PG&E spokesperson Paul Moreno has stated repeatedly that
smart meters do not pose a health risk as the emitted radio
signals are well within limits established by the Federal
Communications Commission. "The meters emit a signal once
every four hours for a fraction of a second, and at very low
power," Moreno said. "These levels are far below what you
would find in many common household appliances."
Of course there is still the debate on whether or not even
these low levels are safe, but for now, PG&E is continuing
to push for smart meter installation. Until the questions of
if and how radiation from electromagnetic and radio wave
fields are damaging to human health, there doesn't seem to
be much foundation for stopping smart meters on this basis
since they hold the potential to drastically reduce energy
consumption.
To some extent, the real argument is would residents rather
bicker over smart meters in their homes, or a new power
plant next door? It seems utilities need to work harder on
educating consumers about the purpose of smart meters, the
roll they play in energy conservation, and the security of
user information so that consumers are not so wary about the
new meters.
Switzerland, Bern
Ethiopia, Addis Ababa
Toledo, Ohio, USA
Russia, Moscow
Thailand, Bangkok
Uruguay, Montevideo
Serbia, Belgrade
Hungary, Budapest
Bloemfontein (judiciary)
United Arab Emirates, Abu Dhabi
Try any
Q-Link or
cell chip
for 3 months, absolutely
RISK-FREE If you do not feel Q-Link improves your
focus, energy, or well-being, simply return it for a full
refund.
Airtube headsets have
30 a day refund.
Contact: Research Center For Wireless Technology 1-888-470-9886
201-484-7652