EMF Protection Cellphone Radiation Mobile Phone SAR Electromagnetic Prevention EMF Qlink Protect EMF Cell Phone Radiation

cell phone radiation research, hyperelectrosensitivity from cell phone radiation


Facts About the EarthCalm® Home Protection System:

home radiation protection

Only $298.00

Read the Earthcalm® FAQ to learn more



Specialty Air Tube Headset



airtube headset, bluetube headset, anit-radiation headset for driving


Airtube Headset info




Cell Phone Study Was Flawed, Say Some Experts
Part 2

Airtube Headsets, Bluetube headsets

Cell Tower

Life Bluetube Headsets

Cell Phone Towers Health Effects

 EM Field Meter

Cell Phone Sensitivity

Text and Tables Not Matching
The report by Mr. Morgan and colleagues points out that the abstract and conclusion section of the paper state there was no "exposure–response" relation, and that "no increased risk of brain tumors was observed for brain areas receiving the highest amount of exposure," but this is contradicted by data reported in the paper.
In Table 5, for example, data showed that when the duration of the cell phone subscription was more than 4 years (the highest exposure), there was greater than a 3-fold risk for brain cancer (OR, 3.74). There was also close to a 3-fold risk when the number of cell phone calls was greater than 2638, the highest exposure (OR, 2.91).

Of importance, there are discrepancies between the tables in the paper and the text, which suggests that "the results may be misleading," Mr. Morgan and colleagues write.
As an example, the text reports that 35% of cases and 34% of control subjects had operator data since the start of their subscription; if calculated out, that would mean that there would be 123 cases and 200 control subjects with this information, they note.
However, Table 4 reports 196 cases and 360 control subjects. The reason for this discrepancy is unclear, "but it would likely make a large difference in the associated risks as there would be 37% fewer cases and 39% fewer controls," they write.
An odd finding is that ipsilateral risk was smaller than contralateral risk, which contradicts the findings of other studies, the authors write. The most likely explanation is that the reported laterality was not consistent with use. Nevertheless, these results are of major concern, Mr. Morgan and colleagues write.

More Research and Precautions Needed
"There is a great need for research, and we need more precautionary messages," said Dr. Moskowitz. "I don't know if we have enough science to come up with standards at this point, but we have a fair amount of evidence for increased brain tumor risk, as well as to the reproductive organs."

About a dozen countries have taken precautionary steps, so it would "not be radical for the United States government to do so as well," he said. No one is suggesting that we give up cell phones, "but there are ways to reduce the risk."


Columbia, South Carolina
Orange, Australia
Greece, Athens
Reno, Nevada
Gold Coast, Queensland
Palau, Koror
Visalia, California
Vietnam, Hanoi,
Lubbock, Texas
Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates, Abu Dhabi, UAE



"Revolutionary New Technologiess
Protect You from the Harmful Effects of Cell Phone Radiation,

Computers, Bluetooth Headsets, Microwave Ovens,

Cordless Phones, and other Wireless Technologies."


Click on any of the pictures below to learn more

Research Center For Wireless Technology



Copyright 2006-2015 All rights reserved

| Privacy | Disclaimer | Returns

Try any Q-Link or cell chip for 3 months, absolutely  RISK-FREE If you do not feel Q-Link improves your focus, energy, or well-being, simply return it for a full refund. Airtube headsets have 30  a day refund.

Research Center For Wireless Technology


Copyright ©2006-2015 All rights reserved
| Privacy | Disclaimer |

Other Language Tools