemiological studies to show the strong correlation between environmental exposures and ill health.

Portland, Oregon
Nigeria, Abuja
Elizabeth, New Jersey
San Marino, San Marino
Topeka Kansas USA
Warren, Michigan
Chesapeake, Virginia
Victor Harbor, South Australia
Savannah, Georgia
Ash Sha'm, United Arab Emirates,Ash Sha'm, UAE


"Revolutionary New Technologiess
Protect You from the Harmful Effects of Cell Phone Radiation,

Computers, Bluetooth Headsets, Microwave Ovens,

Cordless Phones, and other Wireless Technologies."


Click on any of the pictures below to learn more

Research Center For Wireless Technology



Copyright 2006-2015 All rights reserved

| Privacy | Disclaimer | Returns

Try any Q-Link or cell chip for 3 months, absolutely  RISK-FREE If you do not feel Q-Link improves your focus, energy, or well-being, simply return it for a full refund. Airtube headsets have 30  a day refund.


Home  |  STORE  |  EMF METERS  |  EHS  |   FAQ  |  PRODUCTS  |  Directory |  Contact Us | View Cart

Other Language Tools